Metaphyseal Fixation Using Cones and Sleeves for Severe Proximal Tibial Bone Loss.

BACKGROUND: Tibial bone defects are commonly encountered in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and can be managed with metaphyseal cones or sleeves. Few studies have directly compared tibial cones and sleeves in rTKA, and none have limited this comparison to the most severe tibial defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of metaphyseal cones and sleeves for tibial reconstruction in rTKA regarding implant fixation and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing rTKA in which metaphyseal cones or sleeves were utilized for addressing metaphyseal bone loss (34 cones and 18 sleeves). Tibial bone loss was classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone defect classification, with types 2B and 3 being included. Patient-reported outcomes and postoperative complications were collected, and a radiographic evaluation of osseointegration or loosening was performed. RESULTS: There were 52 knees included (34 cones, 18 sleeves), with a median follow-up of 41.0 months. All-cause implant survival was 100% at 2 years and 96% (95% confidence interval: 76 to 99%) at 4 years, with 98% of tibial components demonstrating osseointegration at the final follow-up. During follow-up, there were a total 11 revisions, of which 1 sleeve was revised secondary to implant loosening. Tibial sleeves had a higher risk of revision compared to tibial cones (P < .01), and sleeves fixed with a hybrid technique were more likely to need revision than cones fixed by the same method (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Porous metaphyseal tibial cones and tibial metaphyseal sleeves both performed well at a 41-month median follow-up with no difference in aseptic survivorship between the 2 constructs. Both demonstrate high rates of osseointegration, low rates of aseptic failure, and significant improvement in Knee Society Scores in patients with severe tibial defects in rTKA.

Novel Technique for the Identification of Hip Implants Using Artificial Intelligence.

BACKGROUND: The anticipated growth of total hip arthroplasty will result in an increased need for revision total hip arthroplasty. Preoperative planning, including identifying current implants, is critical for successful revision surgery. Artificial intelligence (AI) is promising for aiding clinical decision-making, including hip implant identification. However, previous studies have limitations such as small datasets, dissimilar stem designs, limited scalability, and the need for AI expertise. To address these limitations, we developed a novel technique to generate large datasets, tested radiographically similar stems, and demonstrated scalability utilizing a no-code machine learning solution. METHODS: We trained, validated, and tested an automated machine learning-implemented convolutional neural network to classify 9 radiographically similar femoral implants with a metaphyseal-fitting wedge taper design. Our novel technique uses computed tomography-derived projections of a 3-dimensional scanned implant model superimposed within a computed tomography pelvis volume. We employed computer-aided design modeling and MATLAB to process and manipulate the images. This generated 27,020 images for training (22,957) and validation (4,063) sets. We obtained 786 test images from various sources. The performance of the model was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. RESULTS: Our machine learning model discriminated the 9 implant models with a mean accuracy of 97.4%, sensitivity of 88.4%, and specificity of 98.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel hip implant detection technique accurately identified 9 radiographically similar implants. The method generates large datasets, is scalable, and can include historic or obscure implants. The no-code machine learning model demonstrates the feasibility of obtaining meaningful results without AI expertise, encouraging further research in this area.

Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients With an Implanted Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may be used as bridge therapy or destination therapy in heart failure patients. Total joint arthroplasty may improve the functional status of patients limited by arthritis. This retrospective case series evaluated patients with an implanted LVAD who underwent a total joint arthroplasty at 1 institution from 2012 to present. Five patients underwent 12 surgeries with 7 primary arthroplasties and 5 revisions. Their mortality, length of stay, coagulopathic events, incidence of infection or revision arthroplasty, and heart transplantation were evaluated, and is the largest study to date of this population. Two patients expired from thrombotic events while 3 progressed to heart transplantation. Joint arthroplasty is feasible in patients with an implanted LVAD with expected risk and perioperative multidisciplinary collaboration.

Predictors of Reinfection in Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Two-Stage Reimplantation.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage reimplantation is an effective treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Many factors are involved in the variable success of this procedure. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between patient risk factors, comorbidities, and the pathogen on reinfection rates following two-stage reimplantation. METHODS: We evaluated 158 patients treated for PJI from 2008-2019. Only patients who had completed a two-stage exchange were included. Patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, time-to-reimplantation, pathogen, antibiotic sensitivities, host status, and reinfection rates were assessed. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify correlation between risk factors and reinfection. A P-value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 31 patients experienced a reinfection (19.6%). There was a statistically significant association between infection with Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) and reinfection (P = .046). Patients with a reinfection also had a significantly greater median serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level (12.65 g/dL) at the time of diagnosis compared to patients without a reinfection (5.0 g/dL) (P = .010). Median Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (56 in no re-infection and 69 in re-infection) and time-to-reimplantation (101 days in no reinfection and 141 days in reinfection) demonstrated a trend toward an association with re-infection but were not statistically significant (P = .055 and P = .054 respectively). CONCLUSION: As the number of arthroplasties continue to rise, PJIs are increasing proportionately and represent a significant revision burden. Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection were strongly associated with failure of a two-stage reimplantation. While not statistically significant with our numbers, there were strong trends toward an association between elevated Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), longer time-to-reimplantation, and reinfection.

Pain associated with cemented and uncemented long-stemmed tibial components in revision total knee arthroplasty.

AIMS: Stemmed tibial components are frequently used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, overall pain, and diaphyseal tibial pain in patients who underwent revision TKA with cemented or uncemented stemmed tibial components. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study involving 110 patients with revision TKA with cemented versus uncemented stemmed tibial components. Patients who underwent revision TKA with stemmed tibial components over a 15-year period at a single institution with at least two-year follow-up were assessed. Pain was evaluated through postal surveys. There were 63 patients with cemented tibial stems and 47 with uncemented stems. Radiographs and Knee Society Scores were used to evaluate for objective findings associated with pain or patient dissatisfaction. Postal surveys were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and the independent-samples t-test. Logistic regression was used to adjust for age, sex, and preoperative bone loss. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in stem length, operative side, or indications for revision were found between the two cohorts. Tibial pain at the end of the stem was present in 25.3% (16/63) of cemented stems and 25.5% (12/47) of uncemented stems (p = 1.000); 74.6% (47/63) of cemented patients and 78.7% (37/47) of uncemented patients were satisfied following revision TKA (p = 0.657). CONCLUSION: There were no differences in patient satisfaction, overall pain, and diaphyseal tibial pain in cemented and uncemented stemmed tibial components in revision TKA. Patient factors, rather than implant selection and surgical technique, likely play a large role in the presence of postoperative pain. Stemmed tibial components have been shown to be a possible source of pain in revision TKA. There is no difference in patient satisfaction or postoperative pain with cemented or uncemented stemmed tibial components in revision TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):165-170.

Orthopaedic Surgery Elicits a Systemic Anti-Inflammatory Signature.

Little information is available on the functional activity of leukocytes after arthroplasty or the expansion of populations with immune suppressive properties during the acute post-operative period. Synovial fluid and matched pre- and post-surgical blood samples were collected from total hip and knee arthroplasty patients (THA and TKA, respectively) to examine the impact of surgery on peripheral blood leukocyte frequency, bactericidal activity, and inflammatory mediator expression. For spinal surgeries, inflammatory mediator production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) pre- and post-surgery was examined. An expansion of immune suppressive granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (G-MDSCs) was observed following arthroplasty, which correlated with significantly increased serum interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels. Analysis of synovial fluid from THA and TKAs revealed reduced granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) and increased interleukin-6 (IL-6), monocyte chemoattractant protein 2 (CCL2) and Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt-3L) compared to pre- and post-surgical serum. For the spinal surgery cohort, stimulation of PBMCs isolated post-surgery with bacterial antigens produced significantly less pro-inflammatory (IL-1α, IL-1ß, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), IL-12p40, growth-related oncogene-α/GRO-α (CXCL1) and 6Ckine (CCL21)) and more anti-inflammatory/tissue repair mediators (IL-10, G-CSF and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)) compared to PBMCs recovered before surgery. The observed bias towards systemic anti-inflammatory changes without concomitant increases in pro-inflammatory responses may influence susceptibility to infection following orthopaedic surgery in the context of underlying co-morbidities or risk factors.

Current and future trends in the diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infection.

The challenge of confirming the diagnosis of prosthetic hip infection is two-fold. First, the presentation of the patient with a prosthetic hip infection often has limited or few subjective complaints and physical findings, nonconfirmatory inflammatory laboratory markers, and negative culture results. Second, there has not been consistent agreement of the definition of prosthetic join infection. Recent work by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society has created a new uniform definition for research and clinical use that may improve the ability to accurately diagnose prosthetic hip infections individually and share data among different sites for research collaboration.

Acute hematogenous infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Forty consecutive patients (42 joints; 22 TKA, 20 THA) treated for acute hematogenous infections were reviewed. All patients underwent irrigation and debridement and exchange of the modular components. At a mean of 56 months (range, 25-124 months) recurrent infection, requiring surgery, developed in 9 of the 42 joints (21%); 8 of the 9 recurrent infections were in patients with a staphylococcal infection (P = 0.0004). Ten of the 40 patients (25%) died within 2 years of infection. Irrigation and debridement for the treatment of an acute hematogenous infection was successful in the majority of patients (76% survivorship at 2 years). Non-staphylococcal infections had a particularly low failure rate (96% survivorship at 2 years). The 2 year mortality rate among this subset of patients was strikingly high.

What is the long-term survival of impaction allografting of the femur?

BACKGROUND: Revision hip surgery of the femur for patients with substantial bone loss is challenging. We previously reported 41 patients (44 hips) treated with femoral impaction grafting followed for a minimum of 2 years. The survivorship, using femoral reoperation for symptomatic aseptic loosening as the end point, was 97% at 8 years. However, data on longer term survival are crucial to adequately compare this surgical technique with other types of revision hip arthroplasty procedures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked what the survivorship of impaction bone grafting was at longer followup, if the severity of bone loss was associated with failure, and finally, if longer length stems had improved survival compared with shorter stems. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2002, 78 femoral revisions were performed in 71 patients using impaction grafting. The average age of the patients was 67 years (range, 33­84 years). Sixty-nine of the 71 patients were available for followup evaluation. We obtained Harris hip scores preoperatively and postoperatively. Radiographs were measured for radiolucent lines. Patients were followed a minimum of 2 years (average, 10.6 years; range, 2-19 years). RESULTS: Survival of the femoral component without revision for any cause was 93% (confidence interval [CI], 83%­97%) and for aseptic loosening was 98% (CI, 87%­100%) at 19 years. Neither severity of bone loss nor the length of the stem predicted failure. CONCLUSIONS: Impaction bone grafting has a high survival of 93% at the 19-year followup for patients with severe bone loss of their femur.

Infection following total knee arthroplasty: prevention and management.

Despite diligent efforts to prevent infection, prosthetic knee infection occurs in up to 2% of patients treated with total knee arthroplasty. Although the risk of infection is relatively low, the effects are considerable. The number of total knee arthroplasties is projected to increase by more than 600% by 2030, resulting in 3.48 million knee replacements, with a possible 70,000 prosthetic knee infections. Infection will be the most common indication for revision total knee arthroplasty. Prophylactic antibiotics and minimizing patient risk factors are critical in preventing infections. Staphylococcus is the most common organism in infected total knee arthroplasties. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial to the long-term outcomes of patients with prosthetic joint infections. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein level, and interleukin-6 serum level should be checked in all patients with clinical signs of infection or unexplained pain or stiffness. The surgical management of a prosthetic knee infection depends on several factors, but none is more important than the timing of infection in relationship to the index surgery. With a success rate of 80% to 90%, two-stage component exchange remains the treatment of choice for chronically infected total knee arthroplasties.