Incidence of mechanical thrombectomy among stroke patients brought directly to a comprehensive stroke center versus transfer from a primary stroke center in upstate New York.

BACKGROUND: Faster time to treatment for stroke is associated with improved outcomes. In cases of large vessel occlusion (LVO), standard of care treatment with thrombectomy can only be provided at a comprehensive stroke center (CSC). We examine the outcomes of patients who are directly brought to our center, a CSC, compared to those seen at a primary stroke center (PSC) and then transferred. METHODS: Patients with LVO presenting to our center from 1/1/2019 to 12/31/2019 were included. Cohorts of patients presenting first to a PSC and presenting first to a CSC were compared. Demographics and outcome metrics (Discharge Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and National Institute of Health Stroke Severity Scale (NIHSS) scores) were obtained for all LVO patients. Imaging was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 864 stroke admissions, 346 had LVO (40%) with 183 (53%) transferring from a PSC and 163 (47%) presenting directly. Similar percentages of each cohort were taken for thrombectomy (25.1% transfer and 31.3% direct). However, as distance between PSC and CSC increased, likelihood of thrombectomy decreased. Transfer patients were more likely to be excluded from thrombectomy secondary to a large volume of complete stroke (p = 0.0001). Direct presenters had lower discharge mRS scores than transfer patients (p < 0.01), however, severity of stroke upon admission was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Patients transferred from a PSC were more likely to have a worse outcome at time of discharge than those presenting directly to our center. Large volume of completed stroke was a frequent reason for exclusion from thrombectomy. Optimizing stroke protocols to CSC in cases of LVOs may result in better outcomes.

MR thermometry imaging for low intensity focused ultrasound modulation of spinal nervous tissue.

OBJECTIVES: Previously in rodent and swine models, we have shown that external low intensity focused ultrasound (liFUS) can be used to modulate pain responses. To ensure no adverse heating events occur with liFUS modulation in a non-invasive manner, we perform initial work in swine to show that magnetic resonance thermometry imaging (MRTI) is capable of measuring <2.0 °C changes at the L5 DRG. Further, we show that our device can be constructed in an MR-compatible fashion to minimize artifact. METHODS: Three MRTI techniques (referenceless, corrected proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS), and PRFS) were applied to assess accuracy of detecting thermal changes at the L5 DRG in unheated euthanized swine. A region of interest (ROI) that includes the L5 DRG was delineated, within which MRTI temperature changes were spatially averaged (ground truth 0 °C). In separate experiments with phantoms, B0 field-inhomogeneity, RF transmit (B1+) and fast gradient echo (fSPGR) magnitude images were acquired to downselect liFUS device materials that produce the least MRI artifacts. RESULTS: Referenceless, corrected PRFS, and PRFS MRTI resulted in temperature measurements of 0.8 ± 1.1 °C, 1.1 ± 1.3 °C and 5.2 ± 5 °C, respectively. Both materials caused B0 perturbation but minimal B1+ and MRTI artifacts. The presence of imaging artifacts did not preclude thermal imaging of the region. SIGNIFICANCE: We provide preliminary data suggesting that referenceless MRTI can adequately detect small thermal changes at the DRG that may occur with neuromodulation, which is one of the first steps in creating a table of safe parameters for liFUS therapy in humans.

Perceptions of pain in aging females undergoing spinal cord stimulation.

Aim: Effects of age and sex on chronic pain outcomes following spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have not yet been assessed. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1 year outcomes from a database of patients receiving thoracic SCS. Subjects were divided into four cohorts: pre-menopausal and post-menopausal females, and aged-matched males. Improvement using the numerical rating scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), McGill Pain Questionnaire and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was assessed. Results: Older females were notably different from males and females under 60 as they had greater improvements in ODI, BDI and PCS. Further, females ≥60 had greater improvement in PCS compared with males ≥60. Conclusion: Our findings suggest greater improvement with 1 year SCS treatment in post-menopausal females, compared with age-matched males.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for chronic pain that does not respond to other therapies. It is well recognized that men and women differ in how they perceive pain and how they respond to pain treatments. However, whether women who are over 60 years old and thus presumed to be menopausal respond differently to SCS has not been evaluated. We looked at our database which collected outcomes related to pain, measured before patients had SCS and 1 year after SCS. We found that women over 60 responded better to SCS treatment. They experienced significantly greater improvements in the disability, depression and catastrophizing associated with their pain than did women under 60. Further SCS resulted in more improvements in catastrophizing in women over 60 than in men over 60. Taken together, our hope is that these data help physicians to determine the best patients for SCS and to counsel their patients appropriately. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to show the impact of sex-specific aging on response to spinal cord stimulation. While we used age as a surrogate for menopause, menopausal status should be documented in the future to confirm that it effects response.

A Pilot Study Comparing Algorithmic Adaptive Conventional Stimulation with High-Dose Stimulation in Chronic Pain Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation is an effective method of treatment for chronic pain. We previously showed that programming using accelerometry was advantageous for paresthesia-based stimulation. However, programming can be labor intensive. OBJECTIVE: Here we focus on standardized programming for both accelerometer-based paresthesia-induced programming (termed "shuffle") and high-dose (HD) subthreshold programming with stimulation delivered over the T9-10 interspace. METHODS: In this prospective cross-over study, patients received 4 weeks of shuffle programming and 4 weeks of HD programming in a randomized order. In both intervals, contacts overlying T9-10 were programmed. Pain scales with measurements of activity and sleep were collected at the end of each study arm and compared with preoperative baseline scores. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled, with 10 patients completing this study. Compared with baseline, during the HD study period, significant improvements were seen in worst pain of week (P = 0.03) and current pain (P = 0.04) as rated on Numeric Rating Scale scores and walking on the Activity Test (P = 0.012). No difference was seen from baseline compared with shuffle stimulation or in shuffle stimulation compared with HD stimulation. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, we demonstrated that HD stimulation at T9-10 is superior to algorithmic programming of paresthesia-based stimulation. These results compared with our previous work with shuffle suggest that paresthesia-based stimulation may necessitate stimulation of additional contact locations and additional programming to optimize. This algorithmic programming of paresthesia-based stimulation continues to warrant exploration.

Botulinum Toxin as an Effective Treatment for Trigeminal Neuralgia in Surgical Practices.

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a common cause of craniofacial pain with many medical and surgical therapies, all of which are imperfect. We examine the use of botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) as an intermediary approach in surgical practices. METHODS: We retrospectively identified TN patients seen by both pain neurology and neurosurgery at our center. Demographics were collected. Pain intensity was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) and compared from baseline to after BTX-A treatment via paired t test. Responder status was assessed, and success of BTX-A was determined for each cohort. Doses of common medications were compared between baseline visit and the most recent BTX-A administration visit. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent BTX-A therapy for TN, 24 (77%) female and 7 (23%) male. Mean age was 62.5 ± 3.1 years and 29 (94%) identified as white. When divided into cohorts according to indication, 11 (35%) failed prior TN surgery, 9 (29%) either declined surgery or were poor surgical candidates, 4 (13%) had multiple sclerosis, 4 (13%) had trigeminal neuropathic pain, and 3 (10%) had atypical TN with pain in additional dermatomes outside the trigeminal distribution. Significant reductions in NRS from baseline to following initial BTX-A treatment were seen in the declined/high risk for surgery (p = 0.004) and those who failed prior TN surgery (p = 0.035) groups. No significant variation in demographics was found between any two groups (p > 0.05 for all). Finally, there was no significant reduction in total daily dose of gabapentin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, baclofen, or lamotrigine in BTX-A responders (p > 0.05 for all). DISCUSSION: Indication is an important predictor for BTX-A, with classical TN patients exhibiting the highest response rates. This research highlights the viability of BTX-A as an important tool in the arsenal of providers seeking to treat TN in a minimally invasive manner.

High-Resolution Spinal Motor Mapping Using Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Pain.

BACKGROUND: High-resolution spinal cord stimulation (HR-SCS) paddle can stimulate medial-dorsal columns and extend stimulation coverage to the laterally positioned spinal targets. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the medio-lateral selectivity of an HR-SCS paddle in patients with chronic pain. METHODS: During standard-of-care spinal cord stimulation (SCS) placement, epidurally evoked electromyography and antidromic dorsal column-evoked potentials were recorded in 12 subjects using an HR-SCS paddle with 8 medio-lateral sites spanning the full epidural width at thoracic T9-12 and a commercial paddle consecutively. RESULTS: Recruitment maps were aligned with respect to physiological midline which was overlapping with anatomic midline in 10 of 11 cases. Overlapping contacts between the HR-SCS and commercial paddles exhibited similar patterns while HR-SCS demonstrated higher precision targeting of certain dermatomes. Spinal motor maps showed that the lateral contacts triggered stronger responses in medial gastrocnemius, adductor magnus, and tibialis anterior while the medial contacts triggered stronger responses in gluteus maximus and adductor hallucis. The time-locked popliteal fossa responses indicated ipsilateral activation by HR-SCS at the lateral contacts and bilateral activation at the medial contacts with stronger ipsilateral responses. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to perform high-resolution medio-lateral SCS mapping in patients with chronic pain. These results show promise that HR-SCS may provide additional ipsilateral recruitment within the extremities which improve targeting of focal pain in the lower extremities. Furthermore, this study supports the functional use of intraoperative neuromonitoring as a decision tool to determine physiological midline in thoracic SCS surgeries and provides a full methodological framework.

Mindfulness Meditation in the Treatment of Chronic Pain.

Chronic pain is a leading cause of disability in the United States. Limited efficacy associated with pharmacologic management and surgical interventions in refractory patients has led to further exploration of cognitive and behavioral interventions as both an adjunctive and primary therapeutic modality. Mindfulness-based meditation has shown to be effective in reducing pain in randomized studies of chronic pain patients as well as models of experimentally induced pain in healthy participants. These studies have revealed specific neural mechanisms which may explain both short-term and sustained pain relief associated with mindfulness-based interventions.

Development of Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict Treatment Response to Spinal Cord Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Despite spinal cord stimulation's (SCS) proven efficacy, failure rates are high with no clear understanding of which patients benefit long term. Currently, patient selection for SCS is based on the subjective experience of the implanting physician. OBJECTIVE: To develop machine learning (ML)-based predictive models of long-term SCS response. METHODS: A combined unsupervised (clustering) and supervised (classification) ML technique was applied on a prospectively collected cohort of 151 patients, which included 31 features. Clusters identified using unsupervised K-means clustering were fitted with individualized predictive models of logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost. RESULTS: Two distinct clusters were found, and patients in the cohorts significantly differed in age, duration of chronic pain, preoperative numeric rating scale, and preoperative pain catastrophizing scale scores. Using the 10 most influential features, logistic regression predictive models with a nested cross-validation demonstrated the highest overall performance with the area under the curve of 0.757 and 0.708 for each respective cluster. CONCLUSION: This combined unsupervised-supervised learning approach yielded high predictive performance, suggesting that advanced ML-derived approaches have potential to be used as a functional clinical tool to improve long-term SCS outcomes. Further studies are needed for optimization and external validation of these models.

Association of Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain and Psoas Measurements Based on Size of Iliopsoas Muscles.

INTRODUCTION: Patients experience variable long-term improvement in chronic back pain despite successful spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trials. Iliopsoas (IP) size has been shown to differ between patients with low back pain and healthy controls. In this study, we examine whether the IP muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) is associated with SCS outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined patients for whom we had lumbar MRIs 6.3 years prior to SCS and baseline and one-year outcome data. Percent change from baseline to one year was calculated for Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Correlations between IP muscle CSA, ratio of iliopsoas muscle size to the vertebral body area (P/VBA), and the ratio of iliopsoas muscle size to BMI (P/BMI) were examined. Sex differences were considered. RESULTS: A total of 73 subjects were included in this study, including 30 females and 43 males. Males had significantly larger IP (males 15.70 ± 0.58, females 9.72 ± 0.43; p < 0.001), P/VBA (males 1.00 ± 0.04, females 0.76 ± 0.03; p < 0.001), and P/BMI ratio (males 0.51 ± 0.02, females 0.32 ± 0.01; p < 0.001) than females. In females, P/VBA predicted NRS worst pain scores (ß = 0.82, p = 0.004, r2 = 0.55) and BDI (ß = 0.59, p = 0.02, r2 = 0.24). In males, P/BMI was a significant predictor of BDI outcome scores (ß = 0.45, p = 0.03, r2 = 0.16). Males who had more muscle mass measured by iliopsoas size had more depression as measured using BDI (p = 0.03, r = 0.61). Females with less muscle mass measured by P/VBA also experienced more depression (p = 0.02, r = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that psoas measurements correlated with various pain outcomes specifically. P/VBA was most predictive in females and P/BMI in males. Depression correlated with P/BMI, reinforcing the complex relationship between depression and constant chronic pain. Tertile analyses further showed a relationship between iliopsoas CSA and depression in males and females. We provide preliminary data of sex-specific psoas measurements as a risk factor for worse SCS outcomes.

Age as an Independent Predictor of Adult Spinal Cord Stimulation Pain Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an efficacious chronic pain treatment most commonly used in middle-aged patients. Results from previous studies that investigated SCS' effects in older patient populations have been equivocal. We examine whether SCS outcomes correlate with age. METHODS: We retrospectively examined prospectively collected outcomes from 189 patients who underwent SCS at Albany Medical Center between 2012 and 2020. The patients completed the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The mean percent change in each outcome was determined and compared via a regression analysis to determine relationships between patient age and each respective outcome metrics. Demographics were compared between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older via χ2 tests. RESULTS: All subjects demonstrated the expected improvement on NRS, BDI, PCS, and MPQ from baseline to 1-year follow-up, with several demonstrating statistically significant changes: NRS-worst pain (18.66%, p < 0.001), NRS-least pain (26.9%, p < 0.001), NRS-average pain (26.9%, p < 0.01), NRS-current pain (26.4%, p < 0.001), ODI (19.6%, p < 0.001), PCS (29.8%, p < 0.001), and MPQ (29.4%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older based on lead type (p = 0.454). Six patients (3.1%) had lead migration, one of whom was 65 or older. Regression analysis revealed improvements in MPQ-sensory and MPQ-affective scores as age increased (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.09; p = 0.046, R2 = 0.05, respectively). Age did not correlate with NRS, ODI, BDI, or PCS. Diagnosis, spinal level of SCS, and lead type were not found to influence any respective outcome measure based on covariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest study where age was correlated to specific pain, depression, and disability outcomes following SCS. We provide evidence that SCS outcomes are equivalent, or better, in older patients following SCS. Based on these findings, SCS is a viable option for treatment of chronic pain in elderly patient populations.

Preoperative evaluation of coagulation status in neuromodulation patients.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of hemorrhage in patients who undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is between 0.5% and 2.5%. Coagulation status is one of the factors that can predispose patients to the development of these complications. As a routine part of preoperative assessment, the authors obtain prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and platelet count. However, insurers often cover only PT/PTT laboratory tests if the patient is receiving warfarin/heparin. The authors aimed to examine their experience with abnormal coagulation parameters in patients who underwent neuromodulation. METHODS: Patients who underwent neuromodulation (SCS, DBS, or intrathecal pump implantation) over a 9-year period and had preoperative laboratory values available were included. The authors determined abnormal values on the basis of a clinical protocol utilized at their practice, which combined the normal ranges of the laboratory tests and clinical relevance. This protocol had cutoff values of 12 seconds and 39 seconds for PT and PTT, respectively, and < 120,000 platelets/µl. The authors identified risk factors for these abnormalities and described interventions. RESULTS: Of the 1767 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 136 had abnormal preoperative laboratory values. Five of these 136 patients had values that were misclassified as abnormal because they were within the normal ranges at the outside facility where they were tested. Fifty-one patients had laboratory values outside the ranges of our protocol, but the surgeons reviewed and approved these patients without further intervention. Of the remaining 80 patients, 8 had known coagulopathies and 24 were receiving warfarin/heparin. The remaining 48 patients were receiving other anticoagulant/antiplatelet medications. These included apixaban/rivaroxaban/dabigatran anticoagulants (n = 22; mean ± SD PT 13.7 ± 2.5 seconds) and aspirin/clopidogrel/other antiplatelet medications (n = 26; mean ± SD PT 14.4 ± 5.8 seconds). Eight new coagulopathies were identified and further investigated with hematological analysis. CONCLUSIONS: New anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications are not monitored with PT/PTT, but they affect coagulation status and laboratory values. Although platelet function tests aid in a subset of medications, it is more difficult to assess the coagulation status of patients receiving novel anticoagulants. PT/PTT may provide value preoperatively.

Can dogs and cats really help our spinal cord stimulation patients?

OBJECTIVES: Pet ownership has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality in several aspects of health but has not been studied in chronic pain patients. We evaluate whether subjects who underwent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and own a pet have improved outcomes compared to non-pet owners. METHODS: After obtaining IRB approval, we re-contacted 38 subjects who underwent SCS surgery with preoperative and 1-year postoperative data on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Pain Catastrophizing scale (PCS). We examined influence of pets and pet ownership-specific behaviors on improvement in SCS outcomes. RESULTS: Patients included 24 males/14 females with a mean age of 59.9 ± 11.5 years. At mean follow-up of 12.2 months (range 10-14), there were improvements in NRS, ODI, BDI, PCS and MPQ. Twenty subjects owned pets and 18 did not; all believed pet ownership could improve health. Pet owners improved more on NRS-right now (p = 0.05) and BDI (p = 0.05), and were more satisfied with SCS (p = 0.04). No significant improvement was seen in ODI, MPQ, or PCS. However, PCS did improve in pet owners who exercised their pet (PCS-total, p < 0.01; PCS-helplessness, p < 0.01; PCS-rumination, p = 0.05; PCS-magnification, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We provide preliminary evidence that pet ownership is associated with improved pain, depression and SCS satisfaction. Exercising with a pet also appears to be beneficial in limiting pain catastrophizing. Pets show promise as a novel means to improve patient SCS outcomes.

Treatment Strategies for Generator Pocket Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Generator site pain is a relatively common phenomenon in patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation (SCS) that complicates management and effective pain relief. This pain may be managed conservatively, with repositioning of the battery and, in some cases, with explant. Here we explore our experience with management of generator site pain ("pocket pain") in a large single-center study. METHODS: All SCS permanent implants and implantable pulse generator (IPG) placements over 9 years were reviewed. Of 785 cases, we identified 43 patients with pocket pain (5.5%). Demographics and treatments of the pocket pain cohort were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age (± SEM) of the pocket pain cohort was 46.86 ± 1.06, and there were 10/33 males/females. Females were overrepresented in pocket pain cohort (76.7%) when compared with the total SCS cohort (59.0%) (X2 = 5.93, P = 0.015). Diagnosis included failed back surgery syndrome (51.2%), complex regional pain syndrome (23.3%), and chronic neuropathic pain (25.5%). No patients improved with conservative therapy. All patients either went on to revision (n = 23) or explant (n = 20). Time from initial surgery to development of pocket pain was 7.5 months (range: 0.3-88) and from pocket pain to revision surgery was 4.5 months (range: 0.4-26). In addition, significantly more pocket pain patients (65.1%) had workers' compensation (WC) insurance compared with patients without pocket pain (24.9%) (X2 = 33.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our institutional experience, pocket pain was inadequately managed with conservative treatments. Being female and having SCS filed under WC increased risk of pocket pain. Future work will explore the nuances in device placement based on body shape and manual activity responsibilities.

Neuromodulation for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Single-Institution Experience With a Collaborative Team.

BACKGROUND: Secondary to the complex care, involved specialty providers, and various etiologies, chronic pelvic pain patients do not receive holistic care. OBJECTIVE: To compare our general and neuromodulation cohorts based on referrals, diagnosis, and therapy and describe our neuromodulation patients. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was established at our center. The intake coordinator assessed demographics and facilitated care of enrolled patients. Outcomes were compared using minimal clinical important difference of current Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) between patients with neuropathic pain who received neuromodulation and those who did not. The neuromodulation cohort completed outcome metrics at baseline and recent follow-up, including NRS score (best, worst, and current), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. RESULTS: Over 7 yr, 233 patients were referred to our consortium and 153 were enrolled. A total of 55 patients had neuropathic pain and 44 of those were managed medically. Eleven underwent neuromodulation. A total of 45.5% patients of the neuromodulation cohort were classified as responders by minimal clinically important difference compared to 26.6% responders in the control cohort at most recent follow-up (median 25 and 33 mo, respectively). Outcome measures revealed improvement in NRS at worst (P = .007) and best (P = .025), ODI (P = .014), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale Rumination (P = .043). CONCLUSION: Eleven percent of patients were offered neuromodulation. There were more responders in the neuromodulation cohort than the conservatively managed neuropathic pain cohort. Neuromodulation patients showed significant improvement at 29 mo in NRS best and worst pain, disability, and rumination. We share our algorithm for patient management.

Recommendations for Neuromodulation in Diabetic Neuropathic Pain.

Over 50% of the 34 million people who suffer from diabetes mellitus (DM) are affected by diabetic neuropathy. Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) impacts 40-50% of that group (8.5 million patients) and is associated with a significant source of disability and economic burden. Though new neuromodulation options have been successful in recent clinical trials (NCT03228420), still there are many barriers that restrict patients from access to these therapies. We seek to examine our tertiary care center (Albany Medical Center, NY, USA) experience with PDN management by leveraging our clinical database to assess patient referral patterns and utilization of neuromodulation. We identified all patients with a diagnosis of diabetes type 1 (CODE: E10.xx) or diabetes type 2 (CODE: E11.xx) AND neuralgia/neuropathic pain (CODE: M79.2) or neuropathy (CODE: G90.09) or chronic pain (CODE: G89.4) or limb pain (CODE: M79.6) OR diabetic neuropathy (CODE: E11.4) who saw endocrinology, neurology, and/or neurosurgery from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. We then determined which patients had received pain medications and/or neuromodulation to divide the cohort into three groups: no treatment, conservative treatment, and neuromodulation treatment. The cohorts were compared with chi-square or one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons to analyze the differences. A total of 2,635 PDN patients were identified, of which 700 received no treatment for PDN, 1,906 received medication(s), and 29 received neuromodulation (intrathecal therapy, spinal cord stimulation, or dorsal root ganglion stimulation). The patients who received pain medications for PDN visited neurology more often than the pain specialists. Of the patients that received neuromodulation, 24 had seen neurology, 6 neurology pain, and 3 anesthesia pain. They averaged 2.78 pain medications prior to implant. Approximately 41% of the patients in the conservative management group were prescribed three or more medications. Of the 1,935 treated patients, only 1.5% of the patients received neuromodulation. The patients on three or more pain medications without symptomatic relief may be potential candidates for neuromodulation. An opportunity, therefore, exists to educate providers on the benefits of neuromodulation procedures.

Spinal Cord Stimulation as Treatment for Cancer and Chemotherapy-Induced Pain.

Neuropathic pain is a rampant disease exacting a significant toll on patients, providers, and health care systems around the globe. Neuromodulation has been successfully employed to treat many indications including failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), phantom limb pain (PLP), radiculopathies, and intractable pelvic pain, among many others. Recent studies have also demonstrated efficacy for cancer-related pain and chemotherapy induced neuropathy with these techniques. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the most commonly employed technique and involves implantation of percutaneous or paddle leads targeting the dorsal columns of the spinal cord with the goal of disrupting the pain signals traveling to the brain. Tonic, high frequency, and burst waveforms have all been shown to reduce pain and disability in chronic pain patients. Closed-loop SCS systems that automatically adjust stimulation parameters based on feedback (such as evoked compound action potentials) are becoming increasingly used to help ease the burden placed on patients to adjust their programming to their pain and position. Additionally, dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is a newer technique that allows for dermatomal coverage especially in patients with pain in up to two dermatomes. Regardless of the technique chosen, neuromodulation has been shown to be cost-effective and efficacious and should be given full consideration in patients with chronic pain conditions.

The Impact of Multidisciplinary Conferences on Healthcare Utilization in Chronic Pain Patients.

Approximately 100 million adults in the United States have chronic pain, though only a subset utilizes the vast majority of healthcare resources. Multidisciplinary care has been shown to improve outcomes in a variety of clinical conditions. There is concern that multidisciplinary care of chronic pain patients may overwhelm existing resources and increase healthcare utilization due to the volume of patients and the complexity of care. We report our findings on the use of multidisciplinary conferences (MDC) to facilitate care for the most complex patients seen at our tertiary center. Thirty-two of nearly 2,000 patients seen per year were discussed at the MDC, making up the top 2% of complex patients in our practice. We evaluated patients' numeric rating score (NRS) of pain, medication use, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and visits to pain specialists prior to their enrollment in MDC and 1 year later. Matched samples were compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Patients' NRS scores significantly decreased from 7.64 to 5.54 after inclusion in MDC (p < 0.001). A significant decrease in clinic visits (p < 0.001) and healthcare utilization (p < 0.05) was also observed. Opioid and non-opioid prescriptions did not change significantly (p = 0.43). 83% of providers agreed that MDC improved patient care. While previous studies have shown the effect of multi-disciplinary care, we show notable improvements with a team established around a once-a-month MDC.

Multidisciplinary Firms and the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Case Study of Low Back Pain.

Sixteen million people suffer with chronic low back pain and related healthcare expenditures can be as high as $USD 635 billion. Current pain treatments help a significant number of acute pain patients, allowing them to obtain various treatments and then "exit the market for pain services" quickly. However, chronic patients remain in pain and need multiple, varying treatments over time. Often, a single pain provider does not oversee their care. Here, we analyze the current pain market and suggest ways to establish a new treatment paradigm. We posit that more cost effective treatment and better pain relief can be achieved with multi-disciplinary care with a provider team overseeing care.

Pain and Interoceptive Awareness Outcomes of Chronic Pain Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: Meditation has been shown to improve outcomes for chronic pain by increasing patients' awareness of their own bodies. Some patients have an innate ability to leverage their mind-body connection, and this interoceptive awareness may aid them in garnering pain relief. We explored whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) patients with greater innate awareness had better outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We contacted 30 thoracic SCS patients with baseline and postoperative pain, psychological, and disability outcomes to complete the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) survey. MAIA distinguishes between beneficial and maladaptive aspects of the perception of body sensations via six positive subscales (noticing, attention regulation, emotional awareness, self-regulation, body listening, and trusting) and two negative subscales (not distracting, not worrying). MAIA subscales and positive/negative groups were correlated with percentage change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). RESULTS: Patients included 14 males/16 females with a mean age of 58. At a mean follow-up of 14.13 months (range 6-26), NRS, ODI, BDI, PCS, and MPQ showed improvements. Positive traits correlated with improvements in pain (MAIA-self regulation with NRS-worst [p = 0.018], NRS-least [p = 0.042], NRS-average [p = 0.006], NRS-current [p = 0.001]; MAIA-body listening with MPQ-total [p = 0.016] and MPQ-sensory [p = 0.026]). Improvement in PCS-total was associated with higher scores in noticing (p = 0.002), attention regulation (p = 0.017), emotional awareness (p = 0.039), and trusting (p = 0.047). PCS-rumination correlated with MAIA-positive total (p = 0.012). In contrast, better attention regulation signified less improvement in ODI (p = 0.043) and MPQ affective (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Higher interoceptive awareness in SCS patients correlated with greater improvement following the procedure, particularly with regards to pain relief and pain catastrophizing. These findings suggest that patients with better mind-body connections may achieve greater pain relief following SCS in this patient population, thereby aiding providers in determining who may benefit from this intervention.