[Biological activity of interferons in the novel coronavirus infection COVID-19].

INTRODUCTION: The immunopathogenesis of the novel coronavirus infection COVID-19 is usually associated with the development of imbalance in the immune response to its causative agent, SARS-CoV-2 virus (Coronaviridae: Coronavirinae: Betacoronavirus: Sarbecovirus). This is manifested, in particular, by interferons' (IFNs) deficiency at the beginning of the disease followed by hyperproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The virus causes a decrease in IFN types I (α/ß) and III (λ) levels; changes in IFN type II (γ) are less studied. In this regard, it is relevant to assess the functional bioactive IFN (interferon status) in COVID-19. The aim of the study was to assess the antiviral potential of the body by testing the biologically active IFNs in COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used biological serum samples of COVID-19 patients taken in the acute phase (110 patients on the 1-5 days of the disease) and during rehabilitation (47 patients during 1-3 months after the disease onset). Assessment of interferon status was performed according to the technique developed by the authors and described earlier. RESULTS: The IFN status of patients with COVID-19 in the acute period and in the phase of post-infection rehabilitation was studied вduring the observation period. It was found that SARS-CoV-2 causes a pronounced inhibition of biological activity of IFN types I and II compared to the reference values by more than 20 and 7 times, respectively. During the post-COVID period, incomplete recovery of the IFN system activity was registered, which proceeded very slowly. No cases of reaching physiological indicators of interferon status were identified during the observation period. CONCLUSION: The obtained data on deficiency of the functional biologically active IFN confirm the hypothesis about the predominant role of impaired IFN production of different types in the immunopathogenesis of the novel coronavirus infection.

Ridostin induces transcription of a wide spectrum of interferon genes in human cells.

The effects of Ridostin on the transcription of IFN family genes in human fibroblasts and lymphocytes were studied by quantitative real-time PCR. The degree of gene induction by Ridostin was most pronounced in fibroblasts, and was significantly higher than the induction by Kagocel: transcription of IFN-ß, oligoadenylate synthetase, and double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase genes increased by about 2000, 100, and 20 times, respectively. In lymphocytes, Ridostin also activated a wide variety of IFN family genes, including genes of IFN-ß, IFN-γ, and IFN-dependent enzymes, but this induction was less pronounced than in the fibroblasts. It was shown that gene response in lymphocyte from a child with cancer is reduced in comparison with that of adult healthy participant. Ridostin, and even more so Reaferon up-regulated activities of ß-actin, glycerophosphate dehydrogenase, and ß2-microglobulin genes, thus making impossible or limiting their use as constitutive stable reference genes (standards) in PCR-assays of IFN and their inductors.