RESUMO
Fractionation of soluble species of P, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Se and Mo in pea and lentil seeds was made by on-line hyphenation of size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Seed samples were extracted with 0.02 mol l(-1) Tris-HCl buffer solution, pH 7.5. SEC was performed on Superdex 75 and Superdex Peptide columns (300 x 10 mm) with the same buffer solution as the mobile phase. Monitoring of oxide ion 47(PO)+ was used for detection of phosphorus compounds. Other elements were detected as ions of 55Mn, 57Fe, 59Co, 62Ni, 65Cu, 66Zn, 82Se and 95Mo nuclides. Elements in individual elution zones were quantified using external calibration. Complete chromatographic recoveries of elements were found in cases of phosphorus, nickel and copper. Substantial parts of manganese and zinc, as well as traces of cobalt, selenium and molybdenum are retained on the column. Injection of EDTA solution removes these elements from the column. Chromatographic profiles of pea and lentil samples are very similar for all elements except Mo. Main element species in the high-molecular-mass region (approx. 190,000 rel. mol. mass unit) were detected in case of Fe. Low-molecular-mass species (<2000 rel. mol. mass unit) as major element forms are typical for Cu and Zn.
Assuntos
Cromatografia em Gel/métodos , Fabaceae/química , Espectrometria de Massas/métodos , Metais/análise , Sementes/química , Fabaceae/embriologiaRESUMO
Fractions of Cu and Zn species in legume samples (common white bean, pea, chick pea and lentil seeds and defatted soybean flour) were analysed by on-line hyphenation of size exclusion chromatography and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Samples were extracted by 0.02 mol l(-1) Tris-HCl buffer solution, pH 7.5. The extraction efficiency lay in the region 60-90 and 60-80% for Cu and Zn, respectively. Quantification of elements in the individual chromatographic fractions was carried out by isotope dilution (ID) and external calibration (EC) techniques. For ID analysis the chromatographic effluent was mixed with the flow of (65)Cu and (68)Zn isotope enriched solution and the isotope ratio values (63)Cu/(65)Cu and ((64)Zn+(66)Zn)/(68)Zn were measured. In the case of EC technique calibration solutions of elements were injected to the flow of mobile phase by the second injector. Prior entering detector the effluent was mixed with the flow of internal standard solution (In, 50 mug l(-1)). Both methods have similar precision, however the behaviour of both studied elements was not the same. The chromatographic analysis itself was the main source of variability in the case of Cu. For Zn species analysis, the extraction process and the manipulation with the extract, played the significant role too. It was probably caused by lower stability of the present zinc chelates. The total amounts of Zn found in all chromatographic fractions represented 85-95% of Zn in sampled extract whereas those of Cu approached 100%. In case of small peaks the results of ID and EC were not the same. The EC results were lower then ID results. The great deal of results uncertainty accounts for the precision.