Silent Airway Mucus Plugs in COPD and Clinical Implications.

BACKGROUND: Airway mucus plugs are frequently identified on CT scans of patients with COPD with a smoking history without mucus-related symptoms (ie, cough, phlegm [silent mucus plugs]). RESEARCH QUESTION: In patients with COPD, what are the risk and protective factors associated with silent airway mucus plugs? Are silent mucus plugs associated with functional, structural, and clinical measures of disease? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified mucus plugs on chest CT scans of participants with COPD from the COPDGene study. The mucus plug score was defined as the number of pulmonary segments with mucus plugs, ranging from 0 to 18, and categorized into three groups (0, 1-2, and ≥ 3). We determined risk and protective factors for silent mucus plugs and the associations of silent mucus plugs with measures of disease severity using multivariable linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 4,363 participants with COPD, 1,739 had no cough or phlegm. Among the 1,739 participants, 627 (36%) had airway mucus plugs identified on CT scan. Risk factors of silent mucus plugs (compared with symptomatic mucus plugs) were older age (OR, 1.02), female sex (OR, 1.40), and Black race (OR, 1.93) (all P values < .01). Among those without cough or phlegm, silent mucus plugs (vs absence of mucus plugs) were associated with worse 6-min walk distance, worse resting arterial oxygen saturation, worse FEV1 % predicted, greater emphysema, thicker airway walls, and higher odds of severe exacerbation in the past year in adjusted models. INTERPRETATION: Mucus plugs are common in patients with COPD without mucus-related symptoms. Silent mucus plugs are associated with worse functional, structural, and clinical measures of disease. CT scan-identified mucus plugs can complement the evaluation of patients with COPD.

Excipient Lung Disease in a Patient with Preexisting Chronic Thromboembolic Disease.

Excipient lung disease is an uncommon condition that occurs when crushed oral tablets are injected intravenously and cause pulmonary hypertension. Diagnosis requires a high degree of clinical suspicion and recognition of characteristic imaging findings. The authors present a previously unreported combination of findings in a patient with excipient lung disease and preexisting chronic thromboembolic disease. A pattern of diffuse centrilobular nodules with sparing of lung segments with chronically occluded pulmonary arteries was highly suggestive of the diagnosis and indicated a vascular cause. Pathologic specimen obtained at the time of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy helped confirm the clinically suspected entity. Keywords: Pulmonary Arteries, Embolism/Thrombosis, Foreign Bodies, Lung Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

Airway-Occluding Mucus Plugs and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Importance: Airway mucus plugs are common in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, the association of airway mucus plugging and mortality in patients with COPD is unknown. Objective: To determine whether airway mucus plugs identified on chest computed tomography (CT) were associated with increased all-cause mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients with a diagnosis of COPD in the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD cohort. Participants were non-Hispanic Black or White individuals, aged 45 to 80 years, who smoked at least 10 pack-years. Participants were enrolled at 21 centers across the US between November 2007 and April 2011 and were followed up through August 31, 2022. Exposures: Mucus plugs that completely occluded airways on chest CT scans, identified in medium- to large-sized airways (ie, approximately 2- to 10-mm lumen diameter) and categorized as affecting 0, 1 to 2, or 3 or more lung segments. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, assessed with proportional hazard regression analysis. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, body mass index, pack-years smoked, current smoking status, forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration, and CT measures of emphysema and airway disease. Results: Among the 4483 participants with COPD, 4363 were included in the primary analysis (median age, 63 years [IQR, 57-70 years]; 44% were women). A total of 2585 (59.3%), 953 (21.8%), and 825 (18.9%) participants had mucus plugs in 0, 1 to 2, and 3 or more lung segments, respectively. During a median 9.5-year follow-up, 1769 participants (40.6%) died. The mortality rates were 34.0% (95% CI, 32.2%-35.8%), 46.7% (95% CI, 43.5%-49.9%), and 54.1% (95% CI, 50.7%-57.4%) in participants who had mucus plugs in 0, 1 to 2, and 3 or more lung segments, respectively. The presence of mucus plugs in 1 to 2 vs 0 and 3 or more vs 0 lung segments was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of death of 1.15 (95% CI, 1.02-1.29) and 1.24 (95% CI, 1.10-1.41), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In participants with COPD, the presence of mucus plugs that obstructed medium- to large-sized airways was associated with higher all-cause mortality compared with patients without mucus plugging on chest CT scans.

Intramyocardial cell-based therapy with Lomecel-B during bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: the ELPIS phase I trial.

Aims: Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) survival relies on surgical reconstruction of the right ventricle (RV) to provide systemic circulation. This substantially increases the RV load, wall stress, maladaptive remodelling, and dysfunction, which in turn increases the risk of death or transplantation. Methods and results: We conducted a phase 1 open-label multicentre trial to assess the safety and feasibility of Lomecel-B as an adjunct to second-stage HLHS surgical palliation. Lomecel-B, an investigational cell therapy consisting of allogeneic medicinal signalling cells (MSCs), was delivered via intramyocardial injections. The primary endpoint was safety, and measures of RV function for potential efficacy were obtained. Ten patients were treated. None experienced major adverse cardiac events. All were alive and transplant-free at 1-year post-treatment, and experienced growth comparable to healthy historical data. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) suggested improved tricuspid regurgitant fraction (TR RF) via qualitative rater assessment, and via significant quantitative improvements from baseline at 6 and 12 months post-treatment (P < 0.05). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and RV ejection fraction (EF) showed no declines. To understand potential mechanisms of action, circulating exosomes from intramyocardially transplanted MSCs were examined. Computational modelling identified 54 MSC-specific exosome ribonucleic acids (RNAs) corresponding to changes in TR RF, including miR-215-3p, miR-374b-3p, and RNAs related to cell metabolism and MAPK signalling. Conclusion: Intramyocardially delivered Lomecel-B appears safe in HLHS patients and may favourably affect RV performance. Circulating exosomes of transplanted MSC-specific provide novel insight into bioactivity. Conduct of a controlled phase trial is warranted and is underway.Trial registration number NCT03525418.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Role of Radiologists.

Management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) should be determined by a multidisciplinary team, ideally at a specialized CTEPH referral center. Radiologists contribute to this multidisciplinary process by helping to confirm the diagnosis of CTEPH and delineating the extent of disease, both of which help determine a treatment decision. Preoperative assessment of CTEPH usually employs multiple imaging modalities, including ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning, echocardiography, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), and right heart catheterization with pulmonary angiography. Accurate diagnosis or exclusion of CTEPH at imaging is imperative, as this remains the only form of pulmonary hypertension that is curative with surgery. Unfortunately, CTEPH is often misdiagnosed at CTPA, which can be due to technical factors, patient-related factors, radiologist-related factors, as well as a host of disease mimics including acute pulmonary embolism, in situ thrombus, vasculitis, pulmonary artery sarcoma, and fibrosing mediastinitis. Although V/Q scanning is thought to be substantially more sensitive for CTEPH compared with CTPA, this is likely due to lack of recognition of CTEPH findings rather than a modality limitation. Preoperative evaluation for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) includes assessment of technical operability and surgical risk stratification. While the definitive therapy for CTEPH is PTE, other minimally invasive or noninvasive therapies also lead to clinical improvements including greater survival. Complications of PTE that can be identified at postoperative imaging include infection, reperfusion edema or injury, pulmonary hemorrhage, pericardial effusion or hemopericardium, and rethrombosis. ©RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Anomalous Systemic Arterial Supply to Normal Basal Segments of the Lung.

Supplemental material is available for this article.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Chest Pain-High Probability of Coronary Artery Disease: 2021 Update.

Management of patients with chronic chest pain in the setting of high probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) relies heavily on imaging for determining or excluding presence and severity of myocardial ischemia, hibernation, scarring, and/or the presence, site, and severity of obstructive coronary lesions, as well as course of management and long-term prognosis. In patients with no known ischemic heart disease, imaging is valuable in determining and documenting the presence, extent, and severity of obstructive coronary narrowing and presence of myocardial ischemia. In patients with known ischemic heart disease, imaging findings are important in determining the management of patients with chronic myocardial ischemia and can serve as a decision-making tool for medical therapy, angioplasty, stenting, or surgery. This document summarizes the recent growing body of evidence on various imaging tests and makes recommendations for imaging based on the available data and expert opinion. This document is focused on epicardial CAD and does not discuss the microvascular disease as the cause for CAD. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Reader Perceptions and Impact of AI on CT Assessment of Air Trapping.

Quantitative imaging measurements can be facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, but how they might impact decision-making and be perceived by radiologists remains uncertain. After creation of a dedicated inspiratory-expiratory CT examination and concurrent deployment of a quantitative AI algorithm for assessing air trapping, five cardiothoracic radiologists retrospectively evaluated severity of air trapping on 17 examination studies. Air trapping severity of each lobe was evaluated in three stages: qualitatively (visually); semiquantitatively, allowing manual region-of-interest measurements; and quantitatively, using results from an AI algorithm. Readers were surveyed on each case for their perceptions of the AI algorithm. The algorithm improved interreader agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients: visual, 0.28; semiquantitative, 0.40; quantitative, 0.84; P < .001) and improved correlation with pulmonary function testing (forced expiratory volume in 1 second-to-forced vital capacity ratio) (visual r = -0.26, semiquantitative r = -0.32, quantitative r = -0.44). Readers perceived moderate agreement with the AI algorithm (Likert scale average, 3.7 of 5), a mild impact on their final assessment (average, 2.6), and a neutral perception of overall utility (average, 3.5). Though the AI algorithm objectively improved interreader consistency and correlation with pulmonary function testing, individual readers did not immediately perceive this benefit, revealing a potential barrier to clinical adoption. Keywords: Technology Assessment, Quantification © RSNA, 2021.

Automated Deep Learning Analysis for Quality Improvement of CT Pulmonary Angiography.

CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the first-line imaging test for evaluation of acute pulmonary emboli. However, diagnostic quality is heterogeneous across institutions and is frequently limited by suboptimal pulmonary artery (PA) contrast enhancement. In this retrospective study, a deep learning algorithm for measuring enhancement of the central PAs was developed and assessed for feasibility of its use in quality improvement of CTPA. In a convenience sample of 450 patients, automated measurement of CTPA enhancement showed high agreement with manual radiologist measurement (r = 0.996). Using a threshold of less than 250 HU for suboptimal enhancement, the sensitivity and specificity of the automated classification were 100% and 99.5%, respectively. The algorithm was further evaluated in a random sampling of 3195 CTPA examinations from January 2019 through May 2021. Beginning in January 2021, the scanning protocol was transitioned from bolus tracking to a timing bolus strategy. Automated analysis of these examinations showed that most suboptimal examinations following the change in protocol were performed using one scanner, highlighting the potential value of deep learning algorithms for quality improvement in the radiology department. Keywords: CT Angiography, Pulmonary Arteries © RSNA, 2022.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Acute Aortic Syndrome.

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) includes the entities of acute aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. AAS typically presents with sudden onset of severe, tearing, anterior, or interscapular back pain. Symptoms may be dominated by malperfusion syndrome, due to obstruction of the lumen of the aorta and/or a side branch when the intimal and medial layers are separated. Timely diagnosis of AAS is crucial to permit prompt management; for example, early mortality rates are reported to be 1% to 2% per hour after the onset of symptoms for untreated ascending aortic dissection. The appropriateness assigned to each imaging procedure was based on the ability to obtain key information that is used to plan open surgical, endovascular, or medical therapy. This includes, but is not limited to, confirming the presence of AAS; classification; characterization of entry and reentry sites; false lumen patency; and branch vessel compromise. Using this approach, CT, CTA, and MRA are all considered usually appropriate in the initial evaluation of AAS if those procedures include intravenous contrast administration. Ultrasound is also considered usually appropriate if the acquisition is via a transesophageal approach. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Asymptomatic Patient at Risk for Coronary Artery Disease: 2021 Update.

Coronary atherosclerotic disease is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity due to major cardiovascular events in the United States and abroad. Risk stratification and early preventive measures can reduce major cardiovascular events given the long latent asymptomatic period. Imaging tests can detect subclinical coronary atherosclerosis and aid initiation of targeted preventative efforts based on patient risk. A summary of available imaging tests for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk asymptomatic patients is outlined in this document. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Syncope.

Syncope and presyncope lead to well over one million emergency room visits in the United States each year. Elucidating the cause of syncope or presyncope, which are grouped together given similar etiologies and outcomes, can be exceedingly difficult given the diverse etiologies. This becomes more challenging as some causes, such as vasovagal syncope, are relatively innocuous while others, such as cardiac-related syncope, carry a significant increased risk of death. While the mainstay of syncope and presyncope assessment is a detailed history and physical examination, imaging can play a role in certain situations. In patients where a cardiovascular etiology is suspected based on the appropriate history, physical examination, and ECG findings, resting transthoracic echocardiography is usually considered appropriate for the initial imaging. While no imaging studies are considered usually appropriate when there is a low probability of cardiac or neurologic pathology, chest radiography may be appropriate in certain clinical situations. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Infective Endocarditis.

Infective endocarditis can involve a normal, abnormal, or prosthetic cardiac valve. The diagnosis is typically made clinically with persistently positive blood cultures, characteristic signs and symptoms, and echocardiographic evidence of valvular vegetations or valvular complications such as abscess, dehiscence, or new regurgitation. Imaging plays an important role in the initial diagnosis of infective endocarditis, identifying complications, prognostication, and informing the next steps in therapy. This document outlines the initial imaging appropriateness of a patient with suspected infective endocarditis and for additional imaging in a patient with known or suspected infective endocarditis. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

4D Flow MRI Quantification of Congenital Shunts: Comparison to Invasive Catheterization.

PURPOSE: To compare invasive right heart catheterization with four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI for estimating shunt fraction in patients with intracardiac and extracardiac shunts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent 4D flow MRI and invasive right heart catheterization with a shunt run between August 2015 and November 2018 were included. The primary objective was comparison of estimated shunt fraction (ratio of pulmonary-to-systemic flow, Qp/Qs) at 4D flow and catheterization. Secondary objectives included comparison of the right ventricular-to-left ventricular stroke volume ratio (RVSV/LVSV) to shunt fraction (for those with applicable shunts) and comparison of cardiac output between 4D flow and catheterization. Statistical analysis included Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age, 49 years ± 16 [standard deviation]; 24 women). 4D flow measurements of Qp/Qs strongly correlated with those at catheterization (r = 0.938), and there was no bias. RVSV/LVSV correlated strongly with Qp/Qs from 4D flow (r = 0.852) and catheterization (r = 0.842). Measurements of left ventricle (Qs) and right ventricle (QP) cardiac output from 4D flow and catheterization (Fick) correlated moderately overall (r = 0.673 [Qp] and r = 0.750 [Qs]). CONCLUSION: Shunt fraction measurement using 4D flow MRI compares well with that using invasive cardiac catheterization.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2021.

Ischemic Heart Disease: Noninvasive Imaging Techniques and Findings.

Ischemic heart disease is a leading cause of death worldwide and comprises a large proportion of annual health care expenditure. Management of ischemic heart disease is now best guided by the physiologic significance of coronary artery stenosis. Invasive coronary angiography is the standard for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis. However, it is expensive and has risks including vascular access site complications and contrast material-induced nephropathy. Invasive coronary angiography requires fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement to determine the physiologic significance of a coronary artery stenosis. Multiple noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities can also anatomically delineate or functionally assess for significant coronary artery stenosis, as well as detect the presence of myocardial infarction (MI). While coronary CT angiography can help assess the degree of anatomic stenosis, its inability to assess the physiologic significance of lesions limits its specificity. Physiologic significance of coronary artery stenosis can be determined by cardiac MR vasodilator or dobutamine stress imaging, CT stress perfusion imaging, FFR CT, PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), SPECT MPI, and stress echocardiography. Clinically unrecognized MI, another clear indicator of physiologically significant coronary artery disease, is relatively common and is best evaluated with cardiac MRI. The authors illustrate the spectrum of imaging findings of ischemic heart disease (coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia, and MI); highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the various noninvasive imaging methods used to assess ischemic heart disease, as illustrated by recent clinical trials; and summarize current indications and contraindications for noninvasive imaging techniques for detection of ischemic heart disease. Online supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

CT Findings and Patterns of e-Cigarette or Vaping Product Use-Associated Lung Injury: A Multicenter Cohort of 160 Cases.

BACKGROUND: e-Cigarette or vaping-induced lung injury (EVALI) causes a spectrum of CT lung injury patterns. Relative frequencies and associations with vaping behavior are unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the frequencies of imaging findings and CT patterns in EVALI and what is the relationship to vaping behavior? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: CT scans of 160 subjects with EVALI from 15 institutions were retrospectively reviewed. CT findings and patterns were defined and agreed on via consensus. The parenchymal organizing pneumonia (OP) pattern was defined as regional or diffuse ground-glass opacity (GGO) ± consolidation without centrilobular nodules (CNs). An airway-centered OP pattern was defined as diffuse CNs with little or no GGO, whereas a mixed OP pattern was a combination of the two. Other patterns included diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), acute eosinophilic-like pneumonia, and pulmonary hemorrhage. Cases were classified as atypical if they did not fit into a pattern. Imaging findings, pattern frequencies, and injury severity were correlated with substance vaped (marijuana derives [tetrahydrocannabinol] [THC] only, nicotine derivates only, and both), vaping frequency, regional geography, and state recreational THC legality. One-way analysis of variance, χ2 test, and multivariable analyses were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients (79.4% men) with a mean age of 28.2 years (range, 15-68 years) with EVALI underwent CT scan. Seventy-seven (48.1%), 15 (9.4%), and 68 (42.5%) patients admitted to vaping THC, nicotine, or both, respectively. Common findings included diffuse or lower lobe GGO with subpleural (78.1%), lobular (59.4%), or peribronchovascular (PBV) sparing (40%). Septal thickening (50.6%), lymphadenopathy (63.1%), and CNs (36.3%) were common. PBV sparing was associated with younger age (P = .02). Of 160 subjects, 156 (97.5%) had one of six defined patterns. Parenchymal, airway-centered, and mixed OP patterns were seen in 89 (55.6%), 14 (8.8%), and 32 (20%) patients, respectively. Acute eosinophilic-like pneumonia (six of 160, 3.8%), DAD (nine of 160, 5.6%), pulmonary hemorrhage (six of 160, 3.8%), and atypical (four of 160, 2.5%) patterns were less common. Increased vaping frequency was associated with more severe injury (P = .008). Multivariable analysis showed a negative association between vaping for > 6 months and DAD pattern (P = .03). Two subjects (1.25%) with DAD pattern died. There was no relation between pattern and injury severity, geographic location, and state legality of recreational use of THC. INTERPRETATION: EVALI typically causes an OP pattern but exists on a spectrum of acute lung injury. Vaping habits do not correlate with CT patterns except for negative correlation between vaping > 6 months and DAD pattern. PBV sparing, not previously described in acute lung injury, is a common finding.

Intimal Sarcoma of the Great Vessels.

Intimal sarcomas of the pulmonary artery and aorta are rare entities with a poor prognosis. In many instances, pulmonary artery sarcomas are misinterpreted as acute or chronic pulmonary thromboembolism, whereas aortic intimal sarcomas are often misdiagnosed as protuberant atherosclerotic disease or intimal thrombus. Discernment of intimal sarcomas from these and other common benign entities is essential for the timely initiation of aggressive therapy. The most useful imaging modalities for assessment of a suspected intimal sarcoma include CT angiography, fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and MRI. The authors discuss the clinical features, current treatment options, characteristic imaging findings, and underlying pathologic features of intimal sarcomas. The authors emphasize imaging discernment of intimal sarcomas and how their differential diagnosis is informed by knowledge of radiologic-pathologic correlation. The most reliable distinguishing imaging features are also emphasized to improve accurate and timely diagnosis. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.

Use of a Dual Artificial Intelligence Platform to Detect Unreported Lung Nodules.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the performance of Dual-AI Deep Learning Platform in detecting unreported pulmonary nodules that are 6 mm or greater, comprising computer-vision (CV) algorithm to detect pulmonary nodules, with positive results filtered by natural language processing (NLP) analysis of the dictated report. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 5047 chest CT scans and corresponding reports. Cases which were both CV algorithm positive (nodule ≥ 6 mm) and NLP negative (nodule not reported), were outputted for review by 2 chest radiologists. RESULTS: The CV algorithm detected nodules that are 6 mm or greater in 1830 (36.3%) of 5047 cases. Three hundred fifty-five (19.4%) were unreported by the radiologist, as per NLP algorithm. Expert review determined that 139 (39.2%) of 355 cases were true positives (2.8% of all cases). One hundred thirty (36.7%) of 355 cases were unnecessary alerts-vague language in the report confounded the NLP algorithm. Eighty-six (24.2%) of 355 cases were false positives. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-AI platform detected actionable unreported nodules in 2.8% of chest CT scans, yet minimized intrusion to radiologist's workflow by avoiding alerts for most already-reported nodules.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Nonspecific Chest Pain-Low Probability of Coronary Artery Disease.

Patients with acute nonspecific chest pain and low probability for coronary disease remain an important clinical management dilemma. We focus on evidence for imaging, in an integrated decision-making setting. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Blunt Chest Trauma-Suspected Cardiac Injury.

Blunt cardiac injuries range from myocardial concussion (commotio cordis) leading to fatal ventricular arrhythmias to myocardial contusion, cardiac chamber rupture, septal rupture, pericardial rupture, and valvular injuries. Blunt injuries account for one-fourth of the traumatic deaths in the United States. Chest radiography, transthoracic echocardiography, CT chest with and without contrast, and CT angiography are usually appropriate as the initial examination in patients with suspected blunt cardiac injury who are both hemodynamically stable and unstable. Transesophageal echocardiography and CT heart may be appropriate as examination in patients with suspected blunt cardiac injuries. This publication of blunt chest trauma-suspected cardiac injuries summarizes the literature and makes recommendations for imaging based on the available data and expert opinion. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.