Practical recommendations for timely, accurate diagnosis of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (MCI and dementia) in primary care: a review and synthesis.

The critical role of primary care clinicians (PCCs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) prevention, diagnosis and management must evolve as new treatment paradigms and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) emerge. Our understanding of AD has grown substantially: no longer conceptualized as a late-in-life syndrome of cognitive and functional impairments, we now recognize that AD pathology builds silently for decades before cognitive impairment is detectable. Clinically, AD first manifests subtly as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD before progressing to dementia. Emerging optimism for improved outcomes in AD stems from a focus on preventive interventions in midlife and timely, biomarker-confirmed diagnosis at early signs of cognitive deficits (i.e. MCI due to AD and mild AD dementia). A timely AD diagnosis is particularly important for optimizing patient care and enabling the appropriate use of anticipated DMTs. An accelerating challenge for PCCs and AD specialists will be to respond to innovations in diagnostics and therapy for AD in a system that is not currently well positioned to do so. To overcome these challenges, PCCs and AD specialists must collaborate closely to navigate and optimize dynamically evolving AD care in the face of new opportunities. In the spirit of this collaboration, we summarize here some prominent and influential models that inform our current understanding of AD. We also advocate for timely and accurate (i.e. biomarker-defined) diagnosis of early AD. In doing so, we consider evolving issues related to prevention, detecting emerging cognitive impairment and the role of biomarkers in the clinic.

Cognitive Performance Does not Limit Physical Activity Participation in the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot Study (LIFE-P).

OBJECTIVES: We examined whether multiple domains of baseline cognitive performance were associated with prospective physical activity (PA) adherence in the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot study (LIFE-P). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: The LIFE-P study was a single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of a PA intervention compared to a successful aging educational intervention in sedentary, mobility-limited older adults. INTERVENTION: A 12-month structured, moderate-intensity, multi-modal PA program that included walking, resistance training, and flexibility exercises. For the first 2 months (adoption), 3 center-based exercise sessions (40-60 min) / week were conducted. During the next 4 months (transition), center-based sessions were conducted 2 times / week. The subsequent maintenance phase consisted of optional once-to-twice-per-week center-based sessions and home-based PA. MEASUREMENTS: Tests of executive and global cognitive functioning, working memory and psychomotor speed were administered at baseline. Median test scores were used to dichotomize participants into low or high cognitive performance groups. RESULTS: 52 mobility-limited older adults (age: 76.9 ±5 yrs) were randomized to the PA arm of LIFE-P. Compared to participants with high cognitive performance, participants with low performance had similar PA adherence rates (all P ≥ 0.34). Furthermore, weak and non-significant univariate relationships were elicited between all measures of cognition and overall PA adherence levels (r values ranged: -0.20 to 0.12, P ≥ 0.12). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that cognitive performance does not limit long-term PA adherence in mobility-limited older adults. Additional studies in larger cohorts are warranted to verify these findings.

Prevalence and significance of unrecognized lower extremity peripheral arterial disease in general medicine practice*.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of unrecognized lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) among men and women aged 55 years and older in a general internal medicine (GIM) practice and to identify characteristics and functional performance associated with unrecognized PAD. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 143 patients with known PAD from the noninvasive vascular laboratory, and 239 men and women aged 55 and older with no prior PAD history from a GIM practice. Group 1 consisted of patients with PAD consecutively identified from the noninvasive vascular laboratory (n = 143). Group 2 included GIM practice patients found to have an ankle brachial index less than 0.90, consistent with PAD (n = 34). Group 3 consisted of GIM practice patients without PAD (n = 205). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Leg functioning was assessed with the 6-minute walk, 4-meter walking velocity, and Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ). Of GIM practice patients, 14% had unrecognized PAD. Only 44% of patients in Group 2 had exertional leg symptoms. Distances achieved in the 6-minute walk were 1,130, 1,362, and 1,539 feet for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, adjusting for age, gender, and race (P <.001). The degree of difficulty walking due to leg symptoms as reported on the WIQ was comparable between Groups 2 and 3 and significantly greater in Group 1 than Group 2. In multiple logistic regression analysis including Groups 2 and 3, current cigarette smoking was associated independently with unrecognized PAD (odds ratio [OR], 6.82; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.55 to 29.93). Aspirin therapy was nearly independently associated with absence of PAD (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.12 to 1.12). CONCLUSION: Unrecognized PAD is common among men and women aged 55 years and older in GIM practice and is associated with impaired lower extremity functioning. Ankle brachial index screening may be necessary to diagnose unrecognized PAD in a GIM practice.

Race and sex influence clearance of nifedipine: results of a population study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate oral clearance of nifedipine and to determine demographic and clinical covariates that affect nifedipine clearance in a clinical population. METHODS: Apparent oral clearance of nifedipine and protein binding were measured in 226 patients receiving sustained-release nifedipine formulations for hypertension and coronary artery disease (black men, n = 111; black women, n = 27; white men, n = 64; white women, n = 24). Mean age +/- SD was 71 +/- 11 years, and mean weight was 86 +/- 17 kg. Nifedipine concentrations were analyzed by HPLC, protein binding was measured by equilibrium dialysis, clearance and covariate effects were estimated by a nonlinear mixed effects population model, and statistical analyses were performed by a nonlinear mixed-effects model (clearance) and ANOVA (protein binding). RESULTS: Clearance was significantly slower in black subjects (8.9 +/- 0.7 mL/min/kg; mean +/- SE) compared with white subjects (11.6 +/- 0.8 mL/min/kg; P = .00004) and in men compared with women (9.3 +/- 0.6 versus 12.1 +/- 1.5 mL/min/kg; P = .0021). Reported alcohol use (alcohol, 8.6 +/- 1.1 versus no alcohol, 10.8 +/- 0.6 mL/min/kg; P = .0002) and smoking status (smoker, 8.8 +/- 2.0 versus nonsmoker, 10.2 +/- 0.6 mL/min/kg; P = .0362) also affected nifedipine clearance. Race and sex had no effect on protein binding of nifedipine (P = .29 and P = .44, respectively). No effects of age, stable coronary artery disease, or reported intake of beta-blockers on nifedipine clearance were detected in this primarily elderly population with hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that race, sex, and environmental factors are identifiable sources of interindividual variation in the oral clearance of nifedipine, a CYP3A substrate. Our experience also suggests that data from clinical populations may be biased with regard to age, sex, and formulation selection, and covariates may not be independently distributed, which can limit analyses.

Member characteristics, participation, and interests: Public Health Nutrition Practice Group.

A survey was developed to assess the level of participation and the membership interests of the Public Health Nutrition Practice Group (PHNPG). Forty-six percent (500 members) returned a completed survey. More than 80% of members believe PHNPG to be their main professional practice area "home" within the Council on Practice structure. Members overwhelmingly viewed practice group contributions as a responsibility, with personal career benefits being of secondary importance. Reading the practice group's newsletter and voting in elections were major areas of involvement. However, willingness to contribute time was a positive finding. Areas of interest and issues of greatest concern were identified. Results of the survey can be used to prepare long-range plans for PHNPG. Membership involvement in practice group activities is the key to an increase in re-enrollments and in new memberships.