Bridge plating is an effective adjunct treatment for complex elbow instability.

BACKGROUND: Managing persistent elbow instability and chronic dislocations presents challenges despite traditional treatments. Supplementary methods like immobilization and various fixations, though common, can carry high complication rates. This study assesses the efficacy of bridge plating in treating complex elbow instability through a retrospective review of patients. Data on characteristics, treatment duration, range of motion, complications, and evaluation scores were analyzed, providing insights into outcomes complications associated with bridge plating. RESULTS: Eleven patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 80 ± 68 weeks postoperatively. The mean age was 53 ± 14 years and there were 5 females and 6 males. The mean body mass index was 38. Bridge plating was used for a spectrum of complex elbow injuries. The mean time from injury to bridge plating in acute cases was 29 ± 19 days and 344 ± 381 days in chronic cases. The mean duration of bridge plating was 121 ± 72 days. At the time of plate removal, mean intraoperative elbow motion was extension 58° ± 12°, flexion 107° ± 14°, supination 66° ± 23° and pronation 60° ± 26°. At the latest follow-up visit, mean elbow motion was extension 37° ± 22°, flexion 127° ± 17°, supination 72° ± 15°, and pronation 63° ± 18°. There were 6 complications (55%): heterotopic ossification, ulnar neuropathy, wound failure over the plate in a thin patient, an ulnar shaft periprosthetic fracture due to a seizure-induced fall, and persistent elbow subluxation despite bridge plate fixation. Finally, 1 patient sustained a fracture of a 3.5-mm locking bridge plate. One patient required a contracture release for persistent stiffness. Four of these complications can be directly attributed to the use of the bridge plate (36%). At final follow-up, the mean patient-rated elbow evaluation score was 34, with 0 indicating no pain and disability. The mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score was 66% for the 8 patients who had this available, with 100% being the best possible attainable score. CONCLUSION: Bridge plating effectively maintains joint reduction in selected complex elbow instability cases. However, patients with bridge plates often require a second surgery for removal and experience high rates of general complications because of the complexity of their condition.

The effect of lateral collateral ligament repair tension on elbow stability: An in vitro biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal repair tension of the lateral collateral ligament of the elbow by performing simulated active flexion with the arm in the varus gravity loaded position using an in vitro elbow simulator. METHODS: Eight cadaveric specimens were mounted in the varus gravity loaded orientation onto an elbow motion simulator. Four states were studied (intact, lateral collateral ligament injured, and 15 N and 20 N lateral collateral ligament repairs) with the forearm in supination and pronation. An electromagnetic tracking system was used to measure joint kinematics during active elbow flexion. FINDINGS: There was no difference in ulnohumeral rotation between the intact state and the 15 N repair (P = .150 for pronation; P = 1.0 for supination) or the 20 N repair (P = 1.0 for pronation; P = .568 for supination). For varus-valgus angulation, the 20 N repair was not statistically different from the intact state (P = .059 in pronation; P = 1.0 in supination). INTERPRETATION: Repair of the lateral collateral ligament following injury can restore joint kinematics with the arm in the varus position. A repair tension of 20 N was successful in restoring joint stability for simulated active motion with the forearm in pronation and supination. This study shows that when the lateral collateral ligament is repaired with adequate tension, avoidance of the varus position may not be as crucial during early motion.

Indomethacin for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis following surgical treatment of elbow trauma: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification is a frequent complication following surgical treatment of elbow trauma. The use of indomethacin to prevent heterotopic ossification is reported in the literature; however, its effectiveness is controversial. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to determine whether indomethacin is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of heterotopic ossification after surgical management of elbow trauma. METHODS: Between February 2013 and April 2018, 164 eligible patients were randomized to receive postoperative indomethacin or placebo medication. The primary outcome was the incidence of heterotopic ossification on elbow radiographs at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. Range of motion, complications, and nonunion rates were also obtained. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the incidence of heterotopic ossification between the indomethacin group (49%) and the control group (55%) (relative risk, 0.89; P = .52). There were no significant differences in postoperative Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores or range of motion (P = .16). The complication rate was 17% in both the treatment and control groups (P > .99). There were no nonunions in either group. CONCLUSION: This Level I study demonstrated that indomethacin prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification in the setting of surgically treated elbow trauma was not significantly different from placebo.

Recovery Trajectories Following Complex Elbow Injuries and Radial Head Arthroplasty: A Longitudinal Study Over 8 Years.

PURPOSE: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is commonly performed to manage comminuted unreconstructible radial head fractures. Although the outcomes of RHA are often satisfactory, revisions are usually considered when pain intensity is higher than expected. Therefore, it is important to investigate the recovery trajectories of patients following RHA over an extended period and the characteristics that may lead to unfavorable outcomes. METHODS: The Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) was used to assess recovery in 94 patients at baseline (within 2-7 days after surgery); 3 and 6 months; and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 years after RHA. Lower PREE values indicate lower pain and disability. Latent growth curve analysis was used to determine classes of recovery. The characteristics of the participants in the identified recovery trajectory classes were then compared. RESULTS: Two distinct recovery trajectories were identified: optimal and suboptimal recoveries. Most patients (84%) belonged to the optimal recovery class, which exhibited significantly lower baseline PREE scores, a consistent pattern of recovery, and a relatively high rate of change. Patients in the suboptimal recovery class (16%) had significantly higher baseline PREE scores and continued to experience relatively higher levels of pain and disability for the duration of the study; their rate of recovery was much slower. Patients belonging to the 2 recovery trajectories did not differ based on age or sex. Although we had low power in other variables, a qualitative exploration showed that the number of current or previous smokers was higher in the suboptimal recovery trajectory class. CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal cohort study, we show that high postsurgical pain and disability, and potentially smoking, may adversely affect the recovery trajectory following RHA. Clinicians are recommended to assess these potential factors while considering revision surgeries. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Morphology of Proximal Ulna Bare Area: A Guide for Olecranon Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: Olecranon osteotomy is commonly used to obtain access to the distal humerus for fracture fixation. The goal of this study was to accurately describe the anatomy of the bare area to minimize articular cartilage damage while performing olecranon osteotomies. METHODS: Twenty cadaveric ulnae were denuded to expose the bare area. Laser surface mapping was used to create 3-dimensional models, and the nonarticular portions of the ulnae were digitally measured. RESULTS: The morphology of the bare area from all aspects of the proximal ulna was defined. The central bare area was consistent in its location, 4.9 ± 1.5 mm distal to the deepest portion of the trochlear notch and 23.2 ± 2.3 mm distal to the olecranon tip. The maximum chevron osteotomy apical angle to stay within the bare area averaged 110° ± 11.8°. However, there was little tolerance for error without the risk of violating the articular cartilage. With transverse osteotomy, averaging 18° ± 10.6° in the coronal plane, there is less risk of damaging the articular cartilage. CONCLUSIONS: Transverse osteotomy perpendicular to the posterior surface of the ulna aiming at the visible bare area on the medial and lateral sides of the greater sigmoid notch may reduce the chances of violating the nonvisible articular cartilage of the proximal ulna. Based on the findings of this study, if chevron osteotomy is used, a shallow apex distal angle of more than 110° is recommended. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides intraoperative landmarks to guide surgeons performing olecranon osteotomies to stay within the bare area.

Nonoperative treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing controversy regarding the nonoperative treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Given that the evidence surrounding the use of various treatment options for lateral epicondylitis has expanded, an overall assessment of nonoperative treatment options is required. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare physiotherapy (strengthening), corticosteroids (CSIs), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and autologous blood (AB) with no active treatment or placebo control in patients with lateral epicondylitis. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched through till March 8, 2021. Additional studies were identified from reviews. All English-language randomized trials comparing nonoperative treatment of patients >18 years of age with lateral epicondylitis were included. RESULTS: A total of 5 randomized studies compared physiotherapy (strengthening) with no active treatment. There were no significant differences in pain (mean difference: -0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.56 to 0.41) or function (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.46 to 0.30). Seven studies compared CSI with a control. The control group had statistically superior pain (mean difference: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.22 to 1.18) and functional scores (SMD: -0.35, 95% CI: -0.54 to -0.16). Two studies compared PRP with controls, and no differences were found in pain (SD: -0.15, 95% CI: -1.89 to 1.35) or function (SMD: 0.14, 95% CI: -0.45 to 0.73). Three studies compared AB with controls, and no differences were observed in pain (0.49, 95% CI: -2.35 to 3.33) or function (-0.07, 95% CI: -0.64 to 0.50). DISCUSSION: The available evidence does not support the use of nonoperative treatment options including physiotherapy (strengthening), CSI, PRP, or AB in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.

Overhead arm positioning in the rehabilitation of elbow dislocations: An in vitro biomechanical study.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical study. INTRODUCTION: Elbow stiffness is a common complication following elbow dislocation. Overhead exercises have been proposed to initiate early motion to reduce stiffness through employing gravity to stabilize the elbow. The implications of this position with regard to elbow kinematics after dislocation have not been reported. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To determine the influence of the overhead position on elbow stability following combined medial and lateral collateral ligament (MCL and LCL) injuries. METHODS: Passive and simulated active extension were performed on 11 cadaveric elbows with the arm in the overhead, dependent, and horizontal positions and with the forearm in pronation, neutral, and supination. Internal-external rotation (IER) and varus-valgus angulation (VVA) of the ulnohumeral joint were assessed for the intact elbow and after simulated MCL-LCL injury. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to analyze the effects of elbow state, arm position, forearm rotation, and extension angle. RESULTS: During passive extension with the arm overhead, the pronated position resulted in more internal rotation than supination (-2.6 ± 0.7°, P = .03). There was no effect of forearm rotation on VVA. The overhead position increased internal rotation relative to the dependent position when the forearm was neutral (-8.5 ± 2.5°, P = .04) and relative to the horizontal position when the forearm was supinated (-12.7 ± 2.2°, P= .02). During active extension, pronation increased valgus angle compared to the neutral (+1.2 ± 0.3°, P= .04) and supinated (+1.5 ± 0.4°, P= .03) positions, but did not affect IER. There was no difference between active and passive motion with the arm overhead (P > .05). DISCUSSION: Movement of the injured elbow in the overhead position most closely replicated kinematics of the intact elbow compared to the other arm positions. CONCLUSIONS: Overhead elbow extension results in similar kinematics between an intact elbow and an elbow with MCL and LCL tears. As such, therapists might consider early motion in this position to reduce the risk of elbow stiffness after dislocation.

Outcomes of radial head implants in total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the management of the radial head in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). In 3-part TEA designs, options include radial head retention, excision, or arthroplasty. Biomechanical studies suggest improved varus-valgus stability with radial head implants in unlinked total elbows. Unfortunately, complications with radial head implants have been common with historical designs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of radial head implants in a current 3-part TEA and identify risk factors for mechanical failure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of radial head implants with a 3-part convertible TEA from 2001 to 2016. Clinical outcomes, functional scores, and radiographic outcomes were recorded. The preoperative radiocapitellar alignment was measured using the radiocapitellar ratio (RCR). Statistics include descriptive statistics, t tests, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: We identified 44 TEAs in 40 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 7.2 years. The average age at surgery was 58 ± 11 years; 80% of the TEAs were performed in women. The indication for surgery was rheumatoid arthritis in 86%; of the implants, 61% were unlinked. The average preoperative RCR was 10.7 ± 17.9. Postoperatively, 2 radial head implants (5%) were subluxated, 6 (14%) were dissociated, and 2 (5%) were dissociated with implant dislocation on radiographic review. The revision rate for radial head subluxation, dissociation, or dislocation was 7% (n = 3). Univariate logistic regression showed that male sex (P = .002), abnormal preoperative RCR (P = .02), linked implant (P = .03), and older age (P = .04) were risk factors for radial head subluxation, dissociation, or implant dislocation. A multivariate model with all 4 variables did not demonstrate statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The incidence of radial head arthroplasty subluxation, dissociation, or implant dislocation was high (23%). In a univariate logistic regression model, male sex, abnormal preoperative RCR, and linked implants were all statistically significant risk factors for mechanical failure of the radial head implant. Our multivariate model did not show any statistically significant independent risk factors. Polyethylene wear or loosening of the radial head implants was not observed in this study; failure of the bipolar linkage was the principal mode of failure. Although further study is required, caution should be used when considering inserting a radial head implant in male patients with significant preoperative radiocapitellar malalignment. Radial head subluxation or dissociation is not an absolute indication for revision in an asymptomatic patient. Improvements in radial head implant designs in TEA are needed.

The effect of hemiarthroplasty implant modulus on contact mechanics: an experimental investigation.

BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasties cause damage to the cartilage that they articulate against, which is a major limitation to their use. This study investigated the use of lower-stiffness materials to determine whether they improve hemiarthroplasty contact mechanics and thus reduce the risk of cartilage damage. METHODS: Eleven fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities were disarticulated and fixed in a custom-built jig that applied a static load of 50 N to the radiocapitellar joint. Flexion angles of 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° were tested with radial head implants made of cobalt-chrome (CoCr) and ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) compared with the native radial head. A Tekscan thin-film sensor was used to measure the contact area and contact pressure between the radius and capitellum. RESULTS: UHMWPE and CoCr were too stiff in the application of hemiarthroplasty, resulting in lower contact areas and higher contact pressures relative to the native joint. The native contact area was, on average, 42 ± 20 mm2 larger than that of UHMWPE (P < .001) and 55 ± 24 mm2 larger than that of CoCr (P < .001). UHMWPE had a contact area 13 ± 10 mm2 greater than that of CoCr (P = .014). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study shows that even though UHMWPE has a stiffness several times lower than CoCr, the use of this material in hemiarthroplasty led to only a minor improvement in contact mechanics. Neither implant restored contact similar to the native articulation. Investigations into new materials to improve the contact mechanics of hemiarthroplasty should focus on materials with a lower stiffness than UHMWPE.

The Unsalvageable Radial Head in Patients Aged 30 Years and Younger.

PURPOSE: Concern exists regarding the use of radial head arthroplasty (RHA) in younger patients. This study assessed clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of RHA in patients aged 30 years and younger. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 26 elbows that underwent a smooth stem modular RHA in patients aged 30 years and younger at a median follow-up of 3.3 years clinically and 2.9 years radiographically. The mean age was 24 ± 5 years. Indications were acute trauma in 13 patients and chronic pathologies in the remaining 13, and these 2 groups were evaluated separately. Patients underwent clinical, functional, and radiographic evaluation. RESULTS: Average arc of motion was 137° ± 16° in the cohort with acute trauma and 120° ± 24° in the cohort with chronic pathologies. Mean Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation scores were 23 ± 18 (acute) and 31 ± 19 (chronic). Mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were 18 ± 15 (acute) and 23 ± 20 (chronic). Average Mayo Elbow Performance Index scores were 90 ± 9 (acute) and 80 ± 13 (chronic). Severe capitellar erosion was present in 1 patient (4%) in the cohort with chronic pathologies. Radiographic stem lucency was seen in all cases with 10 of these (38%) graded as severe. Moderate-to-severe ulnohumeral arthritis developed in 4 patients (15%), 3 of whom were in the chronic reconstruction group. Two patients (8%) required reoperation, 1 for persistent instability and 1 for stiffness, both in the cohort with chronic pathologies. CONCLUSIONS: For acute trauma and challenging chronic conditions involving the radial head in patients aged 30 years and younger, a smooth stem modular RHA is an option. Although reoperation rates based on this series are low, osteoarthritis is common when used for posttraumatic conditions and severe radiographic stem lucency was seen in greater than one-third of patients. These concerning features warrant close follow-up, and further long-term outcomes are needed. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Computed tomography analysis of the relationship between the coronoid and the radial head.

BACKGROUND: The coronoid process is an important stabilizer of the elbow, and its anatomy has been extensively studied. However, data documenting the relationship of the coronoid relative to the radial head (RH) are limited. The latter is a good landmark for the surgeon when débriding or reconstructing the coronoid. This imaging-based study quantified the anatomic relationship between the coronoid and the proximal radius and ulna. METHODS: We investigated 80 cadaveric upper extremities (18 paired elbows) by 3-dimensional digital analysis of computed tomography data. After construction of a standardized coordinate system, the relationships between the coronoid, the anterior-most point of the RH, the deepest point of the articular surface of the RH, the top of the lesser sigmoid notch, and the deepest point of the guiding ridge of the trochlear notch were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean height of the tip of the coronoid was 36 ± 4 mm (range, 26-43 mm). The mean height of the anterior-most point of the RH was 40 ± 4 mm (range, 28-47 mm). The mean distance between the tip of the coronoid and the anterior-most point of the RH was 4.5 ± 1 mm (range, 2-10 mm). For paired elbows, the heights of the tip of the coronoid and the anterior-most point of the RH were similar between sides. CONCLUSION: This study described the relationship between the coronoid and RH. This information should prove useful when reconstructing a coronoid from a medial approach in the case of an intact RH. The difference in radiographic height between the tip of the coronoid and anterior RH in the normal elbow averages 5 mm. However, when we account for the normal cartilage thickness of the RH and coronoid, a 3- to 6-mm difference in height would be seen at surgery depending on whether the cartilage of the coronoid process is intact or removed. The distance between the tip of the coronoid and the anterior-most point of the RH is similar to the size of shavers used when débriding osteophytes during arthroscopy.

Primary total elbow arthroplasty.

There have been significant improvements in surgical techniques and implant designs of elbow arthroplasty over the last five decades. These advances have resulted in improved outcomes and expansion of indications for total elow arthroplasty (TEA). As the proportion of TEAs being performed for inflammatory arthritis has been decreasing in recent years, TEAs are being performed more commonly for the management of acute distal humerus fractures in the elderly, post-traumatic sequelae, and primary osteoarthritis. Appropriate patient selection and meticulous attention to surgical technique including the surgical approach, implant positioning and fixation will result in acceptable outcomes. Future advances in the design, instrumentation, and surgical technique will allow for further improvement in outcomes as the indications for TEA continue to expand.

Effectiveness of radiographs and computed tomography in evaluating primary elbow osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiographic assessment of osteophyte and loose body locations is critical in planning an arthroscopic débridement for primary elbow osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of radiographs and computed tomography (CT) in localizing osteophytes and loose bodies. METHODS: A consecutive series of 36 patients with primary elbow osteoarthritis was investigated with radiographs and multiaxial 2-dimensional CT prior to elbow arthroscopy. The location of osteophytes and loose bodies was assessed in 9 anatomic locations by 2 fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons. The diagnostic effectiveness of both imaging modalities was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity and specificity and compared to the gold standard of elbow arthroscopy. Inter- and intrarater percentage agreement between the observations was calculated using Kappa score. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity for detecting osteophytes in the 9 different anatomic locations was 46% with radiographs and 98% with CT, whereas the mean specificity was 66% and 21% for radiographs and CT, respectively. The mean sensitivity and specificity for loose body detection with radiography were 49% and 89%, respectively, whereas CT had a mean sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 47%. The overall inter-rater percentage agreement between the surgeons in detecting osteophytes and loose bodies on radiographs was 80% and 85%, respectively, whereas on CT it was 95% for detecting osteophytes and 91% for loose bodies. CONCLUSION: CT has greater sensitivity than radiographs for the detection of osteophytes and loose bodies in primary elbow osteoarthritis. The lower specificity of CT may be due to this imaging modality's ability to detect small osteophytes and loose bodies that may not be readily identified during elbow arthroscopy. Radiographs have an inferior inter-rater percentage agreement compared with CT. CT is a valuable preoperative investigation to assist surgeons in identifying the location of osteophytes and loose bodies in patients undergoing surgery for primary elbow osteoarthritis.

Outcomes of nonoperative management of displaced olecranon fractures in medically unwell patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of displaced olecranon fractures in the elderly has a high rate of complications, including wound breakdown and fixation failure. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes of nonsurgical management of displaced olecranon fractures in low-demand elderly and medically unwell patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of 28 patients with displaced closed olecranon fractures was performed with an average follow-up of 11 months. The mean age at the time of injury was 79 ± 10 years. The average Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6.4 ± 2.6. Treatment modalities were at the discretion of the treating surgeon. A sling alone was used in 3 cases, an extension circumferential cast in 9, or a plaster or thermoplastic splint in 16. The mean period of immobilization was 5 ± 1 weeks. Outcomes included range of motion, ability to perform active overhead extension, as well as radiographic and functional outcomes. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the mean elbow range of motion for the cohort was from 28° ± 21° extension to 127° ± 15° flexion. Active overhead elbow extension against gravity was noted or documented in 24 (86%) patients. Two patients (7%) were unable to perform active extension. No pain was noted in 18 elbows, severe pain was present in 1 elbow, and the remainder reported mild occasional pain. All olecranon fractures in this cohort were displaced on the initial lateral radiograph. The mean displacement was 11 ± 7 mm. Nonunion at final radiographic outcome was observed in 23 (82%) elbows. Two (7%) patients developed skin complications related to posteriorly placed splints; one of which was severe. DISCUSSION: This study adds to the growing literature that supports nonoperative management of displaced olecranon fractures in elderly and medically unwell patients with low upper extremity demand. Patients can be counseled that they have a good chance of obtaining overhead extension, with minimal pain. Posteriorly based splints should not be used to minimize skin complications.

Results of Linked Convertible Total Elbow Arthroplasty for the Management of Distal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly.

PURPOSE: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is increasingly used for the management of comminuted distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. There are limited data on the outcome of modern elbow arthroplasty designs in larger patient cohorts. The aim of the current study was to review the outcomes and complications using a cemented convertible TEA system in a linked configuration in patients with distal humeral fractures. METHODS: Patients with distal humeral fractures treated with TEA and a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were reviewed. Demographic information, patient-reported outcome, functional and radiographic outcome assessments, and complications were reported. RESULTS: Forty patients met inclusion criteria; 35 were female. Median follow-up was 4 years (range, 2-13 years). Average age of patients at the index procedure was 79 ± 9 years. All implants were linked. Range of motion was: extension 16° ± 13°, flexion 127° ± 14°, supination 79° ± 11°, and pronation 73° ± 20°. Patient-reported outcome scores were: Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation 37 ± 35, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand 31 ± 31, and Mayo Elbow Performance Index 90 ± 18. Seven patients had heterotopic ossification. Lucent lines were noted predominantly in humeral implant zone V. No lucent lines were noted around the ulnar component in any radiographic zone. Complications occurred in 9 patients (22%) and 2 revisions were performed: one for infection and one for a late periprosthetic fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Total elbow arthroplasty for fracture in elderly patients provides pain relief, functional range of motion, and good patient-reported outcome scores. No implant-related complications of this convertible implant system were encountered, but longer-term follow-up is needed. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow form capture aspects of functioning that are important to patients with elbow injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. INTRODUCTION: The Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and the self-report section of the American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons-elbow form (pASES-e) are two important elbow-specific self-report measures used in routine clinical practice. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To use the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) to link aspects of functioning that are reported using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale by a cohort of patients with elbow disorders and compare it to the content of the PREE and the pASES-e. METHODS: One hundred patients with a variety of elbow disorders (mean age and SD 53.88 (14.51); M: F 48: 52) were recruited from the Roth-McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre. They self-reported important aspects of functioning using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale. These concerns were linked to the ICF using formal linking procedures. These ICF categories were compared to the categories related to the PREE and the pASES-e. Linking was carried out by two independent raters, and agreement was calculated using percentage agreement. RESULTS: A total of 423 self-reported functional activities were linked to 25 second-level ICF categories from the activity and participation domain. Commonly reported activities were D640 doing housework (52%); D540 dressing (47%); and D475 driving (35%). PREE had better coverage of the patient concerns (71%) than pASES-e (50%). D475-driving (35%) and D440-fine hand use (24%) were the 2 major categories that were not captured by the questionnaires. Agreement between the raters was 90.5%. DISCUSSION: This study established that the PREE and the pASES-e were able to capture aspects of functioning important to patients and that align with the ICF, with this happening to a greater extent on the PREE than the pASES-e. Because all patients reported concerns from the activity and participation section ('d' categories) of the ICF, this validated that these PROMs measure this conceptual domain. CONCLUSION: The PREE provided more comprehensive coverage of patients' functional concerns than the pASES-e.

Coronoid process reconstruction with a distal clavicle autograft: an in silico analysis of fitting accuracy.

BACKGROUND: The coronoid process plays a vital role in preserving elbow stability. In cases of acute or chronic deficiency of the coronoid process, reconstruction is warranted to restore stability and to avoid early joint degeneration. The distal clavicle might be a useful osteochondral autograft for coronoid reconstruction with low donor-site morbidity. This study evaluated the fitting accuracy of the distal clavicle as an autograft for coronoid process reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred upper-extremity computed tomography scans of 85 body donors were available for this study (mean age, 69 ± 17 years; 46 male and 39 female donors; 15 bilateral specimens). Standardized 40% transverse defects of the coronoid process were digitally created; the distal clavicles were digitally harvested and placed onto the defects by a best-fit technique in 2 different orientations using commercially available software: (1) with the superior aspect of the articular surface of the graft oriented toward the coronoid tip and (2) with the inferior aspect of the articular surface of the graft oriented toward the coronoid tip. The fitting accuracy of the grafts to the native coronoid process was evaluated from lateral to medial using custom code. RESULTS: Regardless of the orientation of the graft, the distal clavicle provided a good fit in the central portion of the coronoid process. In the lateral and medial aspects of the defect, however, the fitting accuracy of the graft declined significantly (P ≤ .044). No significant differences were observed between ipsilateral and contralateral grafts (P ≥ .199). The intrarater reliability was excellent. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that a distal clavicle autograft may be suitable to replace a transverse defect of the coronoid process; however, it may not fully reconstruct the anteromedial and anterolateral aspects of the coronoid.

Medial elbow exposure: an anatomic comparison of 5 approaches.

PURPOSE: Several surgical approaches to the medial elbow are described; however, it remains unclear which exposure provides the optimal view of relevant medial elbow structures. The purpose of this anatomic study was to determine the visible surface area of the coronoid process, distal humerus, and radial head through 5 approaches to the medial elbow. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremity specimens were dissected. Five surgical approaches were performed on each specimen. The Smith muscle-splitting approach to the ulnar collateral ligament was performed first (Smith), followed by the Hotchkiss medial "Over the top" approach (Hotchkiss), the extended medial elbow approach (EMEA), the flexor carpi ulnaris splitting approach (FCU-Split), and the Taylor and Scham approach (T&S). Bony visualization was determined using laser surface scanning (Artec Space Spider; Artec 3D). The scans were segmented using commercially available digital software (Geomagic Wrap; 3D Systems Corporation), and the surface area visualized was determined. A descriptive analysis of the joint areas visible using the medial collateral ligament (MCL) as a clinical landmark was performed. RESULTS: The EMEA visualized the highest proportion of the total elbow joint from the medial side showing 13.9 ± 6.0 cm2, or 15% ± 4% of the joint. It also provided the best visualization of the coronoid (3.2 ± 1.7 cm2 of surface area, or 26% ± 9%) and distal humerus (9.9 ± 4.3 cm2, or 15% ± 4%). The Hotchkiss approach was best at visualizing the radial head (0.8 ± 0.3 cm2, or 7% ± 3%). The EMEA, Hotchkiss, and Smith approaches showed primarily the anterior bundle of the MCL, its insertion, and the regions anterior to it, whereas the FCU-Split showed the anterior bundle of the MCL and regions both anterior and posterior to it. The T&S showed primarily the areas posterior to the anterior bundle of the MCL; the anterior regions were not visible. The FCU-Split and the T&S allowed visualization of the posterior bundle of the MCL. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intraobserver reliability were 0.997, 0.992, and 0.974 for the test distal humerus, test coronoid, and test radial head, respectively. The ICCs for interobserver reliability were 0.915 for the test distal humerus, 0.66 for the coronoid, and 0.583 for the radial head. CONCLUSION: The EMEA provides the most visualization of the coronoid and distal humerus, whereas the Hotchkiss showed the most radial head. However, these approaches mainly visualize structures anterior to the MCL. If exposure of structures posterior to the MCL is required, the FCU-Split and T&S approaches are more appropriate.