Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 536: 903-913, 2015 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26277440

RESUMO

In the framework of the EU EPHECT project (Emissions, Exposure Patterns and Health Effects of Consumer Products in the EU), irritative and respiratory effects were assessed in relation to acute (30-min) and long-term (24-h) inhalation exposure to key and emerging indoor air pollutants emitted during household use of selected consumer products. A detailed Health Risk Assessment (HRA) was performed for five selected pollutants of respiratory health relevance, namely acrolein, formaldehyde, naphthalene, d-limonene and α-pinene. For each pollutant, the Critical Exposure Limit (CEL) was compared to indoor air concentrations and exposure estimates for the use of 15 selected consumer products by two population groups (housekeepers and retired people) in the four geographical regions of Europe (North, West, South, East), which were derived previously based on microenvironmental modelling. For the present HRA, health-based CELs were derived for certain compounds in case indoor air quality guidelines were not available by the World Health Organization for end-points relevant to the current study. For each pollutant, the highest indoor air concentrations in each microenvironment and exposure estimates across home microenvironments during the day were lower than the corresponding acute and long-term CELs. However, considerable contributions, especially to acute exposures, were obtained in some cases, such as formaldehyde emissions resulting from single product use of a floor cleaning agent (82% CEL), a candle (10% CEL) and an electric air freshener (17% CEL). Regarding multiple product use, the case of 30-min formaldehyde exposure reaching 34% CEL when eight product classes were used across home microenvironments, i.e. all-purpose/kitchen/floor cleaning agents, furniture/floor polish, combustible/electric air fresheners, and perfume, needs to be highlighted. Such estimated values should be evaluated with caution, as these may be attributed to the exposure scenarios specifically constructed for the present study, following a 'most-representative worst-case scenario' approach for exposure and health risk assessment.


Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/estatística & dados numéricos , Monitoramento Ambiental , Europa (Continente) , Substâncias Perigosas , Produtos Domésticos , Humanos , Exposição por Inalação/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 160(1-3): 14-7, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24748489

RESUMO

Results from epidemiological studies on lung cancer and radon exposure in dwellings and mines led to a significant revision of recommendations and regulations of international organisations, such as WHO, IAEA, Nordic Countries, European Commission. Within the European project RADPAR, scientists from 18 institutions of 14 European countries worked together for 3 y (2009-12). Among other reports, a comprehensive booklet of recommendations was produced with the aim that they should be useful both for countries with a well-developed radon programme and for countries with little experience on radon issues. In this paper, the main RADPAR recommendations on radon programmes and policies are described and discussed. These recommendations should be very useful in preparing a national action plan, required by the recent Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Exposição Ambiental/prevenção & controle , Guias como Assunto , Monitoramento de Radiação/normas , Proteção Radiológica/normas , Poluentes Radioativos/efeitos adversos , Radônio/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Poluentes Radioativos/análise , Radônio/análise
3.
Allergy ; 63(7): 810-9, 2008 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18588546

RESUMO

The prevalence of allergies, asthma and other respiratory diseases in large populations has increased in recent decades. Among other factors, this phenomenon has been connected to adverse health effects of air pollution. Although some causal links between occupational exposures and their health effects are shown, still little is known about the health risks of lifelong exposure to indoor air pollutants. To assess the health risks of indoor air pollutants at prevailing concentration levels in Europe, the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission carried out a project called "Critical Appraisal of the Setting and Implementation of Indoor Exposure Limits in the EU" (INDEX). The aims of the project were: (1) to assess health risks of indoor-originated chemical pollutants that might be regulated in the EU and (2) to provide suggestions and recommendations on potential exposure limits or other risk management measures. The results of the INDEX project should contribute to the development of an EU strategy for the management of indoor air quality. The highest priority was given in this study to: formaldehyde, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, benzene and naphthalene. Exposure limits, recommendations and management options were also given to minimize the health risks for these compounds.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/toxicidade , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Exposição por Inalação , Asma/epidemiologia , Benzeno/toxicidade , Monóxido de Carbono/toxicidade , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , União Europeia , Formaldeído/toxicidade , Humanos , Naftalenos/toxicidade , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/toxicidade , Prevalência , Medição de Risco , Incerteza
4.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; 29(3 Suppl): 368-70, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18409729

RESUMO

The European INDEX project was finalised to identify priorities and to assess the needs for an European Community strategy and action plan in the area of indoor air pollution. A list of 5 chemicals, with potential of high indoor concentrations, uncontested health impacts, and effective risk management, were selected to be regulated with priority: Formaldehyde, Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Dioxide, Benzene and Naphtalene. For each compound, guideline values and management options were suggested.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Benzeno/toxicidade , Monóxido de Carbono/toxicidade , Formaldeído/toxicidade , Naftalenos/toxicidade , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos
5.
Noise Health ; 7(28): 41-50, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16417704

RESUMO

Different scientific groups have studied and continue to study the health impacts of physical and chemical agents in the environment. In most cases, every study group has considered the health effect as being solely due to the air pollutant(s) under investigation, for example air pollution without due regard for the simultaneous presence of noise pollution whereas both have an impact on the cardiovascular system. Or in the case of noise studies the contribution of solvent, asphyxiant or metal exposures has not been considered, which can have an impact on hearing impairment. One can, therefore, question the stringency of the available evidence of epidemiological studies in both fields to warrant the consideration of air pollutants as confounding or aggravating factors in studies of specific effects due to noise (and vice versa). In this paper we weigh the existing evidence on the association of noise and air pollutant exposure and associated health impacts. In forthcoming publications, the authors will consider the influence of other factors, which can confound noise studies but are currently not included in the analysis.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Substâncias Perigosas , Ruído/efeitos adversos , Monóxido de Carbono/análise , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Saúde Global , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Humanos , Dióxido de Enxofre/análise
6.
Indoor Air ; 9(2): 103-16, 1999 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10390935

RESUMO

Eighteen laboratories from 10 European countries participated in a comparison organized as part of the VOCEM project, a 2.5-year research collaboration among 4 research institutes and 4 industrial companies. The scope of the project was to improve the procedure used to measure volatile organic compounds (VOC) emitted from building materials and products in small test chambers. The interlaboratory comparison included the GC-MS determination of 5 target compounds from carpet, 8 from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cushion vinyl and 2 from paint; for the first time, chamber recovery (sinks), homogeneity of solid materials and possible contamination during transport were tested. The results show that the intralaboratory variance (random errors) is much smaller than the interlaboratory variance (systematic errors). Causes of the largest interlaboratory discrepancies were: (i) analytical errors; (ii) losses of the heaviest compounds due to sorption on the chamber walls; and (iii) non homogeneity of the materials. The output of this work concerns both the objective of labelling materials with regard to their VOC emissions and the pre-standard drafted by the European Commitee for Standardization (CEN) for this type of determination.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados , Compostos Orgânicos/análise , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Teste de Materiais , Valores de Referência , Volatilização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA