Resident Exposure and Involvement in Core Procedural Competencies within Pediatric Plastic Surgery.

Introduction: The implementation of competency-based residency training in plastic surgery is underway. Key competencies in plastic surgery have been previously identified, however, within the domain of pediatrics, data suggest limited exposure throughout training for Canadian graduates. This study aims to identify the exposure and involvement of residents in core pediatric cases. Methods: We performed a retrospective, multicenter review of plastic surgery resident case logs (T-Res, POWER, New Innovations) across 10 Canadian, English-speaking training programs between 2004 and 2014. Case logs were coded according to the 8 core pediatric competencies previously identified by a modified Delphi technique. Results: A total of 3061 of 59 405 cases (5.2%) logged by 55 graduating residents were core pediatric procedures with an average of 55.6 ± 23.0 cases logged per resident. The top 3 most commonly logged procedures were cleft lip repair, cleft palate repair, and setback otoplasty. The number of cases per program varied widely with the most at 731 and least at 85 logged cases. Roles across procedures have wide variation and residents are most commonly identified as the assistant rather than surgeon or co-surgeon. Conclusion: These findings highlight variability both within and across residency programs with a paucity of exposure and involvement in pediatric plastic surgery cases. This may present a conflict between current recommendations for residency-specific procedural competencies and true clinical exposure. Further curriculum development and simulation may be of benefit.

Introduction: La formation des résidents fondée sur les compétences est en voie d'être adoptée en chirurgie plastique. Les compétences clés sont d'ailleurs déjà établies, mais dans le domaine de la pédiatrie, les données indiquent que les diplômés canadiens y sont peu exposés pendant leur formation. La présente étude vise à déterminer l'exposition et la participation des résidents aux cas fondamentaux en pédiatrie. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont procédé à une analyse multicentrique rétrospective des registres de cas des résidents en chirurgie plastique (T-Res, POWER, New Innovations) de dix programmes de formation anglophones canadiens entre 2004 et 2014. Ils ont codé ces registres en fonction des huit compétences pédiatriques fondamentales préalablement déterminées par une technique Delphi modifiée. Résultats: Au total, 3 061 des 59 405 cas enregistrés (5,2 %) par 55 résidents de dernière année étaient des interventions pédiatriques fondamentales, et chaque résident a enregistré une moyenne de 55,6 ± 23,0 cas. Les trois interventions les plus enregistrées étaient la réparation de la fissure labiale, la réparation de la fissure palatine et l'otoplastie. Le nombre de cas enregistrés variait énormément d'un programme à l'autre, le plus élevé étant de 731 et le plus bas, de 85. Les rôles au cours des interventions étaient très variables, et les résidents étaient davantage qualifiés d'assistants que de chirurgiens ou de cochirurgiens. Conclusion: Ces observations font ressortir la variabilité des pratiques à la fois au sein des programmes de résidence et entre eux et démontrent le peu d'exposition et de participation des résidents aux cas de chirurgie plastique pédiatrique. Elles peuvent révéler un conflit entre les recommandations actuelles en matière de compétences interventionnelles des résidents et la véritable exposition clinique. Il pourrait être utile de voir à l'élaboration plus poussée du programme et des simulations.

Resident Exposure to Aesthetic Surgical and Nonsurgical Procedures During Canadian Residency Program Training.

North American residency programs are transitioning to competency-based medical education (CBME) to standardize training programs, and to ensure competency of residents upon graduation. At the centre of assessment in CBME are specific surgical procedures, or procedural competencies, that trainees must be able to perform. A study previously defined 31 procedural competencies for aesthetic surgery. In this transition period, understanding current educational trends in resident exposure to these aesthetic procedures is necessary. The aim of this study was to characterize aesthetic procedures performed by Canadian plastic surgery residents during training, as well as to describe resident performance confidence levels and degree of resident involvement during those procedures. Case logs were retrieved from all 10 English-language plastic surgery programs. All aesthetic procedures were identified, and coded according to previously defined core procedural competencies (CPCs) in the aesthetic domain of plastic surgery. Data extracted from each log included the procedure, training program, resident academic year, resident procedural role, and personal competence. From July 2004 to June 2014, 6113 aesthetic procedures were logged by 55 graduating residents. Breast augmentation, mastopexy, and abdominoplasty were the most commonly performed CPCs, and residents report high levels of competence and surgical role in these procedures. Facial procedures, in particular rhinoplasty, as well as nonsurgical CPCs are associated with low exposure and personal competence levels. Canadian plastic surgery residents are exposed to most of the core aesthetic procedural competencies, but the range of procedures performed is variable. With the implementation of CBME, consideration should be given to supplementation where gaps may exist in aesthetic case exposure.

Canadian Plastic Surgery Resident Operative Experience in Hand Surgery.

PURPOSE: Core procedural competencies (CPCs) in hand surgery have been previously described. However, it is unknown whether plastic surgery residents receive sufficient operative experience with these procedures. This study aimed to determine whether Canadian plastic surgery residents are receiving adequate exposure to CPCs in hand surgery during residency training. METHODS: Hand surgery case logs recorded by graduating plastic surgery residents at 10 Canadian English-speaking training programs between 2004 and 2014 were reviewed from 3 databases. For each CPC in hand surgery, perceived resident role and self-competence scores were collected and analyzed. Core procedural competencies encompass core essential procedural competencies (CEPCs) and nonessential procedural competencies. RESULTS: There were 55 graduating plastic surgery residents included in the study. A total of 14,909 procedures were logged for 42 CPCs, with an average of 271 procedures/resident. When grouped by subdomain within hand surgery, procedures with the most exposure were related to traumatic finger injuries (29%) and neuropathies (22%). The least common procedures were related to flap reconstructions (0.3%) and muscle release (0.1%). Many residents reported receiving no operative experience (range, 2% to 100%) or between 1 and 10 cases of CEPCs (range, 7% to 50%). Most graduating residents (58% to 72%) did not feel competent independently performing 60% of the most common procedures. There were weak to moderate correlations between role and self-competence, and between postgraduate year and self-competence. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, many plastic surgery residents graduate from training programs with little to no exposure for over half of the CEPCs in hand surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given the great diversity in hand surgery CPCs, it is difficult for residents to gain adequate operative experience during their residency in all of the CPCs.

Variable Experience in Microsurgery and Flap-Based Procedures Among Canadian Plastic Surgery Residents.

TITLE: Variable experience in microsurgery and flap-based procedures among Canadian plastic surgery residents. OBJECTIVE: Plastic surgery residencies are transitioning toward a competency-based education model. It is not known whether trainees can realistically achieve proficiency in microsurgical techniques during their training. This study aims to define the operative experience in the core microsurgical flap procedures among Canadian plastic surgery residents. DESIGN: Microsurgical core procedural competencies (CPCs) have been described. A retrospective review was conducted, evaluating case logs recorded by graduating plastic surgery residents at 10 Canadian English-speaking training programs between 2004 and 2014. Perceived role and competence scores were also collected and analyzed. SETTING: University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. RESULTS: Among 27 microsurgical CPCs, 2082 procedures were logged and each resident performed an average of 37.9 (±21.7) procedures. Anterolateral thigh flaps, radial forearm-based flaps, and digit replants were the most common; however, 10.9% to 14.5% of residents did not have any operative experience with these flaps. Most residents reported zero operative experience with many of the CPCs (10.9%-100%). Co-Surgeon (50%) and First Assistant (30%) were the most common roles. None of the graduating residents reported feeling competent enough to independently perform 50% of the microsurgery CPCs. There was no difference in perceived roles when programs with ≥5 residents were compared against programs with fewer trainees. There were weak to moderate correlations between role and self-perceived competence, and between Post Graduate Year and self-perceived competence. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in resident operative experience in microsurgical CPCs. Many residents graduate with little to no experience in many of the core procedures. Identifying areas of deficiency may help guide curriculum development in the new competency-based education model.

Burn Care and Surgical Exposure amongst Canadian Plastic Surgery Residents: Recommendations for Transitioning to a Competency-Based Medical Education Model.

With the ongoing implementation of a competency-based medical education (CMBE) model for residency programs in North America, emphasis on the duration of training has been refocused onto ability and competence. This study aims to determine the exposure of burn-related core procedural competencies (CPCs) in Canadian Plastic Surgery Residents in order to enhance curricular development and help define its goals. A retrospective review of burn-related resident case logs encompassing all 10 English-speaking plastic surgery residency programs from 2004 to 2014 was performed, including analysis of personal competence scores and resident role by Postgraduate Year (PGY)-year. Case logs of a total of 55 graduating plastic surgery residents were included in the study. Overall, 4033 procedures in burn and burn-related care were logged, accounting for 6.8% of all procedures logged. On average, each resident logged 73 burn procedures, 99% of which were CPCs. The most frequently performed procedure was harvest and application of autograft, allograft, or xenograft, while emergent procedures such as escharotomy and compartment release were performed on average less than one time per resident. Personal competence scores as well as role of the resident (surgical responsibility) increased as PGY-year progressed during residency. Canadian plastic surgery residency programs provide adequate exposure to the majority of the scope of burn care and surgery. However, infrequently encountered but critical procedures such as escharotomy and fasciotomy may require supplementation through dedicated educational opportunities. CMBE should identify these gaps in learning through facilitation of resident competency evaluation. With consideration for the amount of exposure to burn-related CPCs as identified, plastic surgery residency programs can work toward achieving competency in all aspects of burn care and surgery prior to the completion of residency.

Toward the Assessment of Core Procedural Competencies among Canadian Plastic Surgery Residents.

BACKGROUND: Plastic surgery residency training programs are working toward integrating competency-based education into program curriculum and training, a key component of which involves establishing core procedural competencies. This study aims to determine the exposure of graduating Canadian plastic surgery residents to established core procedural competencies. METHODS: A retrospective review of case log procedure data using three databases (T-Res, POWER, and New Innovations) from graduating residents at all 10 Canadian English-speaking plastic surgery training programs between 2004 and 2014 was completed. Case logs were coded according to 177 core procedural competencies identified as "core" by the Delphi method among an expert panel of Canadian plastic surgeons. RESULTS: A total of 59,405 procedures were logged by 55 graduating residents across Canada between 2004 and 2014 (average, 1080 ± 352 procedures per resident). Of 13 plastic surgery domains, 44 percent of all procedures were within either hand, upper extremity, and peripheral nerve (28.3 percent) or nonaesthetic breast (16.1 percent). The most frequently performed core procedural competencies (average case logs per resident) included breast reduction (65.3 ± 33.9); open carpal tunnel release (46.7 ± 34.2); breast reconstruction, implant-based (39.6 ± 20.5); and wound management (35.7 ± 28.6). Sixty-two of 177 procedures were logged on average less than once in 5 years of residency, including escharotomy, temporal parietal fascia flap, Guyon canal release, and soft-tissue fillers. CONCLUSION: This study identifies areas of exposure and underexposure to plastic surgery core procedural competencies, and can help focus surgical education on areas of greater need for surgical skills training and acquisition.

Consensus of Leaders in Plastic Surgery: Identifying Procedural Competencies for Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Training Using a Modified Delphi Technique.

BACKGROUND: Transitioning to competency-based surgical training will require consensus regarding the scope of plastic surgery and expectations of operative ability for graduating residents. Identifying surgical procedures experts deemed most important in preparing graduates for independent practice (i.e., "core" procedures), and those that are less important or deemed more appropriate for fellowship training (i.e., "noncore" procedures), will focus instructional and assessment efforts. METHODS: Canadian plastic surgery program directors, the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons Executive Committee, and peer-nominated experts participated in an online, multiround, modified Delphi consensus exercise. Over three rounds, panelists were asked to sort 288 procedural competencies into five predetermined categories within core and noncore procedures, reflecting increasing expectations of ability. Eighty percent agreement was chosen to indicate consensus. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-eight procedures spanning 13 domains were identified. Invitations were sent to 49 experts; 37 responded (75.5 percent), and 31 participated (83.8 percent of respondents). Procedures reaching 80 percent consensus increased from 101 (35 percent) during round 1, to 159 (55 percent) in round 2, and to 199 (69 percent) in round 3. The domain "burns" had the highest rate of agreement, whereas "lower extremity" had the lowest agreement. Final consensus categories included 154 core, essential; 23 core, nonessential; three noncore, experience; and 19 noncore, fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides clarity regarding which procedures plastic surgery experts deem most important for preparing graduates for independent practice. The list represents a snapshot of expert opinion regarding the current training environment. As our specialty grows and changes, this information will need to be periodically revisited.

Perioperative and Long-Term Smoking Behaviors in Cosmetic Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Many plastic surgeons advocate smoking cessation before patients undergo cosmetic surgery with extensive soft-tissue dissection. Smoking cessation rates after cosmetic surgery are unknown. The preoperative consultation may be an opportunity to promote long-term smoking cessation. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study. All patients over an 8-year study period who smoked before their preoperative consultation; who quit 2 weeks before surgery; and who subsequently underwent rhytidectomy, abdominoplasty, or mastopexy were included. Patients were asked to complete a Web-based survey at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty-five smokers were included, and 47 patients completed the survey, for a response rate of 55.3 percent. Average follow-up was 63.3 months. Five respondents were social smokers and thus excluded. Of the 42 daily smokers, 17 patients (40.5 percent) were no longer smoking cigarettes on a daily basis at long-term follow-up. Of these 17 patients, 10 (23.8 percent) had not smoked since their operation. A total of 24 patients (57.1 percent) had reduced their cigarette consumption by any amount, and 70.8 percent (17 of 24) of these patients agreed that discussing adverse surgical outcomes related to smoking influenced their ability to quit/reduce. Twenty-one of 42 patients (50.0 percent) admitted that they were not compliant with the preoperative smoking cessation instructions. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to investigate long-term smoking cessation from a cosmetic surgery practice. The authors have shown a positive association between smoking cessation and cosmetic surgery. Requesting a period of cessation before cosmetic surgery may promote long-lasting smoking cessation.

A Review of 101 Consecutive Subcutaneous Mastectomies and Male Chest Contouring Using the Concentric Circular and Free Nipple Graft Techniques in Female-to-Male Transgender Patients.

BACKGROUND: Many techniques exist for subcutaneous mastectomy in female-to-male transgender patients. The authors review outcomes for two techniques and present an algorithm to aid surgeons in technique selection. METHODS: One hundred one consecutive female-to-male transgender patients undergoing subcutaneous mastectomy using the concentric circular or free nipple graft technique were retrospectively reviewed. An algorithm for procedure selection was created using classification and regression tree analysis. Aesthetic results (nipple-areola complex, scar, and chest contour) were also independently reviewed. RESULTS: Two hundred two subcutaneous mastectomies were performed (concentric circular, 92 breasts; free nipple graft, 110 breasts). The overall complication rate was 21.3 percent, with 6.4 percent requiring operative intervention (free nipple graft, 1 percent; concentric circular, 13 percent; p < 0.001). The overall revision rate was 23.8 percent (free nipple graft, 12.7 percent; concentric circular, 37.0 percent; p < 0.001). In the concentric circular group, there were 3.3 times the odds of total complications (p = 0.03) and 4.0 times the odds of revision surgery (p < 0.001). Mean aesthetic scores for the concentric circular technique were superior to free nipple graft for scar (3.39 versus 2.62; p < 0.001) and contour (3.82 versus 3.34; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who meet selection criteria, the concentric circular technique is preferred because of fewer scars, improved aesthetic contour, and potential for retained nipple sensation. These patients must be counseled regarding the higher rate of complications and revisions. It was determined that smokers and those with a nipple-to-inframammary fold distance greater than 7 cm or nipple-to-inframammary fold distance less than 7 cm and a body mass index greater than 27 kg/m should undergo the free nipple graft technique because of the increased risk of complications with the concentric circular technique. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Comparison of Outcomes following Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using the DIEP and Pedicled TRAM Flaps: A 12-Year Clinical Retrospective Study and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: There are few studies that compare the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap to the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (pTRAM) flap for use in reconstructive breast surgery. The authors examined four factors that aid in decision-making: donor-site morbidity, need for surgery related to abdominal morbidity, operative time, and complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients undergoing breast reconstruction using the DIEP or pTRAM flap at the University of British Columbia between 2002 and 2013. The authors compared operative time and abdomen- and flap-related complications in both groups. RESULTS: Reconstruction was performed in 507 patients; 25.6 percent received DIEP flaps (n = 183 breasts) and 74.4 percent underwent pTRAM flap surgery (n = 444 breasts). Pedicled TRAM flap patients were more likely to require abdominal closure with mesh (44.2 percent versus 8.1 percent; p < 0.001); 21.2 percent of them had a postoperative bulge and/or hernia versus 3.1 percent of DIEP flap patients; and 12.7 percent of pTRAM flap patients required surgery for hernia/bulge. Controlling for confounders, there were five times the odds of a hernia/bulge in the pTRAM flap group. DIEP flap surgery was 234 minutes longer than pTRAM flap surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of the pTRAM flap may be offset by the need to correct abdominal wall complications. DIEP flap reconstruction had lower donor complications but increased operative time. A cost analysis is needed to determine the most economical procedure. CLINCIAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Development and evaluation of standardized narrative cases depicting the general surgery professionalism milestones.

PURPOSE: Residency programs now are required to use educational milestones, which has led to the need for new methods of assessment. The literature suggests that narrative cases are a promising tool to track residents' progress. This study demonstrates the process for developing and evaluating narrative cases representing the five levels of the professionalism milestones. METHOD: In 2013, the authors identified 28 behaviors in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education general surgery professionalism milestones. They modified previously published narrative cases to fit these behaviors. To evaluate the quality of these cases, the authors developed a 28-item, five-point scale instrument, which 29 interdisciplinary faculty completed. The authors compared the faculty ratings by narrative case and specialty with the authors' initial rankings of the cases by milestone level. They used t tests and analysis of variance to compare mean scores across specialties. RESULTS: The authors developed 10 narrative cases, 2 for each of the 5 milestone levels. Each case contained at least 20 of the 28 behaviors identified in the milestones. Mean faculty ratings matched the milestone levels. Reliability was good (G coefficient = 0.86, phi coefficient = 0.85), indicating consistency in raters' ability to determine the proper milestone level for each case. CONCLUSIONS: The authors demonstrate a process for using specialty-specific milestones to develop narrative cases that map to a spectrum of professionalism behaviors. This process can be applied to other competencies and specialties to facilitate faculty awareness of resident performance descriptors and provide a frame of reference for milestones assessment.

The Development of Assessment Tools for Plastic Surgery Competencies.

BACKGROUND: Objective tools to assess procedural skills in plastic surgery residency training are currently lacking. There is an increasing need to address this deficit in order to meet today's training standards in North America. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this pilot study was to establish a methodology for determining the essential procedural steps for two plastic surgery procedures to assist resident training and assessment. METHODS: Following a literature review and needs assessment of resident training, the authors purposefully selected two procedures lacking robust assessment metrics (breast augmentation and facelift) and used a consensus process to complete a list of procedural steps for each. Using an online survey, plastic surgery Program Directors, Division Chiefs, and the Royal College Specialty Training Committee members in Canada were asked to indicate whether each step was considered essential or non-essential when assessing competence among graduating plastic surgery trainees. The Delphi methodology was used to obtain consensus among the panel. Panelist reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: A total of 17 steps for breast augmentation and 24 steps for facelift were deemed essential by consensus (Cronbach's alpha 0.87 and 0.85, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using the aforementioned technique, the essential procedural steps for two plastic surgery procedures were determined. Further work is required to develop assessment instruments based on these steps and to gather validity evidence in support of their use in surgical education.

Competency-based medical education for plastic surgery: where do we begin?

BACKGROUND: North American surgical education is beginning to shift toward competency-based medical education, in which trainees complete their training only when competence has been demonstrated through objective milestones. Pressure is mounting to embrace competency-based medical education because of the perception that it provides more transparent standards and increased public accountability. In response to calls for reform from leading bodies in medical education, competency-based medical education is rapidly becoming the standard in training of physicians. METHODS: The authors summarize the rationale behind the recent shift toward competency-based medical education and creation of the milestones framework. With respect to procedural skills, initial efforts will require the field of plastic surgery to overcome three challenges: identifying competencies (principles and procedures), modeling teaching strategies, and developing assessment tools. The authors provide proposals for how these challenges may be addressed and the educational rationale behind each proposal. RESULTS: A framework for identification of competencies and a stepwise approach toward creation of a principles oriented competency-based medical education curriculum for plastic surgery are presented. An assessment matrix designed to sample resident exposure to core principles and key procedures is proposed, along with suggestions for generating validity evidence for assessment tools. CONCLUSIONS: The ideal curriculum should provide exposure to core principles of plastic surgery while demonstrating competence through performance of index procedures that are most likely to benefit graduating residents when entering independent practice and span all domains of plastic surgery. The authors advocate that exploring the role and potential benefits of competency-based medical education in plastic surgery residency training is timely.

"Back in the day" what are surgeon bloggers saying about their careers?

OBJECTIVES: The projected shortage of general surgeons is owing to an increased demand for surgical services and a declining pool of practicing general surgeons. Burnout and attrition of residents from surgical residencies contribute to the latter. Attrition may be caused by the choice of a career in surgery without an understanding of the realities; subsequent recognition of the realities may cause residents to reexamine the opportunity costs of a career in the field. Because weblogs (blogs) are often used for reflection, qualitative analysis of the content of blogs authored by general surgeons may provide insight into the positive and negative realities of a surgical career. These insights may be informative to students as they consider a surgical career, may better prepare residents for the reality of what is to come, and identify targets for improving the culture of surgery and mitigating sources of career dissatisfaction. DESIGN: This is a qualitative analysis of entries on blogs authored by practicing general surgeons. A systematic approach was used to identify a sample of blog posts. These posts were analyzed using a constant comparative analysis method associated with constructivist grounded theory. RESULTS: Thirty-five posts drawn from 9 blogs were analyzed. Five main themes were identified in the reviewed blogs. Overall, 104 comments were positive in tone, 74 were neutral, and 147 were negative. There were 96 comments that focused on the rewards of being a surgeon, 88 concerning the practice environment, 57 about the educational environment, 54 about the toll of being a surgeon, and 30 pertaining to nostalgia. The most commonly identified subthemes focused on the training experience (38 comments), a surgical career providing personal fulfillment (35 comments), the impact of the culture of surgery (33 comments), and financial concerns (30 comments). A conceptual framework focused on balance was used to explain how the themes relate to each other. CONCLUSIONS: Themes identified are consistent with prior studies about surgeon career satisfaction. The considerable rewards of being a surgeon were outweighed by the challenges encountered in day-to-day practice. Meeting societal needs for more general surgeons would require efforts to minimize the tolls, to the extent possible, while encouraging individuals drawn to the rewarding work of being a surgeon.