Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(2): 265-269, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35320174

RESUMO

Objective: To compare the frequency of seroma formation in laparoscopic para-umbilical hernia repair with and without primary closure of defect. METHODS: The randomised parallel group study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan, from October 1, 2019, to May 31, 2020, and comprised patients of both genders age 25-65 years diagnosed as a case of para-umbilical hernia. The patients were randomised into group A which subsequently had laparoscopic primary repair of defect with non-absorbable suture prior to mesh placement, and group B which had laparoscopic repair without primary closure of the defect. Case sheets of patients were prepared for age, gender, duration of disease, operating time, body mass index and the presence or absence of seroma formation. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 35(35%) were males and 65(65%) were females with male-to-female ratio of 1:1.9, and an overall mean age of 43.92±10.77 years. Both groups had 50(50%) patients each. Post-operative seroma formation was noted in 1(2%) group A patient and 12(24%) group B patients (p=0.001). Conclusion: Primary closure of the fascial defect in laparoscopic para-umbilical hernia repair resulted in decreased frequency of post-operative seroma formation.


Assuntos
Hérnia Umbilical , Laparoscopia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hérnia Umbilical/epidemiologia , Hérnia Umbilical/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seroma/epidemiologia , Seroma/etiologia , Telas Cirúrgicas
2.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 70(9): 1533-1537, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33040103

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The rationale of the study was to depict the safest method of extracting gallbladder after laparoscopic cholecystectomy to decrease the frequency of wound infection. The objective of the study was to compare the frequency of port site wound infection after gallbladder removal with or without retrieval bag in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: The study design was Randomized Parallel group design conductedin the Department of Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur. A total of 254 patients of both gender age range 25-60 years, diagnosed as a case of cholelithiasis by ultrasonography were included. Case sheet of patients were prepared for age, gender, duration of cholelithiasis, operating time and presence or absence of wound infection. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 40.77 ± 10.95 years. Out of 254 patients, 98 (38.58%) were males and 156 (61.42%) were females with male to female ratio of 1:2.5. Patients were divided in two groups A and B and the frequency of patients having port site wound infection in group A was 1(0.4%) whereas in group B was 14(5.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study concluded that the use of retrieval bag to remove gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy resulted in decreased frequency of port site wound infection. The insignificant association of port site wound infection with different age groups, gender categories and with duration of cholelithiasis was revealed. Moreover wound infection proved significantly associated with both categories with operating time.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Doenças Transmissíveis , Adulto , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagem , Vesícula Biliar/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos de Pesquisa , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA