Outcomes of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with a previous myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: Many patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair have had a previous myocardial infarction (MI). To address the paucity of data regarding outcomes in such patients, we aimed to compare outcomes after open TAAA repair in patients with and without previous MI. METHODS: From 1986 to 2022, we performed 3737 consecutive open TAAA repairs. Of these, 706 (18.9%) were in patients with previous MI. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of operative death. Propensity score matching analyzed preoperative and select operative variables to create matched groups of patients with or without a previous MI (n = 704 pairs). Late survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared by log rank test. RESULTS: Overall, operative mortality was 8.5% and the adverse event rate was 15.2%; these were elevated in patients with MI (11.0% vs 7.9% [P = .01] and 18.0% vs 14.6% [P = .02], respectively). In the propensity score-matching cohort, the MI group had a greater rate of cardiac complications (32.4% vs 25.4%; P = .005) and delayed paraparesis (5.1% vs 2.4%; P = .1); however, there was no difference in operative mortality (11.1% vs 10.9%; P = 1) or adverse event rate (18.0% vs 16.8%; P = .6). Overall, previous MI was not independently associated with operative mortality in multivariable analysis (P = .1). The matched MI group trended toward poorer 10-year survival (29.8% ± 1.9% non-MI vs 25.0% ± 1.8% MI; P = .051). CONCLUSIONS: Although previous MI was not associated with early mortality after TAAA repair, patients with a previous MI had greater rates of cardiac complications and delayed paraparesis. Patients with a previous MI also trended toward poorer survival.

How to treat type 1b endoleakage-extension, fEVAR, bEVAR, or open repair.

Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair has been well described in the literature as a treatment for a wide range of thoracic aortic pathologies. As with any intervention, there remains a risk of an unfavorable outcome, including endoleak, a term used to describe unexpected blood flow between the stent-graft and the wall of the excluded aneurysm. Endoleaks cause pressurized enlargement of the aneurysmal sac and may lead to catastrophic outcomes such as rupture and death. Type 1b endoleak represents a distal landing zone that is compromised by retrograde blood flow. Moreover, there is a lack of data on type 1b endoleaks and its management options. With the increase in emerging endovascular techniques and technologies, endoleaks are more frequent. However, the management of endoleaks is not standardized among different centers. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of type 1b endoleaks after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair, current management options, and our experience.

Very Late Aortic Endograft Infection With Listeria monocytogenes in an Elderly Man.

Endograft infection with Listeria monocytogenes is a rare, potentially devastating complication of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. To our knowledge, only 8 cases have been reported. We describe the case of a 72-year-old man who presented with L. monocytogenes endograft infection and a 19-cm degenerative aneurysm 9 years after having undergone endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The infection was successfully treated with open surgical excision of the infected aortoiliac endograft and its replacement with a rifampin-soaked, bifurcated Dacron graft.

Wound Complications and Reoperations after Transtibial Amputation of the Leg.

BACKGROUND: Transtibial amputations (TTAs) of the leg have been associated with high rates of wound complications. We assessed outcomes of TTAs to determine if bundled interventions implemented at our hospital had an impact on lowering wound complications, including surgical site infections. METHODS: We assessed the impact of a surgical site infection prevention bundle (negative-pressure wound therapy, minimizing the use of staples, and a decontamination protocol for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) on 90-day wound complications. The year of implementation of the prevention bundle was excluded, and the pre-eras and posteras were defined as the four-year period before and after implementation. The study sample consisted of a single-center cohort, with TTA cases identified using operating room scheduling software. RESULTS: A total of 182 TTAs were performed: 110 in the pre-era and 72 in the postera. The wound complication rate decreased from 22 to 17% despite fewer two-stage operations, less imaging to identify peripheral artery disease, and an increased proportion of patients with end-stage renal disease. Wound complications and revision to a higher level of amputation were more associated with indication (especially no-option peripheral artery disease with ischemic rest pains) than with any particular aspect of surgical technique. The use of drains was associated with reoperations but not higher level revision. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of wound complications and revision to a higher level of amputations should be expected among patients with no-option peripheral artery disease with ischemic rest pains undergoing TTAs. Drains should be avoided.

Endovascular management for peripheral arterial trauma: The new norm?

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy is well studied in atraumatic conditions; and there appears to be a growing interest in its application to traumatic injuries. The objective of this study is to compare open and endovascular techniques in the management of peripheral arterial trauma. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients admitted to a Level I Trauma Center sustaining injuries to the subclavian, axillary, superficial femoral, and popliteal arteries. Demographics, surgical interventions, complications, and clinical outcomes were evaluated in patients requiring open or endovascular repair between 2009 and 2015. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients with 70 total arterial injuries were identified. There were 10 subclavian, 14 axillary, 15 superficial femoral, and 31 popliteal artery injuries. Endovascular (n=20) compared to open repairs (n=50) were more commonly performed: by vascular surgeons (90% vs. 54%, p=0.01); in older patients (median age: 38 years vs. 25, p=0.01); primarily involving upper extremity injuries (60% vs. 24%, p=0.01). Furthermore, endovascular repairs less commonly required fasciotomy (15% vs. 46%, p=0.03) and trended towards lower transfusion requirements (50% vs. 77%, p=0.06). Patients undergoing open repair had lower pre-hospital systolic blood pressures (110 vs. 120, p=0.03) and lower initial hematocrit (31.5 vs. 36.2, p=0.02). However, outcomes between groups were trending higher in the endovascular group with respect to limb salvage rates at discharge (94% vs. 89%), median length of stay (14days vs. 9), and median follow-up (288days vs. 92) compared to the open group, but the data were not statistically significant. There was increasing utilization of endovascular repair over time (7% of total procedures in 2009; 50% in 2014). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, endovascular and open techniques were not statistically different in early outcomes. Endovascular therapy appears to provide some advantage when it comes to: challenging anatomy, decreasing blood product utilization, and minimizing physiologic derangement. However, patients with injuries resulting in free hemorrhage or significant external blood loss may still be best served with open repair. Despite this, given the increasing use of endovascular techniques, close collaboration is needed between trauma and endovascular specialists to properly select the optimal management for patients with peripheral arterial trauma.