Patient-reported treatment toxicity and adverse events in Black and White women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: It is not known whether chemotherapy-related symptom experiences differ between Black and White women with early breast cancer (Stage I-III) receiving current chemotherapy regimens and, in turn, influences dose delay, dose reduction, early treatment discontinuation, or hospitalization. METHODS: Patients self-reported their race and provided symptom reports for 17 major side effects throughout chemotherapy. Toxicity and adverse events were analyzed separately for anthracycline and non-anthracycline regimens. Fisher's exact tests and two-sample t-tests compared baseline patient characteristics. Modified Poisson regression estimated relative risks of moderate, severe, or very severe (MSVS) symptom severity, and chemotherapy-related adverse events.Please check and confirm that the authors and their respective affiliations have been correctly identified and amend if necessary.no changes RESULTS: In 294 patients accrued between 2014 and 2020, mean age was 58 (SD13) and 23% were Black. For anthracycline-based regimens, the only significant difference in MSVS symptoms was in lymphedema (41% Black vs 20% White, p = .04) after controlling for axillary surgery. For non-anthracycline regimens, the only significant difference was MSVS peripheral neuropathy (41% Blacks vs. 23% White) after controlling for taxane type (p = .05) and diabetes (p = .05). For all other symptoms, severity scores were similar. Dose reduction differed significantly for non-anthracycline regimens (49% Black vs. 25% White, p = .01), but not for anthracycline regimens or in dose delay, early treatment discontinuation, or hospitalization for either regimen. CONCLUSION: Except for lymphedema and peripheral neuropathy, Black and White patients reported similar symptom severity during adjuvant chemotherapy. Dose reductions in Black patients were more common for non-anthracycline regimens. In this sample, there were minimal differences in patient-reported symptoms and other adverse outcomes in Black versus White patients.

Risk of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome among older women receiving anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer on Modern Cooperative Group Trials (Alliance A151511).

PURPOSE: We examined acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) events among 9679 women treated for breast cancer on four adjuvant Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trials with >90 months of follow-up in order to better characterize the risk for AML/MDS in older patients receiving anthracyclines. METHODS: We used multivariable Cox regression to examine factors associated with AML/MDS, adjusting for age (≥65 vs. <65 years; separately for ≥70 vs. <70 years), race/ethnicity, insurance, performance status, and anthracycline receipt. We also examined the effect of cyclophosphamide, the interaction of anthracycline and age, and outcomes for those developing AML/MDS. RESULTS: On Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 40101, 49907, 9344, and 9741, 7290 received anthracyclines; 15% were in the age ≥65 and 7% were ≥70. Overall, 47 patients developed AML/MDS (30 AML [0.3%], 17 MDS [0.2%]); 83% of events occurred within 5 years of study registration. Among those age ≥65 and ≥70, 0.8 and 1.0% developed AML/MDS (vs. 0.4% for age <65), respectively. In adjusted analyses, older age and anthracycline receipt were significantly associated with AML/MDS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for age ≥65 [vs. <65] = 3.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-8.33; HR for anthracycline receipt [vs. no anthracycline] = 5.16, 95% CI 1.47-18.19). There was no interaction between age and anthracycline use. Deaths occurred in 70% of those developing AML/MDS. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an increased risk for AML/MDS for older patients and those receiving anthracyclines, though these events were rare. Our results help inform discussions surrounding anticipated toxicities of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients.

Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: an update on SIOG recommendations†.

BACKGROUND: Screening tools are proposed to identify those older cancer patients in need of geriatric assessment (GA) and multidisciplinary approach. We aimed to update the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) 2005 recommendations on the use of screening tools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SIOG composed a task group to review, interpret and discuss evidence on the use of screening tools in older cancer patients. A systematic review was carried out and discussed by an expert panel, leading to a consensus statement on their use. RESULTS: Forty-four studies reporting on the use of 17 different screening tools in older cancer patients were identified. The tools most studied in older cancer patients are G8, Flemish version of the Triage Risk Screening Tool (fTRST) and Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13). Across all studies, the highest sensitivity was observed for: G8, fTRST, Oncogeriatric screen, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status, Senior Adult Oncology Program (SAOP) 2 screening and Gerhematolim. In 11 direct comparisons for detecting problems on a full GA, the G8 was more or equally sensitive than other instruments in all six comparisons, whereas results were mixed for the VES-13 in seven comparisons. In addition, different tools have demonstrated associations with outcome measures, including G8 and VES-13. CONCLUSIONS: Screening tools do not replace GA but are recommended in a busy practice in order to identify those patients in need of full GA. If abnormal, screening should be followed by GA and guided multidisciplinary interventions. Several tools are available with different performance for various parameters (including sensitivity for addressing the need for further GA). Further research should focus on the ability of screening tools to build clinical pathways and to predict different outcome parameters.

Breast cancer and aging: results of the U13 conference breast cancer panel.

Breast cancer is predominantly a disease of older women, yet there is a knowledge gap due to the persisting misalignment between the age distribution of women with breast cancer and the age distribution of participants in clinical trials. The purpose of this report is to state the U13 conference breast cancer panel's recommendations regarding therapeutic clinical trials that will fill gaps in knowledge regarding the care of older patients with breast cancer. The U13 conference was a collaboration between the Cancer and Aging Research Group and the National Institute on Aging and the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Clinical trials should be developed for frail and vulnerable patients who would not enroll on the standard phase III trials, as well as efforts need to be made to increase enrollment of fit older patients on standard phase III trials. As a result of this conference, panel members are working with the NCI and cooperative groups to address these knowledge gaps. With the aging population and increasing incidence of breast cancer with age, it is essential to study the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of cancer therapy in this at-risk population.

Similar survival with single-agent capecitabine or taxane in first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Capecitabine is often offered as a first-line chemotherapy option for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this study, we compare characteristics of and survival among women prescribed first-line capecitabine or taxane monotherapy for MBC. Women receiving first-line chemotherapy for MBC from 1998 to 2005 were identified from the North Carolina tumor registry linked with Medicaid and Medicare claims records, and were followed through the end of 2005 with survival data from the National Death Index. T Tests and Chi-square tests were used to compare baseline characteristics. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were examined using Cox proportional hazard modeling. There were 257 patients with MBC starting first-line chemotherapy with capecitabine (n=71) or a taxane (n=186). No differences in age, race, or Charlson comorbidity status were observed between groups. Hormone receptor negative tumors (31.0 vs. 17.7%, p=0.02) and patients insured by Medicaid (28 vs. 12%, p=0.002) were more prevalent in the capecitabine group. Time from metastasis to first-line chemotherapy was longer in the capecitabine group (52 vs. 26% began after 3 months, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, treatment received was not associated with overall or cancer-specific survival. Among standard demographics, age was the only factor significantly associated with overall survival (HR 1.02, p=04). In this population-based study, women who received capecitabine as first-line treatment for MBC were more often hormone receptor negative and insured by Medicaid. In multivariate analysis, first-line capecitabine and taxane for MBC yielded similar overall and cancer-specific survival outcomes.

Fifteen-year median follow-up results after neoadjuvant doxorubicin, followed by mastectomy, followed by adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) followed by radiation for stage III breast cancer: a phase II trial (CALGB 8944).

PURPOSE: To describe long-term results of a multimodality strategy for stage III breast cancer utilizing neoadjuvant doxorubicin followed by mastectomy, CMF, and radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with biopsy-proven, clinical stage III breast cancer and adequate organ function were eligible. Neoadjuvant doxorubicin (30 mg/m(2) days 1-3, every 28 days for 4 cycles) was followed by mastectomy, in stable or responding patients. Sixteen weeks of postoperative CMF followed (continuous oral cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day); methotrexate (0.7 mg/kg IV) and fluorouracil (12 mg/kg IV) weekly, weeks 1-8, and than biweekly, weeks 9-16). Radiation therapy followed adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Clinical response rate was 71% (79/111, 95% CI = 62-79%), with 19% complete clinical response. Pathologic complete response was 5% (95% CI = 2-11%). Median follow-up is 15.6 years. Half of the patients progressed by 2.2 years; half died by 5.4 years (range 6 months-15 years). The hazard of dying was greatest in the first 5 years after diagnosis and declined thereafter. Time to progression and overall survival were predicted by number of pathologically involved lymph nodes (TTP: HR [10 vs. 1 node] 2.40, 95% CI = 1.63-3.53, P < 0.0001; OS: HR 2.50, 95% CI = 1.74-3.58, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After multimodality treatment for locally advanced breast cancer, long-term survival was correlated with the number of pathologically positive lymph nodes, but not to clinical response. The hazard of death was highest during the first 5 years after diagnosis and declined thereafter, indicating a possible intermediate endpoint for future trials of neoadjuvant treatment.

Systemic therapy for older women with breast cancer.

Breast cancer is a common problem in older women. As the number of medical illnesses increases with age and the life expectancy decreases, the benefits of systemic therapy for women with breast cancer become questionable. All women over age 65 years are at high enough risk of breast cancer to consider the risk/benefit ratio of preventive therapy with tamoxifen (Nolvadex) or participation in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) trial. Adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapies for early breast cancer significantly improve disease-free and overall survival; recommendations for their use are based on risk of tumor recurrence. Use of tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting in women with receptor-positive tumors is a relatively simple decision in light of its favorable toxicity profile. The delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy is a more complicated decision, and the patient's wishes, estimated life expectancy, presence of comorbid conditions, and estimated benefit from treatment should be considered. The primary goal of the treatment of metastatic breast cancer is palliation. We discuss trials specific to older women and make appropriate treatment recommendations. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data from clinical trials in women over age 70 years. However, because the clinical trial is the primary scientific mechanism for testing the efficacy of a treatment, every effort should be made to enter older women into treatment protocols.

Breast cancer and aging. Clinical interactions.

The incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer increase with age. As the geriatric population grows, the number of breast cancer cases will reach epidemic proportions. The number of coexisting medical conditions also increases with advancing age. The presence and severity of comorbid conditions influences an individual's ability to tolerate procedures and treatments and must be considered in making disease-management decisions. Screening mammography can potentially save lives in older women. Women whose life expectancy exceeds 5 years should continue annual screening mammography. Choices for local definitive therapy, systemic adjuvant therapy, and treatment of metastatic disease should be based on patient preference and ability to tolerate the planned procedure. In general, otherwise healthy older women should be offered the same treatment options given to younger, postmenopausal women. Alternative, less aggressive, or nonstandard approaches are warranted in women whose life expectancy is limited or who are unable or unwilling to undergo standard management procedures.

Endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer.

Endocrine therapy represents a mainstay of effective, minimally toxic, palliative treatment for metastatic breast cancer. Research focusing on the mechanism of action of endocrine agents will provide new insights leading to new hormonal approaches in breast cancer treatment. Development of new agents, especially the 'pure' antiestrogens, is of great interest. Combining endocrine therapy with biologic agents, especially antiproliferative compounds, may lead to more effective treatment in the adjuvant as well as the advanced setting. Tables 4 and 5 summarize response rates to the different groups of endocrine agents used in metastatic breast cancer and doses of commonly used agents, respectively. At present, tamoxifen is the drug of choice as first-line endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer with no or minimal symptoms in premenopausal or postmenopausal women. Second-line therapy usually consists of megace. Aromatase inhibitors may be used as second- or third-line therapy in postmenopausal women. In premenopausal women, LHRH analogues are a reasonable choice. The other hormonal agents may be beneficial as salvage therapy. More effective endocrine approaches are under development.

Breast cancer in older women.

More than 50% of breast cancers are diagnosed in women aged 65 years or older, a quickly growing segment of the population. Healthy older women should be offered state-of-the-art screening and treatment for breast cancer, including mammography, surgery, radiation therapy, and adjuvant therapy for early stage tumors. Clinical trials focusing on the role of adjuvant treatment in older women with breast cancer are of chief importance. The optimal treatment for older women with life-threatening, comorbid conditions may be primary treatment with tamoxifen or adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen alone after definitive surgery. Outside the clinical trials setting, metastatic disease should be treated similarly in all age groups.

Cancer chemotherapy in older adults. A tolerability perspective.

The incidence of cancer increases with age. Since the geriatric population is growing, we will be confronted with an increasing number of patients with cancer who are > 65 years of age. The purpose of this review is to address the use of cancer chemotherapy in older persons with respect to its tolerability. We performed a review of the literature using 'Medline' and the bibliographies of pertinent publications. Information about cancer treatment in older adults was extracted with particular attention to chemotherapy-related toxicity in patients aged > 65 years. Comorbid disease, polypharmacy/drug interactions, psychosocial issues and age-related physiological changes are major issues in caring for older patients with cancer. Since older individuals may have a greater number of comorbid illnesses, treatment should be initiated on the basis of physiological rather than chronological age. Comparative studies show that chemotherapy-related toxicity is similar in older and younger patients, with the exception of haematological toxicity, which may be more severe in older patients, and cardiotoxicity, which is more frequent in the elderly. Other evidence suggests that gastrointestinal and neurotoxicities may also be more severe in older individuals. The dosages of chemotherapeutic agents that are primarily renally excreted may require adjustment in older patients. Haematological reserve is decrease in older individuals, and drugs that cause myelosuppression must be used with care. The use of haemopoietic growth factors in geriatric patients is currently being investigated.

Vitamin E and breast cancer: a review.

Breast cancer is a major health problem in America, accounting for almost one-third of cancer-related deaths in women. The prevention of breast cancer through dietary modification is an active area of clinical and epidemiologic research. It has been proposed that the dietary supplementation of vitamin E, a lipid-soluble antioxidant, may reduce a woman's risk of developing breast cancer. In animal models, vitamin E has decreased the incidence of carcinogen-induced mammary tumors. Intake and serum levels of vitamin E and their relation to breast cancer have been evaluated in epidemiologic studies. Results of epidemiologic studies, however, have been conflicting. In this review, we examine the evidence that is available pertaining to the relationship between vitamin E and breast cancer. Although epidemiologic study results have been inconsistent, further study of this nontoxic vitamin is warranted. Particular attention should be paid to the interactions of other antioxidants with vitamin E and to the duration and timing (pre- vs. postmenopausal) of vitamin E use in determining its preventive utility in breast cancer.

Rhabdomyolysis and hemolysis associated with sickle cell trait and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.

We report a case of severe oxidative hemolysis and rhabdomyolysis in a patient with sickle cell trait and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. The patient was a 34-year-old black man admitted 24 hours after vigorous exercise with myalgias, malaise, myoglobinuria, anemia, low haptoglobin, and a peripheral blood smear with bite cells consistent with oxidative hemolysis. He had two similar episodes within 21 months of the initial admission. Subsequent evaluation resulted in the diagnosis of sickle cell trait and G6PD deficiency; muscle enzyme levels were normal. G6PD deficiency and sickle cell trait can be expected to occur simultaneously in up to 1% of black males. A second red blood cell defect should be considered when severe hemolysis is seen in a person with sickle cell trait.

Tamoxifen in postmenopausal women a safety perspective.

Tamoxifen is a synthetic antiestrogen with both agonist and antagonist properties. It is believed to act primarily through binding to estrogen receptors in breast cancer cells, acting as a competitive inhibitor of estrogen. Tamoxifen has a wide range of systemic effects, possibly acting on every estrogen target tissue in the body. Tamoxifen therapy is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of recurrence and death in postmenopausal women with early stage breast cancer. In addition, it has been shown to effectively suppress preclinical breast cancer, as evidenced by the decrease in second primary breast cancers in adjuvant trials. Tamoxifen is also the most widely used endocrine therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. Tamoxifen, acting predominantly as an estrogen agonist in the liver, has generally favourable effects on serum lipids in postmenopausal women. In addition, tamoxifen has been shown to preserve bone mineral density and may even decrease the risk of osteoporosis in these women. Most patients treated with tamoxifen have minimal adverse effects. Vasomotor symptoms are the most commonly reported events. Less frequently, vaginal discharge or dryness, nausea and depression have been reported. A slight increase in thromboembolic events in postmenopausal women taking tamoxifen has been suggested in some adjuvant trials. Rarely, ocular toxicity and hepatotoxicity are found. The adverse effect of primary importance is the increased incidence of endometrial carcinoma. Several studies indicate that almost all of the tumours are of low histological grade and stage, similar to those seen with exogenous estrogen use. The relative risk of endometrial cancer in women taking tamoxifen is about 2 to 4 times higher than for postmenopausal women not taking tamoxifen. The benefits of tamoxifen outweigh the risks in almost all postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive early stage breast cancer and in all women with metastatic breast cancer. Should tamoxifen prove to be an effective chemopreventive agent for breast cancer, the risks and benefits of treatment will have to be more carefully assessed for this setting.

Current status of endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Hormonal manipulation is currently the mainstay of palliative care for metastatic breast cancer because it is well tolerated and produces significant responses in approximately one-third of unselected patients. Tamoxifen, a nonsteroidal antiestrogen, is currently considered first-line therapy. Second-line agents include progestins and aromatase inhibitors. New agents, such as the "pure" antiestrogens and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, are being tested. Other approaches for affecting the hormonal milieu are also under investigation, including combinations of hormonal agents, hormonal agents plus biologics, and hormonal agents plus antiproliferative agents. This review will address the basis for endocrine therapy and possible mechanisms of hormonal resistance, currently available agents and newer ones on the horizon, and areas of future interest.

A comparison of treatment outcomes for black patients and white patients with metastatic breast cancer. The Piedmont Oncology Association experience.

Prior studies have shown that black patients with breast cancer have poorer survival times compared with white patients even when adjusted for stage. Seventy-four black patients treated on six Piedmont Oncology Association (POA) protocols were compared with 74 randomly selected white patients treated with the same protocols to determine if race had any independent effect on response, time to progression, or survival time. Patients were evenly matched for pretreatment characteristics with the exception that white patients had a significantly higher percentage of bone metastases and significantly less skin involvement. Response rates and median time to progression were similar for black patients and white patients at 31% and 25%, and 9.3 and 9.1 months, respectively. Black patients had poorer survival times even when adjusting for covariables; median survival time was 14.3 months for black patients and 20.3 months for white patients (P less than 0.05). The reason for this survival difference in Stage IV patients is unclear, but is unlikely to be related to treatment. Additional research in this area will be necessary to resolve this issue.