Baclofen Stability up to One Year in In Vivo Intrathecal Infusion Pumps.

OBJECTIVES: Commercial intrathecal baclofen treatment (ITBT) infusion pumps are recommended to be refilled within a maximum of 180 days, thus necessitating at least twice-yearly outpatient visits and refill injections. In particular, pumps with 40-mL reservoir volumes would allow much longer refill intervals. We investigated baclofen stability in active implanted ITBT infusion pumps in vivo with refill intervals up to 367 days to study the feasibility of lengthening refill intervals beyond six months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained 25 baclofen samples from 19 patients receiving ITBT with varying pump refill intervals. All patients had a baclofen infusion system delivering undiluted 2 mg/mL baclofen at continuous rates of 96.1 to 673.7 µg/d with a concentration of 2.002 mg/mL. Baclofen concentrations of the infusate samples acquired during the refill procedures were analyzed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD) assay, later complemented with repeat assay with pH and physical measurements. We also present the validation data of the HPLC-DAD assay. RESULTS: During the mean refill interval of 247 days (SD 90, range 54-367 days), the mean change in baclofen concentration was -0.0156 mg/mL (-0.8%, SD 0.14, range -0.30 to 0.32 mg/mL, paired t-test p = 0.57, t24 = 0.57). Only a low negative correlation was found between the baclofen concentration and the refill interval (Pearson's r = -0.32, p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: We could not show a significant change in baclofen concentration over the time studied; 2 mg/mL baclofen ITBT refill intervals could be lengthened to up to one year-the theoretical maximum refill interval in our cohort would have been 489 days. Further studies with larger sample sizes and other baclofen brands are warranted.

Towards the Oral Treatment of Ileo-Colonic Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Infliximab Tablets: Development and Validation of the Production Process.

Infliximab (IFX) is an intravenously administered monoclonal antibody antagonizing the effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) systemically and is efficacious in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, studies suggest that the anti-inflammatory effects result from local immunomodulation in the inflamed regions. Furthermore, topical inhibition of TNF in IBD ameliorates inflammation. We therefore hypothesized that orally administered IFX targeted to the ileo-colonic region in IBD may be an efficacious new treatment option. This study describes the development and validation of the production process of ileo-colonic-targeted 5 mg IFX tablets (ColoPulse-IFX) intended for the oral treatment of IBD by means of producing three consecutive validation batches (VAL1, VAL2, and VAL3, respectively). UV-VIS spectroscopy, HPLC-SEC analysis (content, fragments, aggregates), fluorescence spectroscopy (tertiary protein structure), and ELISA (potency) showed no noticeable deviations of IFX compounded to ColoPulse-IFX compared to fresh IFX stock. The average ± SD (n = 10) IFX content of VAL1, VAL2, and VAL3 was 96 ± 2%, 97 ± 3%, and 96 ± 2%, respectively, and complied with the European Pharmacopeia (Ph. Eur.) requirements for Content Uniformity. The average ± SD (n = 3) ColoPulse-IFX potency was 105 ± 4%, 96 ± 4%, and 97 ± 5%, respectively, compared to fresh IFX stock. The IFX release profile from the tablet core was complete (≥85%) after 10 min in simulated ileum medium. The in vitro coating performance of ColoPulse-IFX showed that the formulation was targeted to the simulated ileo-colonic region. Stability data showed that ColoPulse-IFX was stable for up to 6 months stored at 25 °C/60% RH. Based on these results, the production process can be considered validated and its application is discussed in light of the rationale and available evidence for the topical treatment of IBD with IFX.

Vincristine pharmacokinetics and response to vincristine monotherapy in an up-front window study of the Dutch Childhood Leukaemia Study Group (DCLSG).

The relationship between vincristine pharmacokinetics and its antileukaemic effect in children is unknown. Since vincristine plays a key role in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), it is worthwhile to explore if efficacy can be improved by individual dose adjustment. Therefore, we studied the relationship between vincristine antileukaemic effect and pharmacokinetics in children newly diagnosed with ALL before the start of standard induction chemotherapy. Vincristine plasma concentration was measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis with electrochemical detection. Primary pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by maximum a posteriori parameter estimation with a Bayesian algorithm using the ADAPT II software package. Secondary pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the model. Response to a single dose of vincristine was determined on bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) smears after 3 days. Variability of vincristine pharmacokinetics did not explain variability of response to vincristine monotherapy. Our results do not support the clinical application of pharmacokinetically guided adaptation of a standard body surface area-based dose of vincristine.

Increasing the dosage of vincristine: a clinical and pharmacokinetic study of continuous-infusion vincristine in children with central nervous system tumors.

BACKGROUND: Vincristine (VCR) is widely used to treat patients with malignant disease; among the patients treated with VCR are children with brain tumors. In vitro studies have demonstrated that the cytotoxic activity of VCR is related to both extracellular concentration and duration of exposure. The attainment of higher plasma concentrations by injecting larger bolus doses of VCR has been limited by concerns about neurotoxicity. One possible alternative strategy for enhancing the antitumor efficacy of VCR involves prolonging the duration of in vivo exposure. Therefore, the authors explored the neurotoxicity and pharmacokinetics of VCR administered via a 96-hour continuous infusion after administration of a conventional bolus dose in a pediatric population. METHODS: The current study included 16 patients, 11 of whom were males. The median age of the study population was 4.8 years (range, 1.7-15.8 years). The diagnoses included intrinsic pontine glioma (n = 4), ependymoma (n = 5), astrocytoma (n = 3), medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET; n = 2), ganglioglioma (n = 1), and choroid plexus carcinoma (n = 1). Of the 16 patients, 5 were newly diagnosed, and the remaining 11 had disease recurrences, 8 of which arose after radiotherapy. Treatment included cyclophosphamide 65 mg/kg administered intravenously over 1 hour on Day 1, a bolus of VCR 1.5 mg/m(2) administered intravenously on Day 2, and VCR 0.5 mg/m(2) per 24 hours administered via continuous intravenous infusion on Days 2-5. Thus, a total VCR dose of 3.5 mg/m(2) was administered via infusion over 4 days. Fifteen patients received 2 courses of treatment at 21-28-day intervals, and a total of 31 treatment courses were administered. VCR concentrations in plasma samples were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Jaw pain, constipation, mild abdominal pain, and depressed reflexes were common. However, only 1 of 31 courses was associated with Grade III toxicity, and no Grade IV toxicity (e.g., cranial nerve palsy, ileus, inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, seizures, hallucinations, etc.) was noted. The steady-state plasma concentration of VCR during continuous infusion ranged from 1 to 3 microg/L in all patients. Responses after 2 courses were evaluated in 14 of 16 patients. A complete response was noted in one patient (astrocytoma), a partial response in three patients (one each with astrocytoma, ependymoma, and PNET), stable disease in seven patients, and disease progression in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous infusion of VCR after a conventional bolus dose plus cyclophosphamide for children with tumors of the central nervous system did not result in significant neurotoxicity and appeared to be a safe strategy for achieving increased systemic exposure.

An automated HPLC method to determine intracellular vincristine concentrations in mononuclear cells of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

A method to determine intracellular vincristine concentrations in vivo in leukemic cells of patients is useful to investigate mechanisms of vincristine resistance. We developed a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method to measure vincristine concentrations in human mononuclear cells (MNC). This method, with on-line column solid-phase extraction and electrochemical detection, previously developed for determination of vincristine concentrations in human plasma, was validated for determination of intracellular vincristine concentrations over a range of 1.17 to 50.8 micro g/L with a lower limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 1.17 micro g/L. Linearity of the relationship between concentration and response was characterized by a slope (sd) of 0.0683 (0.0008), an intercept (sd) of 0.0004 micro g/L (0.0085), and a regression coefficient of 0.997 (P = 0.05). Maximum bias and within-day and between-day coefficients of variation (CV) were 14.2%, 4.8%, and 5.7%, respectively. The HPLC detector response did not interfere with the vincristine peaks of five independent MNC sources. The method was used successfully to measure intracellular vincristine concentrations in 8 of 35 bone marrow MNC samples of children newly diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 3 days after the first injection of 1.5 mg/m2 vincristine. Vincristine concentrations were in the range of 4.0 to 26.4 micro g/L, which was 5 to 20 times the bone marrow plasma concentration. The described HPLC method is accurate and precise and is suitable for detection of intracellular vincristine concentrations in MNC of children with ALL. The results confirm that in vivo vincristine accumulates in bone marrow MNC of patients.

Pharmacokinetics of vincristine monotherapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We studied vincristine pharmacokinetics in 70 children newly diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, after a single dose of vincristine as monotherapy. Vincristine plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC analysis. A two-compartment, first-order pharmacokinetic model was fitted to the data by maximum a posteriori parameter estimation. In this group of children pharmacokinetic factors were highly variable: median (25th and 75th percentiles) total body clearance, 228 (128-360) mL.min(-1).m(-2); elimination half-life, 1001 (737-1325) min; apparent volume of distribution at steady state 262 (158-469) L/m(2). Vincristine clearance was substantially slower than has been reported previously for children receiving vincristine in combination with steroids as part of combination chemotherapy (median clearance, 228 mL.min(-1).m(-2) versus mean clearance, 381 and 482 mL. min(-1). m(-2), respectively). Steroids are known as inducers of vincristine-metabolizing cytochrome P(450) 3A4 enzymes. The absence of steroids during our study appears to be the most likely explanation for this difference. Furthermore, we found that vincristine clearance was faster in patients with hyperdiploid (>50 chromosomes) than in patients with diploid or hyperdiploid (46-50 chromosomes) leukemic blasts.

Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of vincristine after bolus intravenous dosing: a surrogate marker of brain penetration.

BACKGROUND: Vincristine (VCR) is used widely in oncology practice, and regular dosing is commonly associated with the development of sensorimotor or autonomic neuropathies. However, the incidence of VCR-related central nervous system (CNS) toxicity is comparatively low, suggesting that the blood-brain barrier may limit drug penetration into the brain parenchyma. This study determined whether measurable concentrations of VCR could be detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), as a surrogate marker of brain parenchyma penetration, after bolus intravenous injection in children without primary CNS pathology. METHODS: The authors studied 17 pediatric patients ages 2.5-14.1 years (median, 6.8 years) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or non-Hodgkin lymphoma without evidence of leptomeningeal disease. Patients received VCR 1.5 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection followed at varying intervals by lumbar puncture for scheduled intrathecal methotrexate administration under general anesthesia. Paired VCR concentrations in both plasma and CSF were measured in each patient simultaneously at times ranging from 8 minutes to 146 minutes after the VCR injection. Three patients were studied twice. The paired samples were stored at -40 degrees C until analysis using a high performance liquid chromatography assay with a sensitivity of 0.1 microg/L in CSF and 0.4 microg/L in plasma. RESULTS: Plasma VCR concentrations ranged from 2.2 microg/L to 91.2 microg/L. No measurable VCR concentrations were detected in the CSF samples. CONCLUSIONS: Measurable concentrations of VCR in CSF are not achieved after the administration of standard intravenous bolus doses of VCR. The current observations are consistent with the relative rarity of VCR-related CNS neurotoxicity compared with the commonly observed sensorimotor and autonomic neuropathies. These findings suggest that the penetration of VCR into the brain parenchyma of patients with a relatively intact blood-brain barrier is low and that VCR may have a limited role in the CNS-directed therapy of these patients.