Factors Associated with Same Day Discharge after Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with same day discharge (SDD) after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Total of 800 patients having minimally invasive surgery in the division of gynecologic oncology during a 20-month period. INTERVENTION: Minimally invasive surgery cases were reviewed for determinants of SDD to identify factors that could improve the SDD rate. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the study period, 800 minimally invasive procedures were performed with a 43.0% SDD rate. Patients who had SDD were younger (52.3 years vs 58.0 years; p <.001), had a lower body mass index (31.1 kg/m2 vs 33.7 kg/m2; p <.001), were less likely to have a malignancy (28.2% vs 55.5%; p <.001), had a lower estimated blood loss (36 vs 72 mL; p <.001), and were more likely to have received an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (49.8% vs 39.3%; p <.003). Total surgical time was shorter in women with SDD (156 minutes vs 208 minutes) as was total narcotic use in morphine equivalents (MEq) (milligram intravenous MEq, 23.1 mg MEq vs 28.8 mg MEq). SDD was also associated with earlier start time (p <.001). Laparoscopic cases were most likely to have SDD (51.4%) as compared with robotic assisted surgery (16.1%) or minilaparotomy (10.5%). There was a wide range of SDD among surgeons ranging from 19.8% to 56.2% (p <.001). In a multivariate analysis, the factors predicting SDD in order of predictive factors were surgical time (p <.001), recovery time (p <.001), start time (p <.001), surgeon (p <.001), age (p <.001), estimated blood loss (p <.001), and type of surgery (p = .005). CONCLUSION: Multiple factors affect SDD. Modifiable factors for SDD include the start time, surgeon preference, and patient expectations for SDD. Given these data, centers should prioritize surgical order by which patients are more likely to go home, and surgeons should analyze their own data with respect to achieving higher SDD rates.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Sentinel Node Biopsy and Full Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review the perioperative differences between patients undergoing a minimally invasive sentinel lymph node dissection and those undergoing a full lymphadenectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing a minimally invasive procedure for endometrial cancer that included nodal evaluation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients who underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy were compared with those who underwent a full lymphadenectomy at the time of minimally invasive surgery by either laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 241 minimally invasive surgery procedures for endometrial cancer were performed during the 20-month study period. Nodal dissection was indicated and performed in 156 (65%) of these patients, with 93 undergoing a sentinel lymph node biopsy and 63 a full lymphadenectomy. There was no difference between the sentinel group and the lymphadenectomy group with respect to age, estimated blood loss (p = .23), use of a preoperative enhanced recovery after surgery program (p = .82), or body mass index (34.0 kg/m2 vs 33.7 kg/m2; p = .87). The use of full lymphadenectomy was very dependent on the surgeon (p <.001). There was no difference in narcotic use in milligram intravenous equivalents of morphine in surgery (20.9 vs 22.2; p = .37), recovery (4.6 vs 4.9; p = .73), or total dose (25.4 vs 27.0; p = .33). The surgical procedure was longer with lymphadenectomy (185.2 minutes vs 214.2 minutes; p <.001) and the relative risk of discharge from recovery was lower (0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.97; p = .03). The hospital stay was longer with lymphadenectomy (16.3 hours vs 25.5 hours; p <.001) and same-day discharge less frequent (48.5% vs 13.8%; p <.001). A multivariate analysis confirmed that sentinel node biopsy was associated with an increased relative risk of discharge of 1.68 (95% confidence interval 1.11-2.53; p = .01) CONCLUSION: Total narcotic requirements are similar between sentinel node biopsy and lymphadenectomy. However, sentinel node biopsy is associated with a shorter surgical time, recovery time, and hospital stay.

Pre-emptive Non-narcotic Pain Medication before Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with respect to perioperative narcotics, time in the recovery room, and total time in hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All patients having MIS in the division of gynecologic oncology during a 20-month period. INTERVENTION: MIS cases were compared before and after the implementation of an ERAS protocol that incorporated orally administered acetaminophen, gabapentin, and celecoxib. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 800 MIS cases were performed during the period (77% laparoscopy, 18% robotic, 5% mini-lap). Of these, 449 cases were treated without and 351 with the ERAS protocol. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age, BMI, surgery type, smoking, surgical indication, blood loss, or diagnosis. Total narcotic use in milligram intravenous equivalents of morphine (mg IV Eq) was significantly less in the ERAS patients (28.5-mg IV Eq vs 23.6-mg IV Eq; p <.001). There was a trend toward less narcotics in recovery (4.8-mg IV Eq vs 4.1-mg IV Eq; p = .08). Postoperative recovery room time was not different between the groups (129 minutes vs 131 minutes; p = .66). ERAS was associated with a higher rate of same day discharge (38.5% vs 49.0%; p = .003) and a shorter length of hospital stay (22.9 hours vs 18.5 hours; p = .008), with a hazard ratio for discharge of 0.82 (0.71-0.94). However, the same day discharge rate varied widely between treating physicians (20% to 56%). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ERAS protocol for MIS appears to reduce total perioperative narcotic use but does not reduce recovery room time. There was a reduction in total hospital time, but this may be dependent on practice patterns of individual physicians.