Pro Re Nata brolucizumab for early onset and treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema: A prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab therapy administered on a pro re nata (PRN) basis without loading dose in treatment naïve patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) for 1 year follow-up. METHODS: Patients with recent DME (<6 months) received a mandatory brolucizumab injection at inclusion and other injections could be given on a PRN basis with an 8-week interval (between injections) at minimum. Rescue therapy with other anti-VEGF was possible in case of incomplete DME resolution after the second brolucizumab with a minimum of 1-month treatment free interval between 2 injections. The primary outcome measure was the change in (BCVA) at 12 months. Secondary outcome measures included the change in central subfield thickness (CST), the change in hard exudate surface area and microaneurysms at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were included. At 12 months, the mean (SD) number of injections was 2.6 (0.8) in addition to the first mandatory injection. The mean (SD) interval between 2 consecutive injections was 3.2 (1.4) months. The mean (SD) BCVA improved from 0.62 (0.1) logMAR to 0.40 (0.16) logMAR (p = 0.012). The mean CST reduced from 397.0 (47.2) µm to 224.5 (28.1) µm (p = 0.013). The hard exudate surface area decreased significantly (p = 0.012) as did microaneurysms (p = 0.02). Seven patients required at least 1 rescue therapy. No patients experienced intra-ocular inflammatory adverse events. CONCLUSION: Brolucizumab therapy for DME is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of recent DME and has the potential to reduce the number of injections.

Efficacy and Safety of 0.19-mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Postoperative Cystoid Macular Edema after Pars Plana Vitrectomy: the ILUCYD study.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (Iluvien®) in treating chronic postoperative cystoid macular edema (PCME) after pars plana vitrectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective multicentric case series in clinical settings. SUBJECTS: Patients with chronic PCME who underwent vitrectomy in tertiary care centers in France. All eyes had a documented good response to the DEX implant prior to FAc implantation. METHODS: Review of charts and OCT scans of patients treated with a FAc intravitreal implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoints were the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Secondary endpoints were the intraocular pressure (IOP); proportion of patients maintaining a BCVA ≥20/40; need for additional non-study treatment; differences between eyes that underwent a single and multiple surgeries and OCT biomarkers of better BCVA. RESULTS: Forty-nine eyes of 49 patients with a mean follow-up of 24.5 ± 3.9 months were included. The mean BCVA increased from 0.40 ± 0.26 logMAR at baseline to 0.32 ± 0.24 logMAR at month 24 (M24) (p=0.0035). The mean CRT decreased from 409.37 ± 139.43 µm at baseline to 340 ± 91 µm at M24 (p=0.0001). The mean IOP was 14.0 ± 4 mmHg at baseline and remained stable at 14.03 ± 4.1 mmHg at M24 (p=0.99). During the follow-up, the IOP exceeded 21 mmHg in 9 eyes. The IOP rise was controlled with topical therapy in all eyes except one, which required cyclophotocoagulation. The BCVA was ≥20/40 in 47% of eyes (95% CI: 34%-61%) at baseline and in 58% of eyes at M24 (95% CI: 41%-73%). At M18, the likelihood of achieving a BCVA ≥20/40 was higher in eyes with intact external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone. Additional dexamethasone implant (DEXi) was injected in 14 eyes (28.57%). The treatment burden of 2.45 ± 1.35 DEXi/year was decreased to 0.57 ± 0.60 DEXi/year after FAc implantation (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: FAc implant improved the BCVA and reduced the CRT in eyes with chronic PCME after vitrectomy. The IOP rise could be anticipated by the previous response to corticosteroids. FAc implant in eyes with chronic PCME also allowed reducing the treatment burden.

DRD2 activation inhibits choroidal neovascularization in patients with Parkinson's disease and age-related macular degeneration.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) remains a major cause of visual impairment and puts considerable burden on patients and health care systems. L-DOPA-treated Parkinson Disease (PD) patients have been shown to be partially protected from nAMD, but the mechanism remains unknown. Using murine models, combining 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced PD and laser-induced nAMD, standard PD treatment of L-DOPA/DOPA-decarboxylase inhibitor, or specific dopamine receptor inhibitors, we here demonstrate that L-DOPA treatment-induced increase of dopamine mediated dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) signaling inhibits choroidal neovascularization independently of MPTP-associated nigrostriatal pathway lesion. Analyzing a retrospective cohort of more than two hundred thousand nAMD patients receiving anti-VEGF treatment from the French nationwide insurance database, we show that DRD2-agonist treated (PD) patients have a significantly delayed age of onset for nAMD (81.4 (±7.0) vs 79.4 (±8.1) years old, respectively, p<0.0001) and reduced need for anti-VEGF therapies (-0.6 injections per 100 mg/day daily dose of DRD2 agonists the second year of treatment), similar to the L-DOPA treatment. While providing a mechanistic explanation for an intriguing epidemiological observation, our findings suggest that systemic DRD2 agonists might constitute an adjuvant therapy to delay and reduce the need for anti-VEGF therapy in nAMD patients.

Methotrexate versus conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis.

AIMS: To compare the safety and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis. METHODS: Retrospective study including non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis according to the revised International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis criteria. The primary outcome was defined as the median time to relapse or occurrence of serious adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: 58 patients with non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis (MTX (n=33), MMF (n=16) and AZA (n=9)) were included. The time to treatment failure (ie, primary outcome) after adjustment for corticosteroids dose and the presence of vasculitis was significantly higher with MTX (median time of 34.5 months with MTX (IQR: 11.8 -not reached) vs 8.4 months (3.1-22.9) with MMF and 16.8 months (8.0-90.1) with AZA (p=0.020)). The risk of relapse at 12 months was more than twice lower in MTX as compared with MMF (p=0.046). Low visual acuity at the last visit was significantly lower with MTX (4% vs 9% in MMF vs 57% in AZA group (p=0.008)). Regarding all 75 lines of treatment (MTX (n=39), MMF (n=24) and AZA (n=12)), MTX was more effective than MMF and AZA to obtain treatment response at 3 months (OR 10.85; 95% CI 1.13 to 104.6; p=0.039). Significant corticosteroid-sparing effect at 12 months (p=0.035) was only observed under MTX. Serious adverse events were observed in 6/39 (15%), 5/24 (21%) and 2/12 (17%) with MTX, MMF and AZA, respectively. CONCLUSION: In non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis, MTX seems to be more efficient compared with AZA and MMF and with an acceptable safety profile.

Effect of baseline fluid localization on visual acuity and prognosis in type 1 macular neovascularization treated with anti-VEGF.

PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic value of subretinal (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF) localizations in type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). SUBJECTS: Eyes were prospectively treated with anti-vascular epithelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injections (IVT) according to a Pro-Re-Nata (PRN) or Treat and Extend (TAE) regimen during 24 months. A total of 211 eyes with treatment-naïve type 1 MNV secondary to AMD were consecutively included. Eyes were divided between 2 groups according to the fluid localization: presence of SRF alone (SRF group), or presence of IRF associated or not with SRF (IRF ± SRF group). RESULTS: At baseline the mean BCVA was 66.2 letters. SRF was present in 94.8% of eyes, IRF in 30.8%, and both in 25.6%. Data were available for 201 eyes at 12 months, and 157 eyes at 24 months. The presence of IRF at baseline was associated with lower baseline BCVA and significantly lower BCVA at 12 months (p < 0.001) and 24 months (p < 0.001). Eyes with SRF alone displayed better visual outcomes (BCVA at month 12, SRF = 74.3 letters, IRF ± SRF = 56.9 letters). In the presence of baseline IRF, fibrosis (p = 0.03) and atrophy (p < 0.001) were more frequently found at 24 months. In a multivariate model, the presence of baseline IRF was significantly associated with lower BCVA at month 12 but not at month 24. CONCLUSION: In type 1 MNV, the presence of baseline IRF was associated with worse visual outcomes compared to SRF alone, and more frequent atrophy and fibrosis.

Faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema: from preclinical studies to phase 3 outcomes.

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the standard of care for diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD); however, vision gains and anatomical improvements are not sustained over longer periods of treatment, suggesting other relevant targets may be needed to optimize treatments. Additionally, frequent intravitreal injections can prove a burden for patients and caregivers. Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) has been explored as an additional therapeutic target, due to the involvement of Ang-2 in DME and nAMD pathogenesis. Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that targeting both VEGF and Ang-2 may improve clinical outcomes in DME and nAMD compared with targeting VEGF alone by enhancing vascular stability, resulting in reduced macular leakage, prevention of neovascularization, and diminished inflammation. Faricimab, a novel bispecific antibody that targets VEGF-A and Ang-2, has been evaluated in clinical trials for DME (YOSEMITE/RHINE) and nAMD (TENAYA/LUCERNE). These trials evaluated faricimab against the anti-VEGFA/B and anti-placental growth factor fusion protein aflibercept, both administered by intravitreal injection. In addition to faricimab efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics, durability was evaluated during the trials using a treat-and-extend regimen. At 1 year, faricimab demonstrated non-inferior vision gains versus aflibercept across YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE. In YOSEMITE/RHINE, faricimab improved anatomic parameters versus aflibercept. Reduction of central subfield thickness (CST), and absence of both DME and intraretinal fluid were greater in faricimab- versus aflibercept-treated eyes. In TENAYA/LUCERNE, CST reductions were greater for faricimab than aflibercept at the end of the head-to-head phase (0-12 weeks), and were comparable with aflibercept at year 1, but with less frequent dosing. CST and vision gains were maintained during year 2 of both YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE. These findings suggest that dual Ang-2/VEGF-A pathway inhibition may result in greater disease control versus anti-VEGF alone, potentially addressing the unmet needs and reducing treatment burden, and improving real-world outcomes and compliance in retinal vascular diseases. Long-term extension studies (RHONE-X, AVONELLE-X) are ongoing. Current evidence suggests that dual inhibition with faricimab heralds the beginning of multitargeted treatment strategies inhibiting multiple, independent components of retinal pathology, with faricimab providing opportunities to reduce treatment burden and improve outcomes compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy.

Fluocinolone acetonide 0.2 µg/day intravitreal implant in non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment: EU expert user panel consensus-based clinical recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye (NIU-PS) is an inflammatory disease, which can significantly impair visual acuity if not adequately treated. Fluocinolone-acetonide sustained-release-0.2 µg/day intravitreal (FAc) implants are indicated for prevention of relapse in recurrent NIU-PS. The aim here was to provide treating clinicians with some consensus-based-recommendations for the clinical management of patients with NIU-PS with 0.2 µg/day FAc implants. METHODS: A European-clinical-expert-group agreed to develop a consensus report on different issues related to the use of FAc implants in patients with NIU-PS. RESULTS: The Clinical-expert-panel provided specific recommendations focusing on clinical presentation (unilateral/bilateral) of the NIU-PS; systemic involvement of NIU-PS and the lens status. Treatment algorithms were developed; one that refers to the management of patients with NIU-PS in clinical practice and another that establishes the best clinical scenarios for the use of FAc implants, both as monotherapy and as adjuvant therapy. Additionally, the Clinical-expert-panel has provided recommendations about the use of the FAc implants in a clinical-setting. The Clinical-expert-panel also considered the safety profile of FAc implants and their possible implications in the daily practice. CONCLUSIONS: As more clinical experience has been gained using FAc implants, it was necessary to update the clinical recommendations that guide patient management in the clinic. The current consensus document addresses relevant issues related to the use of FAc implants on different types of patients with various etiologies of NIU-PS, and was conducted to standardize approaches to help specialists obtain better clinical outcomes.

Dexamethasone Implant under a Proactive Treatment Regimen in Clinical Setting: The ProDEX Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of switching intravitreal dexamethasone implants (DEX-implant) from pro re nata (PRN) treatment regimen to a proactive regimen in patients with macular edema of diverse etiologies. DESIGN: An observational, retrospective, uncontrolled, multicenter, national case series. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one eyes from 68 patients treated between October 2015 and June 2023 were included. METHODS: This study included consecutive eyes treated with DEX-implant who were switched from a PRN regimen to a proactive regimen for diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), noninfectious uveitis macular edema (UME; including postsurgical macular edema), and radiation maculopathy (RM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at each visit. RESULTS: According to the etiology, DME represented 49.4% of eyes, UME 24.3%, RVO 21.0%, and RM 6.2%. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of follow-up under the PRN and proactive regimens was 20.6 (13.3) and 14.2 (10.3) months, respectively. Switching from a PRN to a proactive regimen significantly improved mean (SD) BCVA by 3.7 (12.9) ETDRS letters (P = 0.01) with a mean (SD) decrease in CMT of 108.0 (151.4) µm (P < 0.001). The proportion of visits with significant anatomic recurrence (> 50 µm) also decreased from 40.1% to 6.0% after switching to a proactive regimen (P < 0.001). The number of DEX-implant injections significantly increased during the proactive treatment period (P < 0.001), but the change in the number of visits was not significantly different (P = 0.2). The proactive treatment period was not associated with a significant increase in IOP (P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to a proactive regimen in patients already treated with DEX-implant seems to significantly improve BCVA and CMT while maintaining stable IOP. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Efficacity and Safety of the Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Uveitic Macular Edema: A Real-Life Study from the French Uveitis Network.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAi, Iluvien® Horus pharma, Nice, France) in non-infectious uveitic macular edema (UME) and to approach the predictive factors of treatment response. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter real-life study included patients with chronic non-infectious UME who received intravitreal FAi after at least two dexamethasone implants (DEXi). RESULTS: Twenty-six eyes from 22 patients (73.1% of females) were included. The mean age was 60.4 ± 16 years. The mean follow-up was 11.4 ± 2 months. The mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.43 ± 0.36 LogMAR, improving significantly after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (all p < 0.05 vs. baseline). The mean baseline central macular thickness (CMT) was 429 ± 110 µm, improving significantly after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (all p < 0.05 vs. baseline). Five eyes (19.2%) developed ocular hypertension during the follow-up, requiring initiation or strengthening of intraocular pressure lowering medication. The majority of eyes (77%) did not require any rescue DEXi during the available 12-month follow-up. The resolution of UME after DEXi seemed to predict the anatomical response after FAi. The baseline presence of a disorganization of the inner retinal layers (DRIL) and hyperreflective foci (HRF) were both associated with a higher likelihood of requiring rescue DEXi injections. CONCLUSION: FAi implantation led to a significant BCVA and CMT improvement with a good safety profile over the 12-month follow-up. Predictive factors of treatment outcomes seem to include the anatomical response to DEXi and the presence of DRIL and HRF at baseline.

Targeted therapies for uveitis in spondyloarthritis: A narrative review.

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a group of chronic inflammatory disorders of the joints frequently associated with uveitis in almost a quarter of cases. SpA-related uveitis typically affects the eye anterior chamber with sudden onset, causing pain, redness, photophobia, and blurred vision. Ophthalmologists will describe an acute anterior unilateral uveitis. Most patients present with episodic acute anterior non-granulomatous uveitis and retain excellent visual acuity. However, systemic treatments are recommended in the event of frequent relapses (2-3/year) or in rare cases of sight-threatening with ocular complications. The improved understanding of the pathogenesis of SpA has led to the management of this disease by biologics. Here, we review the main data regarding the opportunity to target specific components in inflammatory pathways for the treatment of SpA-related uveitis. These therapies are recommended for long-term control when uveitis relapses occur too frequently despite conventional systemic treatments. Significant benefits have been obtained with the tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFis), particularly infliximab and adalimumab. Paradoxically, a high number of uveitis occurrences have been shown on etanercept. Mixed results have been demonstrated with interleukin-17 antagonists (secukinumab) and interleukin-12/interleukin-23 antagonists (ustekinumab) in cases of failure of TNFis. JAK inhibitors seem to be a valuable class of medications for these patients in the future. Although SpA-related uveitis is typically managed with conventional local and/or systemic treatments, these biological/targeted therapies may provide avenues to control both the underlying SpA and uveitis manifestations. Thus, a close collaboration between patients, rheumatologists, internists, and ophthalmologists is needed to optimally manage ocular inflammation in SpA.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Beyond One Year of Treatment: AZURE, a Randomized Trial of Treat-and-Extend vs. Fixed Dosing.

INTRODUCTION: AZURE was a 76-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase IIIb noninferiority study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen with fixed dosing in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously receiving IVT-AFL for ≥ 1 year. METHODS: Patients were aged ≥ 51 years and had completed ≥ 1 year of IVT-AFL treatment prior to enrollment (IVT-AFL once per month [- 1 or + 2 weeks] for 3 months followed by IVT-AFL every 2 months [6-12 weeks]). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive IVT-AFL 2 mg in either a T&E (minimum treatment interval of 8 weeks with no upper limit, adjusted according to functional and anatomic outcomes, as assessed by the investigator; n = 168), or a fixed dosing regimen (treatment every 8 weeks [± 3 days]; n = 168). The primary endpoint was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline to week (W) 52. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients maintaining vision (< 15-letter loss) at W52. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 332 patients (T&E: n = 165; fixed dosing: n = 167). Mean BCVA change (baseline to W52) was - 0.3 ± 7.5 vs. - 0.5 ± 8.4 letters (T&E vs. fixed dosing; least-squares mean difference [95% CI]: 0.22 [- 1.51 to 1.96] letters; P < 0.0001 for noninferiority test [5-letter margin]). From baseline to W52, 95.2% (T&E) and 94.0% (fixed dosing) of patients maintained vision. Mean central subfield thickness change from baseline to W52 was - 24 ± 55 (T&E) and - 33 ± 47 (fixed dosing) µm. Last treatment interval to W76 was ≥ 12 weeks for 37.0% of T&E patients. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: IVT-AFL T&E can achieve similar functional and anatomic outcomes to fixed dosing every 8 weeks over 52 weeks in patients with nAMD who have completed ≥ 1 year of treatment, while reducing treatment burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02540954.

Hydroxychloroquine Therapy in Sarcoidosis-Associated Uveitis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and tolerance of hydroxychloroquine in sarcoidosis-associated uveitis. METHODS: Retrospective study on all patients with sarcoidosis-associated uveitis who were treated with hydroxychloroquine between 2003 and 2019 in a French university hospital. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with sarcoidosis-associated uveitis received hydroxychloroquine. The mean duration of treatment was 20.0 ± 10.9 months. At the end of the follow-up, hydroxychloroquine success was achieved in 15 (55.6%) patients. Four of them were also on oral corticosteroids, with a prednisone dose ≤5 mg/day. Under treatment, the median prednisone dose decreased from 20.0 (interquartile range (IQR), 7-25) to 5.0 (IQR, 3-6.5) mg/day (p = .02). The incidence rate of flare decreased from 204.6 to 63.8 per 100 person-years (p = .02). Hydroxychloroquine was discontinued in 12 (44.4%) patients during follow-up, including 8 (29.6%) for ineffectiveness, and three who experienced side effects. CONCLUSION: Hydroxychloroquine appears as an interesting option in sarcoidosis-associated uveitis.Abbreviations: AZA: Azathioprine; BAL: Bronchoalveolar Lavage; BCVA: Best-Corrected Visual Acuity; ENT: Ears, Nose and Throat; HCQ: Hydroxychloroquine; IOP: Intra-Ocular Pressure; IQR: interquartile range; MHC: Major Histocompatibility Complex; MMF: Mycophenolate Mofetil; MTX: Methotrexate; PMSI: Programme de Médicalisation du Système d'Information; SAU: Sarcoidosis-Associated Uveitis; SD: Standard Deviation; SUN: Standard Uveitis Nomenclature.

Value of Chest X-Ray and Chest Computed Tomography for Systemic Sarcoidosis Diagnosis in Undifferentiated Uveitis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the contribution of chest X-ray and chest CT for the diagnosis of sarcoid uveitis. METHODS: Retrospective study on consecutive patients with uveitis of unknown etiology, who underwent both chest X-ray and CT during uveitis diagnosis workup in a tertiary French university hospital. RESULTS: A total of 914 patients were included. Systemic sarcoidosis was identified in 23.1%. The probability of discordance between chest X-ray and CT increased with age at diagnosis (p < 0.001). In patients 30 years of age and younger, the probability of discordance was 5% or less, and 0.8% if the ACE level was normal. After 78.3 years of age, the probability of discordance was 20% or more. CONCLUSION: We recommend not to perform CT in patients under 30 years of age with a normal chest X ray and ACE level, and suggest performing chest CT first in the elderly.

Real-world experience with brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration over 2 years: the REBA extension study.

BACKGROUND: To determine long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the real-world setting. METHODS: Retrospective, observational, multicentric study and an extension of the REBA study (Real-world Experience with Brolucizumab in nAMD) to 24 months. The study entailed follow-up of 91 consecutive eyes (67 patients) with nAMD who received brolucizumab therapy and completed 24 months of follow-up. Both treatment-naïve and switch therapy patients were included. All relevant data were collected. The primary outcome measure was changed in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over time. Secondary outcome measures included change in central subfield thickness (CST) and complications. RESULTS: The mean (SD) baseline BCVA was 48.4 (3.5) letters and 36.2 (7.1) letters in treatment-naïve group and switch therapy group, respectively. BCVA gain was + 9.2 (3.7) letters (p = 0.01) and + 7.7 (3.4) letters (p = 0.011), respectively. The change in mean (SD) CST has shown a significant decrease in retinal thickness in treatment-naïve group (from 432.5 (68.4) to 283.0 (51.3) µm; p = 0.018) and in switch therapy group (from 452.5 (40.5) to 271.0 (43.4) µm; p = 0.011) group. One switch patient developed vascular occlusion and another a macular hole after the fifth brolucizumab injection as reported in the primary study. Both patients recovered uneventfully. Three patients demonstrated reversible intraocular inflammation between months 10 and 24. CONCLUSION: Patients showed a significant anatomical and functional response to brolucizumab therapy in the real world, regardless of prior treatment status, until the end of the follow-up period. Overall, 5 significant untoward events were noted.

Etiological Diagnosis of Uveitis: Contribution of the of the Extra-Ophthalmological Clinical Examination.

PURPOSE: Determining uveitis etiology is a challenge. It is based primarily on demographic data and the characteristics of eye examination. It is not clear to what extent extraocular physical signs contribute to elucidating the etiology. This study aimed to establish the contribution of the clinical extra-ophthalmological features for the assessment of the underlying etiology of uveitis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1307 patients with uveitis referred to our tertiary center between 2003 and 2021. Uveitis was classified according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature. Clinical features were collected at diagnosis by internists before the etiological diagnosis was made. The main outcome description was the contribution of clinical features. RESULTS: Clinical extra-ophthalmological features contributed to the assessment of the underlying etiology of uveitis in 363 (27.8%) patients. The joint and the skin examinations were the most useful for etiological investigations, respectively in 12.3% and 11.8% of patients. Five etiologies of uveitis accounted for 80% of the cases: sarcoidosis, HLA-B27-related uveitis, Behçet's disease, multiple sclerosis, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Clinical extra-ophthalmological features were particularly important in the etiological diagnosis of acute bilateral anterior uveitis and panuveitis. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that clinical extra-ophthalmological features are essential for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis in more than a quarter of patients. It demonstrates once again the value of collaboration between ophthalmologists and other specialists experienced in performing extra-ophthalmological clinical examinations, particularly in patients with acute bilateral anterior uveitis and panuveitis.