Imiquimod treatment of vulvar melanoma in situ invading the urethra.

The primary treatment of both in situ and invasive vulvar melanoma is wide local excision of the primary neoplasm. However, this can be a surgical challenge for size, multifocal presentation with proximity to urethra or anus and tendency for local recurrence. The data on adjuvant therapy for vulvar MIS is very limited. A 69-year-old patient with melanoma of the vulva underwent a simple vulvectomy with positive margins in peri-clitoral area, followed by modified radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinofemoral sentinel lymph node dissection with negative margins. She was later diagnosed with MIS of the vulva on different locations and had multiple wide local excisions over several years. One lesion was close to the urethra and a complete excision was difficult. Topical imiquimod × 16 weeks (5% cream) was given. The regimen was augmented from 3 to 5 times weekly. Complete resolution was found at 16 weeks and patient was disease free for 4 years. Recently however, a vaginal melanoma was detected. Imiquimod appeared to be beneficial in the treatment of melanoma in situ of the vulva/ vagina when surgical options were not feasible producing local control of disease with the remaining risk for local and distant metastasis. Metastasis can appear years later, therefore long-term follow-up of patients treated with topical imiquimod is needed.

The impact of an enhanced recovery program (ERP) on the costs of colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERPs) benefit patients but their effects on healthcare costs remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the costs associated with a colorectal ERP in a large academic health system. METHODS: Patients who underwent colorectal surgery from 2012 to 2014 (pre-ERP) and 2015-2017 (ERP) were propensity score matched based on patient and operative-level characteristics. Primary outcomes were median variable, fixed, and total costs. Secondary outcomes included length-of-stay (LOS), readmissions, and postoperative complications (POCs). RESULTS: 616 surgical cases were included. Patient and operative-level characteristics were similar between the cohorts. Variable costs were $1028 less with ERP. ERP showed savings in nursing, surgery, anesthesiology, pharmacy, and laboratory costs, but had higher fixed costs. Total costs between the two groups were similar. ERP patients had significantly shorter LOS (-1 day, p < 0.01), but similar 30-day readmission rates and overall POCs. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ERP for colorectal surgery was associated with lower variable costs compared to pre-ERP.