Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(2): 1114-1134, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33577069

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The novel coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic had intense social and economic effects. Patients infected with COVID-19 may present with a series of conditions. A considerable number of patients express taste and smell disturbances as a prodromal, coexistent, or as the only manifestation of COVID-19 infection. The objective of the present review is to review the hypothetical mechanisms of action and etiopathogenesis of dysgeusia in COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple scientific databases were explored, including PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane-library, LILACS, Livivo and OpenGrey. All types of articles that discussed the pathogenesis of dysgeusia were included, while articles that described dysgeusia without detail about its mode of action were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 47 articles, with different designs, were included in this review. These articles suggested direct viral neural invasion to olfactory and gustatory nerves, viral cytotoxicity to taste buds, angiotensin II imbalance, augmented pro-inflammatory cytokines, and disturbances in salivary glands and sialic acid. COVID-19 induced-dysgeusia was also associated with systemic diseases, medications, zinc, chemicals, and disinfectants. CONCLUSIONS: The most likely cause of transient dysgeusia in COVID-19 is peripheral neurotropism and direct toxicity to taste buds or olfactory epithelium. Other factors may also play a contributory role in dysgeusia, such as a defect in the quality and quantity of saliva, pro-inflammatory cytokines, angiotensin II accumulation, systemic diseases, hypozincemia, and excessive use of chemicals.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/metabolismo , Disgeusia/etiologia , Disgeusia/metabolismo , Ageusia/diagnóstico , Ageusia/etiologia , Ageusia/metabolismo , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Disgeusia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Transtornos do Olfato/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Olfato/etiologia , Transtornos do Olfato/metabolismo , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/fisiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Olfato/fisiologia , Paladar/fisiologia
2.
J Perinatol ; 37(9): 1028-1031, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28617429

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance and accuracy of the JM-103 transcutaneous bilirubinometer and Bilistick System in measuring total serum bilirubin for the early identification of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed on 126 consecutive term and near-term (⩾36 weeks' gestational age) jaundiced newborns in Cairo University Children Hospital NICU, Egypt. Total serum bilirubin was assayed concurrently by the clinical laboratory and Bilistick System and estimated using the JM-103 transcutaneous bilirubin instrument. Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the agreement between determinations. RESULT: The limits of agreement of the Bilistick System (-5.8 to 3.3 mg dl-1) and JM-103 system (-5.4 to 6.0 mg dl-1) versus the clinical laboratory results were similar. CONCLUSION: The Bilistick System is an accurate alternative to transcutaneous (TcB) determination for early diagnosis and proper management of the neonatal jaundice.


Assuntos
Bilirrubina/sangue , Icterícia Neonatal/sangue , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Egito , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Icterícia Neonatal/diagnóstico , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA