Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 111, 2024 01 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38184570

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy is a global challenge. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the problem has persisted despite vaccine availability and decreasing infections. In Uganda, there is still limited information on the extent and predictors of vaccine hesitancy. This study sought to assess the prevalence and predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and the effectiveness of an intervention that involved community pharmacy counseling in combating COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. METHODS: A total of 394 participants were enrolled in a 4-week prospective cohort interventional study. The study was conducted across eight community pharmacies in Mbarara City, between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM daily. The study personnel ascertained the vaccination status of all clients seeking community pharmacy services. All unvaccinated clients were consecutively assessed for eligibility, and eligible clients were systematically enrolled after receiving the community pharmacy services for which they requested. The study intervention involved structured participant counseling (within the pharmacy premise), follow-up short message service (weekly), and telephone calls (bi-weekly). Only participants who did not accept to receive the COVID-19 vaccine despite counseling were followed up for four weeks, or until they accepted to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. The effectiveness of the community pharmacy counseling intervention was determined as an increase in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, and desirable attitudinal change towards COVID-19 disease, vaccination exercise, and vaccines. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize data, and multivariate analysis was used to determine the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Out of 394 participants, 221 (56%) were hesitant to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Participants expressed several reasons (mean 2±1) for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, mostly concerning vaccine safety (N=160, 47.3%). The overall COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate increased by 25.4 percent points (43.9 - 69.3 percent points) after the study intervention. Age, religion, level of education, distance from the nearest public health facility, having a friend/family diagnosed with COVID-19, and personal suspicion of contracting COVID-19 were significant predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is a big challenge in Uganda. A mix of sociodemographic and COVID-19 vaccine perceptions are the key predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Although COVID-19 vaccines were not available at the time of the study, this study found that structured counseling interventions can improve COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rates. Larger prospective studies should evaluate the effectiveness of similar interventions in community pharmacies and other healthcare settings.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Farmácias , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Hesitação Vacinal , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Uganda/epidemiologia , Vacinação , Aconselhamento
2.
BMC Med Educ ; 23(1): 965, 2023 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38102623

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The clinical learning environment is an essential component in health professions' education. Data are scant on how postgraduate trainees in sub-Saharan Africa perceive their medical school learning environments, and how those perceptions contribute to their engagement during training, their emotional wellbeing, and career aspirations. This study examined perceptions of postgraduate medical trainees (residents) in a resource-limited setting, regarding their learning environment and explored perceptual contributions to their career engagement during training. The data reported contribute to understanding how clinical learning environments can be improved in low-resource settings in Uganda and elsewhere. METHODS: This study was done at the Faculty of Medicine of Mbarara University of Science and Technology in Uganda. We used a descriptive cross-sectional design involving sequential mixed methods. Quantitative data were collected using the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM). Qualitative data were collected using focus group discussions. RESULTS: Ninety of the 113 eligible residents responded (79.6%). Of these, 62 (68.9%) were males, 51 (56.7%) were third-year trainees, and the majority (40%) of the residents were aged between 30 and 34 years. Overall PHEEM scored 98.22 ± 38.09; Role Autonomy scored 34.25 ± 13.69, Teaching scored 39.7 ± 13.81, and Social Support scored 24.27 ± 10.59. Gender differences occurred in the perceptions of teaching and social support. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.94 for the overall PHEEM. Five major themes were identified from the qualitative data (trainee support, supervision environment, engagement with overall learning environment, preparation for future practice, and challenges that impede training). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study suggests that postgraduate trainees at the institution perceived the clinical learning environment positively amidst challenges of limited resources. Trainees' insights provided data that propose improvements on a number of domains in the learning environment.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Aprendizagem , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Uganda , Universidades , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos
3.
SAGE Open Med ; 11: 20503121231171350, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37152841

RESUMO

Objectives: The World Health Organization pragmatic guidelines recommend shorter duration drug regimens with newer, more efficacious agents for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. However, adverse drug reactions associated with the use of newer, second-line agents may pose a major barrier to adequate management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. We therefore sought to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with adverse drug reactions among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patient medical records at the tuberculosis treatment unit of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, between January 2013 and December 2020. Medical records were included in the study, if the patients were aged ⩾18 years, tested sputum positive for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, with adequate pharmacovigilance data documented. We assessed all documented health-related patient complaints, deranged laboratory values, and clinician suspected adverse drug reactions for scientific/clinical plausibility. Adverse drug reactions were confirmed using published and manufacturer drug references materials. A multidisciplinary clinician team was involved to decide whether to exclude or include a suspected adverse drug reaction. Results: About 6 in 10 (67.4%; 120/178) patients experienced at least one adverse drug reactions during treatment, of which 18.3%, 14.6%, and 11.4% of adverse drug reactions affected the endocrine/metabolic, otic, and musculoskeletal body systems, respectively. Majority of the adverse drug reactions were probable and had a moderate severity. There was an upward trend in adverse drug reaction incidence between 2015 and 2019. Adverse drug reaction occurrence was associated with previous adverse drug reaction history (adjusted odds ratio = 2.85 (1.08, 7.53 at 95% confidence interval)); however, patients who were underweight (adjusted odds ratio = 0.34 (0.16, 0.69 at 95% confidence interval)) and those treated with bedaquiline-based drug regimens (adjusted odds ratio = 0.2 (0.07, 0.59 at 95% confidence interval)) were less likely to experience an adverse drug reaction. Conclusion: Majority of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis experience at least adverse drug reaction during the course of treatment. The newer standard shorter duration drug regimens (9-12 months) may be associated with intolerable adverse drug reactions that hamper effective management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. There is need for more studies to assess the clinical adverse drug reaction burden associated with the implementation of shorter duration regimens.

4.
J Clin Transl Res ; 9(1): 16-25, 2023 Feb 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36687297

RESUMO

Background: Pregnancy management using medications has been challenging for both healthcare providers and pregnant women, given the fear of teratogenicity effects and the potential for fetal harm. In the developing world, poor health-seeking behavior of patients, delayed initiation of antenatal care (ANC), and low level of educational status of mothers could contribute to the issue of drug safety in pregnancy. Aim: The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with potentially harmful medication use in pregnancy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from April 1 to June 6, 2021, including 209 pregnant women on ANC follow-up at a referral hospital in Southwestern Uganda. The simple random sampling technique was employed to select study participants. Interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to collect the history of medication use since conception and then the participant's ANC card was reviewed to determine prescribed drug regimens and their indications. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 23.0 was used for analysis. Results: Out of the 1,422 medications used by 209 women, 665 (42.2%) were category C, and 182 (11.5%) were category A. A total of 92 (44.0%) pregnant women used at least one potentially harmful medication during the current pregnancy. Having more than average monthly income (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.32 [1.04, 5.14 at 95% confidence interval (CI)]), having a chronic disease (aOR = 3.24 [1.17, 8.97 at 95% C.I]), using 7 and more medications (aOR = 9.12 [4.11, 20.24 at 95% CI]), and use of herbal medicines (aOR = 4.50 [2.10, 9.87 at 95% CI]) were shown to be risk factors. Conclusion: The proportion of pregnant women that used at least one potentially harmful medication is higher than in previous studies. Having comorbidities and taking more medications increase the risk of receiving a potentially harmful medication during pregnancy. Relevance to Patients: This study identified the gaps in the use of medicines during pregnancy which will enable the development and implementation of protocols for optimizing prescribing practices in pregnant women by focusing on the safety of the fetus.

5.
Pan Afr Med J ; 46: 50, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38188887

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: gestational diabetes mellitus is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality among pregnant women worldwide. We aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus among women attending the antenatal care clinic at a tertiary care hospital in South-Western Uganda. METHODS: this was a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted among women at ≥24 weeks of amenorrhea attending the antenatal care clinic at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital between December 2020 and March 2021. We screened all women for gestational diabetes mellitus using the World Health Organization 2013 diagnostic criteria. We obtained socio-demographic, medical, and obstetric data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the factors independently associated with gestational diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: we enrolled 343 pregnant women with a mean age of 27.3 (SD ±12.3) years. Of the 343 participants, 35 (10.2%) had gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (95% C.I: 7.4%-13.9%) and 7 (2%) had diabetes in pregnancy. The factors significantly associated with gestational diabetes mellitus were; previous history of foetal macrosomia in any of the previous pregnancies (aOR: 5.53, 95% C.I: 1.29-23.65) and family history of diabetes mellitus in the first-degree relatives (aOR: 4.45, 95% C.I:1.48-13.34). CONCLUSION: one in every ten pregnant women attending the antenatal care clinic at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital is likely to have gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. There is a need to strengthen routine testing for gestational diabetes mellitus among women attending the antenatal care clinic, especially pregnant women with a prior history of foetal macrosomia and a family history of diabetes mellitus in first-degree relatives.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Prevalência , Macrossomia Fetal , Estudos Transversais , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Uganda/epidemiologia
6.
Open Access Emerg Med ; 13: 279-290, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34234583

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medication-related emergency department admissions impose a huge and unnecessary burden on the healthcare system. We sought to determine the prevalence and predictors of medication-related emergency department admissions, among patients with cardiovascular diseases at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda. METHODS: Institutional research ethics approval was secured to conduct a cross-sectional study at the Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital emergency department, between February and September, 2020. All eligible and consenting patients were enrolled in a consecutive manner after a preliminary diagnosis was made by the attending physician. Structured questionnaire interview and comprehensive medication history reviews were used to identify medication therapy problems, in collaboration with a resident physician present on duty. We used sequential categorization for medication therapy problem(s). Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were used to determine prevalence and predictors of medication-related emergency department admissions. RESULTS: Out of the 128 patients interviewed, 105 (82%) patient admissions were associated with a medication therapy problem: ineffectiveness of drug therapy (53.3%, 56), medication non-adherence (42.9%, 45), and adverse drug reactions (3.8%, 4). Out of a total of 90 incidences of medication non-adherence, 34.4% (31/90) were due to lack of understanding of patient medication regimen, and 27.8% (25/90) due to unaffordable cost of medicines. Female gender (AOR = 4.31 [1.43, 13.03 at 95% CI]; P-value = 0.010]) and a history of tobacco use (AOR = 9.58 [1.14, 80.28 at 95% CI]; P-value = 0.037) were statistically significant predictors of medication-related emergency department admissions in adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: Four in five emergency department admissions were associated with medication-related causes, majorly due to ineffectiveness of drug therapy. Knowledge gap on patient medication regimens was the most prevalent cause for medication non-adherence. Female gender and previous or current tobacco use was an independent risk factor for medication-related admissions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA