A new antigen SUMI carried on glycophorin A encoded by the GYPA*M with c.91A>C (p.Thr31Pro) belongs to the MNS blood group system.

BACKGROUND: MNS is one of the highly polymorphic blood groups comprising many antigens generated by genomic recombination among the GYPA, GYPB, and GYPE genes as well as by single-nucleotide changes. We report a patient with red blood cell (RBC) antibody against an unknown low-frequency antigen, tentatively named SUMI, and investigated its carrier molecule and causal gene. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Standard serologic tests, including enzyme tests, were performed. Monoclonal anti-SUMI-producing cells (HIRO-305) were established by transformation and hybridization methods using lymphocytes from a donor having anti-SUMI. SUMI+ RBCs were examined by immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis (ICFA) using HIRO-305 and murine monoclonal antibodies against RBC membrane proteins carrying blood group antigens. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood, and the GYPA gene was analyzed by polymerase chain reactions and Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: Serologic screening revealed that 23 of the 541,522 individuals (0.0042%) were SUMI+, whereas 1351 of the 10,392 individuals (13.0%) had alloanti-SUMI. SUMI antigen was sensitive to ficin, trypsin, pronase, and neuraminidase, but resistant to α-chymotrypsin and sulfydryl-reducing agents. ICFA revealed that the SUMI antigen was carried on glycophorin A (GPA). According to Sanger sequencing and cloning, the SUMI+ individuals had a GYPA*M allele with c.91A>C (p.Thr31Pro), which may abolish the O-glycan attachment site. CONCLUSIONS: The new low-frequency antigen SUMI is carried on GPA encoded by the GYPA*M allele with c.91A>C (p.Thr31Pro). Neuraminidase sensitivity suggests that glycophorin around Pro31 are involved in the SUMI determinant.

Application of immortalized human erythroid progenitor cell line in serologic tests to detect red blood cell alloantibodies.

BACKGROUND: Antibody screening in pretransfusion tests is necessary to avoid critical complications of blood transfusion. Although red blood cells (RBCs) expressing relevant alloantigen(s) have been used for serologic antibody screening, little attention has been given to the use of cell lines, in which blood group antigen gene(s) are transduced, as reagent RBCs for antibody screening. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The use of an erythroid progenitor cell line for serologic tests was studied. The expression of blood group antigens of erythroid progenitor cells was analyzed by genotyping and flow cytometry. Serologic analysis including hemagglutination was performed using erythroid progenitor cells to evaluate their sensitivity for antibody detection. Overexpression of exogenous erythroid antigen by lentiviral transduction was carried out and investigated for antibody detection sensitivity. RESULTS: Erythroid progenitor cells contained a substantial amount of hemoglobin and expressed sufficient levels of blood group antigens to detect corresponding monoclonal antibodies. Furthermore, the cell line could acquire an exogenous RBC antigen after lentiviral transduction and detected corresponding monoclonal and alloantibodies with equal sensitivity to antigen-positive RBCs. CONCLUSION: Application of erythroid progenitor cell lines for screening for unexpected antibodies could be helpful in solving issues such as reagent availability associated with the conventional RBC-based assay. The genetic expandability of erythroid progenitor cell lines by gene modification techniques could lead to the development of more convenient reagent RBCs.