RESUMO
Background: The internet has led to the realization that the world is a global village. Due to technological advancements, anyone can access the internet and various video sharing platforms and in turn, get access to or share information across the world. One of the most sought-after critical pieces of information on the internet, as well as social media platforms, is information regarding wounds. Objective: To determine the views of patients with chronic wounds regarding the internet and other social media platforms as a source of information regarding wounds. Methodology: A descriptive prospective study covering the period between November 1, 2022, and January 30, 2023. All patients with chronic wounds presenting in the plastic outpatient clinic, together with patients presenting themselves in the wound clinic at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) during this period, were informed about the study and asked to participate. After consenting, they were then required to sign an informed consent form after agreeing to participate. Data collection was done through interviews and filled out in structured questionnaires. Data points included demographics, information on internet use, and interaction with the various social media platforms. Results: 83.4% of the participants were of the opinion that the contents shared were done so by professionals, compared to 12.5% who indicated that the owners or uploaders of the contents were laymen. 2.6% and 1.5%, on the other hand, opined that the owners or uploaders of the contents were unknown and difficult to tell, respectively. Discussion: The participants in the current study felt that some aspects regarding content on wounds that is shared on the internet as well as other social media platforms would need further improvement. Such areas included information regarding wound dressing concepts, the etiology and pathophysiology of wounds, complications of wounds, and wound pain management.
RESUMO
RATIONALE: The burden of critical care is greatest in resource-limited settings. Intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes at public hospitals in Kenya are unknown. The present study is timely, given the Kenyan Ministry of Health initiative to expand ICU capacity. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with mortality at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital and validate the Mortality Probability Admission Model II (MPM0-II). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 450 patients from January 1, 2013, to April 5, 2015, was evaluated using demographics, presenting diagnoses, interventions, mortality, and cost data. RESULTS: ICU mortality was 53.6%, and 30-day mortality was 57.3%. Most patients were male (61%) and at least 18 years old (70%); the median age was 29 years. Factors associated with high adjusted odds of mortality were as follows: age younger than 10 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.59; P ≤ 0.001), ages 35-49 years (aOR, 3.13; P = 0.002), and age above 50 years (aOR, 2.86; P = 0.004), with reference age range 10-24 years; sepsis (aOR, 3.39; P = 0.01); acute stroke (aOR, 8.14; P = 0.011); acute respiratory failure or mechanical ventilation (aOR, 6.37; P < 0.001); and vasopressor support (aOR, 7.98; P < 0.001). Drug/alcohol poisoning (aOR, 0.33; P = 0.005) was associated with lower adjusted odds of mortality. MPM0-II discrimination showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.82). The result of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for calibration was significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a Kenyan public ICU, high mortality was noted despite the use of advanced therapies. MPM0-II has acceptable discrimination but poor calibration. Modification of MPM0-II or development of a new model using a prospective multicenter global collaboration is needed. Standardized triage and treatment protocols for high-risk diagnoses are needed to improve ICU outcomes.