Sex assignment practice in disorders of sexual differentiation: survey results from paediatric endocrinologists in the Arab region.

Background Sex assignment is a major issue in disorders of sexual differentiation (DSD). Not all conditions of DSD have clear recommendations on assignment and timing of surgery. Reports about sex assignment practice and the influence of culture and religion in the Arab region are scarce. Methods A survey questionnaire was distributed to participants in a paediatric endocrinology conference. Four DSD cases were presented. Participants were asked to fill in their answers on sex assignment choice, reasons for the particular assignment, strength of own recommendation and timing of surgery based on their practice. The cases presented were severely virilised XX congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS), severely undervirilised 5α reductase deficiency (5α RD) and XX ovotesticular case. Results Eighty-five endocrinologists participated in the study. Eighty (97.5%) chose a female sex to assign for the XX CAH. For the CAIS, 64 (78%) chose a female sex. Seventy-one (86.5%) voted for a male sex for the XY case of 5α RD. Forty-seven (57%) and 35 (43%) chose a female and a male sex for the ovotesticular case, respectively. The majority indicated that their advice for sex assignment is based on strong recommendations for the CAH, CAIS and 5α RD patients but they were open to the parents' cultural and religious beliefs in their decision of the assignment for the ovotesticular case. Conclusions Practice in the Arab region appears to be in line with the international guidelines in the majority of DSD sex assignment and timing of surgery issues. However, culture and religious beliefs influence the practice in certain circumstances.

Reproducibility of Respondent-Driven Sampling (RDS) in Repeat Surveys of Men Who have Sex with Men, Unguja, Zanzibar.

To assess the reproducibility of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) in obtaining comparable samples across two survey rounds, we conducted integrated bio-behavioral surveillance surveys (IBBSS) using RDS in 2007 and 2011 among men who have sex with men (MSM) on Unguja island in Zanzibar. Differences in the two rounds were assessed by comparing RDS-adjusted population estimates, stratified estimates, and bottleneck plots. Participants in the 2011 survey round were younger (31.4 vs. 9.9% under 19 years old, p < 0.001), more likely to have tested for HIV in the last year (53.7 vs. 10.6%, p < 0.001), and less likely to have injected drugs in the last 3 months (1.0 vs. 23.2%, p < 0.001) compared to participants in the 2007 round. HIV prevalence was 12.3% in 2007 compared to 2.6% in 2011 (p < 0.001). The difference in HIV prevalence persisted after stratifying and adjusting for known differences in the two surveys rounds. Bottleneck plots suggest that recruitment chains were "trapped" in the social networks of MSM who injected drugs to a greater extent in 2007 than in 2011. We conclude that the two rounds of RDS sampled different subsets of the MSM population on Unguja, particularly with respect to inclusion of MSM within the social networks of people who inject drugs. Findings underscore the need to evaluate the reproducibility of RDS in repeated rounds of IBBSS and to develop new sampling methods for key populations at high risk for HIV in order to track the epidemic, develop evidence-based prevention and care programs, and assess their impact.