Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 42(10): 1470-80, 2006 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16619162

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is still considerable uncertainty as to the best algorithm for interpreting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) genotyping results. METHODS: A total of 318 subjects with HIV RNA levels of >1000 copies/mL were enrolled in 41 centers throughout Italy from 2001 through 2003, stratified on the basis of their drug history, randomized (1:1) to 2 arms to have their treatments modified on the basis of the results of HIV genotyping (as interpreted by virtual phenotype analysis or with use of a rule-based interpretation system), and followed up for 48 weeks. At least 1 nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor and 1 protease inhibitor had to be included in any new regimen; nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-naive patients were also prescribed a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor. Only drugs licensed in Italy were allowed. The primary end point was a decrease in HIV RNA level to <400 copies/mL by week 12 according to on-treatment analysis. RESULTS: The mean (+/- standard deviation) values at baseline were as follows: HIV RNA level, 4.1+/-0.74 log(10) copies/mL; CD4(+) T lymphocyte count, 410+/-262 cells/microL; reverse-transcriptase mutations, 4.8+/-2.9; and protease mutations, 2.8+/-2.5. There were 133 patients (41.8%) who were nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor naive and protease inhibitor experienced, 63 patients (19.8%) who were nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor experienced and protease inhibitor naive, and 122 patients (38.4%) who were 3-class experienced. A total of 192 patients completed 12 weeks of the treatment regimen assigned at baseline; at 12 weeks, 66.3% of patients in the virtual phenotype arm and 71.3% of patients in the rule-based interpretation arm had HIV RNA levels of <400 copies/mL (P = .46). No statistically significant difference between arms was observed by intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSION: Both the virtual phenotype and rule-based interpretation methods of HIV genotyping can guide the selection of effective antiretroviral drugs for a salvage regimen.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , HIV/genética , Mutação , Terapia de Salvação , Adulto , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade , Feminino , Genótipo , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , RNA Viral/sangue , RNA Viral/genética , Inibidores da Transcriptase Reversa/uso terapêutico , Carga Viral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA