Coronary anatomy in Turner syndrome versus patients with isolated bicuspid aortic valves.

OBJECTIVE: Variations in coronary anatomy, like absent left main stem and left dominant coronary system, have been described in patients with Turner syndrome (TS) and in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV). It is unknown whether coronary variations in TS are related to BAV and to specific BAV subtypes. AIM: To compare coronary anatomy in patients with TS with/without BAV versus isolated BAV and to study BAV morphology subtypes in these groups. METHODS: Coronary anatomy and BAV morphology were studied in 86 patients with TS (20 TS-BAV, 66 TS-tricuspid aortic valve) and 86 patients with isolated BAV (37±13 years vs 42±15 years, respectively) by CT. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in coronary dominance between patients with TS with and without BAV (25% vs 21%, p=0.933). BAVs with fusion of right and left coronary leaflets (RL BAV) without raphe showed a high prevalence of left coronary dominance in both TS-BAV and isolated BAV (both 38%). Absent left main stem was more often seen in TS-BAV as compared with isolated BAV (10% vs 0%). All patients with TS-BAV with absent left main stem had RL BAV without raphe. CONCLUSION: The equal distribution of left dominance in RL BAV without raphe in TS-BAV and isolated BAV suggests that presence of left dominance is a feature of BAVs without raphe, independent of TS. Both TS and RL BAV without raphe seem independently associated with absent left main stems. Awareness of the higher incidence of particularly absent left main stems is important to avoid complications during hypothermic perfusion.

Coding of coronary arterial origin and branching in congenital heart disease: The modified Leiden Convention.

OBJECTIVES: Variations in coronary anatomy are common and may relate to the position of the coronary ostium relative to the aortic sinus, the angle of coronary take-off, or the course of the coronary arterial branches. Several classification systems have been proposed. However, they all lack a simple rationale that is applicable irrespective of the relative position of the great arteries, as well as in bicuspid aortic valves. We present a modification of a relatively simple system introduced in the early 1980s, designated the "Leiden Convention." METHODS: The first step of the Leiden Convention is that the clinician takes position in the nonfacing sinus of the aorta looking toward the pulmonary orifice. The right-hand facing sinus is sinus 1, and the left-hand facing sinus is sinus 2. The coronary branches arising from sinus 1 are annotated proceeding in a counterclockwise fashion toward sinus 2. "Usual" (normal) coronary anatomy would be 1R-2LCx. Given their clinical relevance, single sinus coronary arteries are discussed separately. RESULTS: This system was originally designed and highly applicable in hearts with an altered great artery relationship, such as in the variable and complicated patterns seen in transposition of the great arteries and double outlet right ventricle. The modified system also can be used in cases with normally related great arteries, cases with single sinus coronary arteries, and cases with bicuspid aortic valves. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Leiden Convention is not a strict classification but a simple coronary coding system that is broadly applicable.

Pulmonary Valve Morphology in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valves.

The aortic and pulmonary valve share a common developmental origin from the embryonic arterial trunk. Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common congenital anomaly and can occur isolated as well as in association with other congenital heart disease (CHD). Data on pulmonary valve morphology in these cases are scarce. In this study, we aimed to determine pulmonary valve morphology in hearts with BAV associated with CHD. In 83 post-mortem heart specimens with BAV and associated CHD, pulmonary valve morphology was studied and related to BAV morphology. In 14/83 (17%) hearts, the pulmonary valve was affected, bicuspid in 8/83 (10%), dome-shaped in 3/83 (4%) and atretic in 3/83 (4%). In specimens with a bicuspid pulmonary valve, 5/8 (63%) had a strictly bicuspid aortic valve (without raphe), 2/3 hearts (67%) with dome-shaped pulmonary valves and 2/3 hearts (67%) with atretic pulmonary valves had BAV without raphe. Six out of eight (75%) specimens with a bicuspid pulmonary valve had a perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD). 4/8 (50%) specimens with a bicuspid pulmonary valve were associated with chromosomal abnormalities: 3 (38%) had trisomy 18 and 1 (13%) had trisomy 13. In BAV with associated CHD, abnormal pulmonary valve morphology was observed in 17% of the hearts. The majority of hearts with abnormal pulmonary valve morphology had a Type B bicuspid aortic valve (without raphe). Bilateral semilunar valvular disease is associated with Type B BAVs and in many cases related to chromosomal abnormalities. As this study was performed in post-mortem specimens with high frequency of associated CHD, caution is warranted with application of these results to the general BAV population.

Coronary anatomy in children with bicuspid aortic valves and associated congenital heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), coronary anatomy is variable. High take-off coronary arteries have been described, but data are scarce, especially when associated with complex congenital heart disease (CHD). The purpose of this study was to describe coronary patterns in these patients. METHODS: In 84 postmortem heart specimens with BAV and associated CHD, position and height of the coronary ostia were studied and related to BAV morphology. RESULTS: High take-off right (RCA) and left coronary arteries (LCA) were observed in 23% and 37% of hearts, respectively, most frequently in hearts with hypoplastic left ventricle (HLV) and outflow tract anomalies. In HLV, high take-off was observed in 18/40 (45%) more frequently of LCA (n=14) than RCA (n=6). In hearts with aortic hypoplasia, 8/13 (62%) had high take-off LCA and 6/13 (46%) high take-off RCA. High take-off was seen 19 times in 22 specimens with perimembranous ventricular septal defect (RCA 8, LCA 11). High take-off was associated with type 1A BAV (raphe between right and left coronary leaflets), more outspoken for the RCA. Separate ostia of left anterior descending coronary artery and left circumflex coronary artery were seen in four hearts (5%), not related to specific BAV morphology. CONCLUSION: High take-off coronary arteries, especially the LCA, occur more frequently in BAV with associated CHD than reported in normal hearts and isolated BAV. Outflow tract defects and HLV are associated with type 1A BAV and high take-off coronary arteries. Although it is unclear whether these findings in infants with detrimental outcome can be related to surviving adults, clinical awareness of variations in coronary anatomy is warranted.

Coronary anatomy as related to bicuspid aortic valve morphology.

OBJECTIVE: Variable coronary anatomy has been described in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs). This was never specified to BAV morphology, and prognostic relevance of coronary vessel dominance in this patient group is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate valve morphology in relation to coronary artery anatomy and outcome in patients with isolated BAV and with associated aortic coarctation (CoA). METHODS: Coronary anatomy was evaluated in 186 patients with BAV (141 men (79%), 51±14 years) by CT and invasive coronary angiography. Correlation of coronary anatomy was made with BAV morphology and coronary events. RESULTS: Strictly bicuspid valves (without raphe) with left-right cusp fusion (type 1B) had more left dominant coronary systems compared with BAVs with left-right cusp fusion with a raphe (type 1A) (48% vs. 26%, p=0.047) and showed more separate ostia (28% vs. 9%, p=0.016). Type 1B BAVs had more coronary artery disease than patients with type 1A BAV (36% vs. 19%, p=0.047). More left dominance was seen in BAV patients with CoA than in patients without (65% vs. 24%, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of a left dominant coronary artery system and separate ostia was significantly related to BAVs with left-right fusion without a raphe (type 1B). These patients more often had significant coronary artery disease. In patients with BAV and CoA, left dominancy is more common.

Bicuspid aortic valve: phosphorylation of c-Kit and downstream targets are prognostic for future aortopathy.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical course of many patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is complicated by ascending aortic dilatation. Currently, the indication for aortic surgery is solely based on the aortic diameter and subsequently only a small proportion of BAV patients undergoing valve surgery require concomitant ascending aortic replacement based on these recommendations. Unfortunately, a substantial number of BAV patients still develop aortic dilatation in the future and would potentially benefit from a more aggressive approach towards ascending aortic replacement. We, therefore, designed this study to identify molecular biological markers in the aortic wall predictive of aortopathy in BAV. METHODS: Ascending aortic wall specimen of BAV (n = 36) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) (n = 23), both without and with (>44 mm) dilatation were investigated histologically and immunohistochemically for the expression of markers for vascular remodelling [transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß, phosphorylated Smad2, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9)], cellular differentiation [c-Kit, phosphorylated-c-Kit, hypoxia-inducable factor-1 alpha (HIF1α)] and haemodynamic influences on the aortic wall [endothelial nitric oxide (eNOS)]. RESULTS: All BAV patients showed significantly less inflammation (P < 0.001) and an altered intima/media ratio when compared with TAV patients. The expression of markers of a signalling pathway characteristic for cellular dedifferentiation, as exemplified by the marked expression of c-Kit, phosphorylated c-Kit and HIF1α; in the dilated BAV group was however completely comparable with only a subgroup of the non-dilated BAV (BAb), whereas the remainder of the non-dilated BAV group (BAa) was significantly distinct. This difference between the dilated BAV and BAa was further confirmed in the expression of TGF-ß, phosphorylated Smad2, MMP9 and eNOS. Besides the expression pattern, similarity in the dilated BAV and BAb was also noted clinically in the most common variant of commissure position and conjoined raphe of the BAV. Based on these observations, we consider the BAb group a likely candidate for future dilatation as opposed to the BAa group. CONCLUSIONS: Using a panel of molecular tissue markers, the non-dilated BAV patients can be divided into groups susceptible and non-susceptible to aortopathy.