A qualitative study of clinicians' and individuals' with lower limb loss perspectives on the development of a novel online self-management program.

PURPOSE: To explore the rehabilitation preferences and experiences of clinicians and patients for education after lower limb loss to facilitate the development of an online self-management program. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive approach was used. Thirty-one clinicians (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and prosthetists), and 26 patients with lower limb loss (transtibial and transfemoral amputation; mean age (SD) of 63.3 (9.1), years) were recruited. We used semi-structured focus groups and one-on-one interviews, and audio recorded the interviews. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: (1) Needing education in rehabilitation described the education in current practice as one-on-one discussion and booklets and highlighted the limitations of education such as its length, static nature, and inaccessible for patients living in remote areas. (2) Getting back to activities prior to amputation emphasized how goal setting and social support could assist patients and facilitate self-management. (3) Augmenting learning highlighted the need for an accessible complementary source for education and potential solutions to overcome the barriers of online delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the importance of education in the rehabilitation of patients to help them get back to their activities. An online accessible tool may improve education by providing information and peer support.

Self-management education assists patients through knowledge and skills to adapt to an amputation.Education should be patient centred.An accessible user-friendly online tool which offers the information and peer support may augment and improve the delivery of self-management education.

Development of a co-created online self-management program for people with lower limb loss: self-management for amputee rehabilitation using technology (SMART).

PURPOSE: To develop an online self-management program for individuals with recent lower limb loss, called Self-Management for Amputee Rehabilitation using Technology (SMART). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Intervention Mapping Framework as a blueprint and involved stakeholders throughout the process. A six-step study was conducted including (1) needs assessment using interviews, (2) translating needs to content, (3) applying the content into a prototype using theory-based methods, (4) a usability assessment using think-aloud cognitive testing, (5) planning for future adoption and implementation, and (6) assessing feasibility using mixed-methods to generate a plan to assess the effectiveness on health-outcomes in a randomized controlled trial. RESULTS: Following interviews with healthcare professionals (n = 31) and people with lower limb loss (n = 26), we determined the content of a prototype version. We then tested usability (n = 9) and feasibility (n = 12) by recruiting individuals with lower limb loss from different pools. We modified SMART to be assessed in a randomized controlled trial. SMART is a six-week online program with weekly contact of a peer mentor with lower limb loss who supported patients with goal-setting and action-planning. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention mapping facilitated the systematic development of SMART. SMART may improve health outcomes, but this would need to be confirmed in future studies.Implications for rehabilitationLearning new coping strategies and habits are essential after lower limb loss.Given the limitations and inaccessibility of educational and rehabilitation programs, online self-management education can assist patients in their recovery.Self-Management for Amputee Rehabilitation using Technology (SMART) has the potential to augment the self-management behaviors in individuals with lower limb loss through an improvement in access to educational content, skill-based videos, and support of a peer.

Usability of Self-Management for Amputee Rehabilitation using Technology (SMART): An online self-management program for users with lower limb loss.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with lower limb loss (LLL) need education to adapt to their amputation. Self-management programs provide education and supportive skills to manage health-related physical and psychological challenges. eHealth technologies, such as online platforms, are increasing access to educational resources. We designed an online self-management program for individuals with LLL called Self-Management for Amputee Rehabilitation using Technology (SMART); however, before evaluating its efficacy, we wanted to understand its appropriateness in the target population. OBJECTIVE: To assess the usability of SMART among individuals with LLL. STUDY DESIGN: The study used a concurrent and retrospective think-aloud process. METHODS: Individuals with LLL, aged 18 years or older (n = 9), reviewed the modules during an online video conferencing session with an assessor. SMART included four stakeholder-informed modules with 18 total sections. Participants were asked to think aloud while completing 11 SMART tasks, such as entering SMART, goal setting, finding skin care, and reading the content of 10 sections, including limb care, diet, fatigue, and energy. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using directed content analysis. RESULTS: The median age was 58 (range: 30-69) years. Overall, SMART was perceived as straightforward, easy to navigate, and an accessible resource for education and skills. Difficulties were identified with navigation (e.g. skipping the "Foot care for diabetes" section), presentation (e.g. unclear audio), and language (e.g. pistoning and contracture). CONCLUSIONS: SMART was redesigned to address the usability issues. The next step is to explore the perceived usefulness of SMART for content and intention to use.

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of Self-Management for Amputee Rehabilitation using Technology (SMART): An online self-management program for individuals with lower limb loss.

BACKGROUND: Lower limb loss (LLL) is a distressing experience with psychological, physical, and social challenges. Education is needed to enhance the coping skills and confidence of patients to improve LLL outcomes. However, access to rehabilitation services and education is limited outside of urban centers. To address this service gap, we co-created an eHealth platform, called Self-Management for Amputee Rehabilitation using Technology (SMART). OBJECTIVES: First, we will test the effect of SMART and usual care compared with usual care only on walking capacity and confidence among individuals with LLL. Second, we will describe key implementation factors for program delivery and adoption at the person- and provider-level. METHODS: This is a Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Design, mixed-methods, multi-site (British Columbia and Ontario, Canada), parallel, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Participants will include adults with unilateral LLL, during early prosthetic fitting (<2 years after casting for initial prosthesis). Participants in both groups will receive usual care. The experimental group will receive SMART with weekly support sessions from a trained peer mentor for goal setting and action planning for six weeks. Participants will be encouraged to continue using SMART for an additional four weeks. The control group will receive usual care, and weekly social contacts for six weeks. The primary outcome measure is walking capacity operationalized as the performance based Timed Up and Go test. The secondary outcome is walking confidence using the Ambulatory Self-Confidence Questionnaire. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and four weeks follow-up. We will describe key implementation factors (such as, participant experience, intervention adoption, fidelity) throughout the study using questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and direct observation. RESULTS: No participants have been enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: SMART has the potential to provide knowledge and skill development to augment rehabilitation outcomes for adults with LLL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04953364 in Clinical Trial Registry (https://clinicaltrials.gov/).

Telehealth interventions for mobility after lower limb loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Mobility is a crucial component for healthy aging after lower limb loss (LLL). Telehealth technologies, for example, smart devices, are novel approaches for health programs delivery regardless of geographical boundaries. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of telehealth interventions on mobility, quality of life, and antecedents of health behavior compared with a control condition (usual care or simpler telehealth interventions with fewer number of behavior change techniques [BCTs]) for community-dwelling adults (>50 years) with an LLL and the effect of mode of delivery and BCTs used in telehealth interventions on health outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus on January 28, 2021, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. Two authors independently screened records and assessed risk of bias. We conducted a narrative synthesis of evidence and, when appropriate, used the standardized mean difference (SMD) and mean difference for meta-analyses and the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for practice recommendations. RESULTS: We identified six randomized controlled trials. Telephone was the most common delivery mode (n = 3), and "instructions for performing behaviors" was the most common BCT (n = 5). Very low certainty evidence showed no changes in mobility (six studies: SMD = 0.33 [95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.08, 0.75]), quality of life (two studies: mean difference = -0.08 [95% CI = -0.30, 0.15]), and antecedents of behavior (five studies: SMD = 0.04 [95% CI = -0.28, 0.36]). CONCLUSIONS: Our review highlights a knowledge gap for the effect of telehealth interventions for people with LLL. Although no promising effect was shown for telehealth interventions, very low certainty evidence precludes making a definitive clinical recommendation.

Developing a research agenda on exercise and physical activity for people with limb loss in Canada.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of high-quality evidence about the effects of exercise or physical activity interventions for adults with lower limb amputations (LLAs). A planning meeting involving stakeholders (i.e., people with LLA, community advocates, health care providers, researchers) was organized to identify key research priorities related to exercise and physical activity for people with LLAs. METHODS: We used a collaborative prioritized planning process with a pre-meeting survey and 2-day virtual meeting that included: identification and prioritization of challenges or gaps; identification and consolidation of solutions; and action planning. This process integrated a modified Delphi approach, including anonymous feedback in two surveys. RESULTS: Thirty-five stakeholders participated. Six challenges related to exercise and physical activity for people with LLA were prioritized. One solution was prioritized for each challenge. After consolidation of solutions, participants developed five research action plans for research including: developing an on-line interface; developing and evaluating peer-support programs to support physical activity; examining integration of people with LLA into cardiac rehabilitation; development and evaluation of health provider education; and determining priority outcomes related to physical activity and exercise. CONCLUSIONS: This collaborative process resulted in an action plan for amputation research and fostered collaborations to move identified priorities into action.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONLower limb amputations impact mobility leading to lower levels of physical activity.There are research gaps in our understanding of the effects of exercise or physical activity interventions for adults with lower limb amputations.Through a collaborative planning process, participants prioritized research directions on physical activity and exercise for people with LLA to advance research in the field.Action plans for research focused on developing online resources, peer support, cardiac rehabilitation for people with LLA, health provider education and determining priority outcomes related to physical activity and exercise.

Identifying priorities and developing strategies for building capacity in amputation research in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Compared to other patient population groups, the field of amputation research in Canada lacks cohesion largely due to limited funding sources, lack of connection among research scientists, and loose ties among geographically dispersed healthcare centres, research institutes and advocacy groups. As a result, advances in clinical care are hampered and ultimately negatively influence outcomes of persons living with limb loss. OBJECTIVE: To stimulate a national strategy on advancing amputation research in Canada, a consensus-workshop was organized with an expert panel of stakeholders to identify key research priorities and potential strategies to build researcher and funding capacity in the field. METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was used to gain consensus on identifying and selecting an initial set of priorities for building research capacity in the field of amputation. This included an anonymous pre-meeting survey (N = 31 respondents) followed by an in-person consensus-workshop meeting that hosted 38 stakeholders (researchers, physiatrists, surgeons, prosthetists, occupational and physical therapists, community advocates, and people with limb loss). RESULTS: The top three identified research priorities were: (1) developing a national dataset; (2) obtaining health economic data to illustrate the burden of amputation to the healthcare system and to patients; and (3) improving strategies related to outcome measurement in patients with limb loss (e.g. identifying, validating, and/or developing outcome measures). Strategies for moving these priorities into action were also developed. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus-workshop provided an initial roadmap for limb loss research in Canada, and the event served as an important catalyst for stakeholders to initiate collaborations for moving identified priorities into action. Given the increasing number of people undergoing an amputation, there needs to be a stronger Canadian collaborative approach to generate the necessary research to enhance evidence-based clinical care and policy decision-making.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONLimb loss is a growing concern across North America, with lower-extremity amputations occurring due to complications arising from diabetes being a major cause.To advance knowledge about limb loss and to improve clinical care for this population, stronger connections are needed across the continuum of care (acute, rehabilitation, community) and across sectors (clinical, advocacy, industry and research).There are new surgical techniques, technologies, and rehabilitation approaches being explored to improve the health, mobility and community participation of people with limb loss, but further research evidence is needed to demonstrate efficacy and to better integrate them into standard clinical care.