The safety of sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors and trends in clinical and hemodynamic parameters in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: The safety and impact of sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-I) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are unknown. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent LVAD Heart Mate 3 (HM3) implantation at a single medical center and received SGLT2-I therapy following surgery was conducted. LVAD parameters, medical therapy, laboratory tests, echocardiography, and right heart catheterization (RHC) study results were recorded and compared before and after initiation of SGLT2-I. RESULTS: SGLT2-I medications were initiated in 29 (21%) of 138 patients following HM3 implantation (23 (79%) received Empagliflozin and 6 (21%) Dapagliflozin). The mean age at the time of LVAD implantation was 62 ± 6.7 years, 25 (86%) were male, and 23 (79%) had diabetes mellitus. The median time from HM3 implantation to SGLT2-I initiation was 108 days, IQR (26-477). Following SGLT2-I therapy, the daily dose of furosemide decreased from 47 to 23.5 mg/day (mean difference = 23.5 mg/d, 95% CI 8.2-38.7, p = 0.004) and significant weight reduction was observed (mean difference 2.5 kg, 95% CI 0.7-4.3, p = 0.008). Moreover, a significant 5.6 mm Hg reduction in systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was measured during RHC (95% CI 0.23-11, p = 0.042) in a subgroup of 11 (38%) patients. LVAD parameters were similar before and after SGLT2-I initiation (p > 0.2 for all). No adverse events were recorded during median follow-up of 354 days, IQR (206-786). CONCLUSION: SGLT2-I treatment is safe in LVAD patients and might contribute to reduction in patients sPAP.

Ischaemic stroke in a patient with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) despite non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy.

Primary stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is primarily with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy. However, 20-36% of ischaemic strokes seem to occur in patients with atrial fibrillation while already on anticoagulation. We present a case of an ischaemic stroke in an elderly female in her 70s with medical history significant for hypertension and NVAF. She had a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 and was on apixaban for thromboprophylaxis. She presented with neurological deficits consistent with a left middle cerebral artery stroke, confirmed via head imaging; the most likely stroke aetiology was determined to be cardioembolic in the setting of NVAF. She was treated with continuation of her apixaban at the same dosage She displayed improved function, although with residual expressive aphasia at her 2-month neurology follow-up. Cardioembolic ischaemic stroke in NVAF despite current NOAC therapy does not have current management guidelines.

Idiopathic left-sided ovarian vein thrombosis in a post-menopausal woman.

Ovarian vein thrombosis (OVT) is a rare thromboembolic condition largely involving the right ovarian vein. Risk factors include pregnancy/ peripartum period, oestrogen therapy, recent surgery or hospitalisation, malignancy, pelvic inflammatory diseases, and thrombophilia; OVT without risk factors is considered idiopathic. We present a rare case of idiopathic left-sided OVT in a post-menopausal woman in her 60s with insignificant past medical history and no identifiable risk factors. She presented with isolated left -lower -quadrant abdominal pain ultimately found to have OVT on computed tomography (CT) scan and confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patient was initially treated with low-molecular-weight heparin and then transitioned to apixaban. She remained symptom-free at 3-month follow-up. Five previous cases of idiopathic left-sided OVT have been reported to-date, but this is the first case in a postmenopausal woman that has not been associated with hypercoagulable risk factors nor further thromboembolic complications.

Bedside Drainage of Perianal Abscesses: Is It Safe and Effective?

BACKGROUND: Perianal abscesses require immediate incision and drainage (I&D). However, prompt bedside drainage is controversial as it may compromise exposure and thorough anal examination. OBJECTIVES: To examine outcomes of bedside I&D of perianal abscesses in the emergency department (ED) vs. the operating room (OR). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients presented to the ED with a perianal abscesses between January 2018 and March 2020. Patients with Crohn's disease, horseshoe or recurrent abscesses were excluded. RESULTS: The study comprised 248 patients; 151 (60.89%) underwent I&D in the OR and 97 (39.11%) in the ED. Patients elected to bedside I&D had smaller abscess sizes (P = 0.01), presented with no fever, and had lower rates of inflammatory markers. The interval time from diagnosis to intervention was significantly shorter among the bedside I&D group 2.13 ± 2.34 hours vs. 10.41 ± 8.48 hours (P < 0.001). Of patients who underwent I&D in the OR, 7.3% had synchronous fistulas, whereas none at bedside had (P = 0.007). At median follow-up of 24 months, recurrence rate of abscess and fistula formation in patients treated in the ED were 11.3% and 6.2%, respectively, vs. 19.9% and 15.23% (P = 0.023, 0.006). Fever (OR 5.71, P = 0.005) and abscess size (OR 1.7, P = 0.026) at initial presentation were risk factors for late fistula formation. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside I&D significantly shortens waiting time and does not increase the rates of long-term complications in patients with small primary perianal abscesses.

The independent impact of dementia in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Although age and frailty are associated with worse prognoses for patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), little is known regarding the independent impact of dementia. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between dementia and outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Consecutive patients with ST-elevation or non-ST elevation MI who had undergone PCI as part of our AMI registry were included in this study. We compared outcomes within the 1-year period of their PCI, including death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and corrected for confounders using Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 28 274 patients, 9167 patients who had undergone PCI for AMI were included in this study, 250 with dementia; Mean age (77.4 ± 9.4 in the dementia group vs. 63.6 ± 12.7 in the control), female gender (32.4 vs. 24.2%, p = .003), diabetes mellitus (54.0 vs. 42.4%, p < .001) and chronic kidney disease (44.4 vs. 19.3%, p < .001) were higher. At 12 months, unadjusted rates of death (25.5 vs. 9.8%, p < .001) and MACE (33.8 vs. 17.6%, p < .001) were higher for patients with dementia. After standardizing for confounding variables, dementia remained an independent risk factor for death (HR 1.90; CI 1.37-2.65; p < .001) and MACE (HR 1.73; CI 1.30-2.31; p < .001), as well as in propensity score matched analysis (HR 1.54; CI: 1.03-2.28; p < .001 and HR 1.49; CI: 1.09-2.02; p < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Dementia is an independent predictor of worse outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for AMI. Future intervention and specialized healthcare measures to mitigate this risk is warranted.

Diastolic Plateau - Invasive Hemodynamic Marker of Adverse Outcome Among Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.

Background: Diastolic plateau is an invasive hemodynamic marker of impaired right ventricular (RV) diastolic filling. The purpose of the current analysis was to evaluate the prognostic importance of this sign in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. Methods: The analysis included all LVAD patients who received continuous-flow LVAD (HeartMate 3) at the Sheba medical center and underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) during follow up post-LVAD surgery. Patients were dichotomized into 2 mutually exclusive groups based on a plateau duration cutoff of 55% of diastole. The primary end point of the current analysis was the composite of death, heart transplantation, or increase in diuretic dosage in a 12-month follow-up period post-RHC. Results: Study cohort included 59 LVAD patients with a mean age of 57 (IQR 54-66) of whom 48 (81%) were males. RHC was performed at 303 ± 36 days after LVAD surgery. Patients with and without diastolic plateau had similar clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic parameters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the cumulative probability of event at 1 year was 65 ± 49% vs. 21 ± 42% for primary outcomes among patients with and without diastolic plateau (p Log rank < 0.05 for both). A multivariate model with adjustment for age, INTERMACS score and ischemic cardiomyopathy consistently showed that patients with diastolic plateau were 4 times more likely to meet the study composite end point (HR = 4.35, 95% CI 1.75-10.83, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Diastolic plateau during RHC is a marker of adverse outcome among LVAD patients.

Impact of Calcium Channel Blockers on Aspirin Reactivity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

PURPOSE: Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) do not reduce the risk of initial or recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) in patients diagnosed with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this current study was to evaluate the association between CCBs and aspirin resistance in patients with CAD. METHODS: Patients with stable CAD who were regularly taking aspirin (75-100 mg qd) for at least 1 month prior to enrollment in the study were included. The VerifyNow system was used for platelet function testing with high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) defined as aspirin reaction units (ARU) >550. We compared patients treated with CCBs versus control group. RESULTS: Five hundred three patients with CAD were included in this study, and 88 were treated with CCBs. Mean age (67.9±9.7 in the CCB group vs. 66.5±11.4 in the control group), gender (77.3 male vs. 82.9%), rates of diabetes mellitus (34.7 vs. 36.9%), rates of CKD (23.5 vs. 23.5%), dyslipidemia (85.1 vs. 85.3%), and statin therapy (89.5 vs. 90.7%) were similar. The mean ARU was 465.4±70.0 for patients treated with CCBs versus 445.2±60.0 in controls (p=0.006). Similarly, 15.9% of CCB patients demonstrated HAPR compared to 7.0% (p=0.006). The administration of CCBs was independently associated with HAPR in a multivariate analysis (OR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.04-8.91, p=0.047) as well as in propensity score matched analysis (OR 1.56; CI: 1.22-1.93; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Usage of CCBs is positively correlated with aspirin resistance. These findings may suggest an adverse pharmacologic effect of CCBs among patients with stable CAD treated with aspirin.