Which general functional outcome measure does a better job of capturing change in clinical status in pelvic and acetabular fracture patients? An analysis of responsiveness over the first year of recovery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the responsiveness of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component score (PCS) to the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) dysfunction index (DI) in pelvic and acetabular fracture patients over multiple time points in the first year of recovery. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred seventy-three patients with surgically treated pelvic and acetabular fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association B or C-type pelvic ring disruption or acetabular fracture) were enrolled into the center's prospective orthopaedic trauma database between January 2005 and February 2015. Functional outcome data were collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Evaluation was performed using the SF-36 Survey and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment. Responsiveness was assessed by calculating the standard response mean (SRM), the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and floor and ceiling effects. RESULTS: Three hundred five patients had complete data for both outcome scores. SF-36 PCS and SMFA DI scores showed strong correlation for all time intervals (r = -0.55 at baseline, r = -0.78 at 6 months, and r = -0.85 at 12 months). The SRM of the SF-36 PCS was greater in magnitude than the SRM of SMFA DI at all time points; this was statistically significant between baseline and 6 months (P < .001), but not between 6 and 12 months (P = .29). Similarly, the proportion of patients achieving MCID in SF-36 PCS was significantly greater than the proportion achieving MCID in SMFA DI between baseline and 6 months (84.6% vs 69.8%, P < .001), and between 6 and 12 months (48.5% vs 35.7%, P = .01). There were no ceiling or floor effects found for SF-36 PCS at any time intervals. However, 16.1% of patients achieved the highest level of functioning detectable by the SMFA DI at baseline, along with smaller ceiling effects at 6 months (1.3%) and 12 months (3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: SF-36 PCS is a more responsive measure of functional outcome than the SFMA DI over the first year of recovery in patients who sustain a pelvic ring disruption or acetabular fracture. This superiority was found in using the SRM, proportion of patients meeting MCID, and ceiling effects. Furthermore, the SF-36 PCS correlated with the more disease-specific SMFA DI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II.

Return to Sport After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: a Comprehensive Review of Qualitative Considerations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome has evolved over time and has resulted in significantly improved clinical outcomes. These outcomes can be measured by clinical and radiographic metrics. Return to sport is commonly used as an outcome measure, not only in terms of overall rate but also type of sport, level of competition, and timing of return, as its quantitative definition continues to develop. Qualitative research methods can highlight the patient-derived themes that affect an athlete's individual return to sport pathway, and can augment the existing methods of outcome reporting. We will specifically review the qualitative research that has been performed on evaluating return to sport after arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS: Current evidence finds a high overall rate of return to sport at 87-93% after arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. The available qualitative research in this body of literature, which is limited, has found three main overarching themes behind athletes' decision and ability, or inability, to return to sport: self-efficacy, social support, and resetting expectations. Athletes experience high rates of return to sport and athletic performance after arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. This review highlights the qualitative considerations for these athletes in their overall readiness to return to sport, and its utility for treating physicians as we interact with these athletes both pre- and post-operatively. Further research is required to elucidate any further overarching themes that may be prevalent in different levels of competition.

Trajectory of Short- and Long-Term Recovery of Tibial Shaft Fractures After Intramedullary Nail Fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the trajectory of recovery after tibial shaft fracture treated with intramedullary nail over the first 5 years and to evaluate the magnitude of the changes in functional outcome at various time intervals. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-two patients with tibial shaft fracture (OTA 42-A, B, C) were enrolled into the Center's prospective orthopaedic trauma database between January 2005 and February 2010. Functional outcome data were collected at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years. INTERVENTION: Enrolled patients were treated acutely with intramedullary nailing of their tibia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Evaluation was performed using the Short Form-36 and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). RESULTS: Mean SF-36 physical component scores improved between 6 and 12 months (P = 0.0008) and between 1 and 5 years (P = 0.0029). Similarly, mean SMFA dysfunction index scores improved between 6 and 12 months (P = 0.0254) and between 1 and 5 years (P = 0.0106). In both scores, the rate or slope of this improvement is flatter between 1 and 5 years than it is between 6 and 12 months. Furthermore, SF-36 and SMFA scores did not reach baseline at 5 years (SF-36 P < 0.0001, SMFA P = 0.0026). A significant proportion of patients were still achieving a minimal clinically important difference in function between 1 and 5 years (SF-36 = 54%, SMFA = 44%). CONCLUSIONS: The trajectory of functional recovery after tibial shaft fracture is characterized by an initial decline in function, followed by improvement between 6 and 12 months. There is still further improvement beyond 1 year, but this is of flatter trajectory. The 5-year results indicate that function does not improve to baseline by 5 years after injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.