Vaccination counseling with and without excipient skin testing in patients with suspected allergic reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and patients with atopy.

Background: Allergic reactions have been reported with mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 prevention. Patients perceived to be at higher risk for a reaction may be referred to an allergist, although evaluation strategies may differ between allergists. Objective: Our aim was to determine outcomes of COVID-19 vaccinations in patients evaluated by an allergist using different approaches. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case series evaluation of 98 patients seen at the University of Michigan Allergy Clinic for concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Of these 98 patients, 34 underwent skin testing with polyethylene glycol (PEG) 2000 with or without PEG 3350/polysorbate 80 testing. Results: Of the 34 patients on whom skin testing was performed, 16 underwent testing before vaccination and 18 underwent testing after a reported vaccine-related event. One patient had a positive skin testing result in response to PEG 3350 following a vaccination reaction and natural infection and was advised against a second dose. One patient with a significant history concerning of anaphylaxis in response to PEG had positive results of testing to identify allergy to PEG 2000, PEG 3350, and polysorbate 80 and was advised against vaccination. Of the 98 patients, 63 (64%) tolerated COVID-19 vaccination without complication after evaluation by an allergist. Conclusion: No significant differences were found between vaccination counseling with and without skin testing to excipients. Patients who presented before the first dose of vaccination were more likely to proceed with COVID-19 vaccination and tolerate vaccination without complication.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: Immune mechanisms and therapeutic targets.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an emerging chronic inflammatory disease of the oesophagus and is clinically characterized by upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms including dysphagia and esophageal food impaction. Histopathologic manifestations, which include intraepithelial eosinophilic inflammation and alterations of the esophageal squamous epithelium, such as basal zone hyperplasia (BZH) and dilated intercellular spaces (DIS), are thought to contribute to esophageal dysfunction and disease symptoms. Corroborative clinical and discovery science-based studies have established that EoE is characterized by an underlying allergic inflammatory response, in part, related to the IL-13/CCL26/eosinophil axis driving dysregulation of several key epithelial barrier and proliferative regulatory genes including kallikrein (KLK) serine proteases, calpain 14 (CAPN14) and anoctamin 1 (ANO1). The contribution of these inflammatory and proliferative processes to the clinical and histological manifestations of disease are not fully elucidated. Herein, we discuss the immune molecules and cells that are thought to underlie the clinical and pathologic manifestations of EoE and the emerging therapeutics targeting these processes for the treatment of EoE.

Prevalence of mastocytosis and Hymenoptera venom allergy in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Mastocytosis is a risk factor for Hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis (HVA). Current guidelines recommend measuring tryptase in patients with HVA and that those with mastocytosis pursue lifelong venom immunotherapy (VIT). Available data on HVA and mastocytosis largely derive from European single-center studies, and the prevalence of HVA with and without mastocytosis in the United States is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the prevalence of HVA and mastocytosis in the United States using an insurance claims database and evaluate the impact of mastocytosis on VIT in patients with HVA in a US cohort. METHODS: The IBM Watson Database, consisting of insurance claims from approximately 27 million US patients in 2018, was queried to identify patients with HVA and/or mastocytosis. Furthermore, a retrospective study of 161 patients undergoing VIT between 2015 and 2018 at the University of Michigan was conducted. RESULTS: In the IBM Watson Database, the prevalence of HVA was 167 per 100,000 (0.167%) and the prevalence of mastocytosis 10 per 100,000 (0.010%) overall and 97 per 100,000 (0.097%) among those with HVA. Mastocytosis showed a 9.7-fold increase among patients with HVA versus the general population. In the U-M cohort, 2.6% of patients with VIT had mastocytosis. Tryptase level did not correlate with venom reaction severity but was higher in patients with systemic VIT reactions. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a lower US HVA prevalence than previously reported. Mastocytosis was more common in US patients with HVA, though at lower rates than previously reported. In patients with VIT there was no correlation between tryptase level and reaction severity.

Mast Cell Activation: When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts.

Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a heterogeneous and rare disorder with episodic and severe activation of mast cells. Because symptoms of mast cell activation are nonspecific, it is important to base the diagnosis on best available clinical and scientific evidence, and not make it one of exclusion. MCAS, much like the mast cell itself, as a whole is greater than the sum of its proposed diagnostic criteria. When each component is considered in isolation, criteria can seem nonspecific, and thus, a broad constellation of symptoms can be attributed to MCAS when they may be due to other disease processes.

Nasal IgE production in allergic rhinitis: Impact of rhinovirus infection.

BACKGROUND: Rhinovirus (RV) infections exacerbate asthma in part by enhancing an allergic state, and these exacerbations can be mitigated via administration of anti-IgE. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the presence of local IgE production in the nose of allergic and non-allergic subjects and assessed whether this was enhanced by RV. METHODS: Local production of specific IgE was determined by comparing ratios of specific to total IgE concentrations between nasal and serum samples. Our initial studies were performed in subjects presenting to the emergency department for allergic and non-allergic respiratory complaints. Subsequently, we investigated influences of experimental RV infection on nasal sIgE production in an allergic cohort. RESULTS: We found evidence of local sIgE production to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in 30.3% and to Blomia tropicalis in 14.6% of allergic subjects. None of the non-allergic subjects demonstrated local IgE. Subjects with active RV infection were more than twice as likely to have local sIgE (45% vs 14%), and subjects with local sIgE being produced were ~3 times more likely to be having an asthma exacerbation. Experimental RV infection was able to induce local sIgE production. CONCLUSION: These studies confirm local IgE production in a large subset of allergic subjects and demonstrate that allergic asthmatics with local IgE are more likely to develop an asthma exacerbation when infected with RV. Our RV challenge studies demonstrate that at least some allergic asthmatics can be induced to secrete locally generated IgE in their nasal airway after RV infection.