Randomised clinical trial: a leucine-metformin-sildenafil combination (NS-0200) vs placebo in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) is suppressed in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), while its' stimulation or overexpression results in reduced disease severity in pre-clinical NAFLD models. Leucine allosterically activates Sirt1 and synergise with other Sirt/AMPK/NO pathway activators. We developed a triple combination of leucine, metformin and sildenafil (NS-0200), which was effective in a mouse model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). AIM: To report the results from a Phase 2, randomised clinical trial of of NS-0200 in 91 subjects with NAFLD (liver fat ≥15% by magnetic resonance imaging-proton-density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)). METHODS: Subjects were randomised to placebo, low-dose (1.1 g leucine/0.5 g metformin/0.5 mg sildenafil) or high-dose NS-0200 (1.1 g leucine/0.5 g metformin/1.0 mg sildenafil) b.d. for 16 weeks; change in hepatic fat was assessed via MRI-PDFF, and lipid metabolism was assessed via changes in the lipidomic signature. Seventy subjects completed the trial and met a priori compliance criteria. Analyses were conducted on the full cohort and on those with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values above median (50 U/L; n = 35). RESULTS: In the full cohort, active treatments did not separate from placebo. High dose NS-0200 reduced hepatic fat by 15.7% (relative change from baseline) in the high ALT group (P < 0.005) while low dose NS-0200 and placebo did not significantly change hepatic fat. Lipidomic analysis showed dose-responsive treatment effects in both overall and high ALT cohorts, with significant decreases in metabolically active lipids and up-regulation of fatty acid oxidation. CONCLUSION: These data support further evaluation of high-dose NS-0200 for treating NASH, especially in those with elevated ALT (NCT 02546609).

Fixed ratio dosing of pramlintide with regular insulin before a standard meal in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Amylin is co-secreted with insulin and is therefore lacking in patients with type 1 diabetes. Replacement with fixed ratio co-administration of insulin and the amylin analogue pramlintide may be superior to separate dosing. This concept was evaluated in a ratio-finding study. Patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled in a randomized, single-masked, standard breakfast crossover study using regular human insulin injected simultaneously with pramlintide 6, 9 or 12 mcg/unit insulin or placebo. Insulin dosage was reduced by 30% from patients' usual estimates. Plasma glucose, glucagon and pramlintide and adverse events were assessed. All ratios reduced 0-3-h glucose and glucagon increments by >50%. No hypoglycaemia occurred. Adverse events were infrequent and generally mild. All pramlintide/insulin ratios markedly and safely reduced glycaemic excursions and suppressed glucagon secretion in the immediate postprandial state. Further study using one of these ratios to explore the efficacy and safety of longer-term meal-time and basal hormone replacement is warranted.

Pharmacometrics and the transition to model-based development.

As the transition to model-based drug development continues, pharmacometric analysis will have an increasingly important role across the entire life cycle of drug discovery, development, regulatory approval, and commercialization. For this reason, pharmacometrics can--and should--have an integrating function in the transformation to model-based development. This essay describes an approach for formalizing the pharmacometrics process using the disciplines encompassed by enterprise engineering.

The effect of pramlintide on hormonal, metabolic or symptomatic responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Pramlintide, a human amylin analogue, is a potential new adjunctive therapy to insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes and insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes. Early clinical trials have shown a transient increased risk of hypoglycaemia in some patients at the time of initiating pramlintide therapy. This may be the result of combining the postprandial glucose, lowering effect of pramlintide with the existing hypoglycaemic potential of insulin without appropriate adjustment of insulin doses. However, the possibility that pramlintide may exert an independent detrimental effect on the physiological responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia needs to be excluded. METHODS: We conducted three separate randomized, placebo-controlled studies in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with adjunctive pramlintide. These studies utilized pramlintide at high doses (either 0.1-1 mg pramlintide daily or 0.1-0.8 mg pramlintide four times a day for 5 or 6 days) as well as doses closer to those anticipated for therapeutic usage (30, 100 or 300 microg three times daily for 14 days), and examined the hormonal, metabolic and symptomatic responses to an insulin-infusion hypoglycaemic challenge conducted at baseline and after days of therapy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Pramlintide had no effect on the counter-regulatory hormonal, metabolic and symptomatic responses to hypoglycaemia. These findings demonstrated that pramlintide, when used as adjunctive therapy to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes, has no independent effect on the response to hypoglycaemia.

Adjunctive therapy with pramlintide lowers HbA1c without concomitant weight gain and increased risk of severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes approaching glycemic targets.

AIMS: In long-term clinical trials in patients with type 1 diabetes spanning a wide range of HbA1c, addition of pramlintide to existing insulin regimens led to reductions in HbA1c that were accompanied by weight loss and no increase in overall severe hypoglycemia event rates. Given that weight gain and increased hypoglycemia risk contribute to the difficulty of attaining HbA1c targets (<7 %), the question arose whether pramlintide could benefit patients approaching, but not reaching glycemic targets with insulin alone. To address this question, we conducted a pooled analysis from 3 long-term clinical trials, including all patients with an entry HbA1c between 7.0 % and 8.5 %. METHODS: Within the subset of patients with an entry HbA1c between 7.0 % and 8.5 % (approximately 28 % of all patients enrolled in the 3 studies), 196 were treated with placebo + insulin (baseline HbA1c 7.9+/-0.4 %, body weight 76.0+/-14.3 kg [mean+/-SD]) and 281 with pramlintide+insulin (baseline HbA1c 7.9+/-0.4 %, body weight 75.4+/-13.1 kg). Endpoints included placebo-corrected changes from baseline to week 26 in HbA1c, body weight, and the event rate of severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Adjunctive therapy with pramlintide resulted in significant reductions in HbA1c and body weight from baseline to week 26 (0.3 % and 1.8 kg, placebo-corrected treatment differences, respectively, both p

Amylin replacement with pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin therapy improves long-term glycaemic and weight control in Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a 1-year, randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: The autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic beta-cells in Type 1 diabetes mellitus renders patients deficient in two glucoregulatory peptide hormones, insulin and amylin. With insulin replacement alone, most patients do not achieve glycaemic goals. We aimed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive therapy with pramlintide, a synthetic human amylin analogue, in patients with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study, 651 patients with Type 1 diabetes (age 41 +/- 13 years, HbA(1c) 8.9 +/- 1.0%, mean +/- sd) were randomized to mealtime injections of placebo or varying doses of pramlintide, in addition to their insulin therapy, for 52 weeks. RESULTS: Addition of pramlintide [60 microg three times daily (TID) or four times daily (QID)] to insulin led to significant reductions in HbA(1c) from baseline to Week 52 of 0.29% (P < 0.011) and 0.34% (P < 0.001), respectively, compared with a 0.04% reduction in placebo group. Three times the proportion of pramlintide- than placebo-treated patients achieved an HbA(1c) of < 7%. The greater reduction in HbA(1c) with pramlintide was achieved without an increase in concomitant insulin use and was accompanied by a significant reduction in body weight from baseline to Week 52 of 0.4 kg in the 60 microg TID (P < 0.027) or QID (P < 0.040) pramlintide treatment groups, compared with a 0.8-kg gain in body weight in the placebo group. The most common adverse event in pramlintide-treated patients was transient, mild-to-moderate nausea. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that mealtime amylin replacement with pramlintide, as an adjunct to insulin therapy, improves long-term glycaemic and weight control in patients with Type 1 diabetes.

Effect of pramlintide on A1C and body weight in insulin-treated African Americans and Hispanics with type 2 diabetes: a pooled post hoc analysis.

An unresolved problem in the management of type 2 diabetes is that improvement of glycemic control with insulin, insulin secretagogues, and insulin sensitizers is often accompanied by undesired weight gain. This problem is of particular concern in ethnic groups with a high propensity for diabetes and obesity, such as African Americans and Hispanics. Two 1-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes have shown that adjunctive therapy with pramlintide, an analog of the human beta-cell hormone amylin, reduces A(1C) with concomitant weight loss, rather than weight gain. To assess the effect of pramlintide in various ethnic groups with type 2 diabetes using insulin, we conducted a pooled post hoc analysis of the 2 trials, which included all Caucasian (n = 315), African American (n = 47), and Hispanic (n = 48) patients (age 57 years, A(1C) 9.1%, body mass index [BMI] 33 kg/m(2), mean values) who completed 52 weeks of treatment with either pramlintide (120 microg twice daily or 150 microg 3 times a day) or placebo. Primary endpoints included changes from baseline to week 52 in A(1C) and body weight. Collectively, pramlintide-treated patients achieved significant reductions from baseline in both A(1C) and body weight (placebo-corrected treatment effects at week 52: -0.5% and -2.6 kg, respectively, both P <.0001). The simultaneous reduction in A(1C) and body weight at week 52 was evident across all 3 ethnic groups and appeared to be most pronounced in African Americans (-0.7%, -4.1 kg), followed by Caucasians (-0.5%, -2.4 kg) and Hispanics (-0.3%, -2.3 kg). The glycemic improvement with pramlintide was not associated with an increased incidence of hypoglycemia over the entire study period (43% pramlintide v 40% placebo). Nausea, the most common adverse event associated with pramlintide treatment, was mostly mild and confined to the first 4 weeks of therapy (25% pramlintide v 16% placebo) with comparable patterns in the 3 ethnic groups. Thus, pending further experience, the combined improvement in glycemic and weight control with pramlintide treatment appears to be generalizable to a broad population of mixed ethnicity.

Addition of pramlintide to insulin therapy lowers HbA1c in conjunction with weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes approaching glycaemic targets.

AIM: Two long-term, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials in insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes, spanning a wide range of baseline glycaemic control, have shown that the addition of pramlintide, an analogue of the beta-cell hormone amylin, to pre-existing insulin regimens results in reductions in HbA1c that are accompanied by weight loss. METHODS: To assess whether this profile of pramlintide is observed in patients approaching, but not yet reaching, glycaemic targets, we conducted a pooled post hoc analysis of the two trials, including all patients with an entry HbA1c between 7.0 and 8.5%. Within this subset of patients, 80 were treated with placebo + insulin [baseline HbA1c 8.0 +/- 0.3%, weight 87.3 +/- 19.3 kg (mean +/- s.d.)] and 86 with pramlintide (120 micro g bid) + insulin [HbA1c 8.0 +/- 0.4%, weight 92.5 +/- 20.4 kg (mean +/- s.d.)]. Endpoints included changes from baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c, body weight, and the event rate of severe hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: Adjunctive therapy with pramlintide resulted in significant reductions in both HbA1c and body weight from baseline to Week 26 (-0.43% and -2.0 kg differences from placebo, respectively, both p < 0.001). These changes were achieved without a concomitant increase in the overall rate of severe hypoglycaemic events (0.13 pramlintide vs. 0.19 placebo, events/patient year of exposure). CONCLUSIONS: The data from this post hoc analysis indicate that the addition of pramlintide to insulin therapy may help patients with type 2 diabetes who are approaching, but not yet reaching, glycaemic targets to achieve further reductions in HbA1c without concomitant weight gain and increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia.

The human amylin analog, pramlintide, reduces postprandial hyperglucagonemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: Amylin is a second beta-cell hormone that is normally co-secreted with insulin in response to meals; it complements the effects of insulin in postprandial glucose control, in part by suppressing glucagon secretion. In patients with type 2 diabetes, mealtime administration of the human amylin analog pramlintide markedly improves postprandial glucose excursions. The aim of this study was to examine whether pramlintide reduces the postprandial hyperglucagonemia that is often seen in this patient population. METHODS: Utilizing a single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design, 24 patients with type 2 diabetes, 12 insulin-treated and 12 non-insulin-treated, underwent a standardized mixed meal test on 2 occasions during which they received, in randomized order, a five-hour intravenous infusion of placebo or pramlintide (100 microg/h). RESULTS: During the placebo infusion, plasma glucose and plasma glucagon concentrations increased substantially after the meal. During the pramlintide infusion, postprandial plasma glucose and plasma glucagon responses were significantly (p < 0.05, all) reduced following ingestion of the same meal, both in the insulin-treated and non-insulin-treated subgroups. CONCLUSION: Supplementation of mealtime amylin with pramlintide reduces postprandial hyperglucagonemia in patients with type 2 diabetes, a mechanism that likely contributes to pramlintide's postprandial glucose-lowering effect.

The human amylin analog, pramlintide, corrects postprandial hyperglucagonemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Mealtime amylin replacement with the human amylin analog pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin therapy improves postprandial glycemia and long-term glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. Preclinical animal studies indicate that these complementary effects may result from at least 2 independent mechanisms: a slowing of nutrient delivery to the small intestine and a suppression of nutrient-stimulated glucagon secretion. The former effect of pramlintide has previously been demonstrated in patients with type 1 diabetes. The present studies characterize the effect of pramlintide on postprandial glucagon secretion in this patient population. Plasma glucagon and glucose concentrations were measured before and after a standardized liquid meal in 2 separate randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of pramlintide administration to patients with type 1 diabetes. In a 2-day crossover study, 18 patients received a 5-hour intravenous infusion of pramlintide (25 microg/h or 50 microg/h) or placebo in addition to subcutaneous (SC) insulin injections. In a 14-day parallel-group study, 84 patients received SC injections of 30, 100, or 300 microg of pramlintide or placebo 3 times daily in addition to SC injections of insulin. In both studies plasma glucagon concentrations increased in response to the meal in the placebo-plus-insulin group but not in any of the pramlintide-treated groups (all pramlintide treatment arms v placebo, P <.05). We conclude that mealtime amylin replacement with pramlintide prevents the abnormal meal-related rise in glucagonemia in insulin-treated patients with type 1 diabetes, an effect that likely contributes to its ability to improve postprandial glucose homeostasis and long-term glycemic control.

Amylin replacement with pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a physiological approach toward improved metabolic control.

Destruction and dysfunction of pancreatic beta-cells, resulting in absolute and relative insulin deficiency, represent key abnormalities in the pathogenesis of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively. Following the discovery of amylin, a second beta-cell hormone that is co-secreted with insulin in response to nutrient stimuli, it was realized that diabetes represents a state of bihormonal beta cell deficiency and that lack of amylin action may contribute to abnormal glucose homeostasis. Experimental studies show that amylin acts as a neuroendocrine hormone that complements the effects of insulin in postprandial glucose regulation through several centrally mediated effects. These include a suppression of postprandial glucagon secretion and a vagus-mediated regulation of gastric emptying, thereby helping to control the influx of endogenous and exogenous glucose, respectively. In animal studies, amylin has also been shown to reduce food intake and body weight, consistent with an additional satiety effect. Pramlintide is a soluble, non-aggregating, injectable, synthetic analog of human amylin currently under development for the treatment of type 1 and insulin-using type 2 diabetes. Long-term clinical studies have consistently demonstrated that pre-prandial s.c. injections of pramlintide, in addition to the current insulin regimen, reduce HbA(1c) and body weight in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, without an increase in insulin use or in the event rate of severe hypoglycemia. The most commonly observed side effects were gastrointestinal-related, mainly mild nausea, which typically occurred upon initiation of treatment and resolved within days or weeks. Amylin replacement with pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin therapy is a novel physiological approach toward improved long-term glycemic and weight control in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

The amylin analog pramlintide improves glycemic control and reduces postprandial glucagon concentrations in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

To explore further the effects of the human amylin analog pramlintide on overall glycemic control and postprandial responses of circulating glucose, glucagon, and metabolic intermediates in type 1 diabetes mellitus, 14 male type 1 diabetic patients were examined in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Pramlintide (30 microg four times daily) or placebo were administered for 4 weeks, after which a daytime blood profile (8:30 AM to 4:30 PM) was performed. Serum fructosamine was decreased after pramlintide (314+/-14 micromol/L) compared with placebo (350+/-14 micromol/L, P = .008). On the profile day, the mean plasma glucose (8.3+/-0.7 v 10.2+/-0.8 mmol/L, P = .04) and postprandial concentrations (incremental areas under the curve [AUCs] from 0 to 120 minutes) were significantly decreased during pramlintide administration (P < .01 for both) despite comparable circulating insulin levels (359+/-41 v 340+/-35 pmol/L). Mean blood glycerol values were reduced (0.029+/-0.004 v 0.040+/-0.004 mmol/L, P = .01) and blood alanine levels were elevated (0.274+/-0.012 v 0.246+/-0.008 mmol/L, P = .03) after pramlintide versus placebo. Blood lactate concentrations did not differ during the two regimens. During pramlintide administration, the AUC (0 to 120 minutes) for plasma glucagon after breakfast was diminished (P = .02), and a similar trend was observed following lunch. In addition, peak plasma glucagon concentrations 60 minutes after breakfast (45.8+/-7.3 v 72.4+/-8.0 ng/L, P = .005) and lunch (47.6+/-9.0 v 60.9+/-8.2 ng/L, P = .02) were both decreased following pramlintide. These data indicate that pramlintide (30 microg four times daily) is capable of improving metabolic control in type 1 diabetics. This may relate, in part, to suppression of glucagon concentrations. Longer-term studies are required to ascertain whether these findings are sustained over time.

Pramlintide, a synthetic analog of human amylin, improves the metabolic profile of patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin. The Pramlintide in Type 2 Diabetes Group.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of 4 weeks of subcutaneous administration of pramlintide, a synthetic analog of human amylin, on metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Serum fructosamine, HbA1c, and fasting plasma lipids were measured in 203 patients in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group multicenter trial using doses of 30 micrograms q.i.d., 60 micrograms t.i.d., and 60 micrograms q.i.d. RESULTS: Statistically significant reductions in serum fructosamine concentrations were observed in the pramlintide 30 micrograms q.i.d. group (17.5 +/- 4.9 mumol/l, P = 0.029), the pramlintide 60 micrograms t.i.d. group (24.1 +/- 4.9 mumol/l, P = 0.003), and the 60 micrograms q.i.d. group (22.6 +/- 4.1 mumol/l, P = 0.001) compared with the placebo group (3.5 +/- 3.8 mumol/l). There were also statistically significant shifts in the proportion of patients with an abnormal serum fructosamine concentration at baseline that normalized at week 4 within the pramlintide 60 micrograms t.i.d. group and the 60 micrograms q.i.d. group. Consistent with the fructosamine results, there were statistically significant reductions in HbA1c in the pramlintide 30 micrograms q.i.d. group (0.53 +/- 0.07%, P = 0.0447), the pramlintide 60 micrograms t.i.d. group (0.58 +/- 0.07%, P < 0.0217), and the pramlintide 60 micrograms q.i.d. group (0.51 +/- 0.08%, P = 0.0242) compared with the placebo group (0.27 +/- 0.08%). Total cholesterol concentrations were also statistically significantly reduced in both the pramlintide 60 micrograms t.i.d. group (8.4 mg/dl, P < 0.01) and 60 micrograms q.i.d. group (10.5 mg/dl, P < 0.01) compared with placebo (1.2 mg/dl). Body weight decreased in both of the pramlintide 60 micrograms groups, but the trend did not achieve statistical significance. The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in serum fructosamine, plasma total and LDL cholesterol concentrations, and HbA1c support the hypothesis that pramlintide may improve metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin.

Effects of 4 weeks' administration of pramlintide, a human amylin analogue, on glycaemia control in patients with IDDM: effects on plasma glucose profiles and serum fructosamine concentrations.

The effects of 4 weeks' administration of pramlintide, an analogue of the human hormone amylin, on blood glucose control in 215 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were examined in a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Pramlintide was administered subcutaneously prior to meals in four dosing regimens: 30 microg four times per day (breakfast, lunch, dinner, and evening snack), 30 microg three times per day (breakfast, lunch and dinner [BLD]), 30 microg three times per day (breakfast, dinner and evening snack [BDS]), and 60 microg twice per day (breakfast and dinner). After 4 weeks of pramlintide 30 microg four times per day administration, there was a statistically significant reduction in the mean 24 h plasma glucose concentration when compared to placebo (-1.4 +/- 0.5 vs 0.3 +/- 0.5 micromol/l, p = 0.009). Serum fructosamine concentrations were reduced 62 +/- 10 micromol/l in the pramlintide 30 mg four times per day group, 43 +/- 7 micromol/l in the pramlintide 30 microg three times per day (BLD) group, 47 +/- 6 micromol/l in the pramlintide 30 microg three times per day (BDS) group, 46 +/- 7 micromol/l in the pramlintide 60 microg twice per day group, and 29 +/- 8 micromol/l by placebo. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was not different in any pramlintide group compared to the placebo group. Nausea, the most frequent adverse event, subsided after the first week of treatment in the majority of patients. In conclusion, pramlintide improved blood glucose control over a 4-week period without increased hypoglycaemia and was well tolerated. Future studies using a longer period of pramlintide administration with assessment of HbA1c as the measurement of glycaemic control are warranted.

Pramlintide: a human amylin analogue reduced postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes.

In order to determine the influence of a 5 h infusion of pramlintide compared to placebo on postprandial glucose, lactate, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations in patients with Type 2 diabetes, a single-blind, randomized, cross-over study was conducted in 24 patients; 12 treated with exogenous insulin and 12 managed with diet and/or oral hypoglycaemic agents. One hour after initiation of infusion, patients consumed a Sustacal test meal. The protocol was repeated on the following day with each patient receiving the alternate study medication. Pramlintide infusion in the insulin-treated patients resulted in statistically significant reductions in mean glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and lactate concentrations during the 4-h period after the Sustacal test meal. Pramlintide infusion also resulted in significant reductions of mean insulin, C-peptide, and lactate concentrations, but not glucose concentrations, in the patients treated with diet and/or oral hypoglycaemic agents. Within this latter group, reduction in postprandial glucose concentrations in individual patients correlated with glycated haemoglobin values. These results suggest that administration of pramlintide may improve glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with insulin or poorly controlled on diet and/or oral hypoglycaemic agents.

Amylin and glycaemic regulation: a possible role for the human amylin analogue pramlintide.

Clinical studies with the human amylin analogue, pramlintide, suggest that it may help to improve glycaemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus using insulin. This has been demonstrated by reductions in postprandial glycaemic excursion, 24-h glucose profile and serum fructosamine concentrations following administration of pramlintide for periods of up to 28 days in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Additionally, preliminary studies with pramlintide in patients with Type 2 diabetes using insulin have indicated its ability to reduce postprandial hyperglycaemia in this population. Thus, this data set suggests a potential role for pramlintide as a partner to insulin for the optimization of glycaemic control in patients with diabetes using insulin.

Modulation of gastric emptying as a therapeutic approach to glycaemic control.

Amylin is a peptide hormone which is deficient in patients with Type 1 and late stage Type 2 diabetes. Evidence from studies in rats and humans has suggested that it is involved in glucose homeostasis by modulating gastric emptying and, possibly, by regulating the release of glucagon. These observations have led to the suggestion that amylin may be used clinically to improve glycaemic control in patients with diabetes. Preliminary studies with the human amylin analogue, pramlintide, have provided evidence of beneficial effects in terms of improved glycaemic control in these patients; these effects are currently being investigated in long term phase III studies.

Self-care behaviors in insulin-dependent diabetes: evaluative tools and their associations with glycemic control.

Clarified the relationships between self-care behaviors and illness-specific outcomes in approximately 270 youths with IDDM. Youths were assessed at three points in time using a semistructured interview measure and multiple indices of dietary intake and physical activity with two different methodologies (i.e., recalls, logs). Glycemic control was most strongly related to the semistructured Self-Care Adherence Interview (SCAI); and second to the overall quality of the youth's dietary intake. The SCAI also predicted glycemic control over time. Physical activity levels and specific nutritional components from the logs and recalls were generally unrelated to glycemic control.

Effect of race and hypertension on plasma amylin concentrations.

Amylin is a recently discovered peptide hormone composed of 37 amino acids that is cosecreted with insulin by pancreatic beta cells. Amylin has been reported to be present in increased amounts in insulin-resistant subjects who are hyper-insulinemic. Because blacks and whites differ in the prevalence of both hypertension and diabetes, we examined amylin levels in 77 individuals; 42 were black (11 hypertensive and 31 normotensive) and 35 were white (10 hypertensive and 25 normotensive) individuals who were either healthy control subjects or hypertensive subjects not receiving antihypertensive medication. Plasma amylin concentrations were measured in two separate monoclonal antibody-based immunofluorescent sandwich-type assays. The F002-2 capture antibody binds amylin plus at least two additional amylin-like peptides, and the F024-4 capture antibody detectably binds only the amylin peptide. There was a significant race-by-diagnosis interaction for levels of amylin immunoreactivity during a 2-hour glucose tolerance test (P<.005 for F002-2 antibody and P<.05 for F024-4 antibody). Highest levels were found in black hypertensive subjects. The results appear to fit with previously observed differences in metabolic status between blacks and whites and with the association between hypertension and alterations in metabolic status.