The Incidence of Retained Objects in Intraoperative X-rays for Missing Counts in Plastic Surgery: We Should Do Better.

Background: In the event of incorrect surgical counts, obtaining X-rays to rule out retained surgical items (RSI) is standard practice. However, these safeguards also carry risk. This study investigates the actual incidence of RSI in plastic reconstructive surgery (PRS) cases as measured on intraoperative X-rays and its associated modifiable risk factors. Methods: X-rays with indication of "foreign body" in PRS procedures from 2012 to 2022 were obtained. Reports with "incorrect surgical counts" and associated perioperative records were retrospectively analyzed to determine the incidence of retained surgical items. Results: Among 257 X-rays, 21.4% indicated incorrect counts during PRS operations. None were positive for RSIs. The average number of staff present was 12.01. This correlated to an average of 6.98 staff turnovers. The average case lasted 8.42 hours. X-rays prolonged the time under anesthesia by an average of 24.3 minutes. Free flap surgery had 49.1% prevalence of missing counts (lower extremity 25.5%, breast 20%, craniofacial 3.6%), followed by hand (14.5%), breast (10.9%), abdominal reconstruction (10.9%), craniofacial (9.1%), and cosmetic (5.4%). Conclusions: Although X-rays for incorrect counts intend to prevent catastrophic sequela of inadvertent RSIs, our results suggest the true incidence of RSI in PRS is negligible. However, intraoperative X-rays have potentially detrimental and pervasive consequences for patients, including increased anesthesia time, radiation exposure, and higher overall cost. Addressing modifiable risk factors to minimize unnecessary intraoperative X-rays is imperative while also considering whether this modality is an effective and appropriate tool in PRS procedures with incorrect surgical counts.

Pediatric upper extremity firearm injuries: an analysis of demographic factors and recurring mechanisms of injury.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding risk factors specific to pediatric upper extremity firearm injuries. The purpose of this study is to evaluate pediatric patients treated for these injuries to identify at-risk populations and recurring mechanisms of injury. METHODS: A 20-year retrospective review was conducted. Patients 17 years of age and younger, with upper extremity injuries related to a firearm, were included. Analysis involved Fisher's exact and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty patients were included. The mean age was 12.04 ± 4.3 years. Most included patients were male (85%). Interestingly, females were more frequently victims of assault (P = 0.03), and males were more frequently injured due to accidental discharge (P < 0.001). The most affected race/ethnicity was White-not Hispanic or Latino (48%). The hand was the most frequent location injured (31%) and was more likely to be accidental than proximal injuries (P = 0.003). Air rifles were the most common firearm type used (56%). Pistols were implicated in 47 (26%) cases, rifles in 17 (9%), and shotguns in 10 (6%). Ninety-nine (55%) patients had procedures in the operating room. The most frequent procedure was foreign body removal (55%). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors such as male sex, White-not Hispanic or Latino race/ethnicity, and adolescent age were attributed to increased risk for injury. Male sex was associated with increased risk of injury by accidental discharge and female sex with intentional assault. Air rifles were the most common firearm type overall, although female sex was associated with increased risk for injury by powder weapon.

Identifying Risk Factors Leading to Unanticipated Postoperative Readmission.

INTRODUCTION: Unanticipated postoperative readmissions are a grading metric directly linked to both the quality of patient care and physician reimbursement. However, little data exist to define factors responsible for these readmissions in the plastic surgery patient population. This study aims to identify patient risk factors contributing to unanticipated postoperative readmissions to optimize perioperative patient care and mitigate negative financial impact upon providers. METHODS: We present an institutional review board-approved study retrospective review of 819 plastic surgery patients undergoing operative procedures performed at our institution between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. All unanticipated readmissions within 30 days of an operation were identified and subjected to statistical analysis in an effort to determine whether these readmissions were associated with identifiable patient risk factors. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine (18.1%) of the 819 investigated patients underwent readmission, reoperation, or both within 30 postoperative days. Seventy-four (9%) patients required hospital readmission, alone; 55 (6.7%) underwent readmission with operative intervention; and 20 (2.4%) required outpatient operative intervention without readmission. Readmitted patients were significantly more likely to have a positive smoking history (P = 0.009), hypertension (P = 0.0008), congestive heart failure (P = 0.0015), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.023), a higher mean age (P = 0.0001), and a higher Charlson Comorbidity Score (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results identify risk factors associated with unanticipated postoperative readmissions specific to a plastic surgery patient population. With this information, practitioners can allocate appropriate perioperative resources and planning for patients at increased risk for readmission, thereby improving delivery of patient care and satisfying quality metrics linked to practitioner reimbursement.

Medical Honey and Silver Dressings Do Not Interfere with Each Other's Key Functional Attributes.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine whether silver-containing dressings and medical-grade honey gel interfere with one another in measurable ways. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dressings applied together in clinical use were tested using in vitro and ex vivo methods to determine whether the combined modalities maintain their individual properties. In order to determine if the presence of silver dressings interfere with honey's osmotic strength, which is a key physical property of medical honey, changes in honey's 2 primary sugars were measured, as well as changes in its overall osmotic strength. Finally, the antibacterial barrier activity of the dressings were tested individually and in honey/silver pairs in 2 in vitro models with 2 clinical strains of bacteria. RESULTS: The data demonstrate that honey with silver dressings resulted in an increased osmolarity, since both the concentration of the 2 primary sugars in honey as well as its overall osmolarity increased. The data also demonstrate that the in vitro antibacterial barrier activity seen with silver-containing dressings does not decrease with the addition of medical honey and in some instances increased. CONCLUSION: Altogether, these data suggest that these 2 classes of dressings do not interfere with each other. Clinical evidence is still required to fully validate these findings.