Commissioning and performance evaluation of commercially available mobile imager for image guided total body irradiation.

BACKGROUND: The setup of lung shield (LS) in total body irradiation (TBI) with the computed radiography (CR) system is a time-consuming task and has not been quantitatively evaluated. The TBI mobile imager (TBI-MI) can solve this problem through real-time monitoring. Therefore, this study aimed to perform commissioning and performance evaluation of TBI-MI to promote its use in clinical practice. METHODS: The source-axis distance in TBI treatment, TBI-MI (CNERGY TBI, Cablon Medical B.V.), and the LS position were set to 400, 450, and 358 cm, respectively. The evaluation items were as follows: accuracy of image scaling and measured displacement error of LS, image quality (linearity, signal-to-noise ratio, and modulation transfer function) using an EPID QC phantom, optimal thresholding to detect intra-fractional motion in the alert function, and the scatter radiation dose from TBI-MI. RESULTS: The accuracy of image scaling and the difference in measured displacement of the LS was <4 mm in any displacements and directions. The image quality of TBI imager was slightly inferior to the CR image but was visually acceptable in clinical practice. The signal-to-noise ratio was improved at high dose rate. The optimal thresholding value to detect a 10-mm body displacement was determined to be approximately 5.0%. The maximum fraction of scattering radiation to irradiated dose was 1.7% at patient surface. CONCLUSION: MI-TBI can quantitatively evaluate LS displacement with acceptable image quality. Furthermore, real-time monitoring with alert function to detect intrafraction patient displacement can contribute to safe TBI treatment.

Failure modes and effects analysis study for accelerator-based Boron Neutron Capture Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) has recently been used in clinical oncology thanks to recent developments of accelerator-based BNCT systems. Although there are some specific processes for BNCT, they have not yet been discussed in detail. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide comprehensive data on the risk of accelerator-based BNCT system to institutions planning to implement an accelerator-based BNCT system. METHODS: In this study, failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was performed based on a treatment process map prepared for the accelerator-based BNCT system. A multidisciplinary team consisting of a medical doctor (MD), a registered nurse (RN), two medical physicists (MP), and three radiologic technologists (RT) identified the failure modes (FMs). Occurrence (O), severity (S), and detectability (D) were scored on a scale of 10, respectively. For each failure mode (FM), risk priority number (RPN) was calculated by multiplying the values of O, S, and D, and it was then categorized as high risk, very high risk, and other. Additionally, FMs were statistically compared in terms of countermeasures, associated occupations, and whether or not they were the patient-derived. RESULTS: The identified FMs for BNCT were 165 in which 30 and 17 FMs were classified as high risk and very high risk, respectively. Additionally, 71 FMs were accelerator-based BNCT-specific FMs in which 18 and 5 FMs were classified as high risk and very high risk, respectively. The FMs for which countermeasures were "Education" or "Confirmation" were statistically significantly higher for S than the others (p = 0.019). As the number of BNCT facilities is expected to increase, staff education is even more important. Comparing patient-derived and other FMs, O tended to be higher in patient-derived FMs. This could be because the non-patient-derived FMs included events that could be controlled by software, whereas the patient-derived FMs were impossible to prevent and might also depend on the patient's condition. Alternatively, there were non-patient-derived FMs with higher D, which were difficult to detect mechanically and were classified as more than high risk. In O, significantly higher values (p = 0.096) were found for FMs from MD and RN associated with much patient intervention compared to FMs from MP and RT less patient intervention. Comparing conventional radiotherapy and accelerator-based BNCT, although there were events with comparable risk in same FMs, there were also events with different risk in same FMs. They could be related to differences in the physical characteristics of the two modalities. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first report for conducting a risk analysis for BNCT using FMEA. Thus, this study provides comprehensive data needed for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) in the treatment process for facilities considering the implementation of accelerator-based BNCT in the future. Because many BNCT-specific risks were discussed, it is important to understand the characteristics of BNCT and to take adequate measures in advance. If the effects of all FMs and countermeasures are discussed by multidisciplinary team, it will be possible to take countermeasures against individual FMs from many perspectives and provide BNCT more safely and effectively.

Planning study: prone versus supine position for stereotactic body radiotherapy in prostate by CyberKnife.

This study aimed to clarify the differences in radiotherapy dose characteristics and delivery efficiency between the supine and prone positions in patients with prostate cancer using the CyberKnife. The planning computed tomography (CT) and delineations of the prone position were obtained by rotating the supine CT images with delineations of 180° using image processing software. The optimization parameters for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were based on the prone position. The optimization parameters determined for the prone position were applied to the supine position for optimization and dose calculation. The dosimetric characteristics of the PTV and OARs, and delivery efficiency were compared between the two different patient positions. The plans in the prone position resulted in better PTV conformity index (nCI), rectum V90%, V80%, V75%, V50% and bladder V50%. A significant difference was observed in treatment time and depth along the central axis (dCAX) between the two plans. The mean treatment time per fraction and dCAX for the supine and prone positions were 20.9 ± 1.7 min versus 19.8 ± 1.3 min (P = 0.019) and 151.1 ± 33.6 mm versus 233.2 ± 8.8 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. In this study the prone position was found to improve dosimetric characteristics and delivery efficiency compared with the supine position during prostate cancer treatment with the CyberKnife.

Technical note: Analysis of brachytherapy source movement by high-speed camera.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of the movement of a brachytherapy source using a high-speed camera for evaluating source position, dwell time, and transit dose. METHODS: A high-speed camera was used to record the source position of an Ir-192 source relative to a ruler within a custom positioning jig in a remote afterloading system. The analyzed frames can be used to assess dwell positions and times. Treatment plans had multiple dwell times equal to 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 s in 2.5- and 5-mm step sizes. Images were acquired at a rate of 146 frames/s. Acquired images were processed to automatically track the actual source using the correlation between a template image and each frame. The brachytherapy dose calculation formalism (AAPM TG43-U1) was applied to each frame to evaluate the transit dose contribution to the total dose. RESULTS: The differences in measured source positions from the nominal for dwell times equal to 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 s in treatment plans were approximately ≤1 mm. The corresponding differences in measured dwell times from the nominal values at 5 mm steps were -15, -9, -5, and 5 ms, respectively. The source velocities at 5 mm steps were approximately 393 mm/s. The dose differences at 5 mm from the source movement with and without the transit dose for these dwell times were 38%, 7%, 3%, and 2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Recording a brachytherapy source using a high-speed camera allowed the evaluation of positional and dwell time accuracies as well as dosimetry assessments, such as the transit dose, based on the application of AAPM TG-43U1.