Predictors of ECG Interpretation Proficiency in Healthcare Professionals.

Accurate ECG interpretation is vital, but variations in skills exist among healthcare professionals. This study aims to identify factors contributing to ECG interpretation proficiency. Survey data and ECG interpretation test scores from participants in the EDUCATE Trial were analyzed to identify predictors of performance for 30 sequential 12-lead ECGs. Nonmodifiable factors (being a physician, clinical experience, patient care impact) and modifiable factors (weekly interpretation volume, training hours, expert supervision frequency) were analyzed. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to generate a Comprehensive Model (incorporating all factors) and Actionable Model (incorporating modifiable factors only). Among 1206 participants analyzed, there were 72 (6.0%) primary care physicians, 146 (12.1%) cardiology fellows-in-training, 353 (29.3%) resident physicians, 182 (15.1%) medical students, 84 (7.0%) advanced practice providers, 120 (9.9%) nurses, and 249 (20.7%) allied health professionals. Among them, 571 (47.3%) were physicians and 453 (37.6%) were nonphysicians. The average test score was 56.4% ± 17.2%. Bivariate analysis demonstrated significant associations between test scores and >10 weekly ECG interpretations, being a physician, >5 training hours, patient care impact, and expert supervision but not clinical experience. In the Comprehensive Model, independent associations were found with weekly interpretation volume (9.9 score increase; 95% CI, 7.9-11.8; P < 0.001), being a physician (9.0 score increase; 95% CI, 7.2-10.8; P < 0.001), and training hours (5.7 score increase; 95% CI, 3.7-7.6; P < 0.001). In the Actionable Model, scores were independently associated with weekly interpretation volume (12.0 score increase; 95% CI, 10.0-14.0; P < 0.001) and training hours (4.7 score increase; 95% CI, 2.6-6.7; P < 0.001). The Comprehensive and Actionable Models explained 18.7% and 12.3% of the variance in test scores, respectively. Predictors of ECG interpretation proficiency include nonmodifiable factors like physician status and modifiable factors such as training hours and weekly ECG interpretation volume.

Impact of Computer-Interpreted ECGs on the Accuracy of Healthcare Professionals.

The interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) involves a dynamic interplay between computerized ECG interpretation (CEI) software and human overread. However, the impact of computer ECG interpretation on the performance of healthcare professionals remains largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interpretation proficiency of various medical professional groups, with and without access to the CEI report. Healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, training levels, and countries sequentially interpreted 60 standard 12-lead ECGs, demonstrating both urgent and nonurgent findings. The interpretation process consisted of 2 phases. In the first phase, participants interpreted 30 ECGs with clinical statements. In the second phase, the same 30 ECGs and clinical statements were randomized and accompanied by a CEI report. Diagnostic performance was evaluated based on interpretation accuracy, time per ECG (in seconds [s]), and self-reported confidence (rated 0 [not confident], 1 [somewhat confident], or 2 [confident]). A total of 892 participants from various medical professional groups participated in the study. This cohort included 44 (4.9%) primary care physicians, 123 (13.8%) cardiology fellows-in-training, 259 (29.0%) resident physicians, 137 (15.4%) medical students, 56 (6.3%) advanced practice providers, 82 (9.2%) nurses, and 191 (21.4%) allied health professionals. The inclusion of the CEI was associated with a significant improvement in interpretation accuracy by 15.1% (95% confidence interval, 14.3-16.0; P < 0.001), decrease in interpretation time by 52 s (-56 to -48; P < 0.001), and increase in confidence by 0.06 (0.03-0.09; P = 0.003). Improvement in interpretation accuracy was seen across all professional subgroups, including primary care physicians by 12.9% (9.4-16.3; P = 0.003), cardiology fellows-in-training by 10.9% (9.1-12.7; P < 0.001), resident physicians by 14.4% (13.0-15.8; P < 0.001), medical students by 19.9% (16.8-23.0; P < 0.001), advanced practice providers by 17.1% (13.3-21.0; P < 0.001), nurses by 16.2% (13.4-18.9; P < 0.001), allied health professionals by 15% (13.4-16.6; P < 0.001), physicians by 13.2% (12.2-14.3; P < 0.001), and nonphysicians by 15.6% (14.3-17.0; P < 0.001).CEI integration improves ECG interpretation accuracy, efficiency, and confidence among healthcare professionals.

Exploring Factors Influencing ECG Interpretation Proficiency of Medical Professionals.

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a crucial diagnostic tool in medicine with concerns about its interpretation proficiency across various medical disciplines. Our study aimed to explore potential causes of these issues and identify areas requiring improvement. A survey was conducted among medical professionals to understand their experiences with ECG interpretation and education. A total of 2515 participants from diverse medical backgrounds were surveyed. A total of 1989 (79%) participants reported ECG interpretation as part of their practice. However, 45% expressed discomfort with independent interpretation. A significant 73% received less than 5 hours of ECG-specific education, with 45% reporting no education at all. Also, 87% reported limited or no expert supervision. Nearly all medical professionals (2461, 98%) expressed a desire for more ECG education. These findings were consistent across all groups and did not vary between primary care physicians, cardiology FIT, resident physicians, medical students, APPs, nurses, physicians, and nonphysicians. This study reveals substantial deficiencies in ECG interpretation training, supervision, and confidence among medical professionals, despite a strong interest in increased ECG education.

CD4 Count in HIV- Brain-Dead Donors: Insight into Donor Risk Assessment for HIV+ Donors.

BACKGROUND: The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Organ Policy Equity Act allows for transplantation of organs from HIV-infected individuals (HIV+), provided it is performed under a research protocol. The safety assessment of an organ for transplantation is an essential element of the donation process. The risk for HIV-associated opportunistic infections increases as circulating CD4+ lymphocytes decrease to less than 200 cells/µL; however, the numbers of circulating CD4+ cells in the HIV-negative (HIV-) brain-dead donor (BDD) is not known. METHODS: Circulating T-lymphocyte subset profiles in conventional HIV- BDD were measured in 20 BDD in a clinical laboratory. RESULTS: The mean age of the BDD cohort was 48.7 years, 95% were white and 45% were women. The average body mass index was 29.2 kg/m. Cerebrovascular accident (40%) was the most prevalent cause of death. Sixteen (80%) subjects had a CD4 count ≤441 cells/µL (lower limit of normal) and 11 (55%) had a CD4 count less than 200 cells/µL; 11 (55%) subjects had a CD8 count ≤125 cells/µL (lower limit of normal). CD4/CD8 ratio was below normal in 3 patients (normal, 1.4-2.6). No recipient had a recognized donor-associated adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute numbers of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes are commonly reduced after brain death in HIV- individuals. Thus, CD4 absolute numbers are an inconsistent metric for assessing organ donor risk, irrespective of HIV status.