RESUMO
Continuing medical education (CME) plays a critical role in healthcare, helping to ensure patients receive the best possible care and optimal disease management. Considering the obstacles to engaging in CME activities faced by the clinical community, as well as employing learning theory, Liberum IME developed Classroom to Clinic™ - a bespoke, accredited learning format that can be tailored to individuals' educational needs and time constraints. Through monitoring use, and incorporating qualitative and quantitative feedback, we continuously evaluate the usability, value and accessibility of this programme and adapt subsequent iterations accordingly. An example of this is the way we adapted our engagement of facilitators. Originally this was accomplished by targeting individuals for train-the-trainer events, but it was clear this was more effective in some countries than in others. To address this variability, we piloted launching a new module at a relevant large international congress. This aimed to instigate a cascade in education sharing, from congress attendees to peers at their clinics and across departments and hospitals. So far, the programme has reported encouraging improvements in uptake, as well as knowledge, competence and clinical practice, while qualitative feedback has allowed for the identification of further educational needs and continued evolution of the programme.
RESUMO
The digitisation of society has reached almost every facet of our daily lives. The COVID-19 pandemic has further showcased the role of information and communications technology (ICT) in society and so much so in continuing medical education (CME). This has provided the CME industry with remarkable opportunities to design better educational programmes and reach more audiences. However, for healthcare professionals to take full advantage of these developments, they need to be digitally competent, at least at a basic level. While digital competence influences CME uptake in the internet age, several factors, in turn, can influence digital competence. These factors come from both within and outside the influence of healthcare professionals and educators. In this article, we explore how digital competence influences CME uptake and recommend ways to improve digital competence among healthcare professionals.
RESUMO
The quality of continuing medical education (CME) is frequently measured using the Moore's Level of Outcome framework, with higher-level outcomes (5 and above) perceived as more valuable than lower-level outcomes (such as Level 3 - knowledge). Higher-level outcomes require more rigorous evaluation, increasing the time requirements of an interaction; however, there is a trend among adult learners towards a preference for shorter, more informal education such as microlearning. This allows for greater reach but prevents outcome evaluation to higher levels. We explored the utility of combining microlearning with more traditional eLearning formats ("microlearning programme") to increase participation while retaining the ability to measure knowledge- and competence-level outcomes. Comparing two recent programmes with similar content run previously ("comparator programmes"), we identified a slight improvement in completion of evaluation activities associated with the microlearning programme. However, the significant reach microlearning affords presents a clear need to bridge the gap between participation and evaluation. Considering these two cases, we concluded that future microlearning initiatives should incorporate evaluation at the point of education, providing a combination of microlearning and microevaluation to drive knowledge gain in a form that is measurable in terms of educational outcomes.