RESUMO
Background: Loss of pregnancy in mares can have many different causes, including both infectious and non-infectious conditions. Extrapolation of findings from other studies is often uncertain as the significance of each cause varies across regions. Causes of pregnancy loss in mares have never been thoroughly studied in Denmark, so a prospective cross-sectional cohort study targeting the entire Danish population of pregnant mares was performed over a period of 13 months to obtain knowledge of the significance of individual causes. Fifty aborted or prematurely delivered stillborn fetuses were submitted for necropsy and examined by a panel of diagnostic laboratory methods. Results: Overall, a cause of fetal loss was established for 72% of the examined cases. Most cases (62%) were lost due to a non-infectious cause, of which obstruction of the feto-placental blood circulation due to severe torsion of the umbilical cord was most prevalent. Pregnancy loss due to a variety of opportunistic bacteria, including bacteria not previously associated with abortion in mares, accounted for 12%, while equid alphaherpesvirus (EHV) type 1 was the cause of pregnancy loss in 8% of the cases. EHV type 4 and Chlamydiaceae species were identified in some cases, but not regarded as the cause of fetal loss. Conclusion: Umbilical cord torsion was found to be the most prevalent cause of fetal loss in Danish mares, while infectious causes such as EHV type 1 and streptococci only accounted for a minor proportion of the losses. The study highlights the need for defined criteria for establishing an abortion diagnosis in mares, particularly in relation to EHV types 1 and 4.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the occurrence of Ehrlichia (E.) canis in dogs living in Germany and evaluate the possibilities and limits of direct and indirect diagnostic methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The first part of the study was a retrospective analysis of routine samples, which had been examined for E. canis antibodies using an indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT). The examination was part of a laboratory profile for the detection of travel-related diseases (travel disease profile) or was performed on an individual basis. In the second part, samples which were examined within a travel disease profile, including E. canis antibodies, were further evaluated for E. canis DNA by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Medical histories were obtained of E. canis-positive dogs (animals which were positive in IFAT and/or PCR) and for a part of the negative animals. RESULTS: For 2015, 11.8% of 12220 samples had antibodies for E. canis. Dogs, which were examined with a travel disease profile, displayed antibodies in 5.6% cases of 1172 animals (investigation period February to March 2016). Of the E. canis-positive dogs (n = 67), 91% were positive with only the IFAT, 7.5% with the IFAT and PCR and 1.5% were only positive by PCR. Anamnesis showed that particularly imported dogs without symptoms were controlled for travel diseases during their first year in Germany. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although endemic E. canis infections play a minor role in Germany, infections with this pathogen are still of importance in this country, particularly because of the import of dogs. Therefore, a medical history helps in early ehrlichiosis diagnosis and to start an adequate treatment. Pathogen detection in imported E. canis-seropositive dogs, which often did not display clinical symptoms in this study, was frequently negative in blood samples by PCR. The diagnostic method should be chosen depending on the disease phase and the underlying question (symptoms or preventive screening).