Effectiveness of a Fourth COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Dose Against the Omicron Variant in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines in solid organ transplant recipients is unclear. We conducted a population-based matched cohort study using linked administrative healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada to estimate the marginal vaccine effectiveness of a fourth versus third dose of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines against clinically important outcomes (ie, hospitalization or death) and infection during the era of the Omicron variant. METHODS: We matched 3120 solid organ transplant recipients with a third COVID-19 vaccine dose (reference) to 3120 recipients with a fourth dose. Recipients were matched on the third dose date (±7 d). We used a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the marginal vaccine effectiveness with outcomes occurring between December 21, 2021 and April 30, 2022. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of COVID-19-related hospitalization or death was 2.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-3.7) in the third dose group compared with 1.1% (95% CI, 0.59-1.8) in the fourth dose group after 84 d of follow-up (P < 0.001). The adjusted marginal vaccine effectiveness was 70% (95% CI, 47-83) against clinically important outcomes and 39% (95% CI, 21-52) against SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a third dose, a fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine was associated with improved protection against hospitalization, death, and SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron era. Results highlight the importance of a booster COVID-19 vaccine dose in solid organ transplant recipients.

Variation in Kidney Transplant Referral Across Chronic Kidney Disease Programs in Ontario, Canada.

Background: Eligible patients with kidney failure should have equal access to kidney transplantation. Transplant referral is the first crucial step toward receiving a kidney transplant; however, studies suggest substantial variation in the rate of kidney transplant referral across regions. The province of Ontario, Canada, has a public, single-payer health care system with 27 regional chronic kidney disease (CKD) programs. The probability of being referred for kidney transplant may not be equal across CKD programs. Objective: To determine whether there is variability in kidney transplant referral rates across Ontario's CKD programs. Design: Population-based cohort study using linked administrative health care databases from January 1, 2013, to November 1, 2016. Setting: Twenty-seven regional CKD programs in the province of Ontario, Canada. Patients: Patients approaching the need for dialysis (advanced CKD) and patients receiving maintenance dialysis (maximum follow-up: November 1, 2017). Measurements: Kidney transplant referral. Methods: We calculated the 1-year unadjusted cumulative probability of kidney transplant referral for Ontario's 27 CKD programs using the complement of Kaplan-Meier estimator. We calculated standardized referral ratios (SRRs) for each CKD program, using expected referrals from a 2-staged Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for patient characteristics in the first stage. Standardized referral ratios with a value less than 1 were below the provincial average (maximum possible follow-up of 4 years 10 months). In an additional analysis, we grouped CKD programs according to 5 geographic regions. Results: Among 8641 patients with advanced CKD, the 1-year cumulative probability of kidney transplant referral ranged from 0.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2%-3.7%) to 21.0% (95% CI: 17.5%-25.2%) across the 27 CKD programs. The adjusted SRR ranged from 0.2 (95% CI: 0.1-0.4) to 4.2 (95% CI: 2.1-7.5). Among 6852 patients receiving maintenance dialysis, the 1-year cumulative probability of transplant referral ranged from 6.4% (95% CI: 4.0%-10.2%) to 34.5% (95% CI: 29.5%-40.1%) across CKD programs. The adjusted SRR ranged from 0.2 (95% CI: 0.1-0.3) to 1.8 (95% CI: 1.6-2.1). When we grouped CKD programs according to geographic region, we found that patients residing in Northern regions had a substantially lower 1-year cumulative probability of transplant referral. Limitations: Our cumulative probability estimates only captured referrals within the first year of advanced CKD or maintenance dialysis initiation. Conclusions: There is marked variability in the probability of kidney transplant referral across CKD programs operating in a publicly funded health care system.

Contexte: Les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale qui y sont admissibles devraient bénéficier d'un accès égal à la transplantation rénale. L'aiguillage vers un programme de transplantation est la première étape essentielle pour recevoir une greffe de rein. Des études suggèrent cependant qu'il existe des variations substantielles dans les taux d'aiguillage vers une greffe de rein selon les régions. La province de l'Ontario, au Canada, dispose d'un système public de santé à payeur unique comptant 27 programmes régionaux d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC). La probabilité d'être aiguillé vers une transplantation rénale n'est pas forcément la même dans tous les programmes d'IRC. Objectif: Déterminer s'il existe une variabilité dans les programmes d'IRC de l'Ontario en ce qui concerne les taux d'aiguillage vers une greffe de rein. Conception: Étude de cohorte représentative d'une population réalisée en Ontario (Canada) entre le 1er janvier 2013 et le 1er novembre 2016 à partir des données administratives en santé. Cadre: Les 27 programmes régionaux d'IRC de la province de l'Ontario (Canada). Sujets: Des patients approchant le besoin de dialyse (IRC de stade avancé) et des patients recevant des traitements de dialyse d'entretien (suivi maximum jusqu'au 1er novembre 2017). Mesures: L'aiguillage vers une greffe de rein. Méthodologie: Nous avons calculé la probabilité cumulative non ajustée d'être aiguillé à l'intérieur d'un an vers une transplantation rénale dans chacun des 27 programmes d'IRC de l'Ontario en utilisant le complément de l'estimateur Kaplan-Meier. Nous avons calculé les ratios d'aiguillage normalisés (SRR­Standardized Reference Ratios) des programmes d'IRC en utilisant les taux d'aiguillge attendus à partir d'un modèle de risques proportionnels de Cox en deux étapes, avec correction en fonction des caractéristiques du patient dans la première étape. Les ratios d'aiguillage normalisés d'une valeur inférieure à 1 étaient inférieurs à la moyenne provinciale (suivi maximum possible de 4 ans et 10 mois). Dans une analyse supplémentaire, nous avons regroupé les programmes d'IRC selon cinq régions géographiques. Résultats: Parmi les 8 641 patients atteints d'IRC de stade avancé, la probabilité cumulative d'aiguillage en un an pour une transplantation rénale variait de 0,9 % (IC 95 %: 0,2-3,7 %) à 21,0 % (IC 95 %: 17,5-25,2 %) pour l'ensemble des 27 programmes d'IRC. Le SRR corrigé variait de 0,2 (IC à 95 %: 0,1-0,4) à 4,2 (IC 95 %: 2,1-7,5). Parmi les 6 852 patients qui recevaient une dialyse d'entretien, la probabilité cumulative d'aiguillage en un an vers la transplantation variait de 6,4 % (IC 95 %: 4,0-10,2 %) à 34,5 % (IC 95 %: 29,5-40,1 %) pour l'ensemble des programmes d'IRC. Le SRR corrigé variait de 0,2 (IC 95 %: 0,1-0,3) à 1,8 (IC 95 %: 1,6-2,1). En regroupant les programmes d'IRC en fonction de la région géographique, nous avons constaté que les patients résidant dans les régions du Nord avaient une probabilité cumulative nettement plus faible d'être aiguillés vers la transplantation en un an. Limites: Nos estimations de la probabilité cumulative n'ont permis de saisir que les aiguillages au cours de la première année d'IRC de stade avancé ou de l'amorce d'une dialyse d'entretien. Conclusion: Il existe une variabilité marquée dans la probabilité d'être aiguillé vers une transplantation rénale dans les programmes d'IRC opérant dans un système de santé financé par l'État.

A Health Survey-Based Prediction Equation for Incident CKD.

BACKGROUND: Prediction tools that incorporate self-reported health information could increase CKD awareness, identify modifiable lifestyle risk factors, and prevent disease. We developed and validated a survey-based prediction equation to identify individuals at risk for incident CKD (eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2), with and without a baseline eGFR. METHODS: A cohort of adults with an eGFR ≥70 ml/min per 1.73 m2 from Ontario, Canada, who completed a comprehensive general population health survey between 2000 and 2015 were included (n=22,200). Prediction equations included demographics (age, sex), comorbidities, lifestyle factors, diet, and mood. Models with and without baseline eGFR were derived and externally validated in the UK Biobank (n=15,522). New-onset CKD (eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2) with ≤8 years of follow-up was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Among Ontario individuals (mean age, 55 years; 58% women; baseline eGFR, 95 (SD 15) ml/min per 1.73 m2), new-onset CKD occurred in 1981 (9%) during a median follow-up time of 4.2 years. The final models included lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol, physical activity) and comorbid illnesses (diabetes, hypertension, cancer). The model was discriminating in individuals with and without a baseline eGFR measure (5-year c-statistic with baseline eGFR: 83.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 82.2 to 84.9; without: 81.0, 95% CI, 79.8 to 82.4) and well calibrated. In external validation, the 5-year c-statistic was 78.1 (95% CI, 74.2 to 82.0) and 66.0 (95% CI, 61.6 to 70.4), with and without baseline eGFR, respectively, and maintained calibration. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported lifestyle and health behavior information from health surveys may aid in predicting incident CKD. PODCAST: This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast.aspx?p=CJASN&e=2023_01_10_CJN05650522.mp3.

Association of Higher-Dose Fluoroquinolone Therapy With Serious Adverse Events in Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

Importance: Population-based data are needed to inform the safe prescribing of fluoroquinolone antibiotics to patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objective: To quantify the 14-day risk of a hospital visit with nervous system and/or psychiatric disorders, hypoglycemia, or a collagen-associated event in patients with advanced CKD newly prescribed a fluoroquinolone at a higher vs a lower dose. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada (January 1, 2008, to March 17, 2020) used linked health care data to identify new users of fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Participants included adults 66 years or older with advanced CKD (an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 but not receiving dialysis). Data analysis was performed from January 1 to April 30, 2021. Exposures: A new prescription for a higher-dose fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin, 501-1000 mg/d; levofloxacin, 501-750 mg/d; or norfloxacin, 401-800 mg/d) vs a lower-dose fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin, 500 mg/d; levofloxacin, 250-500 mg/d; or norfloxacin, 400 mg/d). Main Outcomes and Measure: The primary outcome was the 14-day risk of a hospital visit with nervous system and/or psychiatric disorders, hypoglycemia, or a collagen-associated event. Secondary outcomes included a hospital visit with sepsis, retinal detachment or other tendinopathies, all-cause hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and sudden cardiac death. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on the propensity score was used to balance comparison groups on baseline health. Weighted risk ratios and risk differences were obtained using modified Poisson regression and binomial regression, respectively. Results: Of 11 917 patients (median age, 83 years [IQR, 77-89 years]; 7438 women [62.4%]; median eGFR, 25 [IQR, 21-28] mL/min/1.73 m2) included in the analysis, 5482 (46.0%) received a higher-dose and 6435 (54.0%) received a lower-dose fluoroquinolone. After weighting, the primary composite outcome-a hospital visit with nervous system and/or psychiatric disorders, hypoglycemia, or a collagen-associated event-occurred in 68 of 5482 patients (1.2%) treated with a higher-dose fluoroquinolone and in 47 of 5516 (0.9%) treated with a lower-dose fluoroquinolone (weighted risk ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.01-2.08]; weighted risk difference, 0.39% [95% CI, 0.01%-0.76%]). The risk of sepsis, retinal detachment, all-cause hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and sudden cardiac death did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that older patients with advanced CKD who were prescribed a fluoroquinolone at a higher-than-recommended dose were significantly more likely to experience the composite outcome of a hospital visit with nervous system and/or psychiatric disorders, hypoglycemia, or a collagen-associated event, although the absolute risk of these events was less than 2%.

Effectiveness of first, second, and third COVID-19 vaccine doses in solid organ transplant recipients: A population-based cohort study from Canada.

Limited data exists on the effectiveness of a third COVID-19 vaccine dose in solid organ transplant recipients. We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada to answer this question. We included solid organ transplant recipients (n = 12,842) as of December 14, 2020, with follow-up until November 28, 2021. We used an extended Cox proportional hazards model with vaccination status, including BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChAdOx1 vaccines, modeled as a time-dependent exposure. Individuals started in the unvaccinated category (reference) and could contribute person-time to first, second, and third doses. Over a median follow-up of 349 days, 12.7% (n = 1632) remained unvaccinated, 54.1% (n = 6953) received 3 doses, and 488 (3.8%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (of which 260 [53.3%] had a clinically important outcome [i.e., hospitalization or death]). Adjusted vaccine effectiveness against infection was 31% (95% CI: 2, 51%), 46% (95% CI: 21, 63%), and 72% (95% CI: 43, 86%) for one, two, and three doses. Vaccine effectiveness against clinically important outcomes was 38% (95% CI: 4, 61%), 54% (95% CI: 23, 73%), and 67% (95% CI: 11, 87%). Vaccine effectiveness in solid organ transplant recipients is lower than the general population, however, vaccine effectiveness improved following a third dose.

Pre-transplant maintenance dialysis duration and outcomes after kidney transplantation: A multicenter population-based cohort study.

The association between pre-transplant dialysis duration and post-transplant outcomes may vary by the population and endpoints studied. We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada including kidney transplant recipients (n = 4461) from 2004 to 2014. Our primary outcome was total graft failure (i.e., death, return to dialysis, or pre-emptive re-transplant). Secondary outcomes included death-censored graft failure, death with graft function, mortality, hospitalization for cardiovascular events, hospitalization for infection, and hospital readmission. We presented results by pre-transplant dialysis duration (pre-emptive transplant, and .01-1.43, 1.44-2.64, 2.65-4.25, 4.26-6.45, and 6.46-36.5 years, for quintiles 1-5). After adjusting for clinical characteristics, pre-emptive transplantation was associated with a lower rate of total graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] .68, 95% CI: .46, .99), while quintile 4 was associated with a higher rate (aHR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.71), when compared to quintile 1. There was no significant relationship between dialysis duration and death-censored graft failure, cardiovascular events, or hospital readmission. For death with graft function and mortality, quintiles 3-5 had a significantly higher aHR compared to quintile 1, while for infection, quintiles 2-5 had a higher aHR. Longer time on dialysis was associated with an increased rate of several adverse post-transplant outcomes.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Early Hospital Readmission in Canadian Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Population-Based Multi-Center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Early hospital readmissions (EHRs) occur commonly in kidney transplant recipients. Conflicting evidence exists regarding risk factors and outcomes of EHRs. OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors and outcomes associated with EHRs (ie, hospitalization within 30 days of discharge from transplant hospitalization) in kidney transplant recipients. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study using linked, administrative health care databases. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: We included 5437 kidney transplant recipients from 2002 to 2015. MEASUREMENTS: Risk factors and outcomes associated with EHRs. We assessed donor, recipient, and transplant risk factors. We also assessed the following outcomes: total graft failure, death-censored graft failure, death with a functioning graft, mortality, and late hospital readmission. METHODS: We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association of each risk factor and the odds of EHR. To examine the relationship between EHR status (yes vs no [reference]) and the outcomes associated with EHR (eg, total graft failure), we used a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In all, 1128 kidney transplant recipients (20.7%) experienced an EHR. We found the following risk factors were associated with an increased risk of EHR: older recipient age, lower income quintile, several comorbidities, longer hospitalization for initial kidney transplant, and older donor age. After adjusting for clinical characteristics, compared to recipients without an EHR, recipients with an EHR had an increased risk of total graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.29, 1.65), death-censored graft failure (aHR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.36, 1.94), death with graft function (aHR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.59), mortality (aHR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.22, 1.63), and late hospital readmission in the first 0.5 years of follow-up (eg, 0 to <0.25 years: aHR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.85, 2.40). LIMITATIONS: We were not able to identify which readmissions could have been preventable and there is a potential for residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Results can be used to identify kidney transplant recipients at risk of EHR and emphasize the need for interventions to reduce the risk of EHRs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This is not applicable as this is a population-based cohort study and not a clinical trial.

CONTEXTE: Les réadmissions précoces à l'hôpital (RPH) sont fréquentes chez les receveurs d'une greffe rénale. Les données sur les facteurs de risque d'une RPH et sur les résultats qui y sont associés restent toutefois contradictoires. OBJECTIF: Définir les facteurs de risque et les effets associés à une RPH (soit une hospitalization dans les 30 jours suivant la sortie de l'hôpital après la transplantation) chez les receveurs de greffe rénale. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude de cohorte représentative d'une population, réalisée à partir des bases de données administratives en santé. CADRE: Ontario, Canada. SUJETS: Ont été inclus 5 437 adultes receveurs d'une greffe rénale entre 2002 et 2015. MESURES: Les facteurs de risque et les résultats associés à une RPH. Nous avons évalué les facteurs de risque du donneur, du receveur et de la transplantation. Nous avons également évalué les résultats suivants : l'échec du greffon, l'échec du greffon censuré par le décès, le décès avec un greffon fonctionnel, la mortalité et les réadmissions tardives. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons utilisé la régression logistique multivariée pour examiner l'association de chaque facteur de risque et les probabilités de RPH. Un modèle multivarié des risques proportionnels de Cox a par ailleurs servi à examiner la relation entre le statut des RPH (oui vs non [référence]) et les résultats associés à celles-ci (p. ex., l'échec de la greffe). RÉSULTATS: Dans la cohorte étudiée, 1 128 receveurs d'une greffe rénale (20,7 %) ont été réadmis précocement à l'hôpital. Les facteurs de risque suivants ont été associés à un risque accru de RPH : âge plus avancé du receveur, provenance d'un quartier au quintile de revenu inférieur, présence de plusieurs comorbidités, hospitalization initiale plus longue pour la transplantation rénale et âge plus avancé du donneur. Après ajustement pour les caractéristiques cliniques, par rapport aux receveurs de greffe qui n'avaient pas été réadmis précocement, les patients avec une RPH présentaient un risque accru d'échec du greffon (risque relatif corrigé [RRc] : 1,46; IC 95 % : 1,29-1,65), d'échec du greffon censuré par le décès (RRc: 1,62; IC 95 % : 1,36-1,94), de décès avec un greffon fonctionnel (RRc: 1,34; IC 95 % : 1,13-1,59), de mortalité (RRc: 1,41; IC 95 % : 1,22-1,63) et de réadmission tardive au cours des premiers six mois de suivi (p. ex., entre 0 et moins de 0,25 an de suivi, le RRc était de 2,11; [IC 95 % : 1,85-2,40]). LIMITES: Nous n'avons pas été en mesure d'identifier les réadmissions qui auraient pu être prévenues et il existe un risque de facteurs de confusion résiduels. CONCLUSION: Ces résultats peuvent être employés pour identifier les receveurs d'une greffe rénale susceptibles d'être réadmis rapidement à l'hôpital. Ces résultats soulignent en outre la nécessité d'interventions pour réduire le risque de RPH. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'ESSAI: Sans objet puisqu'il s'agit d'une étude de cohorte basée sur la population et non d'un essai clinique.

Comparison of All-Cause Mortality Between Canadian Kidney Transplant Recipients and Patients With Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Understanding rates of mortality in kidney transplant recipients relative to other common diseases can enhance our understanding of the mortality burden in kidney transplant recipients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival probability in Canadian female and male kidney transplant recipients with patients with common cancers (female: breast, colorectal, lung, or pancreas; male: prostate, colorectal, lung, or pancreas) in a contemporary population. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study using linked administrative health care databases. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: A total of 6888 incident kidney transplant recipients (median age was 50 and 51 years in females and males, respectively) and a total of 532 452 incident patients with cancer (median age range 60 to 72 years across cancer types) from 1997 to 2015. MEASUREMENTS: All-cause mortality. METHODS: The survival of study participants was described using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator. The rate of survival was compared between kidney transplant recipients and patients with cancer using extended Cox regression with a Heaviside function. RESULTS: Kidney transplant recipients had a higher survival probability compared with all cancer types. For example, male kidney transplant recipients had a 5-year survival probability of 89.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.6%-90.5%) compared with 83.3% (95% CI: 83.1%-83.5%) in patients with prostate cancer, and 14.0% (95% CI: 13.7%-14.3%), 56.1% (95% CI: 55.7%-56.5%), and 9.1% (95% CI: 8.5%-9.7%) in patients with lung, colorectal, and pancreas cancer, respectively. After presenting survival probabilities by age at cohort entry and after adjusting for clinical characteristics, similar results were found with a few exceptions. Unlike the unadjusted analysis, in the adjusted analysis males with prostate cancer had a significantly higher survival compared with kidney transplant recipients and females with breast cancer had higher survival compared with kidney transplant recipients at 2+ years of follow-up. In a subpopulation of the cohort who had information available on cancer stage (ie, stages 1-4), we generally found similar results to our primary analysis with kidney transplant recipients having a higher survival probability compared with each cancer stage. However, female kidney transplant recipients had a lower survival probability compared with females with stage 1 breast cancer, whereas male kidney transplant recipients had a lower survival probability compared with males with stage 1 to 3 prostate cancer. LIMITATIONS: External generalizability, residual confounding, and cancer stage could only be provided for a subpopulation. CONCLUSION: Mortality in kidney transplant recipients is lower than in patients with several cancer types. These results improve our understanding of the mortality burden in this population and reaffirm kidney transplantation as a good treatment option for end-stage kidney disease but also highlight the continuing need to improve posttransplant survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This is not applicable as this is a population-based cohort study and not a clinical trial.

CONTEXTE: La comparaison du taux de mortalité des receveurs d'une greffe rénale par rapport à celui des patients atteints d'autres maladies courantes pourrait améliorer notre compréhension du fardeau que cela représente chez les transplantés rénaux. OBJECTIFS: Comparer la probabilité de survie des transplantés rénaux canadiens, femmes et hommes, à celle de patients atteints de cancers fréquents (femmes : sein, colorectal poumons ou pancréas; hommes : prostate, colorectal, poumons ou pancréas) dans une population contemporaine. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude de cohorte représentative d'une population réalisée à partir des données administratives en santé. CADRE: Ontario, Canada. SUJETS: L'étude porte sur 6 888 transplantés du rein incidents (âge médian : 50 ans [femmes] et 51 ans [hommes]) et un total de 532 452 patients atteints d'un cancer (âge médian : 60 à 72 ans pour tous les types de cancers) répertoriés entre 1997 et 2015. MESURES: Mortalité toutes causes confondues. MÉTHODOLOGIE: La survie des patients a été décrite à l'aide de l'estimateur produit-limite de Kaplan-Meier. Une régression étendue de Cox avec une distribution de Heaviside a servi à comparer les taux survie des transplantés rénaux et des patients atteints d'un cancer. RÉSULTATS: La probabilité de survie des transplantés Renaud s'est avérée plus élevée que celle observée pour tous les types de cancer. À titre d'exemple, la probabilité de survie des hommes transplantés était de 89,6 % (IC à 95 % : 88,6-56,9 %) après 5 ans alors qu'elle s'établissait à 83,3 % (IC 95 % : 83,1-83,5 %) chez les patients atteints d'un cancer de la prostate et à 14,0 % (IC à 95 % : 13,7-14,3 %), 56,1 % (IC 95 % : 55,7-56,5 %) et 9,1 % (IC 95 % : 8,5-9,7 %) chez les patients atteints respectivement d'un cancer du poumon, colorectal et du pancréas. Des résultats similaires, à quelques exceptions près, ont été observés après une présentation des probabilités de survie selon l'âge à l'inclusion dans la cohorte et après correction en fonction des caractéristiques cliniques. Dans l'analyse corrigée, contrairement à l'analyse non corrigée, la probabilité de survie des hommes atteints d'un cancer de la prostate et celle des femmes atteintes d'un cancer du sein étaient significativement plus élevées que celle des receveurs d'une greffe rénale après plus de deux ans de suivi. Une sous-population issue de la cohorte de patients disposant d'informations sur le stade du cancer (stades 1 à 4) a montré des résultats généralement similaires à ceux de notre analyse primaire; les transplantés rénaux montrant une probabilité de survie plus élevée comparativement à chaque stade de cancer. Cependant, les receveuses d'une greffe rénale présentaient une probabilité de survie plus faible que les femmes atteintes d'un cancer du sein de stade 1; un résultat similaire a été observé chez les receveurs d'un rein comparativement aux hommes atteints d'un cancer de la prostate de stade 1 à 3. LIMITES: Généralisabilité externe; facteurs de confusion résiduels; stade du cancer connu pour une sous-population uniquement. CONCLUSION: Le taux de mortalité chez les receveurs d'un greffe rénale est inférieur à celui des patients atteints de plusieurs types de cancer. Ces résultats permettent de mieux comprendre le fardeau que représente la mortalité dans cette population et de réaffirmer la transplantation rénale comme option de traitement valide pour l'insuffisance rénale terminale. Ces résultats rappellent également qu'il demeure indispensable d'améliorer les taux de survie post-transplantation. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'ESSAI: Sans objet. Il s'agit d'une étude de cohorte basée sur une population et non d'un essai clinique.

Commentary on the KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in CKD.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize and explain the new guideline on blood pressure (BP) management in chronic kidney disease (CKD) published by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), an independent global nonprofit organization which develops and implements evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in kidney disease. KDIGO issued its first clinical practice guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure (BP) in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) for patients not receiving dialysis in 2012 and now updated the guideline in 2021. RECENT FINDINGS: Recommendations in this update were developed based on systematic literature reviews and appraisal of the quality of the evidence and strength of recommendation following the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach. The updated guideline includes five chapters covering BP measurement techniques, lifestyle interventions for lowering BP, and management of BP in three target populations, namely adults (with and without diabetes), kidney transplant recipients, and children. A dedicated chapter on BP measurement emphasizing standardized preparation and measurement protocols for office BP measurement is a new addition, following protocols used in large randomized trials of BP targets with pivotal clinical outcomes. Based on the available evidence, and in particular in the CKD subgroup of the SPRINT trial, the 2021 guideline suggests a systolic BP target of <120 mm Hg, based on standardized measurements, for most individuals with CKD not receiving dialysis, with the exception of kidney transplant recipients and children. This recommendation is strictly contingent on the measurement of BP using standardized office readings and not routine office readings.

Management of Blood Pressure in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Not Receiving Dialysis: Synopsis of the 2021 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline.

DESCRIPTION: The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure (BP) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not receiving dialysis is an update of the KDIGO 2012 guideline on the same topic and reflects new evidence on the risks and benefits of BP-lowering therapy among patients with CKD. It is intended to support shared decision making by health care professionals working with patients with CKD worldwide. This article is a synopsis of the full guideline. METHODS: The KDIGO leadership commissioned 2 co-chairs to convene an international Work Group of researchers and clinicians. After a Controversies Conference in September 2017, the Work Group defined the scope of the evidence review, which was undertaken by an evidence review team between October 2017 and April 2020. Evidence reviews were done according to the Cochrane Handbook. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to guide the development of the recommendations and rate the strength and quality of the evidence. Practice points were included to provide guidance when evidence was insufficient to make a graded recommendation. The guideline was revised after public consultation between January and March 2020. RECOMMENDATIONS: The updated guideline comprises 11 recommendations and 20 practice points. This synopsis summarizes key recommendations pertinent to the diagnosis and management of high BP in adults with CKD, excluding those receiving kidney replacement therapy. In particular, the synopsis focuses on recommendations for standardized BP measurement and a target systolic BP of less than 120 mm Hg, because these recommendations differ from some other guidelines.

Outcomes of an Inpatient Dialysis Start in Patients With Kidney Graft Failure: A Population-Based Multicentre Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The frequency and outcomes of starting maintenance dialysis in the hospital as an inpatient in kidney transplant recipients with graft failure are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of inpatient dialysis starts in patients with kidney graft failure and examine whether dialysis start status (hospital inpatient vs outpatient setting) is associated with all-cause mortality and kidney re-transplantation. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: We used linked administrative healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: We included 1164 patients with kidney graft failure from 1994 to 2016. MEASUREMENTS: All-cause mortality and kidney re-transplantation. METHODS: The cumulative incidence function was used to calculate the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality and kidney re-transplantation, accounting for competing risks. Subdistribution hazard ratios from the Fine and Gray model were used to examine the relationship between inpatient dialysis starts (vs outpatient dialysis start [reference]) and the dependent variables (ie, mortality or re-transplant). RESULTS: We included 1164 patients with kidney graft failure. More than half (55.8%) of patients with kidney graft failure, initiated dialysis as an inpatient. Compared with outpatient dialysis starters, inpatient dialysis starters had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of mortality and a significantly lower incidence of kidney re-transplantation (P < .001). The 10-year cumulative incidence of mortality was 51.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47.4, 56.9%) (inpatient) and 35.3% (95% CI: 31.1, 40.1%) (outpatient). After adjusting for clinical characteristics, we found inpatient dialysis starters had a significantly increased hazard of mortality in the first year after graft failure (hazard ratio: 2.18 [95% CI: 1.43, 3.33]) but at 1+ years there was no significant difference between groups. LIMITATIONS: Possibility of residual confounding and unable to determine inpatient dialysis starts that were unavoidable. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we identified that most patients with kidney graft failure had inpatient dialysis starts, which was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Further research is needed to better understand the reasons for an inpatient dialysis start in this patient population.

CONTEXTE: On en sait peu sur la fréquence à laquelle est amorcé un traitement de dialyse d'entretien pendant l'hospitalisation des patients qui subissent une défaillance du greffon rénal. On en sait également peu sur les issues liées à cette procédure. OBJECTIFS: Déterminer la fréquence à laquelle un traitement de dialyse est amorcé pendant l'hospitalisation des patients qui subissent une défaillance du greffon, et vérifier si le statut du patient avant le traitement (hospitalisé vs ambulatoire) est associé à la mortalité toutes causes confondues et à la retransplantation. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude de cohorte basée sur la population. CADRE: Nous avons utilisé les bases de données couplées du système de santé de l'Ontario (Canada). SUJETS: Ont été inclus 1 164 patients ayant subi une défaillance du greffon rénal entre 1994 et 2016. MESURES: La mortalité toutes causes confondues et la retransplantation d'un rein. MÉTHODOLOGIE: La fonction d'incidence cumulative a été utilisée pour calculer l'incidence cumulative de la mortalité toutes causes confondues et de la retransplantation, en tenant compte des risques concurrents. Les rapports de risque de sous-distribution du modèle Fine et Gray ont été employés pour examiner le lien entre l'amorce de la dialyse pendant l'hospitalisation (par rapport à l'amorce en ambulatoire [référence]) et les variables dépendantes (mortalité et retransplantation). RÉSULTATS: L'étude porte sur 1 164 patients ayant subi une défaillance du greffon. Plus de la moitié des patients inclus (55,8 %) avaient amorcé la dialyse pendant l'hospitalisation. Comparativement aux patients ayant amorcé la dialyse en ambulatoire, les patients hospitalisés ont montré une incidence cumulative significativement plus élevée de mortalité et une incidence significativement plus faible de retransplantation d'un rein (p<0,001). L'incidence cumulative de mortalité après 10 ans se situait à 51,9 % (IC 95 %: 47,4-56,9 %) pour les patients hospitalisés et à 35,3 % (IC 95 %: 31,1-40,1 %) pour les patients ambulatoires. Après l'ajustement en fonction des caractéristiques cliniques, nous avons constaté que les patients qui avaient amorcé la dialyse à l'hôpital avaient un risque significativement plus élevé de décéder dans l'année suivant la défaillance du greffon (rapport de risque: 2,18 [IC 95 %: 1,43-3,33]), mais aucune différence significative n'était observable entre les deux groupes au-delà d'un an. LIMITES: Possibilité de facteurs de confusion résiduels et incapacité de déterminer les amorces de dialyse inévitables chez des patients hospitalisés. CONCLUSION: Nous avons constaté que la plupart des patients ayant subi une défaillance du greffon avaient amorcé la dialyse pendant l'hospitalisation, et que cette procédure était associée à un risque accru de mortalité. Des recherches supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour mieux comprendre les raisons qui mènent à une amorce de dialyse pendant l'hospitalisation chez ces patients.

Executive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease.

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease for patients not receiving dialysis represents an update to the KDIGO 2012 guideline on this topic. Development of this guideline update followed a rigorous process of evidence review and appraisal. Guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and appraisal of the quality of the evidence. The strength of recommendations is based on the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach. The scope includes topics covered in the original guideline, such as optimal blood pressure targets, lifestyle interventions, antihypertensive medications, and specific management in kidney transplant recipients and children. Some aspects of general and cardiovascular health, such as lipid and smoking management, are excluded. This guideline also introduces a chapter dedicated to proper blood pressure measurement since all large randomized trials targeting blood pressure with pivotal outcomes used standardized preparation and measurement protocols adhered to by patients and clinicians. Based on previous and new evidence, in particular the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) results, we propose a systolic blood pressure target of less than 120 mm Hg using standardized office reading for most people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not receiving dialysis, the exception being children and kidney transplant recipients. The goal of this guideline is to provide clinicians and patients a useful resource with actionable recommendations supplemented with practice points. The burden of the recommendations on patients and resources, public policy implications, and limitations of the evidence are taken into consideration. Lastly, knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research are provided.

Mortality and Morbidity in Kidney Transplant Recipients With a Failing Graft: A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Due to their history of renal disease and exposure to immunosuppression, kidney transplant recipients with a failing graft may be at higher risk of adverse outcomes compared to nontransplant controls. Understanding the burden of disease in transplant recipients may inform treatment decisions of people whose native kidneys are failing and may be eligible for a transplant. OBJECTIVE: To compare mortality and morbidity in kidney transplant recipients with a failing graft to matched nontransplant controls. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Alberta, Canada. PATIENTS: Kidney transplant recipients with a failing graft were identified as having at least 2 estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements between 15-30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (90-365 days apart). We also identified nontransplant controls with a similar degree of kidney dysfunction. MEASUREMENTS: Mortality and hospitalization. METHODS: We propensity-score matched 520 kidney transplant recipients with a failing graft to 520 nontransplant controls. RESULTS: The median age of the matched cohort was 57 years and 40% were women. Compared to matched nontransplant controls, recipients with a failing graft had a higher hazard of death (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.85; p < .001) and a higher rate of all-cause hospitalization (rate ratio, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.42-1.97; p < .001). Kidney transplant recipients also had a higher rate of several cause-specific hospitalizations including genitourinary, cardiovascular, and infectious causes. LIMITATIONS: Observational design with the risk of residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: A failing kidney transplant is associated with an increased burden of mortality and morbidity beyond chronic kidney disease. This information may assist the discussion of prognosis in kidney transplant recipients with a failing graft and the design of strategies to minimize risks.

CONTEXTE: En raison de leurs antécédents de néphropathie et de leur exposition aux immunosuppresseurs, les receveurs d'une greffe rénale dont le greffon est défaillant pourraient être plus susceptibles de souffrir de pathologies associées que les patients non transplantés (contrôles). Comprendre le fardeau de la maladie pour les receveurs d'une greffe pourrait orienter les décisions de traitement pour les patients dont les reins natifs sont défaillants et qui sont admissibles à une greffe. OBJECTIF: Comparer la mortalité et les comorbidités de receveurs d'une greffe rénale dont le greffon est défaillant à celles de patients non greffés (contrôles). TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude de cohorte rétrospective. CADRE: Alberta, Canada. SUJETS: Le statut de receveur avec greffon défaillant a été établi par au moins deux mesures de DFGe se situant entre 15 et 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (de 90 à 365 jours d'intervalle). Des patients non greffés présentant un dysfonctionnement rénal similaire ont servi de contrôles. MESURES: Mortalité et nombre d'hospitalisations. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons jumelé 520 receveurs avec greffon défaillant à 520 patients non greffés sur la base du score de propension. RÉSULTATS: L'âge médian des sujets était de 57 ans et 40 % étaient des femmes. Les patients avec un greffon défaillant ont présenté un risque de mortalité (rapport de risque : 1.54; IC 95 % : 1.28-1.85; p < .001) et un taux d'hospitalization toutes causes confondues (rapport des taux : 1.67; IC 95%, 1.42-1.97; p < .001) plus élevés que les patients non greffés. Ils étaient également hospitalisés plus fréquemment, notamment pour des problèmes génito-urinaires ou cardiovasculaires, ou pour des infections. LIMITES: La nature observationnelle de l'étude pourrait comporter des facteurs de confusion résiduels. CONCLUSION: Une transplantation rénale défaillante a été associée à un plus grand risque de morbidité et de mortalité que l'insuffisance rénale chronique. Cette information pourrait orienter les discussions concernant le pronostic des receveurs d'un rein dont le greffon est défaillant et guider l'élaboration de stratégies pour minimiser les risques.

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation.

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

Summary of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation.

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence. The strengths of recommendations are provided in the full report. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

Canadian-Australasian Randomised trial of screening kidney transplant candidates for coronary artery disease-A trial protocol for the CARSK study.

Transplantation is the preferred treatment for patients with kidney failure, but the need exceeds the supply of transplantable kidneys, and patients routinely wait >5 years on dialysis for a transplant. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is common in kidney failure and can exclude patients from transplantation or result in death before or after transplantation. Screening asymptomatic patients for CAD using noninvasive tests prior to wait-listing and at regular intervals (ie, annually) after wait-listing until transplantation is the established standard of care and is justified by the need to avoid adverse patient outcomes and loss of organs. Patients with abnormal screening tests undergo coronary angiography, and those with critical stenoses are revascularized. Screening is potentially harmful because patients may be excluded or delayed from transplantation, and complications after revascularization are more frequent in this population. CARSK will test the hypothesis that eliminating screening tests for occult CAD after wait-listing is not inferior to regular screening for the prevention of major adverse cardiac events defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina. Secondary outcomes include the transplant rate, safety measures, and the cost-effectiveness of screening. Enrolment of 3,306 patients over 3 years is required, with patients followed for up to 5 years during wait-listing and for 1 year after transplantation. By validating or refuting the use of screening tests during wait-listing, CARSK will ensure judicious use of health resources and optimal patient outcomes.

Mortality in Incident Maintenance Dialysis Patients Versus Incident Solid Organ Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Cohort.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The mortality rate is high among dialysis patients, but how this compares with other diseases such as cancer is poorly understood. We compared the survival of maintenance dialysis patients with that for patients with common cancers to enhance the understanding of the burden of end-stage kidney disease. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 33,500 incident maintenance dialysis patients in Ontario, Canada, and 532,452 incident patients with cancer (women: breast, colorectal, lung, or pancreas; men: prostate, colorectal, lung, or pancreas) from 1997 to 2015 using administrative health care databases. EXPOSURE: Incident kidney failure treated with maintenance dialysis versus incident diagnoses of cancer. OUTCOME: All-cause mortality. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator was used to describe the survival of subgroups of study participants. Extended Cox regression with a Heaviside function was used to compare survival between patients with incident kidney failure treated with maintenance dialysis and individual diagnoses of various incident cancers. RESULTS: In men, dialysis had worse unadjusted 5-year survival (50.8%; 95% CI, 50.1%-51.6%) compared with prostate (83.3%; 95% CI, 83.1%-83.5%) and colorectal (56.1%; 95% CI, 55.7%-56.5%) cancer, but better survival than lung (14.0%; 95% CI, 13.7%-14.3%) and pancreas (9.1%; 95% CI, 8.5%-9.7%) cancer. In women, dialysis had worse unadjusted 5-year survival (49.8%; 95% CI, 48.9%-50.7%) compared with breast (82.1%; 95% CI, 81.9%-82.4%) and colorectal (56.8%; 95% CI, 56.3%-57.2%) cancer, but better survival than lung (19.7%; 95% CI, 19.4%-20.1%) and pancreas (9.4%; 95% CI, 8.9%-10.0%) cancer. After adjusting for clinical characteristics, similar results were found except when examining men and women with lung and pancreas cancer, for which dialysis patients had a higher rate of death 4 or more years after diagnosis. Women and men 70 years and older with incident kidney failure treated with maintenance dialysis had unadjusted 10-year survival probabilities that were comparable to pancreas and lung cancer. LIMITATIONS: Cancer stage could be obtained for only a subpopulation. CONCLUSIONS: Survival in incident dialysis patients was lower than in patients with several different solid-organ cancers. These results highlight the need to develop interventions to improve survival on dialysis therapy and can be used to aid advance care planning for elderly patients beginning treatment with maintenance dialysis.

Socioeconomic Status and Kidney Transplant Outcomes in a Universal Healthcare System: A Population-based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists regarding the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and outcomes after kidney transplantation. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study in a publicly funded healthcare system using linked administrative healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada to assess the relationship between SES and total graft failure (ie, return to chronic dialysis, preemptive retransplantation, or death) in individuals who received their first kidney transplant between 2004 and 2014. Secondary outcomes included death-censored graft failure, death with a functioning graft, all-cause mortality, and all-cause hospitalization (post hoc outcome). RESULTS: Four thousand four hundred-fourteen kidney transplant recipients were included (median age, 53 years; 36.5% female), and the median (25th, 75th percentile) follow-up was 4.3 (2.1-7.1) years. In an unadjusted Cox proportional hazards model, each CAD $10000 increase in neighborhood median income was associated with an 8% decline in the rate of total graft failure (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.97). After adjusting for recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics, SES was not significantly associated with total or death-censored graft failure. However, each CAD $10000 increase in neighborhood median income remained associated with a decline in the rate of death with a functioning graft (adjusted (a)HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98), all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99), and all-cause hospitalization (aHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in a universal healthcare system, SES may not adversely influence graft health, but SES gradients may negatively impact other kidney transplant outcomes and could be used to identify patients at increased risk of death or hospitalization.

Barriers and Enablers to Organ Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Beliefs of Frontline Intensive Care Unit Professionals and Organ Donor Coordinators.

BACKGROUND: A shortage of transplantable organs is a global problem. The purpose of this study was to explore frontline intensive care unit professionals' and organ donor coordinators' perceptions and beliefs around the process of, and the barriers and enablers to, donation after circulatory determination death (DCDD). METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study used a semistructured interview guide informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework to interview 55 key informants (physicians, nurses, and organ donation coordinators) in intensive care units (hospitals) and organ donation organizations across Canada. RESULTS: Interviews were analyzed using a 6-step systematic approach: coding, generation of specific beliefs, identification of themes, aggregation of themes into categories, assignment of barrier or enabler and analysis for shared and unique discipline barriers and enablers. Seven broad categories encompassing 29 themes of barriers (n = 21) and enablers (n = 4) to DCDD use were identified; n = 4 (14%) themes were conflicting, acting as barriers and enablers. Most themes (n = 26) were shared across the 3 key informant groups while n = 3 themes were unique to physicians. The top 3 shared barriers were: (1) DCDD education is needed for healthcare professionals, (2) a standardized and systematic screening process to identify potential DCDD donors is needed, and (3) practice variation across regions with respect to communication about DCDD with families. A limited number of differences were found by region. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple barriers and enablers to DCDD use were identified. These beliefs identify potential individual, team, organization, and system targets for behavior change interventions to increase DCDD rates which, in turn, should lead to more transplantation, reducing patient morbidity and mortality at a population level.

Criteria to Identify a Potential Deceased Organ Donor: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the global published literature defining a potential deceased organ donor and identifying clinical triggers for deceased organ donation identification and referral. DATA SOURCES: Medline and Embase databases from January 2006 to September 2017. STUDY SELECTION: All published studies containing a definition of a potential deceased organ donor and/or clinical triggers for referring a potential deceased organ donor were eligible for inclusion. Dual, independent screening was conducted of 3,857 citations. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was completed by one team member and verified by a second team member. Thematic content analysis was used to identify clinical criteria for potential deceased organ donation identification from the published definitions and clinical triggers. DATA SYNTHESIS: One hundred twenty-four articles were included in the review. Criteria fell into four categories: Neurological, Medical Decision, Cardiorespiratory, and Administrative. Distinct and globally consistent sets of clinical criteria by type of deceased organ donation (neurologic death determination, controlled donation after circulatory determination of death, and uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death) are reported. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the clinical criteria sets reported will reduce ambiguity associated with the deceased organ donor identification and the subsequent referral process, potentially reducing the number of missed donors and saving lives globally through increased transplantation.