Dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy in drug delivery: a roadmap for correct characterization of nanoparticles and interpretation of results.

In this focus article, we provide a scrutinizing analysis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) as the two common methods to study the sizes of nanoparticles with focus on the application in pharmaceutics and drug delivery. Control over the size and shape of nanoparticles is one of the key factors for many biomedical systems. Particle size will substantially affect their permeation through biological membranes. For example, an enhanced permeation and retention effect requires a very narrow range of sizes of nanoparticles (50-200 nm) and even a minor deviation from these values will substantially affect the delivery of drug nanocarriers to the tumour. However, amazingly a great number of research papers in pharmaceutics and drug delivery report a striking difference in nanoparticle size measured by the two most popular experimental techniques (TEM and DLS). In some cases, this difference was reported to be 200-300%, raising the question of which size measurement result is more trustworthy. In this focus article, we primarily focus on the physical aspects that are responsible for the routinely observed mismatch between TEM and DLS results. Some of these factors such as concentration and angle dependencies are commonly underestimated and misinterpreted. We convincingly show that correctly used experimental procedures and a thorough analysis of results generated using both methods can eliminate the DLS and TEM data mismatch completely or will make the results much closer to each other. Also, we provide a clear roadmap for drug delivery and pharmaceutical researchers to conduct reliable DLS measurements.

Hybrid Nanoparticles for Haloperidol Encapsulation: Quid Est Optimum?

The choice of drug delivery carrier is of paramount importance for the fate of a drug in a human body. In this study, we have prepared the hybrid nanoparticles composed of FDA-approved Eudragit L100-55 copolymer and polymeric surfactant Brij98 to load haloperidol-an antipsychotic hydrophobic drug used to treat schizophrenia and many other disorders. This platform shows good drug-loading efficiency and stability in comparison to the widely applied platforms of mesoporous silica (MSN) and a metal-organic framework (MOF). ZIF8, a biocompatible MOF, failed to encapsulate haloperidol, whereas MSN only showed limited encapsulation ability. Isothermal titration calorimetry showed that haloperidol has low binding with the surface of ZIF8 and MSN in comparison to Eudragit L100-55/Brij98, thus elucidating the striking difference in haloperidol loading. With further optimization, the haloperidol loading efficiency could reach up to 40% in the hybrid Eudragit L100-55/Brij98 nanoparticles with high stability over several months. Differential scanning calorimetry studies indicate that the encapsulated haloperidol stays in an amorphous state inside the Eudragit L100-55/Brij98 nanoparticles. Using a catalepsy and open field animal tests, we proved the prolongation of haloperidol release in vivo, resulting in later onset of action compared to the free drug.

Establishment and characterization of a triple negative basal-like breast cancer cell line with multi-drug resistance.

Triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) is one of the most aggressive subtypes of breast cancer and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. The management of TNBC is currently based on the use of classical cytotoxic drugs, i.e., anthracyclines and/or microtubule-binding agents (TBAs). However, conventional chemotherapy is not always effective in these tumors and a systemic relapse is often observed, potentially due to the development of multi-drug resistance (MDR). Therefore, an improved understanding of MDR mechanisms may improve the therapeutic strategies for TNBC. In the present study, a paclitaxel-resistant (TxR) breast cancer cell subline of HCC1806 TNBC cells was established and characterized. The resistance index of this subline was calculated according to the IC50 of HCC1806-TxR relative to the parental HCC1806 cells (16.86-fold). TxR-cells also exhibited cross-resistance to vinblastin, doxorubicin and etoposide (~14-, ~4- and ~3-fold, respectively). As assessed with reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, TxR-resistant cells exhibited the upregulated expression of a number of multidrug resistance-associated genes, including MDR-1, MRP-1, -5, -6 and YB-1. The TxR cells also exhibited an increased expression of MDR-related proteins including MDR1 and MRP-1, which led to a substantial increase (5.4-fold) of the paclitaxel efflux from TxR-cells. In addition, the pro-apoptotic protein Fas was downregulated, whereas the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 was upregulated, in TxR-cells. This may explain why a reduced extent of apoptosis was observed when TxR cells were exposed to TBAs and topoisomerase type II inhibitors, relative to the parental HCC1806 cells. Thus, the HCC1806-TxR cell line may serve as an appropriate model for the analysis of chemoresistance mechanisms in TNBCs, and for the investigation of novel anticancer agents for overcoming MDR-mediated mechanisms in TNBC.

Ethyl-2-amino-pyrrole-3-carboxylates are novel potent anticancer agents that affect tubulin polymerization, induce G2/M cell-cycle arrest, and effectively inhibit soft tissue cancer cell growth in vitro.

Microtubules are known to be one of the most attractive and validated targets in cancer therapy. However, the clinical use of drugs that affect the dynamic state of microtubules has been hindered by chemoresistance and toxicity issues. Accordingly, the development of novel agents that target microtubules is needed. Here, we report the identification of novel compounds with pirrole and carboxylate structures: ethyl-2-amino-pyrrole-3-carboxylates (EAPCs) that provide potent cytotoxic activities against multiple soft tissue cancer cell lines in vitro. Using the MTS cell proliferation assay, we assessed the activity of EAPCs on various cancer cell lines including leiomyosarcoma SK-LMS-1, rhabdomyosarcoma RD, gastrointestinal stromal tumor GIST-T1, A-673 Ewing's sarcoma, and U-2 OS osteosarcoma. We found that in the majority of cases, two EAPC compounds (EAPC-20 and EAPC-24) considerably inhibited cancer cell proliferation in vitro. The growth-inhibitory effects of EAPC-20 and EAPC-24 were time and dose dependent. The molecular mechanisms of action of these compounds were because of the inhibition of tubulin polymerization and induction of a robust G2/M cell-cycle arrest, leading to considerable accumulation of tumor cells in the M-phase. Finally, EAPCs induced tumor cell death by apoptotic pathways. The above-mentioned effects were also observed in most soft tissue tumor cell lines and the gastrointestinal stromal tumor cell line investigated. Taken together, our data identify potent antitumor activity of EAPCs in vitro, thus providing a novel scaffold with which to develop potent chemotherapeutic agents for cancer therapy.