Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Pharm Res ; 45(3): 185-204, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35304727

RESUMO

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the antidiabetic effect of pharmaconutrients as an add-on in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients by pooling data from currently available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data sources included the PubMed and EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. RCTs reporting changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), or homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) levels following add-on pharmaconutritional therapies for T2DM patients consuming antidiabetic drugs were targeted. Using random-effects meta-analyses, we identified pharmaconutrients with effects on glycemic outcomes. Heterogeneity among studies was presented using I2 values. Among 9537 articles, 119 RCTs with nine pharmaconutrients (chromium; coenzyme Q10; omega-3 fatty acids; vitamins C, D, and E; alpha-lipoic acid; selenium; and zinc) were included. Chromium (HbA1c, FBG, and HOMA-IR), coenzyme Q10 (HbA1c and FBG), vitamin C (HbA1c and FBG), and vitamin E (HbA1c and HOMA-IR) significantly improved glycemic control. Baseline HbA1c level and study duration influenced the effects of chromium and vitamin E on HbA1c level. Sensitivity analyses did not modify the pooled effects of pharmaconutrients on glycemic control. Administration of chromium, coenzyme Q10, and vitamins C and E for T2DM significantly improved glycemic control. This study has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018115229).


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Controle Glicêmico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Humanos , Nutrientes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 20156, 2019 12 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31882917

RESUMO

Though the pediatric use of fluoroquinolones (FQs) is limited for musculoskeletal safety concerns, the clinical usefulness still exists. This study examined the association between FQs and musculoskeletal adverse events (AEs) as well as the possible risk factors associated with the pediatric FQs uses. This population-based, longitudinal, retrospective study was conducted using Korean National Sample Cohort database originating between 2002 and 2015. An FQ-treated pediatric cohort (<18 years old) was compared to a control treated with amoxicillin. Propensity score matching (PSM) and a Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for a diagnosis of musculoskeletal AEs within 60 days of the first prescription. Among one million participants, total of 15,706 and 147,840 children were eligible for the FQ and amoxicillin cohorts, respectively. The PSM cohorts showed a slightly increased risk of musculoskeletal AEs after FQ treatment (HR, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.40; p = 0.042). This association was stronger in males, older patients, and some FQs users. This study indicates that pediatric FQ use is associated with a risk of musculoskeletal AEs and that FQ use should be carefully monitored in groups with certain risk factors. Well-designed pragmatic trials could be expected to clarify these issues.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Fluoroquinolonas/efeitos adversos , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/etiologia , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
3.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 13296, 2019 09 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31527625

RESUMO

Glycemic variability (GV) has been an emerging target for preventing complications related to type 2 diabetes. For reducing GV, DPP-IV inhibitors have shown effectiveness compared to other oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs (OADs), but systematic evaluation has yet to be existed. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed to evaluate the effect of DPP-IV inhibitors compared with other OADs, on GV as measured by mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE). Searches were conducted using Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, from which eligible studies were retrieved; seven RCTs were included in the analysis. DPP-IV inhibitors were found to significantly reduce MAGE compared to other OADs (mean difference = -14.61; 95% CI = -19.00 to -10.21; p < 0.0001) without significant heterogeneity among sulfonylureas (mean difference = -14.93; 95% CI = -21.60 to -8.26; p < 0.0001). Initial combination therapy with DPP-IV inhibitors more effectively reduced MAGE than stepwise add-on therapies (p = 0.006), although no differences in MAGE were found based on HbA1c values. These findings indicate that DPP-IV inhibitors are promising alternatives for reducing GV in type 2 diabetes patients. However, further studies utilizing larger numbers of patients and longer-term follow-ups are needed.


Assuntos
Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Índice Glicêmico/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA