Long-term safety profile of belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety profile of long-term belimumab therapy combined with standard therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in patients with active disease. METHODS: Patients who were randomized to receive intravenous placebo or belimumab 1, 4, or 10 mg/kg, plus standard therapy, and completed the initial 52-week double-blind treatment period were then allowed to enter a 24-week open-label extension phase. During the extension period, patients in the belimumab group either received the same dose or were switched to 10 mg/kg and patients in the placebo group were switched to belimumab 10 mg/kg. Patients who achieved a satisfactory response during the 24-week extension period were allowed to participate in the long-term continuation study of monthly belimumab 10 mg/kg. Adverse events (AEs) and abnormal laboratory results were analyzed per 100 patient-years in 1-year intervals. RESULTS: Of the 364 patients who completed the 52-week double-blind treatment period, 345 entered the 24-week extension, and 296 continued treatment with belimumab in the long-term continuation study. Safety data through 4 years of belimumab exposure (1,165 cumulative patient-years) are reported. Incidence rates of AEs, severe/serious AEs, infusion reactions, infections, malignancies, grades 3/4 laboratory abnormalities, and discontinuations due to AEs were stable or declined during 4-year belimumab exposure. The most common AEs included arthralgia, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, fatigue, and nausea. Serious infusion reactions were rare: only 1 occurred during the 4-year followup period. Rates of serious infection decreased from 5.9/100 patient-years to 3.4/100 patient-years, and no specific type of infection predominated. CONCLUSION: Belimumab added to standard therapy was generally well-tolerated over the 4-year treatment period in patients with SLE, which suggests that belimumab can be administered long term with an acceptable safety profile.

Tumor Necrosis Factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) Receptor-1 and Receptor-2 agonists for cancer therapy.

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Agents that activate the TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand death receptors, TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2, have attracted substantial attention and investment as potential anti-cancer therapies. Preclinical studies of TRAIL-R agonists indicate that they may be efficacious in a wide range of tumor types, especially when combined with chemotherapeutic agents. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: The rationale for clinical development of TRAIL-R agonists is described, including the basis for combining these agents with other agents that modulate the 'checks and balances' of the apoptotic pathways. Accruing data that highlight differences between TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 that could affect the clinical significance of their specific agonists are described. The clinical experience to date with each of the agonists is summarized. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: The reader will gain an understanding of the rationale for the clinical development of TRAIL-R agonists, as well as the current status of clinical trials of these interesting new agents. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Ongoing clinical trials will provide important information regarding the future development of TRAIL-R agonists.

Phase 2 study of mapatumumab, a fully human agonistic monoclonal antibody which targets and activates the TRAIL receptor-1, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical pharmacological properties of mapatumumab (agonistic human monoclonal antibody to TRAIL-R1) suggest that this antibody reduces cell viability, induces cell death in many types of cancer cell lines in vitro, inhibits or reduces tumor growth in xenograft models of solid tumors, and can induce significant tumor regression in some models. The receptor for mapatumumab, TRAIL-R1, is expressed on NSCLC cell lines. This pharmacologic profile suggests that mapatumumab may have therapeutic benefit in the treatment of NSCLC. METHODS: This Phase 2 multi-center study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of mapatumumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with at least 1 platinum-based regimen. Each patient was to receive mapatumumab at a dose of 10mg/kg administered intravenously (IV) every 21 days in absence of disease progression. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients with relapsed or refractory Stage IIIB or IV or recurrent NSCLC were enrolled. Patients had received a median of 3 previous therapeutic regimens (range 1-7). Mapatumumab was well tolerated by the patients in this study with no discontinuations due to adverse events. The most common adverse events reported, regardless of relationship, were fatigue, cough, nausea, dyspnea, constipation, and vomiting. Laboratory analyses revealed no appreciable evidence of hepatic or renal toxicity among the study patients. No patients developed anti-mapatumumab antibodies. The plasma mapatumumab concentrations observed in this study were consistent with the predicted exposures, based on Phase 1 pharmacokinetic results. None of the 32 treated patients showed a response according to the RECIST criteria. Nine patients (29%) had stable disease (SD). CONCLUSION: In a group of heavily pretreated NSCLC patients, no objective single agent activity of mapatumumab was demonstrated, but the drug was safe and well tolerated. Based on this favorable safety profile, and preclinical evidence of potential synergy in combination with agents commonly used to treat NSCLC, future evaluation of mapatumumab in combination with chemotherapy is warranted.