A Comparison of Obstetric Interventions and Outcomes Between Black and White Patients at an Urban Tertiary Medical Center.

The objective of the study is to evaluate whether rates of selected labor and delivery interventions and severe maternal morbidity (SMM) differ between Black and White pregnant patients. This retrospective observational cohort study included all Black or White pregnant patients who delivered at the University of Chicago Medical Center between January 2015 and December 2019. Data queried included demographic information, antepartum complications, preterm interventions, labor and delivery events, and neonatal outcomes. SMM was a composite outcome, including intensive care unit admission, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, eclampsia, cardiac arrest, or death. In total, 10,885 parturients (9001 Black and 1884 White) and 11,211 neonates (9254 born to Black and 1957 to White patients) were included in the study. Black patients were more likely to have preterm labor (3.51% vs. 1.86%, p = 0.0002) and no prenatal care (17.83% vs. 4.05%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the administration of magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection (Black 44.78% vs. White 49.32%, p = 0.48) or antenatal corticosteroids (Black 67.83% vs. White 71.98%, p = 0.28) among those with preterm delivery. There was no significant difference in SMM (Black 2.24% vs. White 2.44%, p = 0.60), and SMM rates decreased over time (OR 0.79 per year, 95% CI: 0.72-0.87, p < 0.0001) for all patients. Black patients had more pregnancy complications, but their complications were addressed with similar rates of obstetrical interventions. In a high-resource setting, there was no difference in rates of SMM when compared to White patients.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Ordering Patterns for Routine HIV Screening among Resident Physicians at an Urban Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: We sought to measure resident physician knowledge of HIV epidemiology and screening guidelines, attitudes toward testing, testing practices, and barriers and facilitators to routine testing. METHODS: Resident physicians in internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine were surveyed. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 63% (162 of 259). Half knew details of the HIV screening guidelines, but few follow these recommendations. Less than one-third reported always or usually performing routine testing. A significant proportion reported only sometimes or never screening patients with risk factors. This was despite a strong belief that HIV screening improves patient care and public health. The most common barriers to testing were competing priorities and forgetting to order the test. Elimination of written consent and electronic reminders was identified as facilitators to routine testing. Although an institutional policy assigns responsibility for test notification and linkage of HIV-positive patients to care to the HIV care program, only 29% were aware of this. CONCLUSIONS: Few resident physicians routinely screen for HIV infection and some don't test patients with risk factors. While competing priorities remain a significant barrier, elimination of written consent form and electronic reminders has facilitated testing. Increasing the awareness of policies regarding test notification and linkage to care may improve screening.