Selective killing of human immunodeficiency virus infected cells by non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-induced activation of HIV protease.

BACKGROUND: Current antiretroviral therapy against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) reduces viral load and thereby prevents viral spread, but it cannot eradicate proviral genomes from infected cells. Cells in immunological sanctuaries as well as cells producing low levels of virus apparently contribute to a reservoir that maintains HIV persistence in the presence of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Thus, accelerated elimination of virus producing cells may represent a complementary strategy to control HIV infection. Here we sought to exploit HIV protease (PR) related cytotoxicity in order to develop a strategy for drug induced killing of HIV producing cells. PR processes the viral Gag and Gag-Pol polyproteins during virus maturation, but is also implicated in killing of virus producing cells through off-target cleavage of host proteins. It has been observed previously that micromolar concentrations of certain non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) can stimulate intracellular PR activity, presumably by enhancing Gag-Pol dimerization. RESULTS: Using a newly developed cell-based assay we compared the degree of PR activation displayed by various NNRTIs. We identified inhibitors showing higher potency with respect to PR activation than previously described for NNRTIs, with the most potent compounds resulting in ~2-fold increase of the Gag processing signal at 250 nM. The degree of enhancement of intracellular Gag processing correlated with the compound's ability to enhance RT dimerization in a mammalian two-hybrid assay. Compounds were analyzed for their potential to mediate specific killing of chronically infected MT-4 cells. Levels of cytotoxicity on HIV infected cells determined for the different NNRTIs corresponded to the relative degree of drug induced intracellular PR activation, with CC50 values ranging from ~0.3 µM to above the tested concentration range (10 µM). Specific cytotoxicity was reverted by addition of PR inhibitors. Two of the most active compounds, VRX-480773 and GW-678248, were also tested in primary human cells and mediated cytotoxicity on HIV-1 infected peripheral blood mononuclear cells. CONCLUSION: These data present proof of concept for targeted drug induced elimination of HIV producing cells. While NNRTIs themselves may not be sufficiently potent for therapeutic application, the results provide a basis for the development of drugs exploiting this mechanism of action.

Binding kinetics of darunavir to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease explain the potent antiviral activity and high genetic barrier.

The high incidence of cross-resistance between human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitors (PIs) limits their sequential use. This necessitates the development of PIs with a high genetic barrier and a broad spectrum of activity against PI-resistant HIV, such as tipranavir and darunavir (TMC114). We performed a surface plasmon resonance-based kinetic study to investigate the impact of PI resistance-associated mutations on the protease binding of five PIs used clinically: amprenavir, atazanavir, darunavir, lopinavir, and tipranavir. With wild-type protease, the binding affinity of darunavir was more than 100-fold higher than with the other PIs, due to a very slow dissociation rate. Consequently, the dissociative half-life of darunavir was much higher (>240 h) than that of the other PIs, including darunavir's structural analogue amprenavir. The influence of protease mutations on the binding kinetics was tested with five multidrug-resistant (MDR) proteases derived from clinical isolates harboring 10 to 14 PI resistance-associated mutations with a decreased susceptibility to various PIs. In general, all PIs bound to the MDR proteases with lower binding affinities, caused mainly by a faster dissociation rate. For amprenavir, atazanavir, lopinavir, and tipranavir, the decrease in affinity with MDR proteases resulted in reduced antiviral activity. For darunavir, however, a nearly 1,000-fold decrease in binding affinity did not translate into a weaker antiviral activity; a further decrease in affinity was required for the reduced antiviral effect. These observations provide a mechanistic explanation for darunavir's potent antiviral activity and high genetic barrier to the development of resistance.