National plans and awareness campaigns as priorities for achieving global brain health.

Neurological conditions are the leading cause of death and disability combined. This public health crisis has become a global priority with the introduction of WHO's Intersectoral Global Action Plan on Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders 2022-2031 (IGAP). 18 months after this plan was adopted, global neurology stakeholders, including representatives of the OneNeurology Partnership (a consortium uniting global neurology organisations), take stock and advocate for urgent acceleration of IGAP implementation. Drawing on lessons from relevant global health contexts, this Health Policy identifies two priority IGAP targets to expedite national delivery of the entire 10-year plan: namely, to update national policies and plans, and to create awareness campaigns and advocacy programmes for neurological conditions and brain health. To ensure rapid attainment of the identified priority targets, six strategic drivers are proposed: universal community awareness, integrated neurology approaches, intersectoral governance, regionally coordinated IGAP domestication, lived experience-informed policy making, and neurological mainstreaming (advocating to embed brain health into broader policy agendas). Contextualised with globally emerging IGAP-directed efforts and key considerations for intersectoral policy design, this novel framework provides actionable recommendations for policy makers and IGAP implementation partners. Timely, synergistic pursuit of the six drivers might aid WHO member states in cultivating public awareness and policy structures required for successful intersectoral roll-out of IGAP by 2031, paving the way towards brain health for all.

Current Status of Integrated Palliative Care Among Parkinson Foundation Centers of Excellence in the United States.

Background and Objectives: To assess the current structures, knowledge, and readiness to integrate palliative care (PC) into Parkinson disease (PD) care at Parkinson's Foundation Centers of Excellence (COE) in the United States. Methods: Three unique surveys were administered to health care professionals/staff at COEs to assess PC (1) resources, (2) knowledge and comfort, (3) clinical experience and processes, (4) barriers, and (5) readiness for implementation. Results: Response rates for the 3 surveys were 97%, 98%, and 56%. In total, 41% of COEs have access to outpatient PC specialists, 71% have mental health counseling, 82% have support groups, and 9% had very limited PC resources. Overall, 74% of providers believed persons with advanced PD should receive PC, and knowledge of PC fundamentals was good across providers. For high-needs persons with PD (PWP), only 16% of physicians and 24% of advanced practice providers made referrals to PC specialists ≥75% of the time, while 9% and 16% never made such referrals. Limited time, space, financing, and staffing were seen as major barriers to PC implementation. In total, 37% of providers were satisfied with their COE's ability to provide PC services. Most COEs report a culture open to change and appear well-positioned to implement PC in a more comprehensive fashion. Discussion: These results demonstrate the emergence of structures and processes to provide PC to persons with PD at COEs. They also identify concrete opportunities to strengthen integration of PC through educational, quality improvement, and advocacy efforts.

Holding back in communications with clinicians: Patient and care partner perspectives in Parkinson's disease.

Objectives: To describe how patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and care partners choose to share or withhold information from clinicians. Methods: This is a qualitative, descriptive study nested within a multisite, randomized clinical trial of outpatient palliative care compared to standard neurologic care for PD. Interviews with patients (n = 30) and care partners (n = 30) explored experiences communicating with neurology clinicians. Thematic analyses identified themes relevant to patient-care partner-clinician communication. Results: There were four themes relevant to sharing and/or withholding information from clinicians: (1) Suppressing Concerns During Visits, (2) Care Partner Awareness of Patients' Communication Barriers due to Cognitive Impairment, (3) Limited Sharing of Sensitive or Intimate Issues by Patients and Care Partners, and (4) Patient and Care Partner Suggestions to Overcome 'Holding Back'. Conclusion: Limitations to communication between patients, care partners, and clinicians should be acknowledged and recognized in routine Parkinson's disease care to foster accurate disclosure of unmet palliative care and other needs. Triadic communication strategies may help patients and care partners talk about unmet palliative care needs. Innovation: By recognizing that cognitive impairment and sensitive topics can be barriers, clinicians can adjust or adopt targeted communication strategies for identifying and discussing care needs.

Does a novel community-based outpatient palliative care intervention for Parkinson's disease and related disorders improve care? Qualitative results from patients and care partners.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care has the potential to address significant unmet needs in people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders, but models that rely on in-person specialty palliative care teams have limited scalability. AIM: To describe patient and care partner experiences with a novel, community-based palliative care intervention for Parkinson's disease. DESIGN: Qualitative study embedded in a randomized clinical trial to document participant experiences with a novel palliative care intervention (community neurologist training and remote team-based specialist palliative care). Transcripts were coded and thematically analyzed through a combination of team-based inductive and deductive coding. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight patients and 33 care partners purposively sampled from participants in a randomized clinical trial of a palliative care intervention for Parkinson's disease and related disorders conducted at nine sites. RESULTS: Benefits of the intervention included management of a wider range of non-motor symptoms, facilitation of conversations about the future, greater engagement with the health care team, and increased referrals to resources. Participants identified areas of improvement, including uptake of palliative care training by community neurologists, additional prognostic counseling, and clarity and timeliness of communication with the multidisciplinary team. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians caring for people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders should screen for non-motor symptoms, provide regular prognostic counseling, and refer to specialty palliative care services earlier in the course of illness. Future interventions should be designed to promote uptake of palliative care training by community neurologists and further optimize referral to and coordination with in-person or remote specialty palliative teams.

Parkinson's Disease Carepartners' Perceptions of the Challenges and Rewards of Caregiving.

BACKGROUND: Multiple debilitating symptoms and the progressive nature of Parkinson's disease (PD) affect carepartners' quality of life. Although, there is abundant knowledge on caregiver burden there is limited knowledge on PD carepartners' perceptions of caregiving. AIM: To understand family members' perception of their role, and of the challenges and rewards of PD caregiving. METHOD: Using a qualitative descriptive research design, we conducted semi-structured interviews with current and former PD carepartners (n = 16). Interviews were audio-recorded, de-identified, and transcribed verbatim. Data were coded and analyzed to identify themes. RESULTS: We identified 5 themes: (a) Unpredictability is the hardest part of caregiving. It was hard to cope with the unpredictable daily and longer-term fluctuations in PD symptoms; (b) Disease progression and multiple symptoms contribute to carepartners' emotional distress. Carepartners felt unprepared and were saddened by the patient's and their own losses; (c) Caring for a family member is not a "burden." Though stressful, carepartners resisted associating caregiving with the term "burden"; (d) Caregiving is a partnership. Carepartners saw their role as being less of "givers" and more of partners in disease management; and (e) Caregiving is an opportunity for personal satisfaction, joy, and growth. Caregiving was seen as a "gift" that enabled carepartners to express love and experience personal growth. CONCLUSIONS: Despite challenges PD carepartners view their role as "partners" in the management of the disease and find meaning and strength in caregiving. A palliative care approach emphasizing the positives and challenges of caregiving may provide carepartners with better support.

Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Patient Perspectives on Goals of Care Conversations.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known regarding circumstances surrounding advanced care planning (ACP) for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We aim to describe preferences, and perspectives surrounding ACP in patients with ALS. METHODS: We conducted a survey of patients with ALS. Survey questions were related to advance directive completion and ACP discussions regarding end-of-life (EoL) choices. RESULTS: 49 surveys were included. Patients have given thought to advance directives, goals of care, and EoL treatments within months of diagnosis (Median: 1 month; IQR: .6 - 3 months). Twenty-seven opened dialogue with spouses, 24 with family members, 19 with health professionals and 16 with their lawyer. Eighty percent were comfortable discussing advance directives and power of attorney while fewer (70%) are less comfortable regarding specific aspects of care such as CPR or invasive ventilation. Only one barrier to discussion was identified with one patient reporting they did not wish to talk about the topic. There was no significant correlation between timing of diagnosis and whether an EoL discussion had occurred (τb = .23, P = .14: n = 42). Level of feeling informed was significantly associated with making EoL decisions for CPR, legal arrangements for a decision maker and completion of living will or AD. CONCLUSION: In this small cohort, a substantial proportion of ALS patients initiated EoL conversations early. When feeling informed, patients were more likely to make specific EoL choices. Findings suggest an opportunity for providers to help facilitate conversations, ensuring patient wishes.

Caregiver Burden in Parkinson Disease: A Scoping Review of the Literature from 2017-2022.

Caregiver burden is a term that refers to the adverse effect of caregiving on the physical, emotional, social, spiritual, and financial well-being of the caregiver. Caregiver burden is associated with providing care to an individual with a chronic illness or disability, and the unique symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) can amplify a patient's needs and reliance on others, leading to adverse outcomes for patients and their caregivers. In this scoping review of the literature from January 2017 through April 2022 that included 114 studies, we provide an updated, evidence-based summary of patient and caregiver-related factors that contribute to caregiver burden in PD. We also describe the impact of caregiver stress and burden on caregivers based on qualitative research studies and review recent interventions to mitigate burden. By providing clinical updates for practitioners, this review is designed to improve recognition of caregiver burden in the post-pandemic era and foster the development of targeted interventions to reduce caregiver burden in PD.

The "Surprise Question" for Prognostication in People With Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders.

CONTEXT: Parkinson's disease and related disorders (PDRD) are fatal neurodegenerative disorders characterized by a fluctuating course that can complicate prognostication. The "surprise question" (SQ: "Would you be surprised if your patient died in the next year?") has been used to identify patients with limited prognosis but has not been assessed in PDRD. OBJECTIVES: To determine the validity of the SQ in predicting 12-month mortality in PDRD. METHODS: Data was analyzed from 301 patients and 34 community-based neurologists who were participating in a clinical trial of outpatient palliative care for patients with PDRD. Clinicians answered the SQ for each patient at baseline. Descriptive statistics at baseline, chi-square tests of independence, 2 × 2 and 2 × 3 cross tables were used. Survival analysis compared SQ responses using Kaplan-Meier curves. Risk estimate analyses identified patient characteristics associated with clinicians' responses. RESULTS: Mortality was 10.3% (N = 31) at 1 year. The sensitivity and specificity of the SQ was 80.7% and 58.9%, respectively with AUC = 0.70, positive predictive value of 18.4% and negative predictive value of 96.4%. Older age, atypical parkinsonism, and dementia were associated with responding "no" to the SQ. CONCLUSION: The SQ is sensitive to 12-month mortality in PDRD, with a high negative predictive value. The SQ may be useful for identifying patients less likely to die within a year and may be useful for identifying patients with palliative care needs outside of end-of-life care. This latter use may assist in mobilizing early and timely referral to specialist palliative care.

Patient and Family Outcomes of Community Neurologist Palliative Education and Telehealth Support in Parkinson Disease.

Importance: Parkinson disease and related disorders (PDRD) are the fastest growing neurodegenerative illness in terms of prevalence and mortality. As evidence builds to support palliative care (PC) for PDRD, studies are needed to guide implementation. Objective: To determine whether PC training for neurologists and remote access to a PC team improves outcomes in patients with PDRD in community settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pragmatic, stepped-wedge comparative effectiveness trial enrolled and observed participants from 19 community neurology practices supported by PC teams at 2 academic centers from March 8, 2017, to December 31, 2020. Participants were eligible if they had PDRD and moderate to high PC needs. A total of 612 persons with PDRD were referred; 253 were excluded. Patients were excluded if they had another diagnosis meriting PC, were receiving PC, or were unable or unwilling to follow study procedures. Patients received usual care or the intervention based on when their community neurologist was randomized to start the intervention. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to September 2023. Intervention: The intervention included (1) PC education for community neurologists and (2) team-based PC support via telehealth. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were differences at 6 months in patient quality of life (QOL; measured by the Quality of Life in Alzheimer Disease Scale [QOL-AD]) and caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Interview) between the intervention and usual care. Results: A total of 359 patients with PDRD (233 men [64.9%]; mean [SD] age, 74.0 [8.8] years) and 300 caregivers were enrolled. At 6 months, compared with usual care, participants receiving the intervention had better QOL (QOL-AD score, 0.09 [95% CI, -0.63 to 0.82] vs -0.88 [95% CI, -1.62 to -0.13]; treatment effect estimate, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.07-1.86; P = .03). No significant difference was observed in caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Interview score, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.16 to 2.23] vs 0.55 [95%, -0.44 to 1.54]; treatment effect estimate, 0.64; 95% CI, -0.62 to 1.90; P = .32). Advance directive completion was higher under the intervention (19 of 38 [50%] vs 6 of 31 [19%] among those without directives at the beginning of the study; P = .008). There were no differences in other outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: PC education for community neurologists and provision of team-based PC via telehealth is feasible and may improve QOL and advance care planning. Overall treatment effects were small and suggest opportunities to improve both the intervention and implementation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03076671.

Parkinson disease patients' and carepartners' perceptions of palliative care.

INTRODUCTION: Outpatient palliative care offers an opportunity to improve the quality of life of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and families. While there are efforts to improve clinicians' palliative care knowledge and skills, there is limited knowledge on patients and carepartners' knowledge and perceptions of palliative care. As part of a larger study on implementing outpatient palliative care, this study aimed to understand patients' and carepartners' knowledge and perceptions of palliative care, and their palliative care needs and preferences prior to the implementation. METHODS: Using qualitative descriptive research design, we completed semi-structured interviews with 47 patients and carepartners prior to the project implementation. De-identified transcripts of interviews were coded and analyzed. RESULTS: Five themes were identified that describe patients' and carepartners' palliative care knowledge, perceptions, needs and preferences: (a) Patients and carepartners have varied knowledge and perceptions of palliative care (b) Non-motor symptoms are challenging for patients and carepartners, (c) Addressing patients' grief and emotional needs is important to patients and carepartners, (d) Carepartners want a place for emotional care, well-being, and strategizing and (e) Patients and carepartners desire anticipatory guidance and care planning. Study participants desired guidance to manage non-motor symptoms, support for patients' emotional needs and for carepartners, and for anticipatory guidance to guide future planning. CONCLUSIONS: Despite varied palliative care knowledge, PD patients and carepartners universally desire care that addresses their palliative care needs. Palliative care education and integration of palliative care approaches into standard care may facilitate increased acceptance of outpatient palliative care throughout the disease trajectory.

Telehealth serious illness care program for older adults with hematologic malignancies: a single-arm pilot study.

ABSTRACT: Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) feel shocked and bewildered when diagnosed. Serious illness conversations (SICs) may increase disease understanding and preparations for the future. However, SICs often happen late, in part because of clinician-perceived patient discomfort. Telehealth may promote patient comfort by allowing SICs to take place at home. This study assesses the feasibility and usability of a telehealth-delivered Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) for older adults with AML and MDS. We conducted a single-arm pilot study including 20 older adults with AML and MDS. Feasibility was measured using retention rate, with >80% considered feasible. Usability was measured using telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ; range, 1-7): >5 considered usable. We collected other outcomes including acceptability and disease understanding and conducted post-visit qualitative interviews to elicit feedback. Hypothesis testing was performed at α = 0.10 owing to the pilot nature and small sample size. Retention rate was 95% (19/20); mean TUQ scores were 5.9 (standard deviation [SD], 0.9) and 5.9 (SD, 1.1) for patients and caregivers, respectively. We found the SICP to be acceptable. The majority of patients found the SICP to be very or extremely worthwhile (88.2%; 15/17), and reported it increased closeness with their clinician (75.0%; 12/16). After their visit, patient estimates of curability, and overall life expectancy aligned more closely with those of their clinicians. In qualitative interviews, most patients said that they would recommend this program to others (89.5%, 17/19). This study demonstrated that delivery of the telehealth SICP to older patients with AML and MDS is feasible, usable, and acceptable. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04745676.

Reach of Palliative Care for Parkinson Disease: Results From a Large National Survey of Patients and Care Partners.

Background and Objectives: People with Parkinson disease (PWP) and their care partners have high palliative care needs resulting from disabling motor and nonmotor symptoms. There is growing support for palliative care (PC) approaches to Parkinson disease. However, little is known regarding the extent to which the palliative needs of PWP and care partners are currently being met. This study's primary objective is to describe PWP's and care partners' perceptions of the extent to which their PC needs are being met. Secondary objectives are to describe their perceptions of the quality of clinical communication and their knowledge of PC. Methods: PWPs and care partners (n = 12,995) who had consented to receiving surveys from the Parkinson's Foundation were emailed an electronic survey. PC was operationalized as comprising 5 key components: systematic assessment and management of (1) nonmotor symptoms, (2) PWPs' emotional and spiritual needs, (3) care partners' needs, (4) the completion of annual advance care planning, and (5) timely referrals to specialist palliative care and hospice when appropriate. Results: A total 1,882 individuals (1,266 PWP and 616 care partners) responded to the survey (response rate 14.5%). Few PWP (22%) reported that their neurologists never asked regarding bothersome nonmotor symptoms or did so or only if they brought it up. Fifty percent of PWP reported that pain as a specific nonmotor symptom was never managed or managed only if they brought it up. Similarly, PWPs' emotional and spiritual needs (55%), care partners' well-being (57%), and completion of advance care planning documentation (79%) were never addressed or only addressed if PWP brought it up. The quality of clinical communication was generally rated as open and honest (64% PWP). Fewer PWP (30%) reported that doctors helped them deal with the uncertainties of Parkinson disease. Most PWP (85%) reported being knowledgeable regarding PC, and 68% reported that the goal of PC was to help friends and family cope with the illness. Discussion: Although some elements of PC are currently being addressed in routine care for PWP, there are many gaps and opportunities for improvement. These data may facilitate focused attention and development of resources to improve the quality and availability of PC for Parkinson disease.

Prognosis in chronic progressive neurologic disease: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prognostication is the process of predicting a patient's likely outcome from their medical condition, and consists of determining both how well and how long a patient may live. There are few disease-specific prognostic tools to estimate a patient's individualized prognosis in terms of symptom burden and mortality. Here we summarize relevant literature on prognosis in four progressive neurologic diseases-dementia, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and multiple sclerosis-as well as on best practices on communicating prognosis with patients and care partners. METHODS: We conducted a PubMed search for terms including "prognosis", "mortality" and "prognostic indicators" in addition to specific diseases, and for terms including "prognosis AND communication". Only English-language papers were included in this review. The time frame of our literature search was 1965 through March 1, 2023. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: There is some literature to help clinicians in predicting disease progression and survival. These include both general factors (e.g., age, medical co-morbidities) and disease-specific factors (e.g., postural instability in Parkinson's disease). There is also literature on communication of prognosis in neurologic and non-neurologic disease which demonstrates that many patients and care partners prefer to hear prognosis early after diagnosis and to have prognosis discussed as a roadmap of disease. CONCLUSIONS: More work is needed to develop tools for individualized prognostication and communication for patients with neurologic disease. While there is limited literature on disease-specific prognostic models, existing literature combined with palliative care approaches may improve prognostic guidance for patients.

Spatiotemporal dynamics of selective attention and visual conflict monitoring using a Stroop task.

Selective attention and conflict monitoring are daily human phenomena, yet the spatial and temporal neurological underpinnings of these processes are not fully understood. Current literature suggests these executive functions occur via diverse and highly interconnected neural networks, including top-down, bottom-up, and conflict-control loops. To investigate the spatiotemporal activity of these processes, we collected neuromagnetic data using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in 28 healthy adults (age 19-36), while they performed a computerized Stroop task based on color naming. We focused on low-frequency oscillations in the context of top-down control and hypothesized that conflict monitoring-related activity would first be observed in the left anterior cingulate cortex, followed by the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and subsequently in the parietal and temporal lobes. Significant activity between 600-1000 ms post-stimulus onset was found for incongruent vs. congruent/neutral contrasts. Interestingly, spatiotemporal analysis did not provide evidence for a top-down pattern of activation, instead revealing a simultaneous pattern of activation in the frontal and temporal lobes. Most notable is the involvement of the left posterior inferior temporal cortex (pITC) and the left temporoparietal junction (TPJ), which have not conventionally been considered active players in attentional control. These results may be largely driven by alpha and beta oscillations from our sample population. Our findings challenge early theoretical models of top-down processing in the context of cognitive control from an attention perspective and also suggest a need to investigate attentional centers in the temporal lobe. Furthermore, the study highlights the valuable temporal data provided by MEG, which has been missing from previous studies.

Spirituality and Spiritual Distress in Parkinson's Disease Caregivers: A Scoping Review.

Despite recognition that spiritual concerns contribute to caregiver burden, little is known about spirituality, spiritual well-being, and spiritual distress in Parkinson's disease caregivers. In this scoping review of the literature through October 2022, we searched PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase, and CINAHL. From an initial pool of 328 studies, 14 were included. Caregiver factors (e.g., depression, age) and patient factors (e.g., faith, motor function) affected caregiver spirituality and spiritual well-being. Caregivers experienced loss of meaning, existential guilt, and loneliness, and coped through acquiescence, cultural beliefs, prayer, and gratitude. Future research should focus on the specific spiritual needs of Parkinson's disease caregivers and interventions to address them.

The Total Enjoyment of Life: A Framework for Exploring and Supporting the Positive in Palliative Care.

The World Health Organization defines palliative care by its focus on improving quality of life (QOL). Although reducing suffering is part of improving QOL, it should not be the sole focus of our efforts. Opportunities for joy, meaning, love, and growth exist in the midst of serious illness and should be explored and supported even in the face of suffering. Intentionally focusing on these outcomes expands provider's toolset for improving QOL, creates opportunities to better understand, celebrate, and support the full humanity of the person in front of us, and may increase the satisfaction of practice for clinicians. The "Total Enjoyment of Life" provides a framework for reminding clinicians to systematically address positive outcomes. This framework can also be used to suggest clinical strategies for promoting positive outcomes and expanding the scope of interventions and outcomes to be considered in clinical research.