Very high-power and short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in a Latin American low-volume private center.

BACKGROUND: Center volume and operator experience/training are important factors impacting outcomes in AFib CA. Setting for RF delivery (power, duration, and contact force) associated with better outcomes remains to be determined. METHODS: This is an observational, longitudinal, and retrospective study. All consecutive procedures performed between December 12, 2013, and March 9, 2023, in a low-volume private center in Latin America were analyzed. Procedure characteristics and outcomes were compared between STD and vHPSD. RESULTS: Two hundred ten procedures were performed on 194 patients. Median annual number of procedures was 19 (7-29). Median age was 62 (52-68), and majority were male (71%). Median procedure duration was 155 (125-195) min, mean fluoroscopy time 32.8 ± 15 min and mean fluoroscopy dose 373.5 ± 208.9 mGray. Median follow-up was 27 months, significantly longer in STD compared with vHPSD group (43 [31-68] vs. 13 [8-19], respectively; P ≤ 0.001). The recurrence rate was 33.2% and major complications 8.6%. Compared with STD, vHPSD resulted in a significantly shorter procedure duration (125 vs. 180 min, P ≤ 0.001), shorter fluoroscopy time (22.7 ± 9.5 vs. 39.2 ± 14.3 min, P ≤ 0.001), and lower fluoroscopy dose (283.8 ± 161.1 vs. 438.3 ± 216.1 mGray, P ≤ 0.001). No long-term recurrence difference was observed when the follow-up periods were comparable. No difference in complication rate was observed (8.5% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.988). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes in AFib CA in a Latin American low-volume private center can be considered acceptable, with efficacy and safety similar to those reported in the literature. Compared with STD ablation, vHPSD showed higher efficiency with similar efficacy and safety.

Catheter ablation of frequent monomorphic ventricular arrhythmias in Andersen-Tawil syndrome: case report and focused literature review.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Andersen-Tawil syndrome type 1 is a rare autosomal dominant disease caused by a KCNJ2 gene mutation and clinically characterized by dysmorphic features, periodic muscular paralysis, and frequent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Although polymorphic and bidirectional ventricular tachycardias are prevalent, PVCs are the most frequent VAs. In addition, a "dominant" morphology with RBBB pattern associated with either superior or inferior axis is seen in most of the patients. Due to the limited efficacy of most antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation (CA) is an alternative in patients with monomorphic VAs. Based on our experience, we aimed to review the arrhythmogenic mechanisms and substrates for VAs, and we analyzed the potential reasons for CA failure in this group of patients. METHODS: Case report and focused literature review. RESULTS: Catheter ablation has been reported to be unsuccessful in all of the few cases published so far. Most of the information suggests that VAs are mainly originated from the left ventricle and probably in the Purkinje network. Although identifying well-established and accepted mapping criteria for successful ablation of a monomorphic ventricular arrhythmia, papillary muscles seem not to be the right target. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to understand better the precise mechanism and site of origin of VAs in Andersen-Tawil syndrome patients with this particular "dominant" monomorphic ventricular pattern to establish the potential role of CA.

Outcomes of Patients With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Treated With ß-Blockers.

Importance: Patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) may experience life-threatening arrhythmic events (LTAEs) despite ß-blocker treatment. Further complicating management, the role of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in CPVT is debated. Objective: To investigate the long-term outcomes of patients with RYR2 CPVT treated with ß-blockers only and the cost to benefit ratio of ICD. Design, Settings, and Participants: This prospective cohort study conducted from January 1988 to October 2020 with a mean (SD) follow-up of 9.4 (7.5) years included patients who were referred to the Molecular Cardiology Clinics of ICS Maugeri Hospital, Pavia, Italy. Participants included consecutive patients with CPVT who were carriers of a pathogenic or likely pathogenic RYR2 variant with long-term clinical follow-up. Exposures: Treatment with selective and nonselective ß-blocker only and ICD implant when indicated. Main Outcome and Measures: The main outcome was the occurrence of the first LTAE while taking a ß-blocker. LTAE was defined as a composite of 3 hard end points: sudden cardiac death, aborted cardiac arrest, and hemodynamically nontolerated ventricular tachycardia. Results: The cohort included 216 patients with RYR2 CPVT (121 of 216 female [55%], median [IQR] age 14, [9-30] years). During a mean (SD) follow-up of 9.4 (7.5) years taking ß-blockers only, 28 of 216 patients (13%) experienced an LTAE (annual rate, 1.9%; 95% CI, 1.3-2.7). In multivariable analysis, experiencing either an LTAE (hazard ratio [HR], 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2-8.9; P = .02) or syncope before diagnosis (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.8-11.1; P = .001) and carrying a C-terminal domain variant (HR, 18.1; 95% CI, 4.1-80.8; P < .001) were associated with an increased LTAE risk during ß-blocker therapy only. The risk of LTAE among those taking selective ß-blockers vs nadolol was increased 6-fold (HR, 5.8; 95% CI, 2.1-16.3; P = .001). Conversely, no significant difference was present between propranolol and nadolol (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.4-7.3; P = .44). An ICD was implanted in 79 of 216 patients (37%) who were followed up for a mean (SD) of 8.6 (6.3) years. At the occurrence of LTAE, ICD carriers were more likely to survive (18 of 18 [100%]) than non-ICD carriers (6 of 10 [60%]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, selective ß-blockers were associated with a higher risk of LTAE as compared with nadolol. Independently from treatment, LTAE and syncope before diagnosis and C-terminal domain variants identified patients at higher risk of ß-blocker failure, and the ICD was associated with reduced mortality in high-risk patients with CPVT.

Resultados del primer registro de implante de cardiodesfibriladores y resincronizadores SAC (RENCARE) / Results of the First SAC Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Registry (RENCARE)

RESUMEN Introducción: La prevención de la muerte súbita y el tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardíaca son temas de gran importancia. Para prevenir la muerte súbita y mejorar el pronóstico de la insuficiencia cardíaca se utilizan los cardiodesfibriladores y cardioresincronizadores. Objetivos: Evaluar la cantidad y tipo de dispositivos implantados en nuestro país, así como las características de los pacientes, las complicaciones agudas y las que se presentan en el seguimiento. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, prospectivo, multicéntrico en centros de salud con la capacidad de implantar cardiodesfibriladores y cardioresincronizadores. Se incluyeron pacientes a los que se les realizó implante de estos dispositivos desde enero del 2016 hasta enero de 2017, con un seguimiento de 12 meses. Resultados: Se incluyeron 249 pacientes (edad promedio de 64,8 ± 13,7 años, 73,9% de sexo masculino, 72,1% con Fey < 35%). La etiología subyacente de la miocardiopatía era isquémica en el 39,8%, dilatada 26,7% y chagásica en el 11,2% de los casos. El 58% de los implantes realizados fueron cardiodesfibriladores y el 39%, cardiodesfibriladores asociados con cardioresincronizadores. El 84% de los procedimientos fueron primoimplantes. La indicación más frecuente del implante fue por prevención primaria de muerte súbita (67,9%). La tasa de complicaciones menores fue del 4,4% y no se reportaron complicaciones mayores. Conclusiones: El siguiente registro evidenció una gran proporción de implantes en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica, la indicación principal fue por prevención primaria de muerte súbita y la tasa de complicaciones fue similar a la reportada internacionalmente.

ABSTRACT Background: Prevention of sudden death and treatment of heart failure are very important topics. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization devices are used to prevent sudden death and improve heart failure symptoms and prognosis. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the number, type of implanted devices, clinical characteristics of the patients and acute and follow-up complications. Methods: An observational, prospective, multicenter study was carried out in healthcare centers with the capacity to implant cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization devices. The study included all patients who underwent implantation of these devices from January 2016 to January 2017, with a 12-month follow-up. Results: A total of 249 patients (73.9% men) with mean age of 64.8±13.7 years, and 72.1% with ejection fraction <35%, were included in the study. The underlying cardiomyopathy etiology was ischemic in 39.8% of cases, dilated in 26.7% and chagasic in 11.2%. Fifty-eight percent of implants were implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and 39% were cardioverter-defibrillators associated with cardiac resynchronization devices. In 84% of cases, procedures were first implants. The most frequent indica-tion of implantation was for primary prevention of sudden death (67.9%). Minor complication rate was 4.4% and no major complications were reported. Conclusions: The present registry evidenced a large proportion of cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization implants in patients with ischemic heart disease. The main indication was for primary prevention of sudden death and the complication rate was similar to that reported internationally.

Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification and Prevention in Chagas Disease: A Non-systematic Review of the Literature.

Chagas disease is an important public health problem in Latin America. However, migration and globalisation have resulted in the increased presence of Chagas disease worldwide. Sudden cardiac death is the leading cause of death in people with Chagas disease, most often due to ventricular fibrillation. Although more common in patients with documented ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death can also be the first manifestation of Chagas disease in patients with no previous symptoms or known heart failure. Major predictors of sudden cardiac death include cardiac arrest, sustained and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, left ventricular dysfunction, syncope and bradycardia. The authors review the predictors and risk stratification score developed by Rassi et al. for death in Chagas heart disease. They also discuss the evidence for anti-arrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, ICDs and pacemakers for the prevention of sudden cardiac death in these patients. Given the widespread global burden, understanding the risk stratification and prevention of sudden cardiac death in Chagas disease is of timely concern.

2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: Executive summary.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an arrhythmogenic disorder of the myocardium not secondary to ischemic, hypertensive, or valvular heart disease. ACM incorporates a broad spectrum of genetic, systemic, infectious, and inflammatory disorders. This designation includes, but is not limited to, arrhythmogenic right/left ventricular cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Chagas disease, and left ventricular noncompaction. The ACM phenotype overlaps with other cardiomyopathies, particularly dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmia presentation that may be associated with ventricular dilatation and/or impaired systolic function. This expert consensus statement provides the clinician with guidance on evaluation and management of ACM and includes clinically relevant information on genetics and disease mechanisms. PICO questions were utilized to evaluate contemporary evidence and provide clinical guidance related to exercise in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Recommendations were developed and approved by an expert writing group, after a systematic literature search with evidence tables, and discussion of their own clinical experience, to present the current knowledge in the field. Each recommendation is presented using the Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence system formulated by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association and is accompanied by references and explanatory text to provide essential context. The ongoing recognition of the genetic basis of ACM provides the opportunity to examine the diverse triggers and potential common pathway for the development of disease and arrhythmia.

2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an arrhythmogenic disorder of the myocardium not secondary to ischemic, hypertensive, or valvular heart disease. ACM incorporates a broad spectrum of genetic, systemic, infectious, and inflammatory disorders. This designation includes, but is not limited to, arrhythmogenic right/left ventricular cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Chagas disease, and left ventricular noncompaction. The ACM phenotype overlaps with other cardiomyopathies, particularly dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmia presentation that may be associated with ventricular dilatation and/or impaired systolic function. This expert consensus statement provides the clinician with guidance on evaluation and management of ACM and includes clinically relevant information on genetics and disease mechanisms. PICO questions were utilized to evaluate contemporary evidence and provide clinical guidance related to exercise in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Recommendations were developed and approved by an expert writing group, after a systematic literature search with evidence tables, and discussion of their own clinical experience, to present the current knowledge in the field. Each recommendation is presented using the Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence system formulated by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association and is accompanied by references and explanatory text to provide essential context. The ongoing recognition of the genetic basis of ACM provides the opportunity to examine the diverse triggers and potential common pathway for the development of disease and arrhythmia.

Asymptomatic Ventricular Pre-excitation: Between Sudden Cardiac Death and Catheter Ablation.

Debate about the best clinical approach to the management of asymptomatic patients with ventricular pre-excitation and advice on whether or not to invasively stratify and ablate is on-going. Weak evidence about the real risk of sudden cardiac death and the potential benefit of catheter ablation has probably prevented the clarification of action in this not infrequent and sometimes conflicting clinical situation. After analysing all available data, real evidence-based medicine could be the alternative strategy for managing this group of patients. According to recent surveys, most electrophysiologists invasively stratify. Based on all accepted risk factors - younger age, male, associated structural heart disease, posteroseptal localisation, ability of the accessory pathway to conduct anterogradely at short intervals of ≤250 milliseconds and inducibility of sustained atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia and/or atrial fibrillation - a shared decisionmaking process on catheter ablation is proposed.

Erratum to '2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing' [Journal of Arrhythmia 32/1 (2016) 1-28].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.12.001.].

Ablación por catéter de fibrilación auricular en Latinoamérica: resultados del primer registro de la Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLAECE) / Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in Latin America: results of the first registry of the Latin American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Cardiac (SOLAECE)

Objetivo: conocer los resultados de la ablación por catéter de fibrilación auricular (FA) en Latinoamérica. Material y método: se analizaron los resultados (éxito agudo, complicaciones totales y complicaciones mayores) de los procedimientos de ablación de FA paroxística (FA-P), FA-NO paroxística (FA-NP) y FA total (FA-P + FA-NP) incluidos en el Primer Registro Latinoamericano de Ablación por Catéter dirigido y coordinado por la Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLAECE), y su relación con las características de los centros. Las variables categóricas se expresaron como proporciones y se compararon utilizando la prueba de chi cuadrado. Se consideró diferencia estadísticamentemente significativa un valor de P < 0,05. Resultados: la FA fue el cuarto sustrato más frecuentemente abordado con 1.649 procedimientos (11%). De ellos, 1.161 fueron de FA-P (70,4%) y 488 de FA-NP (29,6%). El número de ablaciones de FA al año fue de 30 o menos en 46 centros (81%); 50 o más en siete centros (12%), y 100 o más en cinco centros (9%). El promedio por centro fue de 26. El éxito agudo de la ablación de FA total fue de 90%. No se observaron diferencias entre FA-P y FA-NP (88,9% versus 90,8%, P=NS). La tasa de complicaciones totales fue de 8,31%, y tampoco se observaron diferencias entre los dos sustratos (FA-P 8,4% versus FA-NP 8,2%, P=NS). Las complicaciones mayores fueron de 4,12%. El resultado de la ablación (éxito agudo y complicaciones) se relacionó principalmente con el volumen de procedimientos de los centros. Conclusiones: los resultados de la ablación de FA en Latinoamérica son similares a los reportados en el resto del mundo. La experiencia del centro se relacionó directamente con los resultados, en particular con las complicaciones. Aquellos centros con tasas elevadas de complicaciones mayores deberían reanalizar sus programas de ablación de FA a fin de mejorar la seguridad de este tratamiento.

Summary Objective: to evaluate the results of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in Latin America. Material and methods: the results (acute success, total complications and major complications) of ablation procedures of paroxysmal-AF (AF-P), Non-paroxysmal (AF-NP), and total FA (AF-P + AF-NP) included in the First Latin American Catheter Ablation Registry coordinated by SOLAECE were analyzed and the relationship of these results with the characteristics of the centers were established. Categorical variables were expressed as proportions and compared using the chi² test. A P value of <0,05 was considered statistically significant. Results: AF was the fourth most frequently substrate treated with 1,649 procedures (11%). Of these, 1,161 were AF-P (70.4%) and 488 AF-NP (29.6%). The number of AF ablations per year was 30 or less in 46 centers (81%), 50 or more in 7 (12%) and 100 or more in five (9%). The per center procedures average was 26. The acute ablation success of total AF was 90%. No difference between acute ablation success of AF-P and AF-NP (88.9% vs 90.8%, P=NS) was observed. The total complications rate was 8.31%, and no difference between the two substrates was observed (AF-P 8.4% vs AF-NP 8.2%, P =NS). Major complications rate was 4.12%. The result of ablation (acute success and complications) was related mainly to the number of procedures performed by the center. Conclusions: the results of AF ablation in Latin America do not differ greatly from those observed in other places around the world. Features related to the characteristics of the centers, especially its experience, were directly related to the results, particularly complications. Those centers with high rates of major complications should re-examine its AF ablation programs to improve the safety of this treatment.

Executive Summary: European Heart Rhythm Association Consensus Document on the Management of Supraventricular Arrhythmias: Endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE).

This paper is an executive summary of the full European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, published in Europace. It summarises developments in the field and provides recommendations for patient management, with particular emphasis on new advances since the previous European Society of Cardiology guidelines. The EHRA consensus document is available to read in full at http://europace.oxfordjournals.org.

The first Latin American Catheter Ablation Registry.

AIMS: To assess the results of transcatheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias in Latin America and establish the first Latin American transcatheter ablation registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: All ablation procedures performed between 1 January and 31 December 2012 were analysed retrospectively. Data were obtained on the characteristics and resources of participating centres (public or private institution, number of beds, cardiac surgery availability, type of room for the procedures, days per week assigned to electrophysiology procedures, type of fluoroscopy equipment, availability and type of electroanatomical mapping system, intracardiac echo, cryoablation, and number of electrophysiologists) and the results of 17 different ablation substrates: atrio-ventricular node reentrant tachycardia, typical atrial flutter, atypical atrial flutter, left free wall accessory pathway, right free wall accessory pathway, septal accessory pathway, right-sided focal atrial tachycardia, left-sided focal atrial tachycardia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, atrio-ventricular node, premature ventricular complex, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, post-myocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia in chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy, ventricular tachycardia in congenital heart disease, and ventricular tachycardias in other structural heart diseases. Data of 15 099 procedures were received from 120 centres in 13 participating countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, Dominican Republic, Uruguay, and Venezuela). Accessory pathway was the group of arrhythmias most frequently ablated (31%), followed by atrio-ventricular node reentrant tachycardia (29%), typical atrial flutter (14%), and atrial fibrillation (11%). Overall success was 92% with the rate of global complications at 4% and mortality 0.05%. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation in Latin America can be considered effective and safe.

Registro Nacional de Ablación con Catéter 2010 / National Registry of Catheter Ablation 2010

Introducción La ablación con catéter de sustratos y circuitos arritmogénicos es un procedimiento habitual en la práctica médica actual. El Registro Nacional de Ablación con Catéter 2010 se realizó con centros de electrofisiología cardíaca de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires y provincias de la Argentina, coordinado por representantes de los Comités de Arritmias de la Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología y de la Federación Argentina de Cardiología, con participación libre y anónima. Objetivo Conocer el número de procedimientos de ablación con catéter, sustratos arritmogénicos tratados, resultados y complicaciones a través de la información suministrada por los participantes durante el período estudiado. Material y métodos Se realizó un registro retrospectivo de los procedimientos desde el 1 de enero al 31 de diciembre de 2010, en el que participaron 24 centros. Se elaboró una base de datos que, una vez completada por los participantes, se unificó en una sola base central. Se asignaron códigos numéricos a los pacientes y los centros para garantizar el anonimato de los datos. Resultados Los 24 centros comunicaron 1.500 procedimientos de ablación en 1.460 pacientes. Todos los pacientes fueron tratados con radiofrecuencia. Los sustratos más frecuentemente tratados fueron: taquicardia por reentrada nodal auriculoventricular (25%), haces accesorios (25%), aleteo auricular (18%) y fibrilación auricular (16%). El éxito global fue del 93,8% y se observaron complicaciones en el 2,2% de los procedimientos. Las complicaciones más frecuentes fueron las relacionadas con el acceso vascular (0,7%). Se comunicó una muerte por tromboembolia pulmonar. Conclusiones Este tercer registro argentino sobre ablación con catéter brinda información importante y útil. Muestra una tasa de éxito inmediato adecuada, similar a lo comunicado en otros registros nacionales previos, con una tasa de morbimortalidad baja, por lo que esta práctica médica mantiene en la Argentina niveles de eficacia y seguridad semejantes a lo referido en otras publicaciones.

Background Catheter ablation of arrhythmogenic substrates and circuits is a common procedure in current medical practice. The National Registry of Catheter Ablation 2010 was carried out in cardiac electrophysiology centers from the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires and Argentine provinces, coordinated by members of the Arrhythmia Committees of the Argentine Society of Cardiology and the Argentine Federation of Cardiology. Its participation was free and anonymous. Objective To know the number of catheter ablation procedures, treated arrhythmogenic substrates, outcomes and complications, using the information provided by participants during the study period. Methods A retrospective registry of the procedures was carried out from January 1 to December 31, 2010, with the participation of 24 centers. A database was developed, and once completed by participants, it was unified into a single central database. Patients and centers were assigned number codes to ensure data anonymity. Results Twenty-four centers reported 1500 ablation procedures in 1460 patients. All patients were treated with radiofrequency. The most common substrates approached were atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (25%) and accessory bundles (25%), atrial flutter (18%) and atrial fibrillation (16%). Over-all success rate at the end of the procedures was 93.8%, and complications were present in 2.2% of the procedures. The most common complications were those related to vascular access (0.7%). A single death was recorded, due to pulmonary thromboembolism. Conclusions This third Argentine registry on catheter ablation provides important and useful information, and shows an adequate immediate success rate, similar to those reported by previous national registries, with low incidence of morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, in Argentina, this medical practice maintains similar efficacy and safety levels compared to other publications.