Longitudinal Interleaved Residency Training: A Consensus Definition.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cognitive benefits of longitudinal curricula and interleaving have been demonstrated in several disciplines. However, most residency curricula are structured in a block format. There is no consensus definition as to what constitutes a longitudinal program, making comparative research on curricular efficacy a challenge. The objective of our study was to arrive at a consensus definition of Longitudinal Interleaved Residency Training (LIRT) in family medicine. METHODS: A national workgroup was convened and utilized a Delphi method between October 2021 and March 2022 to arrive at a consensus definition. RESULTS: Twenty-four invitations were sent, and 18 participants initially accepted. The final workgroup (n=13) was representative of the nationwide diversity of family medicine residency programs in terms of geographic location (P=.977) and population density (P=.123). The following definition was approved: "LIRT is a curricular design and program structure that offers graduated, concurrent clinical experiences in the core competencies of the specialty. LIRT models the comprehensive scope of practice and continuity that defines the specialty; applies training methods that enhance long-term retention of knowledge, skills, and attitudes across all dimensions and locations of care delivery; and accomplishes program objectives through employment of longitudinal curricular scheduling and interleaving with spaced repetition." Additional technical criteria and definitions of terms are elucidated in the body of this article. CONCLUSIONS: A representative national workgroup crafted a consensus definition of Longitudinal Interleaved Residency Training (LIRT) in family medicine, a program structure with a basis in emerging evidence-based cognitive science.

COVID-19 and practice transformation: Building an office-based opioid treatment program in a family medicine residency practice.

INTRODUCTION: This brief report describes how a family medicine residency practice (FMRP) leveraged a resident-led quality improvement project and a grant-funded Addiction Integrated Care Team (AICT) to initiate an office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) program to provide medications for opioid use disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: In 2020, the practice experienced four disruptors that shifted motivation for practice development: (a) The COVID-19 pandemic demanded rapid change in primary care processes/staffing, including pivoting to telehealth/remote practice. (b) The practice's transition to a federally qualified community health center model meant a shift in organizational priorities that required offering OBOT services. (c) External grant resources became available through the AICT program to support practice core for OBOT, and 10 implementation strategies were utilized. (d) A resident champion implemented an OBOT quality improvement project. RESULTS: These efforts resulted in the practice offering the OBOT program and 18 patients receiving OBOT from January 2020 to February 2021, with 10 of 18 patients engaged for 12 months or longer. Further, the cumulative adoption and reach from January 2020 through September 2022 was 15 faculty and 14 residents becoming prescribers and 101 patients served within the OBOT program, respectively. DISCUSSION: FMRPs striving for significant practice transformation, such as implementing an OBOT program during a pandemic, may benefit from synergistic guidance and resources including established theory, strategies from the implementation science literature, and resident-led quality improvement efforts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

The Impact of Virtual Interviews on Recruitment and Implicit Bias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated virtual residency interview adoption. The impact of virtual interviews on program directors' (PD) National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) Match satisfaction, their future interview plans, and their perceptions about virtual interviews' influence on bias are unknown. We report the results of a survey of family medicine (FM) PDs about these topics after mandatory virtual interviews in 2020-2021. METHODS: A national survey of all FM PDs was conducted in April 2021 (n=619). The response rate was 46.37% (n=287). Questions asked whether PDs conducted virtual interviews, as well as PDs' general perceptions of virtual interviews' impact on administrative burden, diversity and bias; PD's ability to communicate program culture and assess applicants' alignment with program values; PD's satisfaction with Match results; and plans for interview structure postpandemic. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-four (93.1%) respondents performed only virtual interviews; 83.9% (n=220) conducting virtual interviews were satisfied with Match results, with no difference between programs with all virtual interviews vs others (OR 1.2, P=.994). PDs who communicated program values and involved residents in virtual interviews experienced higher Match satisfaction (OR 7.6, P<.001; OR 4.21, P=.001). PDs concerned about virtual interviews increasing bias against minorities before 2020 were still concerned after (OR 8.81, P<.001) and had lower Match satisfaction (OR 0.24, P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most FM PDs conducted entirely virtual interviews in 2020 and were satisfied with the Match. Interview processes including residents and conveying residency culture increased Match satisfaction. PDs are concerned about bias in virtual interviews, but more investigation about bias is needed.

Teaching Resident Self-Assessment Through Triangulation of Faculty and Patient Feedback.

PROBLEM: To accurately determine one's ability in any clinical competency, an individual must be able to self-assess performance and identify personal limitations. Existing research demonstrates that physicians of all levels are unreliable self-assessors. This poses a concern in medical practice, which requires continuous updates to clinical competencies and awareness of personal limitations. Few published studies examine graduate medical education curricula designed to develop self-assessment skills. INTERVENTION: Conceptual models, such as self-determination theory, suggest that self-assessment is most effectively learned through reflective processes. The Family Medicine Residency Program at Lehigh Valley Health Network developed a learner-centered competency assessment process that integrates advising and performance review. The multisource, observable behavior-based process encourages conversation between resident and advisor. Utilizing feedback from clinical preceptors and patient surveys, advisors guide residents in determining individual learning needs in core competency areas, including relationship-centered care. Development of medical learners' capacity to form relationships is one means to improving the patient experience. CONTEXT: This retrospective case study evaluates the accuracy of senior residents' self-assessment in relationship-centered care compared with that of junior residents. The study population includes the 34 residents enrolled from AY 2009-2012. Data sets represent specific 6-month periods and have 3 component scores-Self, Faculty, and Patient-which were triangulated to determine concordance rates by postgraduate year level. OUTCOME: The concordance rate among first-years was 26.7%, whereas third-years saw 60.0% concordance. A discordance analysis found the Patient score most often deviated from the other 2 scores, whereas the Faculty score was never the sole dissenter. When all 3 scores differed, the Self score frequently fell between the other 2 scores. LESSONS LEARNED: The principles of self-determination theory provide a valuable framework for understanding the development of residents' intrinsic motivation to become lifelong learners. The trend in improved concordance rates among senior residents suggests that prompting learners to triangulate feedback from multiple sources can lead to a shift in perspective about competency. Further study is needed to determine whether our results are generalizable to other competencies and educational settings.

The radar graph: the development of an educational tool to demonstrate resident competency.

BACKGROUND: Despite the movement toward competency-based assessment by accrediting bodies in recent years, there is no consensus on how to best assess medical competence. Direct observation is a useful tool. At the same time, a comprehensive assessment system based on direct observation has been difficult to develop. INTERVENTION: We developed a system that translates data obtained from checklists of observed behaviors completed during educational activities, including direct observation of clinical care, into a graphic tool (the "radar graph") usable for both formative and summative assessment. Using unique, observable behaviors to evaluate levels of competency on the Dreyfus scale, we assessed resident performance in 6 learning sites within our residency. Data are represented on a radar graph, which residents and faculty used to recognize both strengths and areas for growth to guide educational planning for the individual learner. RESULTS: Initial data show that the radar graphs have construct validity because the development process accurately reflects the desired construct, assessors were adequately trained, and the radar graphs demonstrated resident growth over time. A form completion rate of 90% for >1500 disseminated assessments suggests the feasibility of our process. CONCLUSIONS: The radar graph is a promising tool for use in resident feedback and competency assessment. Further research is needed to determine the full utility of the radar graphs, including a better understanding of the tool's reliability and construct validity.