Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
MedEdPORTAL ; 19: 11375, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38131037

RESUMO

Introduction: Improved reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) curricula are needed to address educational deficiencies both at our institution and on a national level. To improve REI education for OB/GYN residents and medical students, we developed and piloted a curriculum with in-person and virtual flexibility. Methods: We developed three clinical vignettes for a facilitator-led case-based discussion among OB/GYN residents: two office cases and one emergency scenario. Cases were evaluated by content experts and tested before implementation. Pre- and postsurveys included both multiple-choice questions on content and a Likert-scale self-assessment of comfort, satisfaction, and knowledge. Postsurveys were administered immediately postintervention and at a delayed interval. Responses were compared using paired t tests and McNemar tests. Results: Eighteen learners (16 OB/GYN residents and two medical students) participated, the majority in person, of whom 17 (94%) completed a postsurvey. Self-rated proficiency in evaluating and managing irregular menses, infertility, and amenorrhea all improved significantly immediately following the intervention (p < .05 for all). Learners reported significantly more knowledge and comfort with REI compared to other subspecialties following the intervention (p < .05). More learners responded correctly to knowledge questions postintervention (p < .05 for questions 1 and 2, p = .16 for question 3). All learners were satisfied with and enjoyed the curriculum. Eight learners completed the delayed postsurvey and showed sustained improvements in knowledge and competence with REI content. Discussion: Facilitator-guided case-based learning was effective in improving learners' confidence, comfort, and knowledge in managing REI conditions, and improvements were sustained following a delayed interval.


Assuntos
Infertilidade , Internato e Residência , Estudantes de Medicina , Feminino , Humanos , Currículo , Autoavaliação (Psicologia)
2.
F S Rep ; 4(1): 93-97, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36959956

RESUMO

Objective: Evidence strongly supports the use of mifepristone-misoprostol combination treatment for early pregnancy loss (EPL) among pregnancies conceived without assisted reproductive technologies. No literature exists, however, regarding the efficacy of this treatment in the medical management of EPL among pregnancies after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). These patients differ as some use exogenous hormonal supplementation to provide pregnancy support. Thus, the management for EPL may differ between unassisted conceptions and those after ET. Mifepristone, a progesterone receptor antagonist, may demonstrate an altered treatment effect when used with misoprostol to manage EPL in assisted reproductive technologie-conceived pregnancies. Objective: To describe our institution's experience using mifepristone-misoprostol to manage EPL after in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer IVF-ET. Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: Single academic institution from 2020 to 2022. Patientss: Nine patients with ultrasound confirmed EPL after IVF-ET. Interventions: All 9 patients underwent in vitro fertilization followed by fresh or frozen embryo transfer. All 9 received 200 mg of mifepristone 24 hours before 800 µg of misoprostol. Main Outcome Measurements: Incomplete abortion, need for surgical management, number of days to negative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Results: Of the 9 subjects included, one had a programmed frozen embryo transfer cycle, 6 had modified natural frozen embryo transfer cycles, and 2 underwent fresh ET. Eight subjects had successful expulsion of tissue with one dose of treatment, and one required uterine aspiration. No subjects required additional dosing of misoprostol. The mean number of days elapsed from mifepristone treatment to tissue expulsion was 4.89 ± 11.30 days and the mean days to negative-range serum hCG was 36.89 ± 18.59 days. At the initial ultrasound, all pregnancies had one gestational sac seen; 5/9 had a yolk sac; only 3 had fetal cardiac activity. The mean gestational age at the time of EPL diagnosis was 55.22 ± 8.77 days, with the majority (8/9) having completed 7 weeks gestation. Conclusions: Mifepristone-misoprostol combination treatment appears to be a reasonable option for those with EPL after IVF-ET. Future, larger-scale studies are needed comparing combination treatment with misoprostol only among various ET protocols.

3.
F S Rep ; 3(4): 342-348, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36568927

RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate aneuploidy rates and in vitro fertilization (IVF)/pregnancy outcomes for patients undergoing IVF and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with a recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) diagnosis compared to infertility diagnoses without RPL. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic fertility center. Patients: Of 372 patients undergoing IVF/PGT-A between January 2016-December 2018, 294 patients were included in the analysis: 56 patients with an RPL diagnosis and 238 with infertility diagnoses without RPL. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measured was the embryonic aneuploidy rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization and blastulation rates, number of blastocysts biopsied, cycles without euploid blastocysts, and rates of pregnancy losses, clinical pregnancies, and live births after a euploid embryo transfer. Results: The cohort included 56 patients with RPL and 238 patients without RPL, including data from their first IVF cycle within the time period. Aneuploidy rates were similar between the groups, with a mean of 55% (±31%) in RPL and 54% (±34%) in non-RPL cycles. Similar rates persisted after controlling for age, ovarian reserve, and infertility diagnosis. Fertilization and blastulation rates, as well as cumulative clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth rates after the transfer of at least one euploid embryo were also similar between the two groups. Conclusions: These results suggest that IVF/PGT-A cycles from patients with an RPL diagnosis have similar IVF and pregnancy outcomes to those of patients with infertility without RPL. This research can help guide counseling for RPL patients considering IVF with PGT-A.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA