RESUMO
Introduction: NIV (Non-invasive ventilation) and HFNC (High Flow nasal cannula) are being used in patients with acute respiratory failure. HACOR score has been exclusively calculated for patients on NIV, on other hand ROX index is being used for patients on HFNC. This is first study where ROX index has been used in patients on NIV to predict failure. Aim of the study: This study investigates the comparative diagnostic performance of HACOR score and ROX index to predict NIV failure. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of non-invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients admitted between 1st April 2020 to 15th June 2021 to ICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital located in Central India. We assessed factors responsible for NIV failure, and whether these scores HACOR/ROX index have discriminative capacity to predict risk of invasive mechanical ventilation. Results: Of the 441 patients included in the current study, 179 (40.5%) recovered, while remaining 262 (59.4%) had NIV failure. On multivariable analysis, ROX index > 4.47 was found protective for NIV-failure (OR 0.15 (95% CI 0.03-0.23; p<0.001). Age > 60 years and SOFA score were other significant independent predictors of NIV-failure. The AUC for prediction of failure rises from 0.84 to 0.94 from day 1 to day 3 for ROX index and from 0.79 to 0.92 for HACOR score in the same period, hence ROX score was non-inferior to HACOR score in current study. DeLong's test for two correlated ROC curves had insignificant difference expect day-1 (D1: 0.03 to 0.08; p=3.191e-05, D2: -0.002 to 0.02; p = 0.2671, D3: -0.003 to 0.04; p= 0.1065). Conclusion: ROX score of 4.47 at day-3 consists of good discriminatory capacity to predict NIV failure. Considering its non-inferiority to HACOR score, the ROX score can be used in patients with acute respiratory failure who are on NIV.
RESUMO
Background: In India, 15%-20% of tuberculosis (TB) cases are categorized as extra-pulmonary TB, and tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) is the second-most common type after tuberculous lymphadenitis. However, the paucibacillary nature of TPE makes its diagnosis challenging. As a result, relying on empirical anti-TB treatment (ATT) based on clinical diagnosis becomes necessary for achieving the best possible diagnostic outcome. The study aims to determine the diagnostic utility of Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (MTB/RIF) for the detection of TB in TPE in high incidence setting of Central India. Methods: The study enrolled 321 patients who had exudative pleural effusion detected through radiological testing and were suspected of having TB. The medical procedure of thoracentesis was conducted to collect the pleural fluid, which was then subjected to both the Ziehl-Neelsen staining and Xpert MTB/RIF test. The patients who showed improvement after receiving anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) were considered the composite reference standard. Results: The sensitivity of smear microscopy was found to be 10.19%, while that of the Xpert MTB/RIF method was 25.93% when compared to the composite reference standard. The accuracy of clinical diagnosis was measured using receiver operating characteristics based on clinical symptoms, and it was found to be 0.858 (area under the curve). Conclusions: The study shows that Xpert MTB/RIF has significant value in diagnosing TPE, despite its low sensitivity of 25.93%. Clinical diagnosis based on symptoms was relatively accurate, but relying on symptoms alone is not enough. Using multiple diagnostic tools, including Xpert MTB/RIF, is crucial for accurate diagnosis. Xpert MTB/RIF has excellent specificity and can detect RIF resistance. Its quick results make it useful in situations where a rapid diagnosis is necessary. While it should not be the only diagnostic tool, it has a valuable role in diagnosing TPE.