Ring Enhancement in Non-Neoplastic Breast Tissue on MRI During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Incidence and Clinical Implications.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe new lesions called ring enhancement in non-neoplastic breast tissue on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients, and to investigate the factors influencing their occurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 811 consecutive patients (mean age; 50.0 [range, 24-81] years) with breast cancer who had undergone NAC between January 2020 and December 2021, identifying cases with new ring enhancement on post-NAC MRI. We analyzed the MRI findings and identified factors that were potentially associated with ring enhancement through statistical analyses using the chi-square test, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Forty-seven (5.8%) patients developed new ring enhancement on post-NAC MRI. The variables associated with ring enhancement were premenopausal status (p = 0.0007), younger age (p = 0.0011), high mammographic density (p = 0.0076), and high background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on baseline MRI (p = 0.0001). Among these, high BPE was independently associated with the occurrence of ring enhancement (p = 0.0294, OR = 2.08; CI: 1.08-4.03). In a subset of high BPE patients, an association between HER2-positive cancers and ring enhancement was observed (odds ratio = 5.51 vs. 2.54). New lesion development exhibited no association with any specific NAC drug (p = 0.1676-0.7583 per drug). CONCLUSION: Ring enhancement often occurs on post-NAC MRI and mostly disappears on subsequent MRI scans. High BPE on MRI was associated with this finding and HER2-positive cancers potentiated it. Knowledge of this finding can prevent unnecessary biopsies.

Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess how well radiologists visualize relevant features of lesions seen with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in comparison to hand-held breast ultrasound in women going to breast biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five subjects were recruited from women who were scheduled to undergo a breast biopsy for at least one Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System four or five lesion identified in a diagnostic setting. In this institutional review board-approved study, the subjects underwent imaging of the breast(s) of concern using a dedicated system that allowed both hand-held breast ultrasound and ABVS. Five experienced breast radiologists reviewed the 30 lesions in 25 subjects in a reader study. Each reader was asked to specify the lesion type, size, imaging features, Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System, and suspicion of malignancy and to compare the lesion characteristics of shape and margins between the two modalities. RESULTS: Seven (23.3%) masses were malignant and 23 (76.4%) were benign. Across all lesions regardless of size or final pathology, there was no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity (P > .15) between the two modalities. For malignant lesions, the reader visualization confidence scores between the two ultrasound modalities were not significantly different (P > .1). However, analysis for nonmalignant cases showed a statistically significant increase in reader visualization confidence in lesion shape and margins (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists showed increased confidence in visualization of benign masses and equal confidence in suspicious masses with ABVS imaging. This information could help decrease the need for additional hand-held imaging after automated whole breast ultrasound.