Effect of Clinical Decision Support With Audit and Feedback on Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that has been associated with high costs and adverse long-term outcomes. Objective: To determine whether a multifaceted intervention is effective for the prevention of AKI after coronary angiography or PCI. Design, Setting, and Participants: A stepped-wedge, cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted in Alberta, Canada, that included all invasive cardiologists at 3 cardiac catheterization laboratories who were randomized to various start dates for the intervention between January 2018 and September 2019. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older who underwent nonemergency coronary angiography, PCI, or both; who were not undergoing dialysis; and who had a predicted AKI risk of greater than 5%. Thirty-four physicians performed 7820 procedures among 7106 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Participant follow-up ended in November 2020. Interventions: During the intervention period, cardiologists received educational outreach, computerized clinical decision support on contrast volume and hemodynamic-guided intravenous fluid targets, and audit and feedback. During the control (preintervention) period, cardiologists provided usual care and did not receive the intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was AKI. There were 12 secondary outcomes, including contrast volume, intravenous fluid administration, and major adverse cardiovascular and kidney events. The analyses were conducted using time-adjusted models. Results: Of the 34 participating cardiologists who were divided into 8 clusters by practice group and center, the intervention group included 31 who performed 4327 procedures among 4032 patients (mean age, 70.3 [SD, 10.7] years; 1384 were women [32.0%]) and the control group included 34 who performed 3493 procedures among 3251 patients (mean age, 70.2 [SD, 10.8] years; 1151 were women [33.0%]). The incidence of AKI was 7.2% (310 events after 4327 procedures) during the intervention period and 8.6% (299 events after 3493 procedures) during the control period (between-group difference, -2.3% [95% CI, -0.6% to -4.1%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.56 to 0.93]; P = .01). Of 12 prespecified secondary outcomes, 8 showed no significant difference. The proportion of procedures in which excessive contrast volumes were used was reduced to 38.1% during the intervention period from 51.7% during the control period (between-group difference, -12.0% [95% CI, -14.4% to -9.4%]; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.90]; P = .002). The proportion of procedures in eligible patients in whom insufficient intravenous fluid was given was reduced to 60.8% during the intervention period from 75.1% during the control period (between-group difference, -15.8% [95% CI, -19.7% to -12.0%]; OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.87]; P = .002). There were no significant between-group differences in major adverse cardiovascular events or major adverse kidney events. Conclusions and Relevance: Among cardiologists randomized to an intervention including clinical decision support with audit and feedback, patients undergoing coronary procedures during the intervention period were less likely to develop AKI compared with those treated during the control period, with a time-adjusted absolute risk reduction of 2.3%. Whether this intervention would show efficacy outside this study setting requires further investigation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03453996.

Canadian Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusion Registry: Ten-Year Follow-Up Results of Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusions (CTO) occur in nearly 20% of coronary angiograms. CTO revascularization, either by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), is infrequently performed, approximately one-third of cases. Long-term outcomes are unknown. The objective of the study was to determine whether early CTO revascularization of patients, either by CABG or PCI, was associated with improved clinical outcomes. METHODS: One thousand six hundred twenty-four patients from the Canadian CTO registry were followed for at least 9.75 years. Revascularization was performed according to routine clinical practice. Patients were grouped according to CTO revascularization status (PCI or CABG of CTO vessel, CTO revasc) or no CTO revasc (medical therapy only, or PCI/CABG of non-CTO vessels only), within 3 months of initial angiogram. Patients were followed for mortality, revascularization procedures (PCI and CABG), and hospitalizations for acute coronary syndromes and heart failure. RESULTS: Early CTO revasc was performed in 28.2% of patients (17.5% CABG, 10.7% PCI). The CTO revasc group was younger, with more males and generally fewer comorbidities. There was a significantly lower mortality probability at 10 years in the CTO revascularization group (22.7% [95% CI, 19.0%-26.9%]) compared with the no CTO revasc group (36.6% [95% CI, 33.8%-39.5%]). At 10 years, revascularization rates (14.0% versus 22.8%) and acute coronary syndrome hospitalization rates (10.0% versus 16.6%) were significantly lower in the CTO revasc group. Baseline-adjusted analysis showed CTO revasc was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.54-0.84]). In both landmark and time varying analyses, association with lower mortality was particularly robust for CTO revascularization by CABG (hazard ratio 0.56 and 0.60, respectively), with a marginally significant result for PCI in the time varying analysis (hazard ratio 0.711 [95% CI, 0.51-0.998]). CONCLUSIONS: Early CTO revascularization was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality, revascularization rates, and hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome at 10 years, and mainly driven by outcomes in patients with CABG.

Eliciting Patient Experiences About Their Care After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Experience surveys provide an opportunity for patients to give their feedback about health care processes and services. Unfortunately, the most current surveys have been designed as "one-size fits-all" tools, and thus, do not take into account items pertaining to specific clinical groups. The objective of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the specific aspects of care deemed important to cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: Individual semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with a cohort of patients who had previously underwent cardiac surgery. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Using a phenomenological approach, a thematic analysis was used to generate a list of themes and subthemes deemed important by participants. RESULTS: Eight interviews were conducted in July and August 2019. Participants included 7 men and 1 woman, ranging from 55 to 84 years of age. Five key themes emerged from the data: (1) overall experience; (2) communication; (3) the physical hospital environment; (4) care needs and ongoing management; and (5) person-centred care. Our interviews revealed that participants had many overwhelmingly positive experiences with care. Through reports of their own experiences, participants highlighted important areas that might be improved. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm and expand upon those highlighted in quantitative research by our group. Findings and knowledge derived from this study might be used to inform quality improvement activities. These might also play a key role in the development of a patient experience survey, specifically for those who undergo cardiac surgery; thus addressing a potential limitation of surveys currently in use.

CONTEXTE: Les sondages sur l'expérience offrent l'occasion aux patients de transmettre leur point de vue au sujet des services et des processus de soins de santé. Malheureusement, la plupart des sondages actuels sont conçus comme des outils universels, et ne prenent donc pas en considération certains aspects propres à des groupes cliniques précis. L'objectif de cette étude est de mieux cerner les aspects précis des soins qui sont jugés importants par les patients qui ont subi une intervention chirurgicale cardiaque. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Des entretiens téléphoniques individuels semi-structurés ont été menés avec une cohorte de patients ayant subi une intervention chirurgicale cardiaque. Les entretiens ont été enregistrés et retranscrits. Une analyse thématique utilisant une approche phénoménologique a été effectuée pour générer une liste de thèmes et de sous-thèmes jugés importants par les participants. RÉSULTATS: Huit entretiens ont été réalisés en juillet et en août 2019. Les participants regroupaient sept hommes et une femme, âgés de 55 à 84 ans. Les données recueillies ont permis de cerner cinq thèmes clés : 1) expérience globale; 2) communication; 3) environnement physique à l'hôpital; 4) besoins en matière de soins et prise en charge continue; et 5) soins axés sur le patient. Nos entretiens ont révélé que les participants avaient eu plusieurs expériences de soins extrêmement positives. En relatant leurs propres expériences, les participants ont souligné d'importants aspects qui pourraient être améliorés. CONCLUSIONS: Nos résultats confirment ceux des recherches quantitatives effectuées par notre groupe, et viennent les étayer. Les données et les résultats générés par cette étude pourraient être utilisés pour mettre au point des mesures visant l'amélioration de la qualité. Ils pourraient également jouer un rôle important dans la création d'un sondage sur l'expérience des patients, et plus précisément l'expérience des patients ayant subi une intervention chirurgicale cardiaque, et ainsi remédier aux limites possibles des sondages utilisés à l'heure actuelle.

Automated Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Is Associated With Modest Improvement in Program Completion.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a guideline-indicated modality for reducing residual cardiovascular risk among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. However, many referred patients do not initiate or complete a CR program; even more patients are never even referred. METHODS: All post-CABG patients in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, from January 1, 1996, to March 31, 2016, were included. Data were obtained from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease and TotalCardiology Rehabilitation databases. Automated referral to CR at discharge after CABG was instituted on July 1, 2007. We used interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the impact of automated referral on CR referral and completion rates and studied the association of these CR process markers with mortality. RESULTS: A total of 8,118 patients underwent CABG surgery during the study period: 5,103 before automation and 3,015 after automation. Automation increased referral rates from 39.5% to 75.0% (P < 0.001). Automated referral was associated with a 7.2% increase in CR completion in the overall population (33.3% vs 26.1%; P < 0.001). In adjusted models, CR referral alone was not associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, 95% CI 0.64-1.11), but CR completion was (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.61). CONCLUSION: Automated referral in post-CABG patients resulted in modest improvement in CR program completion. Therefore, even when CR referral is automated to include all eligible patients, additional strategies to support CR program enrollment and completion remain necessary to achieve the desired health benefits.

Patient-Reported Experiences With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: The Canadian Patient Experience Survey-Inpatient Care is a validated measure for adult inpatient experience. Linking surveys with administrative data can examine the experience of patients in specific demographic or clinical groups. METHODS: We examined survey responses obtained over a 4-year period from patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft and/or valve replacement in Alberta. The 56-question telephone survey was administered within 6 weeks of discharge. Surveys were linked with administrative records to identify the Canadian Classification of Intervention procedure codes, which were in scope. Responses to each question were reported as percentage in "top box," where "top box" represents the most positive answer choice (eg, "always" and "yes"). RESULTS: From April 2014 to March 2018, 1082 surveys were completed by patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft and/or valve replacement. Respondents were predominantly male (73.8%), with a mean age of 64.7 ± 11.9 years. Overall, 73.3% of respondents rated their hospital care as 9 or 10 out of 10 (best), and 86.2% would "definitely recommend" the hospital to friends/family members. Top performing questions pertained to having a discussion about help needed after discharge (96.6% responding "yes") and receiving written discharge information (93.2% responding "yes"). Lack of quietness of the hospital environment at night (34.8% responding "always") and lack of staff sufficiently describing side effects of new medications (44.9% responding "always") were identified as potential areas for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide patient-reported experiences about inpatient cardiac care in Alberta hospitals. The findings could inform quality improvement initiatives that are patient-centred.

Outcomes of medically managed patients with myocardial infarction.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes associated with medical management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting to hospitals with and without onsite catheterization facilities. METHODS: All patients (n=25,921) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=10,563) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=15,358) in Alberta, Canada between April 2010-March 2016 were categorized according to availability of catheterization facilities at the hospital they presented to and their management strategy (medically managed without coronary angiography or medically managed after coronary angiography). RESULTS: Overall, 51% presented to hospitals without catheterization facilities; and 34% were managed medically (18% without coronary angiography, and 16% after coronary angiography). Rates of medical management were higher at hospitals without versus those with catheterization facilities (43% vs. 24%, p<0.01). However, both the rate of presentation to hospitals without catheterization facilities (70% non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 24% ST-elevation myocardial infarction, p<0.01) and medical management (45% non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 18% ST-elevation myocardial infarction, p<0.01) differed by myocardial infarction type. The lack of catheterization facilities at the presenting hospital had no association with in-hospital mortality in patients medically managed without coronary angiography, but was associated with a lower risk of mortality among patients medically managed after coronary angiography. However, the latter benefit was restricted to non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients only (adjusted hazard ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.76). CONCLUSION: The availability of catheterization facilities at the hospital at which non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presented influenced their likelihood of being medically managed, but was not associated with adverse short- or long-term mortality outcomes.

Total and Cause-Specific Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Observations From the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease Registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are increasingly older and have a higher comorbidity burden. This study evaluated trends in 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year total and cause-specific mortality using a large, contemporary cohort of patients who underwent PCI in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: We used the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry to identify patients aged ≥ 20 years who underwent PCI between 2005 and 2013. All patients were followed until death or being censored by August 2016. Cause of death was from the Vital Statistics database and classified as cardiac or noncardiac. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate predicted mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years post-PCI. RESULTS: Of the 35,602 patients who underwent PCI, 5284 (14.8%) had died. Mean (standard deviation) follow-up was 74.9 (35.1) months. Over the study period, patients were older and more likely to undergo PCI for an acute coronary syndrome indication. Thirty-day (2005: 1.3%; 2013: 3.2%; P < 0.001), 1-year (2005: 2.7%; 2013: 5.7%; P < 0.001), and 2-year (2005: 4.5%; 2013: 7.5%; P < 0.001) predicted mortality after PCI increased over the study period. Cardiac cause of death dominated in the short-term, but the proportion of noncardiac deaths increased as time from PCI to death increased (30 days = 11.5%, 1 year = 31.5%, 2 years = 39.6%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, we found all-cause mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years after PCI increased over time. Cardiac causes of death dominate in the short-term after PCI; however, noncardiac cause becomes a major driver of mortality in the long-term.

CONTEXTE: Les patients devant subir une intervention coronarienne percutanée (ICP) sont de plus en plus âgés et subissent un fardeau accru de comorbidités. La présente étude a évalué les tendances de la mortalité totale et due à une cause particulière à 30 jours, 1 an et 2 ans, au sein d'une vaste cohorte contemporaine de patients ayant subi une ICP en Alberta, au Canada. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons utilisé le registre APPROACH (Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease) pour recenser les patients âgés de 20 ans ou plus qui avaient subi une ICP entre 2005 et 2013. Tous les patients ont fait l'objet d'un suivi jusqu'au décès ou à la censure des données en août 2016. La cause du décès était issue de la Base de données sur l'état civil et classée comme étant d'origine cardiaque ou non cardiaque. On a eu recours à un modèle de régression logistique multivarié pour calculer la mortalité prédite 30 jours, 1 an et 2 ans après l'ICP. RÉSULTATS: Sur les 35 602 patients ayant subi une ICP, 5 284 (14,8 %) étaient décédés. La durée moyenne de suivi (écart type) était de 74,9 (35,1) mois. Au cours de la période de l'étude, les patients étaient plus âgés et plus susceptibles de subir une ICP pour une indication de syndrome coronarien aigu. On observe une augmentation de la mortalité prédite après l'ICP au cours de la période de l'étude selon les taux suivants : à trente jours (2005 : 1,3 %; 2013 : 3,2 %; p < 0,001), à 1 an (2005 : 2,7 %; 2013 : 5,7 %; p < 0,001) et à 2 ans (2005 : 4,5 %; 2013 : 7,5 %; p < 0,001). Les causes cardiaques de décès dominaient à court terme, mais la proportion de décès d'origine non cardiaque augmentait avec le temps au fur et à mesure de l'allongement de l'intervalle entre la date de l'ICP et le décès (30 jours = 11,5 %, 1 an = 31,5 %, 2 ans = 39,6 %; p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: Dans cette étude de population, nous avons trouvé que la mortalité toutes causes confondues à 30 jours, 1 an et 2 ans après une ICP augmente au fil du temps. Les causes cardiaques de décès dominent peu de temps après l'ICP, tandis que les causes non cardiaques jouent un rôle déterminant dans la mortalité à long terme.

Expanding the impact of a longstanding Canadian cardiac registry through data linkage: challenges and opportunities.

The Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) began as a province-wide inception cohort of all adult Alberta residents undergoing cardiac catheterization for ischemic heart disease. Strengths of the APPROACH initiative include the prospective collection of detailed clinical, procedural, and treatment information, measured at point-of-care. While this aspect of APPROACH provides data users with several advantages over use of typical administrative data, the ability to link APPROACH with data from multiple other sources has provided several unique opportunities to measure cardiovascular care and outcomes. As of June 2018, clinical information has been collected by APPROACH on over 240,000 adult Alberta residents. Linkage of this rich clinical data to administrative health data (eg. Vital statistics, hospitalizations, ambulatory events, prescription medications), secondary use clinical data (e.g. laboratory, ECG, rehabilitation, EMR, imaging) and other data sources (eg. Geospatial, crime data, meteorological) allows better study of the determinants of a patient's health trajectory. This paper describes applied examples of work that has leveraged the potential of linking several datasets with the APPROACH registry.

Patient perspectives on engagement in decision-making in early management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Surveys of patients suggest many want to be actively involved in treatment decisions for acute coronary syndromes. However, patient experiences of their engagement and participation in early phase decision-making have not been well described. METHODS: We performed a patient led qualitative study to explore patient experiences with decision-making processes when admitted to hospital with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Trained patient-researchers conducted the study via a three-phase approach using focus groups and semi-structured interviews and employing grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: Twenty patients discharged within one year of a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome participated in the study. Several common themes emerged. First, patients characterized the admission and early treatment of ACS as a rapidly unfolding process where they had little control. Participants felt they played a passive role in early phase decision-making. Furthermore, participants described feeling reduced capacity for decision-making owing to fear and mental stress from acute illness, and therefore most but not all participants were relieved that expert clinicians made decisions for them. Finally, once past the emergent phase of care, participants wanted to retake a more active role in their treatment and follow-up plans. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted with ACS often do not take an active role in initial clinical decisions, and are satisfied to allow the medical team to direct early phase care. These results provide important insight relevant to designing patient-centered interventions in ACS and other urgent care situations.

Risk Prediction Models for Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Accompanying Cardiac Catheterization: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Identification of patients at risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is valuable for targeted prevention strategies accompanying cardiac catheterization. METHODS: We searched MedLine and EMBASE for articles that developed or validated a clinical prediction model for CI-AKI or dialysis after angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool c-statistics of models. Heterogeneity was explored using stratified analyses and meta-regression. RESULTS: We identified 75 articles describing 74 models predicting CI-AKI, 10 predicting CI-AKI and dialysis, and 1 predicting dialysis. Sixty-three developed a new risk model whereas 20 articles reported external validation of previously developed models. Thirty models included sufficient information to obtain individual patient risk estimates; 9 using only preprocedure variables whereas 21 included preprocedural and postprocedure variables. There was heterogeneity in the discrimination of CI-AKI prediction models (median [total range] in c-statistic 0.78 [0.57-0.95]; I2 = 95.8%, Cochran Q-statistic P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in the discrimination of models using only preprocedure variables compared with models that included postprocedural variables (P = 0.868). Models predicting dialysis had good discrimination without heterogeneity (median [total range] c-statistic: 0.88 [0.87-0.89]; I2 = 0.0%, Cochran Q-statistic P = 0.981). Seven prediction models were externally validated; however, 2 of these models showed heterogeneous discriminative performance and 2 others lacked information on calibration in external cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Three published models were identified that produced generalizable risk estimates for predicting CI-AKI. Further research is needed to evaluate the effect of their implementation in clinical care.

Relation between initial treatment strategy in stable coronary artery disease and 1-year costs in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is costly, and annual expenditures are projected to increase. Our objective was to examine the variation in patient-level costs and identify drivers of cost in patients with stable coronary artery disease. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study using administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, we identified all patients with stable coronary artery disease after index angiography between Oct. 1, 2008, and Sept. 30, 2011. We excluded patients with a myocardial infarction within 90 days before the index, with normal coronaries, or with mild coronary disease. We categorized hospitals into low, medium or high revascularization ratio centres. The primary outcome was cumulative 1-year health care costs. A hierarchical generalized linear model identified patient, physician and hospital characteristics associated with patient costs, with 2 main covariates of interest: treatment allocation (medical v. percutaneous coronary intervention v. coronary artery bypass grafting) and hospital revascularization ratio. RESULTS: A total of 183 630 angiography procedures were performed in Ontario during the study period. The final cohort included 39 126 patients with stable coronary artery disease, of which 15 138 received medical treatment and 23 988 received revascularization. The mean 1-year cost was $24 026 (interquartile range $8235-$30 511). The mean costs for medical management and revascularization were $18 069 and $27 786, respectively. The strongest predictor of costs was revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention: cost ratio 1.27, 95% CI [confidence interval] 1.24-1.31; coronary artery bypass grafting: cost ratio 2.62, 95% CI 2.53-2.71). Hospital revascularization ratio did not significantly affect costs. There was no significant interaction between treatment and revascularization ratio. INTERPRETATION: Most health care costs were due to acute care hospital admissions, and costs were higher for patients undergoing revascularization than medical therapy. This study suggests that treatment decision has a substantial impact on health care resources.

Predictors of Initial Revascularization Versus Medical Therapy Alone in Patients With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing an Invasive Strategy.

BACKGROUND: Although an invasive strategy is a class I clinical practice guideline for non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes, there is wide variation in the proportion of patients who undergo revascularization despite early angiography. We sought to identify the predictors of early revascularization versus medical therapy alone in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing an invasive strategy and to assess their clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed revascularization status by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting within 7 days of the index angiogram in all patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome who underwent an invasive strategy in Ontario, Canada, from October 1, 2008, to October 31, 2013, with follow-up through December 31, 2014. The primary outcome was mortality. Multivariable hierarchical logistic models identified predictors of revascularization, and multivariable Cox models with treatment strategy as a 3-level time-varying covariate assessed the relationship between revascularization status and clinical outcomes. We identified 50 302 patients of whom 34 288 (68.2%) underwent revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention: 28 011 and coronary artery bypass grafting: 6277). There was a 2-fold variation in revascularization rates across hospitals. A higher risk presentation significantly predicted revascularization (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.35), as did having the angiogram by an interventional cardiologist (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-1.98). Revascularized patients with either percutaneous coronary intervention (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.69) or coronary artery bypass grafting (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.60) had improved survival compared with medically treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome who underwent an early invasive approach received revascularization, there was wide variation. Revascularization was associated with significantly improved survival.

Kidney Function Does Not Modify the Favorable Quality of Life Changes Associated With Revascularization for Coronary Artery Disease: Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with kidney disease have potential to benefit from revascularization, they are also at higher risk of complications, which may affect quality of life. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied a cohort of 8198 adults who underwent coronary angiography in Alberta, between 2004 and 2008, and completed health-related quality-of-life (HR-QOL) surveys. Changes in HR-QOL measures were most favorable among patients who received coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), but did not significantly differ by kidney function within groups of patients who received CABG, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or medical therapy (P value for interaction between estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] and revascularization status >0.10 for all outcomes). Among those who received CABG, the adjusted mean EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) utility score for those with eGFR >90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) increased by 0.11 (95% CI, 0.09-0.14) and for those with eGFR <30 mL/min per 1.73m(2) by 0.13 (95% CI, 0.05-0.21). The adjusted mean EQ-5D utility score also increased similarly at all levels of eGFR for those who received PCI and for those who received medical management. Mean changes in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores were also similar across all levels of eGFR within each treatment group for the quality of life, angina frequency, angina stability, physical limitations, and treatment satisfaction domains of the SAQ. Among those who received CABG, the adjusted mean SAQ quality of life score for those with eGFR >90 mL/min per 1.73m(2) increased by 22.1 (95% CI, 18.5-25.7) and for those with eGFR <30 mL/min per 1.73m(2) by 14.0 (95% CI, 2.31-25.63). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in HR-QOL do not vary by kidney function among patients selected for CABG, PCI, or medical management of coronary disease.

Considerations in Cardiac Revascularization for the Elderly Patient: Age Isn't Everything.

Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality even in the elderly population. Treatment opportunities in the elderly population are often underappreciated. Revascularization procedures (coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention) can be associated with important benefits in symptom control, quality of life, and long-term mortality, at an upfront cost of an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Risk models to assess periprocedural risk are useful. The best models would balance unique aspects of risk with the very real potential benefit of revascularization. Current models fall short in this regard. Frailty, a clinical syndrome of vulnerability, is present in 25%-50% of cardiac patients, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The addition of frailty can improve the discrimination of risk models. Elderly patients commonly consider quality of life to have greater importance than mortality outcomes. Furthermore, hospital admission is associated with a reduction in mobilization, loss of muscle strength, and worsening frailty, and interferes with a fundamental value in the elderly: the maintenance of independence. Therefore, an understanding of frailty, quality of life, and other unique aspects of risk, as well as individual patient goals, can assist in further defining prognosis and refine decision-making in this important and vulnerable population.

Gender differences in the prevalence and treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions.

BACKGROUND: Gender differences exist in the presentation and outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Our study objective was to compare gender differences in prevalence, co-morbidities, and revascularization treatment in CAD patients with chronic total occlusions (CTOs). METHODS: A retrospective analysis using the Canadian Multicenter CTO Registry, which included 1,690 consecutive CTO patients identified at coronary angiography and a control group of 7,682 non-CTO patients. RESULTS: The prevalence of women in the CTO group was significantly lower compared to the control group (19% vs. 30%, P < 0.001). Within the overall CTO group, women were significantly older than men (70 ± 12 vs. 66 ± 11 years, P < 0.001) with more comorbidities, including hypertension and heart failure. Rates of PCI in the CTO group were similar between gender (10%), however, women with CTO were treated significantly less by CABG compared to men (19% vs. 27%, P = 0.003). Moreover, compared to male patients, significantly fewer women undergoing CABG had revascularization of the CTO artery (84% vs. 93%, P = 0.03). Multivariable analysis indicated that female gender (along with age, chronic renal failure, prior MI and cerebro-vascular disease) were independent predictors for not receiving CABG treatment for CTO. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender differences exist in CTO patients with both lower prevalence of CTOs at angiography and lower revascularization rates of CTOs by CABG. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Optimizing Value From Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Age, Sex, and Clinical Subgroups.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost utility of a center-based outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program compared with no program within patient subgroups on the basis of age, sex, and clinical presentation (acute coronary syndrome [ACS] or non-ACS). METHODS: We performed a cost-utility analysis from a health system payer perspective to compare cardiac rehabilitation with no cardiac rehabilitation for patients who had a cardiac catheterization. The Markov model was stratified by clinical presentation, age, and sex. Clinical, quality-of-life, and cost data were provided by the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease and TotalCardiology. RESULTS: The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for cardiac rehabilitation varies by subgroup, from $18,101 per QALY gained to $104,518 per QALY gained. There is uncertainty in the estimates due to uncertainty in the clinical effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation. Overall, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that 75% of the time participation in cardiac rehabilitation is more expensive but more effective than not participating in cardiac rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation varies depending on patient characteristics. The current analysis indicates that cardiac rehabilitation is most cost effective for those with an ACS and those who are at higher risk for subsequent cardiac events. The findings of the current study provide insight into who may benefit most from cardiac rehabilitation, with important implications for patient referral patterns.

Cardiac rehabilitation referral, attendance and mortality in women.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces mortality in women and men with coronary artery disease (CAD). The objective of this study was to examine sex differences in long-term mortality, based on CR referral rates and attendance patterns in a large CAD population. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: The Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) and Cardiac Wellness Institute of Calgary (CWIC) databases were used to obtain information on all patients. Rates of referral to and attendance at CR were compared by sex. Logistic regression models were constructed to assess whether sex predicted CR referral or completion. The association between referral, completion, and survival was assessed by sex using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: 25,958 subjects (6374-24.6%-were women) with at least one vessel CAD were included. Females experienced reduced rates of CR referral (31.1% vs 42.2%, p < 0.0001) and completion (50.1 vs 60.4%, p < 0.0001). Adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, relative to men, CR referral was significantly lower in women (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.74, 95% CI 0.69, 0.79) as was CR completion (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66, 0.81). Women completing CR experienced the greatest reduction in mortality (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.28, 0.45) with a relative benefit greater than men (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.46, 0.56). CONCLUSION: This is the first large cohort study to demonstrate that referral to and attendance at CR is associated with a significant mortality reduction in women, comparatively better than that in men.

The effect of a regional care model on cardiac catheterization rates in patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ACS often present to community hospitals without on-site cardiac catheterization and revascularization therapies. Transfer to specialized cardiac procedural centers is necessary to provide access to these procedures. We evaluated process of care within a regional care model by comparing cardiac catheterization and revascularization rates and outcomes in ACS patients presenting to community and interventional hospitals. METHODS: We evaluated a total of 6154 patients with ACS admitted to Southern Alberta hospitals (where a distinct regional care model for ACS exists) between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009. We compared cardiac catheterization and revascularization rates during index hospitalization among patients admitted to community and interventional hospitals. Thirty day and 1-year survival were also evaluated. RESULTS: Catheterization was performed more often in patients presenting to community hospitals compared to the interventional facility (respectively 69.5% and 51.4%, p < 0.0001). Catheterization within 72 hours of admission occurred in 48% of patients presenting to the interventional center and in 68.3% of community patients (P < 0.0001). In patients undergoing catheterization, revascularization (PCI and/or CABG) was also performed more frequently in the community group (74.5% vs 56.1%, P < 0.0001). Risk adjusted mortality rates were the same for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization regardless of hospital of initial presentation. CONCLUSION: ACS patients presenting to community centers associated with a regional care model had effective access to cardiac catheterization and revascularization. These findings support the importance of regional initiatives and processes of care that facilitate access to cardiac catheterization for all ACS patients.