Incidence and risk factors associated with the development of hypothyroidism after postoperative chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients with high-risk features: Supplementary analysis of JCOG1008.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypothyroidism is a recognized late adverse event following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). In the JCOG1008 trial, we treated patients with high-risk HNC with postoperative chemoradiotherapy. We aimed to elucidate factors associated with hypothyroidism by analyzing the JCOG1008 data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2012-2018, 261 patients from 28 institutions were enrolled in JCOG1008. Thyroid function tests were conducted to assess hypothyroidism, including free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone assays. Hypothyroidism was defined as Grade 2 or higher in CTCAE v4.0. Various clinical and dosimetric parameters were analyzed. In radiotherapy, there were no dose constraints for the thyroid. Multivariable analysis was conducted on these variables to identify predictive factors for hypothyroidism. RESULTS: The analysis included 162 patients (57 with 3D-CRT and 105 with IMRT), with a median follow-up of 4.7 years (0.3-9.3 years). Among these, 27 (16.7 %) developed hypothyroidism within 2 years after radiotherapy. In a multivariable analysis, the weekly cisplatin [OR=7.700 (CI: 1.632-36.343, p = 0.010)] and baseline FT4 [OR=0.009 (CI: <0.001-0.313, p = 0.010)] were significantly associated with hypothyroidism in the IMRT group. Regarding dosimetric characteristics, V60Gy [OR=1.069 (CI: 0.999-1.143, p = 0.054)] was potentially associated with the development of hypothyroidism. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the incidence of hypothyroidism within 2 years after postoperative chemoradiotherapy for high-risk HNC was 16.7 % based on analytical results from prospective clinical trials.

Risk prediction model for cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury in patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy: A re-analysis of a phase II/III JCOG1008 trial.

OBJECTIVES: Acute kidney injury (AKI) represents a major toxicity associated with cisplatin. We developed a risk prediction model for cisplatin-induced AKI in patients with postoperative high-risk head and neck cancer who received chemoradiotherapy during a randomized phase II/III trial, JCOG1008. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-one patients received radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin at 40 mg/m2 (weekly arm) or 3-weekly cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 (3-weekly arm). AKI was defined using the AKI Network classification/staging system as increased serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL or a ≥1.5-fold increase from baseline 30 days after completing chemoradiotherapy. The Akaike information criterion was used to explore the optimal model by combining explanatory variables at registration. RESULTS: Among the 251 patients (210 men and 41 women (median age; 62 years)), 94 (37.5 %) developed cisplatin-induced AKI. The optimal cisplatin-induced AKI risk prediction model comprised four factors, including a primary site of hypopharynx/larynx (vs. oral cavity/oropharynx), 3-weekly arm (vs. weekly arm), serum albumin of ≤3.5 g/dL (vs. >3.5 g/dL) and creatinine clearance (CCr) of <90 mL/min (vs. ≥90 mL/min). The incidence of cisplatin-induced AKI rose with cumulative count of the four factors. When the cumulative count was ≥2, the positive predictive value for cisplatin-induced AKI was 50.3 %. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a risk prediction model for cisplatin-induced AKI in patients with head and neck cancer who received postoperative chemoradiotherapy using primary site, cisplatin administration method, serum albumin, and CCr. Patients with risk factors unrelated to the cisplatin administration method should adopt a weekly cisplatin regimen.

A multi-institutional randomized phase III study comparing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer; Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG2202 (LAPAN study).

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP), including laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy, has gained widespread acceptance over the last decade owing to its favorable short-term outcomes. However, evidence regarding its oncologic safety is insufficient. In March 2023, a randomized phase III study was launched in Japan to confirm the non-inferiority of overall survival in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer undergoing MIDP compared with that of patients undergoing open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). METHODS: This is a multi-institutional, randomized, phase III study. A total of 370 patients will be enrolled from 40 institutions within 4 years. The primary endpoint of this study is overall survival, and the secondary endpoints include relapse-free survival, proportion of patients undergoing radical resection, proportion of patients undergoing complete laparoscopic surgery, incidence of adverse surgical events, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Only a credentialed surgeon is eligible to perform both ODP and MIDP. All ODP and MIDP procedures will undergo centralized review using intraoperative photographs. The non-inferiority of MIDP to ODP in terms of overall survival will be statistically analyzed. Only if non-inferiority is confirmed will the analysis assess the superiority of MIDP over ODP. DISCUSSION: If our study demonstrates the non-inferiority of MIDP in terms of overall survival, it would validate its short-term advantages and establish its long-term clinical efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCT 1,031,220,705 [ https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1031220705 ].

Short-term outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis (JCOG1704).

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for marginally resectable gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis (ELM) remains unfavorable, even after R0 resection. To assess the safety and efficacy of preoperative docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS), we conducted a multicenter phase II trial. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included histologically proven HER2-negative gastric adenocarcinoma with bulky nodal (bulky N) involvement around major branched arteries or para-aortic node (PAN) metastases. Patients received three cycles of docetaxel (40 mg/m2, day 1), oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2, day 1), and S-1 (80-120 mg/body, days 1-14), followed by gastrectomy with D2 plus PAN dissection. Subsequently, patients underwent postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 for 1 year. The primary endpoint was major (grade ≥ 2a) pathological response rate (pRR) according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma criteria. RESULTS: Between October 2018 and March 2022, 47 patients (bulky N, 20; PAN, 17; both, 10) were enrolled in the trial. One patient was ineligible. Another declined any protocol treatments before initiation. Among the 45 eligible patients who initiated DOS chemotherapy, 44 (98%) completed 3 cycles and 42 (93%) underwent R0 resection. Major pRR and pathological complete response rates among the 46 eligible patients, including the patient who declined treatment, were 57% (26/46) and 24% (11/46), respectively. Common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (24%), anorexia (16%), febrile neutropenia (9%), and diarrhea (9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemotherapy with DOS yielded favorable pathological responses with an acceptable toxicity profile. This multimodal approach is highly promising for treating gastric cancer with ELM.

Frequency of lymph node metastasis according to tumor location in clinical T1 early gastric cancer: supplementary analysis of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group study (JCOG0912).

BACKGROUND: The frequency of lymph node metastases per lymph node site in early gastric cancer has not been well clarified from the data based on prospective studies. This exploratory analysis aimed to determine the frequency and location of lymph node metastases in clinical T1 gastric cancer using the data from JCOG0912 to investigate the validity of the extent of standard lymph node dissection defined in Japanese guidelines. METHODS: This analysis included 815 patients with clinical T1 gastric cancer. The proportion of pathological metastasis was identified for each lymph node site per tumor location (middle third and lower third) and four equal parts of the gastric circumference. The secondary aim was identification of the risk factor for lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients (10.9%) had pathologically positive lymph node metastases. Although the overall frequency of metastases was low (0.3-5.4%), metastases were widely located in each lymph node sites when primary lesion was in the middle third of the stomach. No. 4sb and 9 showed no metastasis when primary lesion was in the lower third of the stomach. Lymph node dissection of metastatic nodes resulted in a 5-year survival in more than 50% of patients. A tumor greater than 3 cm and a T1b tumor were associated with lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: This supplementary analysis demonstrated that nodal metastasis from early gastric cancer is widely and disorderly not depending on the location. Thus, systematic lymph node dissection is necessary to cure the early gastric cancer.