Correction of Footdrop Due to Multiple Sclerosis Using the STIMuSTEP Implanted Dropped Foot Stimulator.

Background: Footdrop is a significant problem in multiple sclerosis, reducing the safety and efficiency of walking. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can produce dorsiflexion, correcting footdrop. The purpose of this retrospective analysis of clinical study data was to compare the effect of external and implanted FES devices for the correction of footdrop. Methods: External FES was used for a minimum of 6 months before implantation. Walking performance was assessed using 10-m walking speed, 3-minute walking distance, the Physiological Cost Index, and health- and device-related quality of life and device-use questionnaires. Assessments were made before implantation and a mean (SD) of 128 (24) days after surgery, with additional walking speed measurements at 3 years. Results: Twenty-three people with multiple sclerosis received the STIMuSTEP implant. Both devices enabled statistically significant increases in walking speed and walking distance, with a strong trend toward a reduced Physiological Cost Index, indicating that walking required less effort (P = .07). Both devices improved device-related quality of life. Walking speed gain with FES was maintained at 3 years. Three implants failed after falls, and there was one case of neuropraxia. The implant was used more days per week and was quicker to put on each day than the external FES device. Conclusions: The STIMuSTEP implanted dropped foot stimulator is an effective long-term intervention for the correction of footdrop.

Assessing surgical skill using bench station models.

BACKGROUND: The acquisition of surgical skill is one of the essentials of good surgical practice. The training of plastic surgeons is presently unstructured, with few objective measures of surgical skill. The trainee's time to acquire skills may be inadequate because of the shortened time for training with the Calman system. There is also increasing pressure from the government to introduce testing of surgical competency for all surgeons. The authors introduce a series of tasks that allow assessment of technical skill among plastic surgical trainees. METHODS: A range of surgeons with differing surgical skill were tested. They performed three tasks designed to assess their ability to suture skin, take a medium-thickness skin graft, and repair a tendon. The candidates were videotaped during the procedures and scored by four independent observers using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill scoring system. Each candidate was then given an overall competence score. RESULTS: Sixty-five candidates were tested with an experience range from consultant to junior senior health officer. Results showed significant differences down the grades, with consultants performing the tasks with greater competency than their juniors (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The authors have demonstrated a valid and reliable method of objectively measuring the surgical skill of plastic surgical trainees. The authors have shown that consultants perform better than the juniors and that the tasks are easily reproduced. This has implications for future assessment in that these tests may be used as formal assessment programs for testing and teaching trainees throughout their careers.

Technical performance: relation between surgical dexterity and technical knowledge.

Technical performance consists of surgical knowledge, judgment, and dexterity. Although assessment of surgical dexterity is now possible, assessing technical knowledge and its relation to dexterity has not been elucidated. Surgeons of varying experience were recruited to the skills laboratory to undertake three assessments: simple surgical dexterity (at 14 stations scored by motion analysis), an operating room equipment examination, and a novel error analysis. The scores were correlated, and p < 0.05 was deemed to be significant. Thirty surgeons were recruited; and construct validity was exhibited in all areas. Correlations were shown to exist between the two knowledge examinations (Spearman's rho = 0.39). Correlations existed between all dexterity task parameters and the equipment examination, whereas they existed for only 15 of the 28 parameters of the error examination and were always weaker. The stronger correlations between dexterity and instrument and operating room (OR) equipment reflect greater surgical experience and time spent in the OR. The weaker correlations between the error analysis and dexterity suggest that these skills are learned at different times. The identification of common surgical errors should be more formally taught to ensure greater uniformity.

Use of suturing as a measure of technical competence.

There is an ongoing demand for surgeons to demonstrate that they can operate well, maintain their performance, and deliver acceptable results. Currently, surgeons are assessed by a series of subjective and peer-reviewed interviews, but at no stage is the objective assessment of surgical competence measured. The authors have introduced an objective test of suturing skill as one of an array of tests used to assess technical ability. A range of surgeons with differing surgical skill was tested. The candidates were asked to suture a 4-cm wound on a latex skin pad. They were videotaped during the procedure and were scored by four independent observers using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill scoring system. Their movements were also monitored using an electromagnetic tracking system. Forty-three plastic surgeons and 46 general surgeons were divided into four groups, depending on grade, and were assessed. The difference in scores among the plastic surgeons gave a value of p < 0.001, whereas the general surgeons gave a value of p = 0.001. However, when similar grade but different specialties were compared, plastic surgeons scored significantly higher (down to senior house officer [resident year 1-2] level; mean p value = 0.019). Interrater reliability was also high (Cronbach alpha = 0.89). This task has shown that technical ability can be assessed objectively. The task has also been shown to exhibit face, construct, and concurrent validity. This has important implications for the future of surgical training in that it allows one to identify whether the fundamentals of surgical technique have been passed on to the trainee and to monitor their progress continually. It also may be used in revalidation of surgeons.

Measurement of surgical dexterity using motion analysis of simple bench tasks.

The possibility of using quantitative motion analysis for objective assessment of simple surgical dexterity is investigated using the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) with qualitative analysis undertaken by inspection. Bench-top knot tying and suturing skills were performed and examined for the ability to discriminate between surgeons of varying experience. These exercises were found to discriminate significantly between junior and senior surgeons in terms of both time taken and the number of movements required. The relation between time and motion was found to be variable depending on what skill was being undertaken: simple suturing, suturing at depth, or knot tying (1.71 vs. 1.86 vs. 2.36; p = 0.002 for 1 vs. 2; p < 0.001 for others). When the number of movements in a minute (standardized movements per minute) were considered, both groups were found to work at a similar rate, depending on the task, implying that the more experienced surgeon is more economical, performing the same exercise with fewer moves rather than with higher speed. Motion analysis exhibits face and construct validity and is a reliable assessment of simple surgical dexterity. Its use for objective assessment of dexterity and competence should be encouraged.

Laboratory-based validation of a novel suture technique for wound closure.

Wound closure in open surgery is a fundamental skill acquired early during the surgeon's career. Individual modifications are adopted frequently by the more experienced surgeon in an effort to increase efficiency. To date, there has been no objective measurement regarding whether these modifications significantly impact economy of movement or procedure time. The advent of the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) allows standardized, objective evaluation of a novel suture technique for wound closure (study group) developed by one of the senior authors (DBH) and compares the technique to the current method taught by the Royal College of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (control group). Ten surgical registrars underwent both tasks in a standardized manner for five repetitions. Mean total movements and duration of procedure were decreased significantly for the study group (analysis of variance: = 0.018 and = 0.033 respectively) with an economy index (total movements/total time) of 0.79 movements per second for the control group vs. 0.67 for the study group. This study demonstrates ICSAD's usefulness in defining a novel suture technique as a more efficient method of cutaneous closure than the currently advocated technique.

Reducing the morbidity from extravasation injuries.

Extravasation is defined as the leakage of solutions from the vein. This may cause damage to surrounding tissue during intravenous fluid administration. Extravasation has an incidence of 5% of all cytotoxic drug administrations. In the authors' hospital, a protocol has been set up using the dilution flush-out technique. Extravasation packs containing cannulae, normal saline, hyaluronidase, and instructions on how to manage extravasation injuries, accompanied by an audit sheet to assist follow-up, have been introduced to allow the treatment of extravasation at the ward level in an attempt to reduce morbidity from the injury. Between December 1997 and December 1999, 18 adult patients were identified with extravasation injuries after the administration of cytotoxic medication. Seventeen were treated immediately according to the protocol. One, however, was not. Patients were followed-up for 6 months after injury. The 17 patients treated immediately needed no further surgical intervention, whereas the 1 patient not treated needed a split skin graft to cover the defect. The authors recommend the placement of "extravasation packs" on all wards where cytotoxic drugs are prescribed and that all staff members are familiar with this regime. These steps help to reduce the morbidity of a potentially damaging injury.