Retinopathy severity correlates with RANTES concentrations and CCR 5-positive microvesicles in diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: RANTES regulates leukocyte recruitment to areas affected by the inflammatory process. Microvesicles (MVs) belong to a subpopulation of extracellular vesicles and show proangiogenic potential by transferring bioactive molecules to target cells. OBJECTIVES: the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between circulating proangiogenic factors (MVs and RANTES) and diabetes complications in patients with different severities of diabetic retinopathy (DR). CCR5 (CD195) receptors transported by annexin V-labeled MVs were also investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Diabetic patients (n = 61), among whom 35 had confirmed DR classified according to guidelines, and controls (n = 25) were included. MVs were isolated by centrifugation and analyzed using flow cytometry, RANTES was assessed by ELISA. RESULTS: the study group differed from the control group with respect to BMI, age, heart rate and systolic blood pressure. Additionally, glucose and creatinine concentrations were significantly increased: 5.30 [5.09-5.62] vs. 9.38 [7.48-11.55] (p <0.0001) mmol/l and 74.59 [64-84] vs. 89.00 [77.11-105.44] µmol/l (p = 0.0005), respectively. RANTES concentrations were significantly increased in diabetic patients compared to those of controls (15.5 (9.7-18.1) vs. 8.9 (0.9-14.6) µg/ml (p = 0.011)), and RANTES concentration significantly increased with respect to nonproliferative DR progression. Moreover, the number of CCR5-positive MVs was significantly increased in patients with heavy nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (HNPDR) compared to those with so nonproliferative DR (SNPDR): 1178 [836-2254] vs. 394 [275-799] counts/µl. CONCLUSIONS: Correlation of RANTES concentrations with the stage of nonproliferative DR and the statistically significant dependence of CCR5-positive MVs with disease progression suggest that MVs and RANTES can be considered new biomarkers.

MynxGrip for Closure of Antegrade Puncture After Peripheral Interventions With Same-Day Discharge.

BACKGROUND: This was the first prospective study to assess the safety and efficiency of MynxGrip vascular closure device (VCD) in peripheral interventions with antegrade access. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 66 consecutive patients from 1 center. All patients were discharged home on the day of procedure and were observed for adverse events at 1 and 30 days of follow-up. No major complications were observed. The rate of minor complications (conversion to manual or mechanical compression) was 7.6%. Postdischarge, 3% of patients experienced minor complications-small abscess, ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis. In 1 patient, a second VCD was deployed after device failure. The derived device failure rate was 5.9%. No patients required hospitalization. No late bleeding and no hematomas >6 cm were noted. The mean time to discharge was 4 hours and 5 minutes. CONCLUSION: The MynxGrip was safe and effective in sealing access sites after antegrade femoral artery puncture with same-day discharge.

Left Main Stenting in Comparison With Surgical Revascularization: 10-Year Outcomes of the (Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting) LE MANS Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study has reported 10-year clinical follow-up of patients enrolled in the prospective, randomized LE MANS (Left Main Stenting) trial. BACKGROUND: The very long-term outcome after left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization remains unknown. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 105 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis with low and medium complexity of coexisting coronary artery disease according to SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting (n = 52) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n = 53). Drug-eluting stents were implanted in 35%, whereas arterial grafts to the left anterior descending artery were utilized in 81%. Currently, the mean long-term follow-up was collected at 9.8 ± 1.0 years. Follow up for all-cause mortality is complete, whereas the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) was reported from 90% of patients. Ambulatory follow-up was completed in 46 (43.9%) patients. RESULTS: At 10 years, there was a trend toward higher ejection fraction in stenting when compared with surgery (54.9 ± 8.3% vs. 49.8 ± 10.3%; p = 0.07). The mortality (21.6% vs. 30.2%; p = 0.41) and MACCE (51.1% vs. 64.4%; p = 0.28) were statistically not different between groups; however, numerically the difference was in favor of stenting. Similarly, there was no difference in the occurrence of myocardial infarction (8.7 vs. 10.4%; p = 0.62), stroke (4.3 vs. 6.3%; p = 0.68), and repeated revascularization rates (26.1% vs. 31.3%; p = 0.64). The probability of very long-term survival up to 14 years was comparable between PCI and CABG (74.2% vs. 67.5%; p = 0.34; hazard ratio: 1.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 3.13); however, there was a trend toward higher MACCE-free survival in the PCI group (34.7% vs. 22.1%; p = 0.06; hazard ratio: 1.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.97 to 2.99). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis with low and medium complexity of coexisting coronary artery disease, stenting offers numerically, but statistically nonsignificant, favorable long-term outcome up to 10 years in terms of safety and efficacy outcome measures, therefore, constitutes an alternative therapy for CABG.

RETRACTED: Correlation between the number and origin of circulating microparticles and fibrin clot properties in patients with coronary artery disease.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted after the journal was approached by its authors bringing important matters to our attention. It has been retracted due to the fact that following this publication there appeared concerns about provenance of the data presented and the authorship of this paper.

Long-term results of plaque excision combined with aggressive pharmacotherapy in high-risk patients with advanced peripheral artery disease (SAVE a LEG registry).

BACKGROUND: In United States alone there are more than 12 million people with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Long-term outcomes of plaque excision in high-risk population (patients with diabetes and patients with end stage renal disease on dialysis) are scarce. METHODS: Since November 2003, we treated 225 consecutive patients (138 male, mean age: 66.3 ± 12.4, range: 29-93) with SilverHawk(TM) plaque excision for critical limb ischemia or disabling claudication. A total of 367 procedures were performed treating 832 lesions (157 restenotic, 675 de novo). One hundred fifty-five patients (68.9%) were diabetics, 74 (32.9%) were on dialysis. All patients were treated with statins, clopidogrel, aspirin, and aggressive glycemic control. The primary endpoint for our study was target lesion revascularization (TLR), and the secondary endpoint was an assessment of major adverse events (all cause death, amputation, TLR). RESULTS: The average time of observation was 2.2 ± 1.2 years. Procedural success rate was 99.4% with <30% residual stenosis achieved in 818 (98.9%) lesions. SilverHawk was used alone in 86.7%. No acute limb loss or major perforation occurred. Sixty (26.6%) patients had TLR. Long-term mortality was 16.4%. Seven (3.1%) patients had to undergo major amputations and 7 (3.1%) minor amputations. Seventy (31.1%) patients had a major adverse event. Atorvastatin 80 mg was found to be independent predictor of survival, and major amputation was found to be independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: SilverHawk Plaque Excision combined with aggressive pharmacotherapy in this presented high-risk population is associated with promising long-term outcomes that compare favorably with accepted standards of care.

Early and long-term outcomes after surgical and percutaneous myocardial revascularization in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and unprotected left main disease.

UNLABELLED: Surgical myocardial revascularization (CABG) in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCA) is a Class I recommendation in the AHA/ACC guidelines, however it is associated with increased perioperative risk in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). The aim of this study was to compare early and late results after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and CABG in this cohort of patients. METHODS: A multicenter prospective registry included 138 patients with patent but severely narrowed (> 50%) ULMCA disease and NSTE-ACS diagnosed between January 2005 and April 2007. After emergent coronary angiography, 63 patients underwent PCI, whiles 75 were assigned for CABG. RESULTS: Groups were comparable with regard to sex, age and prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM). They had similar left ventricular ejection fraction, SYNTAX Score and incidence of distal LM stenosis. However, PCI patients were at higher surgical risk (Euroscore 8.7 +/- 3.7 vs. 7.4 +/- 3.0; p = 0.02) and myocardial infarction incidence (28% vs. 14%; p = 0.07). The 30-day mortality was 1.5% after PCI vs. 12% after CABG (p = 0.043) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were 3.2% vs. 14.7%, respectively (p = 0.04). After 12 months, there were 4 deaths in the PCI group and 12 deaths in the CABG group (6.3% vs. 16%; p = 0.14). There was no difference in MACCE (9.5% vs. 9.3% p = ns). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a trend toward better survival after PCI (p = 0.07). Revascularization with CABG and a Euroscore > 5 were the independent risk factors influencing early survival, while a Euroscore > 6 was the independent predictor of late mortality. CONCLUSIONS: PCI is a reasonable alternative to CABG in patients with NSTE-ACS and ULMCA stenosis.

Early and long-term results of unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: the LE MANS (Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting) registry.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate early and late outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCA) and to compare bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) subgroups. BACKGROUND: PCI is an increasingly utilized method of revascularization in patients with ULMCA. METHODS: This multicenter prospective registry included 252 patients after ULMCA stenting enrolled between March 1997 and February 2008. Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome was diagnosed in 58% of patients; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cases were excluded. Drug-eluting stents were implanted in 36.2% of patients. RESULTS: Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) occurred in 12 (4.8%) patients during the 30-day period, which included 4 (1.5%) deaths. After 12 months there were 17 (12.1%) angiographically confirmed cases of restenosis. During long-term follow-up (1 to 11 years, mean 3.8 years) there were 64 (25.4%) MACCE and 35 (13.9%) deaths. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 78.1% and 68.9%, respectively. Despite differences in demographical and clinical data in favor of BMS patients, unmatched analysis showed a significantly lower MACCE rate in DES patients (25.9% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.039). This difference was strengthened after propensity score matching. The DES lowered both mortality and MACCE for distal ULMCA lesions when compared with BMS. Ejection fraction <50% was the only independent risk factor influencing long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Stenting of ULMCA is feasible and offers good long-term outcome. Implantation of DES for ULMCA decreased the risk of long-term MACCE, and particularly improved survival in patients with distal ULMCA disease.