Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg).

BACKGROUND: Bleeding and transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are known predictors of mortality. Transradial arterial access reduces bleeding and transfusion related to femoral access complications, although its association with mortality is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of arterial access site (radial or femoral) with transfusion and mortality in unselected PCIs. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: By data linkage of three prospectively collated provincial registries, 38,872 procedures in 32,822 patients in British Columbia were analysed. The association between access site, transfusion and outcomes was assessed by logistic regression, propensity score matching and probit regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 30-Day and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: 1134 (3.5%) patients had at least one blood transfusion. Transfused patients had a significantly increased 30-day and 1-year mortality, adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) 4.01 (3.08 to 5.22) and 3.58 (2.94 to 4.36), respectively. By probit regression the absolute increase in risk of death at 1 year associated with receiving a transfusion was 6.78%. The number needed to treat was 14.74 (prevention of 15 transfusions required to "avoid" one death). Radial access halved the transfusion rate. After adjustment for all variables, radial access was associated with a significant reduction in 30-day and 1-year mortality, odds ratio = 0.71 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.82) and 0.83 (0.71 to 0.98), respectively (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a registry of all comers to PCI, transradial access was associated with a halving of the transfusion rate and a reduction in 30-day and 1-year mortality.

Antianginal efficacy and safety of controlled-delivery diltiazem QD versus an equivalent dose of immediate-release diltiazem TID.

Controlled-delivery once-daily diltiazem (qd), 180 mg and 360 mg, was assessed in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials using a 3 x 3 Latin square design. Both studies compared the controlled-delivery dosage form to the same total daily dose of immediate-release diltiazem administered three times daily (tid) and to placebo. The primary measure of efficacy was the time to termination of the exercise tolerance test (ETT) at 2, 8, and 24 hours after the morning dose. There were no significant differences in time to ETT termination between the qd and tid formulations at any time, except at 24 hours with 180 mg qd versus 60 mg tid. The comparison to placebo showed that diltiazem 180 mg qd, 360 mg qd, and 120 mg tid significantly lengthened the time to ETT termination (p < 0.05) at all time points, while diltiazem 60 mg tid did not differ from placebo at any time point. The qd formulation also increased the time to 1-mm ST-segment depression and reduced the number of angina attacks and the amount of nitroglycerin used when compared to placebo. No new or unusual adverse events were noted. Diltiazem controlled-release capsules administered once daily are safe and effective for the treatment of patients with chronic stable angina.

Effect of amlodipine, atenolol and their combination on myocardial ischemia during treadmill exercise and ambulatory monitoring. Canadian Amlodipine/Atenolol in Silent Ischemia Study (CASIS) Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the effects of amlodipine, atenolol and their combination on ischemia during treadmill testing and 48-h ambulatory monitoring. BACKGROUND: It is not known whether anti-ischemic drugs exert similar effects on ischemia during ambulatory monitoring and exercise treadmill testing. METHODS: Patients with stable coronary artery disease and ischemia during treadmill testing and ambulatory monitoring were randomized to receive amlodipine (n = 51) or atenolol (n = 49). Each group underwent a counterbalanced, crossover evaluation of single drug and placebo, followed by evaluation of the combination. RESULTS: Amlodipine and the combination prolonged exercise time to 0.1-mV ST segment depression by 29% and 34%, respectively (p < 0.001) versus 3% for atenolol (p = NS). During ambulatory monitoring, the frequency of ischemic episodes decreased by 28% with amlodipine (p = 0.083 [NS]), by 57% with atenolol (p < 0.001) and by 72% with the combination (p < 0.05 vs. both single drugs; p < 0.001 vs. placebo). Suppression of ischemia during exercise testing and ambulatory monitoring was similar in patients with and without exercise-induced angina. Exercise time to angina improved by 29% with amlodipine (p < 0.01), by 16% with atenolol (p < 0.05) and by 39% with the combination (p < 0.005 vs. placebo, atenolol and amlodipine). In patients with angina, total exercise time improved by 16% with amlodipine (p < 0.001), by 4% with atenolol (p = NS) and by 19% with the combination (p < 0.05 vs. placebo and either single drug). In those patients without angina, no therapy significantly improved total exercise time. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemia during treadmill testing was more effectively suppressed by amlodipine, whereas ischemia during ambulatory monitoring was more effectively suppressed by atenolol. The combination was more effective than either single drug in both settings.

Relative importance of psychologic traits and severity of ischemia in causing angina during treadmill exercise. Canadian Amlodipine/Atenolol in Silent Ischemia Study (CASIS) Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to compare the influence of psychologic traits versus ischemia severity on the occurrence of angina during treadmill exercise. BACKGROUND: Some studies suggest that angina is associated with certain psychologic traits, whereas others show an association with more severe ischemia. The relative influence of these two factors and the extent to which they interact are not known. METHODS: Off-drug treadmill exercise testing and a battery of psychologic tests were performed on 122 patients with known coronary artery disease. Psychologic tests measured sensitivity to physical symptoms, denial and deception, type A behavior, anger, hostility, depression, marital adjustment and amount of external stress. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine the independent association of psychologic traits, ischemic threshold and exercise tolerance with the occurrence of angina. RESULTS: Angina during treadmill exercise was reported by 66 of 122 patients. On univariate testing, angina was positively associated with sensitivity to physical symptoms (p < 0.001), type A behavior (p = 0.021) and depression (p = 0.032) and was negatively associated with exercise tolerance (p < 0.001) and work load threshold for ischemia (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed independent and additive associations of angina with sensitivity to physical symptoms (p = 0.003), exercise capacity (p = 0.003) and work load threshold for ischemia (p = 0.018). Once these were included in a logistic model, depression and type A behavior were no longer significant. Other psychologic traits showed no association with angina. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity to physical symptoms, ischemic threshold and exercise tolerance are independently associated with angina, with sensitivity to physical symptoms having the stronger influence. The physiologic and psychologic mechanisms underlying symptom perception have an influence on angina that is independent of and additive to the severity of underlying ischemia.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty without on-site surgical facilities.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is associated with a low risk of serious complications, the most important of which is acute coronary occlusion needing emergency surgery. There is a consensus among many cardiologists and cardiac surgeons that all PTCA procedures need on-site surgical backup. A task force report on PTCA by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association mandates the presence of an on-site cardiovascular surgical team. Since 1981, we have performed PTCA without the benefit of on-site surgery but with backup surgery provided at a regional cardiac surgical center located 6 kilometers away. Up to the end of 1991, 762 patients have undergone 847 PTCAs. Most patients had 1-vessel angioplasty (94.6%). The primary success rate since 1981 was 76%, and from January 1990 to December 1991 it was 87% (n = 313). Complications included death in 7 patients (0.9%), myocardial infarction in 16 (2.1%) and emergency surgery in 12 (1.6%). Surgical backup was provided on a next available operating room basis. The average time from decision to transfer to onset of surgery was 164 minutes (range 75 to 320). All patients survived surgery, but 42% developed a new Q-wave myocardial infarction. These patients were followed up until the end of 1991, and are all alive. The results are similar to those reported from centers with and without on-site surgery. With careful selection of patients and a formal, coordinated plan for backup surgery, PTCA can be safely performed without on-site surgery.

Enalapril versus digoxin in patients with congestive heart failure: a multicenter study. Canadian Enalapril Versus Digoxin Study Group.

Patients with New York Heart Association functional class II or III heart failure stabilized on furosemide therapy were entered into a randomized controlled trial comparing enalapril (n = 72) and digoxin (n = 73). End points were clinical outcome, treadmill exercise capacity and echocardiographic left ventricular dimensions. Improvement in clinical outcome was defined as a reduction of at least one functional class or withdrawal because of an adverse clinical event. After 4 weeks, 13 patients receiving enalapril showed improvement, 55 had no change and 9 manifested deterioration compared with 7, 49 and 17, respectively, in the digoxin group (p less than 0.01). After 14 weeks, 13 patients receiving enalapril showed improvement, 50 had no change and 9 manifested deterioration, compared with 14, 37 and 22, respectively, in the digoxin group (p less than 0.025). More patients in the digoxin group were withdrawn because of an adverse clinical event (p less than 0.05). Exercise time and percent fractional shortening improved in both groups (p less than 0.001 and less than 0.05, respectively), with no significant difference between groups (p greater than 0.50). Both rate-pressure product and subjectively evaluated exertion during submaximal exercise were reduced only in the enalapril group. Although the majority of patients in both groups did well, those receiving enalapril experienced fewer adverse clinical events and had less fatigue during submaximal exercise.

Comparison of 5F and 7/8F catheters for left ventricular and coronary angiography.

Fifty-two patients were randomized into two groups of 26 to the use of either 5 or 7/8F catheters for their first left heart cardiac catheterization. Clinical characteristics for the two groups were similar. 5F catheters were significantly inferior to 7/8F catheters in terms of torque control (P less than .001), ease of engaging coronary ostia (P less than .001), and quality of angiograms (P less than .05). Nine patients in the 5F group required a change to 7/8F catheters for completion of the procedure. There was no difference in procedure time or fluoroscopy time between the groups. Time to haemostasis was significantly shorter in the 5F group (P less than .01), but there was no difference between groups with respect to haematoma formation or rebleed after haemostasis. We conclude the slight advantage of 5F catheters in terms of haemostasis is outweighed by many disadvantages. Their routine use in cardiac catheterization, at least at this time, cannot be recommended.

Conversion from intravenous procainamide to oral sustained release tablets in cardiac patients.

There is as yet no established method for converting from intravenous to oral sustained release procainamide (Procan SR; Parke-Davis Canada Inc). The pharmacokinetics of simultaneous discontinuation of intravenous procainamide and administration of oral sustained release procainamide was studied in six patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Patients were converted after ensuring that steady-state concentrations were achieved with intravenous procainamide. Serum procainamide levels were obtained at the time of conversion and 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 6.0 h after conversion. The mean steady-state concentration (23.7 +/- 8.9 mumols/L) and the adjusted mean serum procainamide concentration with Procan SR (25.3 +/- 7.9 mumols/L) were not significantly different. This indicated that the serum procainamide concentration obtained with the intravenous infusion was not compromised when the patients were switched to oral therapy. Although mean percentage serum procainamide concentration fluctuation was 102.6 +/- 92.5, all patients tolerated the conversion well. Therefore, the method used in this study is an acceptable method of conversion.

Usefulness of sustained-release diltiazem for stable angina pectoris.

Sustained-release diltiazem, 120 and 180 mg twice daily, was assessed in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 65 stable angina patients with exercise-induced ST depression. Exercise testing was performed 12 +/- 1 hours after the last dose at the end of each of the 3 treatment weeks. Both dose levels of drug reduced spontaneous angina (p less than 0.001) and increased exercise duration (p less than 0.01) and time to 1-mm ST depression (p less than 0.001). No differences were noted between the 2 dose levels. Rate-pressure product at maximal exercise was similar for the 3 groups. Only 1 patient terminated the study because of adverse drug effects; severe adverse effects occurred in 1 placebo and 1 low-dose period. Sustained-release diltiazem is safe and efficacious monotherapy for patients with stable angina.

A multicenter randomized trial of ionic (ioxaglate) and nonionic (iopamidol) low-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography.

A multicentered double-blind randomized study was performed comparing the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic changes induced by two new low osmolar contrast agents used for cardiac angiography. The low osmolar ionic (ioxaglate) contrast agent was compared with a low osmolar nonionic (iopamidol) contrast agent in 150 patients with angina pectoris undergoing angiography. Systolic blood pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, heart rate, and QT interval were measured just before and for 90 s following the left ventricular angiography and selective coronary angiography. Each group was also evaluated for adverse events and quality of radiographic images. Following left ventricular angiography, the systolic blood pressure dropped slightly in both groups with a greater decrease seen in the iopamidol group at 5 s (p less than 0.05). After selective right and left coronary angiography, systolic blood pressure decreased transiently and equally in both treatment groups. The left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased after the ventriculogram in both groups (15.9 +/- 6.3 to 18.9 +/- 8.6 mmHg in the ioxaglate group and 16.1 +/- 6.7 to 20.1 +/- 7.8 mmHg in the iopamidol group), the change being significant only in the iopamidol group (p less than 0.05). Heart rate increased slightly but significantly in the ioxaglate-treated patients following left ventricular angiography (71.4 +/- 15.2 to 74.4 +/- 13.7 beats/min) (p less than 0.01). QT interval transiently increased following left ventriculography with ioxaglate (407 +/- 59.5 to 420 +/- 58.3 ms) (p less than 0.05) compared with iopamidol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Failure of amiodarone to prevent ventricular fibrillation (sudden death) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

A case of ventricular fibrillation with successful resuscitation is described in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and a history of syncope. Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who are at risk for sudden death can be identified by electrocardiographic monitoring which demonstrates episodes of ventricular tachycardia. Therapy with amiodarone has been shown to abolish ventricular tachycardia and to reduce the incidence of sudden death. Amiodarone therapy eliminated malignant ventricular ectopic activity in this patient during 48 h of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, yet the subsequent exercise stress test provoked an episode of ventricular fibrillation.

A randomized double-blind comparison of diltiazem and nifedipine in stable angina.

A double-blind crossover trial comparing diltiazem (360 mg/day) and nifedipine (120 mg/day) for treatment of stable angina was conducted in 21 of 27 patients with proven coronary artery disease who completed the trial. All patients started with a 2 week placebo period followed by a random assignment to either drug treatment for 3 weeks and subsequent crossover to the other treatment. The two drug treatment periods were separated by a 1 week placebo washout phase and the study was completed with a 1 week placebo phase. There were no significant differences between patients' responses to diltiazem and nifedipine in relation to time to onset of angina, ST depression responses to exercise, heart rate or systolic or diastolic blood pressure. A total of 37 adverse effects were reported with nifedipine compared with 9 with diltiazem in the 22 patients in whom drug safety was analyzed. Additionally, two patients treated with nifedipine were withdrawn from study participation before crossover. There was a significant (p less than 0.05) difference with respect to incidence of edema (7 of 22 patients taking nifedipine, 1 of 22 taking diltiazem) and dizziness (7 of 22 patients taking nifedipine, 0 of 22 taking diltiazem). The most frequent adverse effect reported with diltiazem was rash (3 of 22 patients). Severe adverse effects were reported in four patients: in one with diltiazem (rash) and in three with nifedipine (palpitation in two and headache in one). A reduction in prescribed dosage was required in 37% of nifedipine-treated compared with 6% of diltiazem-treated patients. Efficacy measures were significantly improved above placebo levels by both diltiazem and nifedipine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Randomized double blind trial comparing sotalol and propranolol in chronic ventricular arrhythmia.

Sotalol is a beta-blocker which also prolongs repolarization. Its relative efficacy towards suppressing chronic ventricular arrhythmia was tested by comparison with propranolol. This double blind parallel comparison study involved 30 patients with or without coronary artery disease who had chronic symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia and more than an average of 30 premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) per hour. After the placebo baseline period patients received four weeks of active treatment with sotalol or propranolol. Responders were patients who had 75% or more reduction of PVCs during 24 h Holter monitoring. One patient in each treatment group had intolerable side effects on a low dose of the drug and were withdrawn. Side effects were present more frequently in the propranolol group compared with sotalol. Proarrhythmic effects were present in one patient on sotalol. There was no significant difference in suppression of ventricular extrasystoles (sotalol 65%, propranolol 44%), with reduction in ventricular couplets being 99% for sotalol and 49% for propranolol. There was a significant increase in QTc in patients on sotalol. Therefore, sotalol is a well tolerated drug and may be preferable to propranolol for control of chronic ventricular arrhythmia.

Paradoxical coronary embolism associated with an unusual interatrial flap valve.

A 75-year-old woman presented with deep venous thrombosis and multiple pulmonary emboli. Course was complicated by pulmonary hypertension which caused central shunting of blood through an abnormal patent foramen ovale. Paradoxical embolus to the right coronary artery was demonstrated premorbidly and at autopsy.

Safety of outpatient cardiac catheterizations.

Since 1979 most of the cardiac catheterizations at the investigators' institution have been performed as outpatient procedures. All cardiac catheterizations performed over a 66-month period were analyzed. A total of 3,071 outpatient cardiac catheterizations (83% of all cardiac catheterizations) were performed. The percutaneous femoral technique was used in 98% of the procedures. Most patients (79%) had both right and left-sided cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography, which showed significant coronary artery disease (70.4%). Only 13.6% of the study results were normal. Thirty-four patients (1.1%) had major complications, including 4 deaths (0.13%). Seventy patients (2.3%) were admitted for observation only. More than 96% of all patients did not have a major complication and were discharged the same day. Thus, outpatient cardiac catheterization can be performed safely, with a potential reduction in hospital costs and better utilization of medical beds.

Primary sarcoma of the pulmonary trunk: successful surgical intervention and prolonged survival.

We present a rare case of pulmonary trunk sarcoma in a young male in which the diagnosis was made antemortem. Total surgical removal of the tumor, including replacement of the pulmonary valve, was undertaken. This patient is the longest reported survivor of pulmonary trunk sarcoma and remains free of any signs or symptoms of recurrence. No adjuvant chemotherapy was required.

Use of catheter-tip velocity--pressure transducer to evaluate left ventricular function in man: effects of intravenous propranolol.

A catheter-tip velocity transducer with two high-fidelity pressure manometers was used to evaluate the left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic effects of intravenous propranolol (10 mg). Nine patients without clinical evidence of heart failure were studied. Pulsatile ascending aortic blood flow velocity and pressure and LV pressure were measured continuously during drug administration. Beat-to-beat changes in stroke volume index, stroke work index, LV end-diastolic pressure, maximum blood flow velocity and acceleration, and maximum LV dP/dt were determined. Propranolol produced a decrease in maximum blood flow velocity (from 58 +/- 4.7 to 42 +/- 5.1 cm/sec, p less than 0.002), and acceleration (from 1181 +/- 130 to 847 +/- 117 cm/sec2, p less than 0.002, max dP/dt (from 1361 +/- 70 to 1146 +/- 63 mm Hg/sec, p less than 0.002), stroke volume index (from 47 +/- 3.0 to 38 +/- 3.2 ml/m2, p less than 0.002) and total stroke work index (from 702 +/- 33 to 603 +/- 44 mJ/m2 p less than 0.04), with little change in mean aortic pressure, peak systolic pressure and LV end-diastolic pressure. Depression in myocardial function was detectable within 1 minute after initiation of propranolol and persisted when negative chronotropic effects were eliminated by atrial pacing. The multisensor catheter technique allows rapid and safe detection of changes in cardiovascular function during propranolol administration in conscious man.